test: spell out AskUserQuestion everywhere instead of AUQ

Per user feedback: don't shorten AskUserQuestion to AUQ — the
abbreviation reads as cryptic. Apply across all the new code from this
branch:

- Rename test/skill-e2e-auq-format-compliance.test.ts →
  test/skill-e2e-ask-user-question-format-compliance.test.ts
- Touchfile entry auq-format-pty → ask-user-question-format-pty
  (touchfiles.ts + matching assertion in touchfiles.test.ts)
- Function rename navigateToModeAuq → navigateToModeAskUserQuestion
- Variable auqVisible → askUserQuestionVisible
- Outcome literal 'real_auq' → 'real_question'
- All comments + JSDoc + CHANGELOG entry write AskUserQuestion in full
- "AUQs" plural → "AskUserQuestions"

No behavior change. 49/49 free tests still pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Garry Tan
2026-04-26 05:03:16 -07:00
parent 43de088689
commit 9ce9e10aae
9 changed files with 53 additions and 53 deletions
+7 -7
View File
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
## [1.15.0.0] - 2026-04-26
## **Skill prompts get a 25% haircut. Plan-mode E2E coverage doubles, and AUQ rendering is now testable.**
## **Skill prompts get a 25% haircut. Plan-mode E2E coverage doubles, and AskUserQuestion rendering is now testable.**
Three pieces of work in one release. First, every preamble resolver got compressed: 18 resolvers (Voice, Writing Style, AskUserQuestion Format, Completeness Principle, Plan Mode Info, Brain Sync, Routing Injection, and 11 more) lost a third of their prose without losing a single semantic rule. The full corpus of generated `SKILL.md` files dropped from 3.08 MB to 2.30 MB across 47 outputs. Second, the 5 plan-mode E2E tests added in v1.11.1.0 and rewritten in v1.12.1.0 turned out to have never actually passed — the SDK harness they used couldn't observe Claude's plan-mode confirmation UI. This release ships a real-PTY harness that drives the actual `claude` binary, watches the rendered terminal, and gets all 5 to green. Third, on top of that harness, 6 new E2E tests cover behaviors no test could reach before: AUQ format compliance, plan-design UI-scope detection (positive path), tool-budget regression, /ship idempotency end-to-end, /plan-ceo answer-routing, and /autoplan phase ordering.
Three pieces of work in one release. First, every preamble resolver got compressed: 18 resolvers (Voice, Writing Style, AskUserQuestion Format, Completeness Principle, Plan Mode Info, Brain Sync, Routing Injection, and 11 more) lost a third of their prose without losing a single semantic rule. The full corpus of generated `SKILL.md` files dropped from 3.08 MB to 2.30 MB across 47 outputs. Second, the 5 plan-mode E2E tests added in v1.11.1.0 and rewritten in v1.12.1.0 turned out to have never actually passed — the SDK harness they used couldn't observe Claude's plan-mode confirmation UI. This release ships a real-PTY harness that drives the actual `claude` binary, watches the rendered terminal, and gets all 5 to green. Third, on top of that harness, 6 new E2E tests cover behaviors no test could reach before: AskUserQuestion format compliance, plan-design UI-scope detection (positive path), tool-budget regression, /ship idempotency end-to-end, /plan-ceo answer-routing, and /autoplan phase ordering.
