test(autoplan): pin CLI refusals to the result-code registry's fix text

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

test/autoplan-admission.test.ts

@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 import { afterAll, describe, expect, test } from 'bun:test';
 import * as fs from 'node:fs';
 import * as path from 'node:path';
+import { RESULT_CODES } from '../lib/result-codes';
 import { ROOT } from './helpers/autoplan-run-fixture';
 import { HEAD, capyRunner, readRunJson, writePlan } from './helpers/autoplan-capy';
 
@@ -29,6 +30,7 @@ describe('admission', () => {
     const { out, res } = first(r, 'none');
     expect(res.status).toBe(3);
     expect(res.stderr).toMatch(/no install verdict at .*\(INSTALL_UNVERIFIED\)$/m);
+    expect(res.stderr).toContain(`; fix: ${RESULT_CODES.INSTALL_UNVERIFIED.fix} (INSTALL_UNVERIFIED)`);
     expect(res.stdout).toContain('GSTACK_RESULT: skill=autoplan status=refused');
     expect(fs.existsSync(path.join(out, 'run.json'))).toBe(false);
   });

test/autoplan-capy-e2e.test.ts

@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 import { afterAll, describe, expect, test } from 'bun:test';
 import * as fs from 'node:fs';
 import * as path from 'node:path';
+import { RESULT_CODES } from '../lib/result-codes';
 import { ROOT, SMALL_PLAN } from './helpers/autoplan-run-fixture';
 import { capyRunner, phaseVia, readJsonl, readRunJson, writePlan, type CapyRunner } from './helpers/autoplan-capy';
 
@@ -151,7 +152,9 @@ describe('conformance: one run through every mechanism', () => {
     expect(ok(c.ap(['answer', '--out', s.out, '--gate-rev', '1', '--reply', `${accept}b`])).stdout).toMatch(/^GATE_PENDING: p1/m);
     const full = ok(c.ap(['answer', '--out', s.out, '--gate-rev', '1', '--reply', 'all']));
     expect(full.stdout).toMatch(new RegExp(`^APPLY: ${run}-${accept} `, 'm'));
-    expect(c.ap(['next', '--out', s.out]).stderr).toMatch(/\(PLAN_AMEND_PENDING\)$/m);
+    const pendingNext = c.ap(['next', '--out', s.out]).stderr;
+    expect(pendingNext).toMatch(/\(PLAN_AMEND_PENDING\)$/m);
+    expect(pendingNext).toContain(`; fix: ${RESULT_CODES.PLAN_AMEND_PENDING.fix} (PLAN_AMEND_PENDING)`);
     const v2 = path.join(s.dir, 'plan-v2.md');
     fs.writeFileSync(v2, SMALL_PLAN.replace('Tests cover', 'Ship behind RETRY_BACKOFF=1, default off. Tests cover'));
     expect(ok(c.ap(['revise', '--out', s.out, '--plan', v2, '--incorporates', `${run}-${accept}`])).stdout).toMatch(/^AMENDMENTS: pending=none$/m);

test/autoplan-record.test.ts

@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 import { afterAll, describe, expect, test } from 'bun:test';
 import * as fs from 'node:fs';
 import * as path from 'node:path';
+import { RESULT_CODES } from '../lib/result-codes';
 import { capyRunner, readJsonl, readRunJson, writePlan } from './helpers/autoplan-capy';
 
 const r = capyRunner();
@@ -92,6 +93,7 @@ describe('submit --record', () => {
     const prose = submit(`INPUT: ceo ${snapshotOf(out)}\n\nThe plan looks fine overall but I have concerns.\n`);
     expect(prose.status).toBe(1);
     expect(prose.stderr).toMatch(/table.*list.*No findings\..*\(RESULT_FINDINGS_MISSING\)$/m);
+    expect(prose.stderr).toContain(`; fix: ${RESULT_CODES.RESULT_FINDINGS_MISSING.fix} (RESULT_FINDINGS_MISSING)`);
     const two = submit(`${list(snapshotOf(out))}\n${TABLE}`);
     expect(two.status).toBe(1);
     expect(two.stderr).toMatch(/more than one findings shape.*\(RESULT_FINDINGS_MISSING\)$/m);

test/autoplan-revise.test.ts

@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 import { afterAll, describe, expect, test } from 'bun:test';
 import * as fs from 'node:fs';
 import * as path from 'node:path';
+import { RESULT_CODES } from '../lib/result-codes';
 import { SMALL_PLAN } from './helpers/autoplan-run-fixture';
 import { capyRunner, phaseVia, readJsonl, readRunJson, writePlan } from './helpers/autoplan-capy';
 
@@ -131,6 +132,7 @@ describe('revise', () => {
       const res = r.ap(['revise', '--out', s.out, ...args]);
       expect(res.status).toBe(3);
       expect(res.stderr).toMatch(/d1b is not a pending amendment \(pending: none\).*\(AMENDMENT_UNKNOWN\)$/m);
+      expect(res.stderr).toContain(`; fix: ${RESULT_CODES.AMENDMENT_UNKNOWN.fix} (AMENDMENT_UNKNOWN)`);
       expect(res.stderr).not.toContain('PLAN_AMEND_PENDING');
       expect(res.stderr).not.toContain('edit the plan');
     }