codex: drop judge vocabulary and the maintainer known-bad-list note (s10 M1, M2)

The synthesis line keeps its Recommendation: <action> because <reason> shape.
M16 (consult-mode embed rule) is a UC2 gate and keeps its wording; the
outside-voice prompt bodies sent to Codex are unchanged.

Template-only commit: generated SKILL.md is expected red until the regeneration commit.

codex/SKILL.md.tmpl

@@ -108,10 +108,6 @@ The probe multi-signal auth logic accepts: `$CODEX_API_KEY` set, `$OPENAI_API_KE
 set, or `${CODEX_HOME:-~/.codex}/auth.json` exists. Avoids false-negatives for
 env-auth users (CI, platform engineers) that file-only checks would reject.
 
-**Update the known-bad list** in `bin/gstack-codex-probe` when a new Codex CLI version
-regresses. Current entries (`0.120.0`, `0.120.1`, `0.120.2`) trace to the stdin
-deadlock fixed in #972.
-
 ---
 
 ## Step 0.6: Resolve portable roots
@@ -190,7 +186,7 @@ mode sections.
 ## Synthesis recommendation (REQUIRED) — all modes
 
 Every mode ends by emitting ONE synthesis recommendation line after presenting
-Codex's verbatim output, in the canonical format the AskUserQuestion judge grades:
+Codex's verbatim output, in this format:
 
 ```
 Recommendation: <action> because <one-line reason that names the most actionable finding>

codex/sections/challenge-mode.md.tmpl

@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ Tokens: N | Est. cost: ~$X.XX
 
 3a. **Synthesis recommendation (REQUIRED).** After presenting the full
 adversarial output, emit ONE recommendation line summarizing what the user
-should do, in the canonical format the AskUserQuestion judge grades:
+should do, in this format:
 
 ```
 Recommendation: <action> because <one-line reason that names the most exploitable finding>

codex/sections/consult-mode.md.tmpl

@@ -193,8 +193,8 @@ Session saved — run /codex again to continue this conversation.
    "Note: Claude Code disagrees on X because Y."
 
 8. **Synthesis recommendation (REQUIRED).** Emit ONE recommendation line
-summarizing what the user should do based on Codex's consult output, in the
-canonical format the AskUserQuestion judge grades:
+summarizing what the user should do based on Codex's consult output, in this
+format:
 
 ```
 Recommendation: <action> because <one-line reason that names the most actionable insight from Codex>

codex/sections/review-mode.md.tmpl

@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ GATE: UNVERIFIED (Codex completed and tagged nothing; read the output above)
 
 5a. **Synthesis recommendation (REQUIRED).** After presenting Codex's verbatim
 output and the GATE verdict, emit ONE recommendation line summarizing what the
-user should do, in the canonical format the AskUserQuestion judge grades:
+user should do, in this format:
 
 ```
 Recommendation: <action> because <one-line reason that names the most actionable finding>