### The numbers that matter
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Token-level reduction comes from regenerating every `SKILL.md` against the slim
| Plan-mode E2E tests passing | 0/5 | 5/5 | +5 |
| Plan-mode E2E wall time | ∞ (never green) | 790 s (sequential) | proven |
| Real-PTY E2E test count | 5 | 11 | +6 |
| Gate-tier paid E2E added | 0 | 3 | auq-format, design-with-ui, budget-regression |
| Gate-tier paid E2E added | 0 | 3 | ask-user-question-format, design-with-ui, budget-regression |
| Periodic-tier paid E2E added | 0 | 3 | mode-routing, ship-idempotency, autoplan-chain |
| New helper unit tests | 0 | 23 | parser + budget regression coverage |
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ The biggest wins are the tier-≥3 plan reviews that load full preamble surface
### What this means for builders
Faster every-skill startup, cheaper prompt-cache pricing on cold reads, more headroom inside the 200K context window for actual work. The plan-mode E2E tests now actually verify the skill doesn't silently write a plan file when `/plan-ceo-review` runs in plan mode. And the 3 new gate-tier tests catch a class of regression that was previously invisible: AUQ format drift (`Recommendation:` line missing), UI-scope misdetection (positive path), and tool-call budget bloat (a skill burning 3× the tools it used to). Run `bun run gen:skill-docs --host all` after pulling. The 11 plan-mode tests will run in CI on the next gate-tier eval pass.
Faster every-skill startup, cheaper prompt-cache pricing on cold reads, more headroom inside the 200K context window for actual work. The plan-mode E2E tests now actually verify the skill doesn't silently write a plan file when `/plan-ceo-review` runs in plan mode. And the 3 new gate-tier tests catch a class of regression that was previously invisible: AskUserQuestion format drift (`Recommendation:` line missing), UI-scope misdetection (positive path), and tool-call budget bloat (a skill burning 3× the tools it used to). Run `bun run gen:skill-docs --host all` after pulling. The 11 plan-mode tests will run in CI on the next gate-tier eval pass.
### Itemized changes
@@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ Faster every-skill startup, cheaper prompt-cache pricing on cold reads, more hea
- `parseNumberedOptions(visible)` and `isPermissionDialogVisible(visible)` helpers in `claude-pty-runner.ts`. Tests can now look up an option index by its label without hard-coding positions, and auto-grant Claude Code's file-edit / workspace-trust / bash-permission dialogs that fire during preamble side-effects.
- `findBudgetRegressions()` and `assertNoBudgetRegression()` in `test/helpers/eval-store.ts`. Pure functions returning tests that grew >2× in tools or turns vs the prior eval run, with floors at 5 prior tools / 3 prior turns to avoid noise. Env override `GSTACK_BUDGET_RATIO`.
- 6 new real-PTY E2E tests on the harness:
- `skill-e2e-auq-format-compliance.test.ts` (gate, ~$0.50/run): asserts every gstack `AskUserQuestion` rendering contains the 7 mandated format elements (ELI10, Recommendation, Pros/Cons with ✅/❌, Net, `(recommended)` label).
- `skill-e2e-ask-user-question-format-compliance.test.ts` (gate, ~$0.50/run): asserts every gstack `AskUserQuestion` rendering contains the 7 mandated format elements (ELI10, Recommendation, Pros/Cons with ✅/❌, Net, `(recommended)` label).
- `skill-e2e-plan-design-with-ui.test.ts` (gate, ~$0.80/run): positive coverage for `/plan-design-review` UI-scope detection. Counterpart to the existing no-UI early-exit test — without it, a regression that flips the detector to "early-exit always" would ship undetected.
- `skill-budget-regression.test.ts` (gate, free): branch-scoped library-only assertion that no skill burns >2× tools or turns vs its prior recorded run.
- `skill-e2e-plan-ceo-mode-routing.test.ts` (periodic, ~$3/run): verifies AUQ answer routing — HOLD SCOPE picks routes to rigor language, SCOPE EXPANSION picks route to expansion language.
- `skill-e2e-plan-ceo-mode-routing.test.ts` (periodic, ~$3/run): verifies AskUserQuestion answer routing — HOLD SCOPE picks routes to rigor language, SCOPE EXPANSION picks route to expansion language.
- `skill-e2e-ship-idempotency.test.ts` (periodic, ~$3/run): runs `/ship` end-to-end against a real git fixture with `STATE: ALREADY_BUMPED` baked in; asserts no double-bump, no double-commit, no fixture mutation.
