chore: bump version and changelog (v0.11.3.0)

Design outside voices — parallel Codex + Claude subagent for cross-model
design critique with litmus scorecard synthesis. OpenAI hard rules + gstack
slop blacklist unified. Classifier for landing page vs app UI.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,5 +1,15 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## [0.11.3.0] - 2026-03-23 — Design Outside Voices
+
+### Added
+
+- **Every design review now gets a second opinion.** `/plan-design-review`, `/design-review`, and `/design-consultation` dispatch both Codex (OpenAI) and a fresh Claude subagent in parallel to independently evaluate your design — then synthesize findings with a litmus scorecard showing where they agree and disagree. Cross-model agreement = high confidence; disagreement = investigate.
+- **OpenAI's design hard rules baked in.** 7 hard rejection criteria, 7 litmus checks, and a landing-page vs app-UI classifier from OpenAI's "Designing Delightful Frontends" framework — merged with gstack's existing 10-item AI slop blacklist. Your design gets evaluated against the same rules OpenAI recommends for their own models.
+- **Codex design voice in every PR.** The lightweight design review that runs in `/ship` and `/review` now includes a Codex design check when frontend files change — automatic, no opt-in needed.
+- **Outside voices in /office-hours brainstorming.** After wireframe sketches, you can now get Codex + Claude subagent design perspectives on your approaches before committing to a direction.
+- **AI slop blacklist extracted as shared constant.** The 10 anti-patterns (purple gradients, 3-column icon grids, centered everything, etc.) are now defined once and shared across all design skills. Easier to maintain, impossible to drift.
+
 ## [0.11.2.0] - 2026-03-22 — Codex Just Works
 
 ### Fixed

TODOS.md

@@ -432,6 +432,30 @@ Shipped: Default model changed to Sonnet for structure tests (~30), Opus retaine
 
 Shipped as v0.5.0 on main. Includes `/plan-design-review` (report-only design audit), `/qa-design-review` (audit + fix loop), and `/design-consultation` (interactive DESIGN.md creation). `{{DESIGN_METHODOLOGY}}` resolver provides shared 80-item design audit checklist.
 
+### Design outside voices in /plan-eng-review
+
+**What:** Extend the parallel dual-voice pattern (Codex + Claude subagent) to /plan-eng-review's architecture review section.
+
+**Why:** The design beachhead (v0.11.3.0) proves cross-model consensus works for subjective reviews. Architecture reviews have similar subjectivity in tradeoff decisions.
+
+**Context:** Depends on learnings from the design beachhead. If the litmus scorecard format proves useful, adapt it for architecture dimensions (coupling, scaling, reversibility).
+
+**Effort:** S
+**Priority:** P3
+**Depends on:** Design outside voices shipped (v0.11.3.0)
+
+### Outside voices in /qa visual regression detection
+
+**What:** Add Codex design voice to /qa for detecting visual regressions during bug-fix verification.
+
+**Why:** When fixing bugs, the fix can introduce visual regressions that code-level checks miss. Codex could flag "the fix broke the responsive layout" during re-test.
+
+**Context:** Depends on /qa having design awareness. Currently /qa focuses on functional testing.
+
+**Effort:** M
+**Priority:** P3
+**Depends on:** Design outside voices shipped (v0.11.3.0)
+
 ## Document-Release
 
 ### Auto-invoke /document-release from /ship — SHIPPED

VERSION

@@ -1 +1 @@
-0.11.2.0
+0.11.3.0