- `skill-e2e-autoplan-chain.test.ts` (periodic, ~$8/run): asserts `/autoplan` phase ordering by tee'ing timestamps as each `**Phase N complete.**` marker appears.
- `test/helpers-unit.test.ts`: 23 unit tests covering `parseNumberedOptions` edge cases (empty, partial paint, >9 options, stale-vs-fresh anchoring) and `findBudgetRegressions` (noise floor, env override, missing tool data).
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ Faster every-skill startup, cheaper prompt-cache pricing on cold reads, more hea
#### For contributors
- `test/helpers/touchfiles.ts`: 5 plan-mode test selections + e2e-harness-audit selection now point at `claude-pty-runner.ts` instead of the deleted helper. 6 new entries (`auq-format-pty`, `plan-ceo-mode-routing`, `plan-design-with-ui-scope`, `budget-regression-pty`, `ship-idempotency-pty`, `autoplan-chain-pty`) with tier classifications: 3 gate, 3 periodic.
- `test/helpers/touchfiles.ts`: 5 plan-mode test selections + e2e-harness-audit selection now point at `claude-pty-runner.ts` instead of the deleted helper. 6 new entries (`ask-user-question-format-pty`, `plan-ceo-mode-routing`, `plan-design-with-ui-scope`, `budget-regression-pty`, `ship-idempotency-pty`, `autoplan-chain-pty`) with tier classifications: 3 gate, 3 periodic.
- `test/e2e-harness-audit.test.ts`: recognizes `runPlanSkillObservation` as a valid coverage path alongside the legacy `canUseTool` / `runPlanModeSkillTest` patterns.
- New unit test: `test/gen-skill-docs.test.ts` asserts plan-review preambles stay under 33 KB and the slim Voice section preserves its load-bearing semantic contract (lead-with-the-point, name-the-file, user-outcome framing, no-corporate, no-AI-vocab, user-sovereignty).
- `test/touchfiles.test.ts`: skill-specific change selection count updated 15 → 18 to match the 6 new touchfile entries that depend on `plan-ceo-review/**`.
+2 -2
View File
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
*
* - parseNumberedOptions(visible)
* Parses ` 1.` / ` 2.` numbered-option lines out of TTY text.
* Used by the AUQ format-compliance and mode-routing tests to look
* Used by the AskUserQuestion format-compliance and mode-routing tests to look
* up an option index by its label without hard-coding positions.
*
* - findBudgetRegressions / assertNoBudgetRegression(comparison)
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ describe('parseNumberedOptions', () => {
test('anchors on LAST cursor when both stale and fresh fit in the tail', () => {
// Both lists fit in the same 4KB tail (small buffer). The granted
// permission dialog options come first, the real AUQ comes second.
// permission dialog options come first, the real AskUserQuestion comes second.
// We must return the FRESH options, not the STALE ones.
const visible = [
' 1. STALE_grant',
+3 -3
View File
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ export function isPlanReadyVisible(visible: string): boolean {
* option list (so isNumberedOptionListVisible matches them) but they
* are NOT a skill's AskUserQuestion — they're claude asking the user
* whether to grant a tool/file permission. Tests that look for skill
* AUQs must explicitly skip these.
* AskUserQuestions must explicitly skip these.
*
* Both English phrases below are stable across recent Claude Code
* versions. The check is permissive on whitespace because TTY rendering
@@ -206,13 +206,13 @@ export function parseNumberedOptions(
// visually reads "1. Option" can come through as "1.Option".
const optionRe = /^[\s]*([1-9])\.\s*(\S.*?)\s*$/;
// We anchor on the LATEST ` 1.` line in the buffer — the cursor marker
// for the active AUQ. Older numbered lists (e.g., a granted permission
// for the active AskUserQuestion. Older numbered lists (e.g., a granted permission
// dialog still in scrollback) sit above it and must be ignored. Without
// this, parseNumberedOptions returns stale options after the dialog is
// dismissed.
const lines = tail.split('\n');
// Anchor on the LAST ` 1.` line (cursor is on option 1 of the active
// AUQ). Greedy character classes don't help here — we need a literal
// AskUserQuestion). Greedy character classes don't help here — we need a literal
// `` after optional leading whitespace.
let cursorLineIdx = -1;
for (let i = lines.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+3 -3
View File
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ export const E2E_TOUCHFILES: Record<string, string[]> = {
// Real-PTY E2E batch (#6 new tests on the harness).
// Each one tests behavior the SDK harness can't observe (rendered TTY,
// numbered-option lists, multi-phase ordering, idempotency state echo).
'auq-format-pty': ['plan-ceo-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completeness-section.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts'],
'ask-user-question-format-pty': ['plan-ceo-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completeness-section.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts'],
'plan-ceo-mode-routing': ['plan-ceo-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts'],
'plan-design-with-ui-scope': ['plan-design-review/**', 'test/fixtures/plans/ui-heavy-feature.md', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts'],
'budget-regression-pty': ['test/helpers/eval-store.ts', 'test/skill-budget-regression.test.ts'],
@@ -351,8 +351,8 @@ export const E2E_TIERS: Record<string, 'gate' | 'periodic'> = {
// Real-PTY E2E batch — tier classification:
// gate: cheap, deterministic, run on every PR
// periodic: long-running or expensive (>$3/run), run weekly
'auq-format-pty': 'gate', // ~$0.50/run, single skill probe
'plan-ceo-mode-routing': 'periodic', // ~$3/run, deep navigation through 8-12 prior AUQs
'ask-user-question-format-pty': 'gate', // ~$0.50/run, single skill probe
'plan-ceo-mode-routing': 'periodic', // ~$3/run, deep navigation through 8-12 prior AskUserQuestions
'plan-design-with-ui-scope': 'gate', // ~$0.80/run
'budget-regression-pty': 'gate', // free, library-only assertion
'ship-idempotency-pty': 'periodic', // ~$3/run, real /ship in plan mode
@@ -16,12 +16,12 @@
* Why real-PTY: the existing skill-e2e-plan-format tests cover what the
* AGENT writes via the SDK (capture-to-file harness). This test covers
* what the USER actually sees in the terminal different bug class
* (e.g., AUQ tool truncates long prose, conductor renderer mangles
* (e.g., AskUserQuestion tool truncates long prose, conductor renderer mangles
* bullets, model collapses sections under token pressure). Two layers
* of defense for a format-discipline regression that previously ate ~6
* weeks of compliance drift before it was noticed.
*
* Trigger choice: /plan-ceo-review fires its mode-selection AUQ
* Trigger choice: /plan-ceo-review fires its mode-selection AskUserQuestion
* deterministically and early (Step 0F), so we don't need to drive
* through any prior questions to reach a format check.
*
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ function findFormatGaps(visible: string): FormatGap[] {
describeE2E('AskUserQuestion format compliance (gate)', () => {
test(
'first AUQ from /plan-ceo-review contains all 7 mandated format elements',
'first AskUserQuestion from /plan-ceo-review contains all 7 mandated format elements',
async () => {
const session = await launchClaudePty({
permissionMode: 'plan',
@@ -82,10 +82,10 @@ describeE2E('AskUserQuestion format compliance (gate)', () => {
const since = session.mark();
session.send('/plan-ceo-review\r');
// Wait for a SKILL AUQ. Strategy: poll the visible buffer until it
// Wait for a SKILL AskUserQuestion. Strategy: poll the visible buffer until it
// contains both a numbered-option list AND the format markers we
// expect (ELI10 + Recommendation). When both are present, it IS a
// real format-compliant AUQ — not a permission dialog or trust
// real format-compliant AskUserQuestion — not a permission dialog or trust
// prompt.
//
// While polling, auto-grant any permission dialogs we see in the
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ describeE2E('AskUserQuestion format compliance (gate)', () => {
const budgetMs = 300_000;
const start = Date.now();
let captured = '';
let auqVisible = false;
let askUserQuestionVisible = false;
let lastPermSig = '';
// Snapshot debug counters every poll so the timeout error shows
// WHY we never matched (cursor-found vs markers-found discrepancy).
@@ -106,20 +106,20 @@ describeE2E('AskUserQuestion format compliance (gate)', () => {
await Bun.sleep(2000);
if (session.exited()) {
throw new Error(
`claude exited (code=${session.exitCode()}) before AUQ rendered.\n` +
`claude exited (code=${session.exitCode()}) before AskUserQuestion rendered.\n` +
`Last visible:\n${session.visibleSince(since).slice(-2000)}`,
);
}
const visible = session.visibleSince(since);
// Marker check: anywhere in the post-slash region. Since `since`
// is set right after sending /plan-ceo-review, there's no stale
// AUQ above this line — the only AUQ that can produce these
// AskUserQuestion above this line — the only AskUserQuestion that can produce these
// markers is the current one.
const hasEli10 = /ELI10\s*:/i.test(visible);
const hasRecommend = /Recommendation\s*:/i.test(visible);
// Cursor check: a numbered option list near the bottom of the
// buffer means the AUQ is currently rendered (not scrolled away).
// buffer means the AskUserQuestion is currently rendered (not scrolled away).
const cursorTail = visible.slice(-4000);
const hasCursor = isNumberedOptionListVisible(cursorTail) &&
parseNumberedOptions(cursorTail).length >= 2;
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ describeE2E('AskUserQuestion format compliance (gate)', () => {
// Permission dialog branch: grant once per unique rendering, but
// only when we don't already have format markers visible (so we
// don't accidentally grant a permission inside a real AUQ).
// don't accidentally grant a permission inside a real AskUserQuestion).
if (
hasCursor &&
!(hasEli10 && hasRecommend) &&
@@ -144,18 +144,18 @@ describeE2E('AskUserQuestion format compliance (gate)', () => {
}
}
// Real AUQ check: cursor visible AND markers present anywhere in
// Real AskUserQuestion check: cursor visible AND markers present anywhere in
// the post-slash region.
if (hasCursor && hasEli10 && hasRecommend) {
debugBothSeen++;
captured = visible;
auqVisible = true;
askUserQuestionVisible = true;
break;
}
}
if (!auqVisible) {
if (!askUserQuestionVisible) {
throw new Error(
`AUQ not rendered within ${budgetMs}ms.\n` +
`AskUserQuestion not rendered within ${budgetMs}ms.\n` +
`Debug counts: cursorSeen=${debugCursorSeen} markersSeen=${debugMarkersSeen} bothSeen=${debugBothSeen}\n` +
`Last visible (4KB):\n${session.visibleSince(since).slice(-4000)}`,
);
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ describeE2E('AskUserQuestion format compliance (gate)', () => {
// Surface the captured text last 3KB on failure for debugging.
const tail = captured.slice(-3000);
throw new Error(
`AUQ format compliance FAILED — missing ${gaps.length} mandated field(s):\n` +
`AskUserQuestion format compliance FAILED — missing ${gaps.length} mandated field(s):\n` +
gaps.map(g => ` - ${g.field} (regex: ${g.re.source})`).join('\n') +
`\n--- captured (last 3KB) ---\n${tail}`,
);
+1 -1
View File
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ describeE2E('/autoplan chain ordering (periodic)', () => {
const visible = session.visibleSince(since);
// Auto-grant any permission dialog so autoplan can keep moving
// through its phases. The autoplan template auto-decides AUQs
// through its phases. The autoplan template auto-decides AskUserQuestions
// it owns; only permission prompts (file/tool grants) need our
// hand-pressing. Classify on tail to avoid stale matches.
const recentTail = visible.slice(-1500);
+15 -15
View File
@@ -11,9 +11,9 @@
* the question but the agent ignores the choice (e.g. always defaults
* to EXPANSION) would not be caught by any prior test.
*
* Tier: periodic (not gate). Each run navigates 8-12 prior AUQs (telemetry,
* Tier: periodic (not gate). Each run navigates 8-12 prior AskUserQuestions (telemetry,
* proactive, routing, vendoring, brain, office-hours, premise×3, approach)
* before reaching Step 0F. At ~30s per AUQ that's a 4-6 min navigation
* before reaching Step 0F. At ~30s per AskUserQuestion that's a 4-6 min navigation
* phase per case. The full 2-case suite runs ~12-15 min, $3-4. Too slow
* for gate-tier; weekly is fine.
*
@@ -57,20 +57,20 @@ const CASES: ModeCase[] = [
];
/**
* Navigate prior AUQs by picking option 1 until we hit an AUQ whose
* Navigate prior AskUserQuestions by picking option 1 until we hit an AskUserQuestion whose
* options match one of the 4 mode names. Returns the option index
* matching `targetMode`, with the buffer marker pointing AT that AUQ.
* matching `targetMode`, with the buffer marker pointing AT that AskUserQuestion.
*
* Throws if we don't reach the mode AUQ within `maxNav` prior AUQs or
* Throws if we don't reach the mode AskUserQuestion within `maxNav` prior AskUserQuestions or
* the overall budget.
*/
async function navigateToModeAuq(
async function navigateToModeAskUserQuestion(
session: ClaudePtySession,
since: number,
targetMode: ModeCase['mode'],
opts: { maxNav?: number; budgetMs?: number } = {},
): Promise<{ modeIndex: number; visibleAtMode: string }> {
// /plan-ceo-review's mode AUQ (Step 0F) sits behind several preamble
// /plan-ceo-review's mode AskUserQuestion (Step 0F) sits behind several preamble
// and Step 0A-0C-bis gates: telemetry, proactive, routing, vendoring,
// brain privacy, office-hours offer, premise challenge (3 questions),
// approach selection. 12 hops is the conservative ceiling.
@@ -100,12 +100,12 @@ async function navigateToModeAuq(
if (sig === lastSig) continue;
lastSeenList = opts;
// Is THIS the mode AUQ?
// Is THIS the mode AskUserQuestion?
if (opts.some(o => MODE_RE.test(o.label))) {
const target = opts.find(o => o.label.toUpperCase().includes(targetMode));
if (!target) {
throw new Error(
`Mode AUQ rendered but target "${targetMode}" not in option labels:\n` +
`Mode AskUserQuestion rendered but target "${targetMode}" not in option labels:\n` +
opts.map(o => ` ${o.index}. ${o.label}`).join('\n'),
);
}
@@ -121,10 +121,10 @@ async function navigateToModeAuq(
continue;
}
// Not the mode AUQ — answer with option 1 (recommended) and continue.
// Not the mode AskUserQuestion — answer with option 1 (recommended) and continue.
if (priorAnswered >= maxNav) {
throw new Error(
`Navigated ${maxNav} prior AUQs without reaching the mode AUQ. ` +
`Navigated ${maxNav} prior AskUserQuestions without reaching the mode AskUserQuestion. ` +
`Last list:\n${opts.map(o => ` ${o.index}. ${o.label}`).join('\n')}`,
);
}
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ async function navigateToModeAuq(
// Give the agent a beat to advance before re-polling.
await Bun.sleep(2000);
}
throw new Error(`Mode AUQ not reached within ${budgetMs}ms`);
throw new Error(`Mode AskUserQuestion not reached within ${budgetMs}ms`);
}
describeE2E('/plan-ceo-review mode routing (gate)', () => {
@@ -150,13 +150,13 @@ describeE2E('/plan-ceo-review mode routing (gate)', () => {
const since = session.mark();
session.send('/plan-ceo-review\r');
const { modeIndex } = await navigateToModeAuq(session, since, c.mode);
const { modeIndex } = await navigateToModeAskUserQuestion(session, since, c.mode);
// Snapshot the visible buffer at mode-pick time, then send the index.
const sincePick = session.rawOutput().length;
session.send(`${modeIndex}\r`);
// Wait for downstream evidence: either next AUQ or plan_ready or
// Wait for downstream evidence: either next AskUserQuestion or plan_ready or
// a posture-distinctive substring shows up.
const budgetMs = 240_000;
const start = Date.now();
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ describeE2E('/plan-ceo-review mode routing (gate)', () => {
isNumberedOptionListVisible(downstreamSnapshot) &&
!c.postureRe.test(downstreamSnapshot)
) {
// Plan-ready AND a follow-up AUQ are both visible but
// Plan-ready AND a follow-up AskUserQuestion are both visible but
// posture text has not appeared yet. Keep polling for a bit.
}
}
+6 -6
View File
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
*
* Counterpart to the existing no-UI early-exit test. When the input plan
* DOES describe UI changes, /plan-design-review must NOT early-exit and
* must reach a real skill numbered-option AUQ (its first design-rating
* must reach a real skill numbered-option AskUserQuestion (its first design-rating
* question), with the captured evidence NOT echoing the early-exit phrase.
*
* Why: today we only test the negative path (no-UI early-exit). A
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ const FIXTURE = path.join(ROOT, 'test', 'fixtures', 'plans', 'ui-heavy-feature.m
describeE2E('/plan-design-review with UI scope (gate)', () => {
test(
'reaches a real skill AUQ (or plan_ready) without echoing the no-UI early-exit phrase',
'reaches a real skill AskUserQuestion (or plan_ready) without echoing the no-UI early-exit phrase',
async () => {
const fixtureRelPath = path.relative(ROOT, FIXTURE);
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ describeE2E('/plan-design-review with UI scope (gate)', () => {
timeoutMs: 480_000,
});
let outcome: 'real_auq' | 'plan_ready' | 'timeout' | 'exited' = 'timeout';
let outcome: 'real_question' | 'plan_ready' | 'timeout' | 'exited' = 'timeout';
let evidence = '';
let debugBuffer = ''; // captured at end so timeout error has data
@@ -86,13 +86,13 @@ describeE2E('/plan-design-review with UI scope (gate)', () => {
// in visibleSince(since) and would otherwise re-trigger forever.
const recentTail = visible.slice(-2500);
// Real skill AUQ visible (not a permission dialog)?
// Real skill AskUserQuestion visible (not a permission dialog)?
if (
isNumberedOptionListVisible(recentTail) &&
parseNumberedOptions(recentTail).length >= 2 &&
!isPermissionDialogVisible(recentTail)
) {
outcome = 'real_auq';
outcome = 'real_question';
evidence = visible.slice(-3000);
break;
}
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ describeE2E('/plan-design-review with UI scope (gate)', () => {
await session.close();
}
// PASS: real_auq or plan_ready, AND evidence does NOT echo the
// PASS: real_question or plan_ready, AND evidence does NOT echo the
// early-exit phrase.
if (outcome === 'exited' || outcome === 'timeout') {
throw new Error(
+1 -1
View File
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ describe('selectTests', () => {
expect(result.selected).toContain('plan-review-prosons-hardstop-neg');
expect(result.selected).toContain('plan-review-prosons-neutral-neg');
// v1.13.x real-PTY E2E batch entries that also depend on plan-ceo-review/**
expect(result.selected).toContain('auq-format-pty');
expect(result.selected).toContain('ask-user-question-format-pty');
expect(result.selected).toContain('plan-ceo-mode-routing');
expect(result.selected).toContain('autoplan-chain-pty');
expect(result.selected.length).toBe(18);