fix(evals): repair proof-run reds in design-consultation, document-release, design and QA fixtures

- design-consultation Phase 1 asks one brief that confirms context and decides
  research; the confirm-only first question scored substance 2.
- document-release defines ship-owned inputs, exact steps and the JSON result,
  and drops stale spawned-from-/ship text (judge actionability 3.67 -> 4/4/4).
- plan-design-with-ui accepts the Step 0D focus menu the same way the shared
  picker does ("focus on specific ones?").
- plan-design-review plan-mode saves in three Edits instead of one final Write.
- QA functional annotations ask for the full 40-character revision.
- Outside-disabled attribution judges quoted prior-record data by its exact
  timestamp or a dated, pre-existing-record sentence; four captured phrasings
  replay clean and current claims still fail.
- --case can select autoplan-dual-voice by its literal test name.

design-consultation/SKILL.md

@@ -644,15 +644,12 @@ sections. Read a section in full before doing its step; do not work from memory.
 
 ## Phase 1: Product Context
 
-Confirm product context in Q1, pre-filled from the codebase; then ask the memorable-thing question.
+**AskUserQuestion Q1 — one brief that confirms context AND decides research.** Never ask a confirm-only question first. In the ELI10, state your pre-filled read (from README, product files or office-hours output): what the product is, who it's for, its space and project type (web app, dashboard, marketing site, editorial, internal tool, etc.). Options:
+- A) Context right — research what top products in this space do for design first
+- B) Context right — work from design knowledge only
+- C) Context wrong or incomplete — I'll correct it
 
-**AskUserQuestion Q1 — include ALL of these:**
+Recommend A or B for this product, naming what research buys or costs here versus the other. **Explicitly say:** "At any point you can just drop into chat and we'll talk through anything — this isn't a rigid form, it's a conversation."
-1. Confirm what the product is, who it's for, what space/industry
-2. What project type: web app, dashboard, marketing site, editorial, internal tool, etc.
-3. "Want me to research what top products in your space are doing for design, or should I work from my design knowledge?"
-4. **Explicitly say:** "At any point you can just drop into chat and we'll talk through anything — this isn't a rigid form, it's a conversation."
-
-Pre-fill context from README or office-hours output, then confirm it and the research preference in Q1.
 
 **Memorable-thing forcing question.** Before moving on, ask the user: *"What's the one
 thing you want someone to remember after they see this product for the first time?"*

design-consultation/SKILL.md.tmpl

@@ -125,15 +125,12 @@ Phase 5: `DESIGN_READY` uses AI mockups on realistic product screens; `DESIGN_NO
 
 ## Phase 1: Product Context
 
-Confirm product context in Q1, pre-filled from the codebase; then ask the memorable-thing question.
+**AskUserQuestion Q1 — one brief that confirms context AND decides research.** Never ask a confirm-only question first. In the ELI10, state your pre-filled read (from README, product files or office-hours output): what the product is, who it's for, its space and project type (web app, dashboard, marketing site, editorial, internal tool, etc.). Options:
+- A) Context right — research what top products in this space do for design first
+- B) Context right — work from design knowledge only
+- C) Context wrong or incomplete — I'll correct it
 
-**AskUserQuestion Q1 — include ALL of these:**
+Recommend A or B for this product, naming what research buys or costs here versus the other. **Explicitly say:** "At any point you can just drop into chat and we'll talk through anything — this isn't a rigid form, it's a conversation."
-1. Confirm what the product is, who it's for, what space/industry
-2. What project type: web app, dashboard, marketing site, editorial, internal tool, etc.
-3. "Want me to research what top products in your space are doing for design, or should I work from my design knowledge?"
-4. **Explicitly say:** "At any point you can just drop into chat and we'll talk through anything — this isn't a rigid form, it's a conversation."
-
-Pre-fill context from README or office-hours output, then confirm it and the research preference in Q1.
 
 **Memorable-thing forcing question.** Before moving on, ask the user: *"What's the one
 thing you want someone to remember after they see this product for the first time?"*

document-release/SKILL.md

@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ Make factual updates directly; ask about risky or subjective decisions in standa
 
 ## Ship-owned documentation mode
 
-With a ship candidate, require the actual spawned marker and audit-scope rules below.
+With a ship candidate, follow audit-scope's inputs, steps and JSON result below.
 Missing marking/inputs/assets returns `blocked`, never standalone execution. Ship
 authority overrides generic spawned recommendations and standalone steps.
 
@@ -438,8 +438,8 @@ authority overrides generic spawned recommendations and standalone steps.
 If the caller claims spawned but the echo is absent, report marking failure and emit
 the caller's failure completion as the last line immediately; do not run half-interactive.
 Otherwise stay interactive without the marker. Outside ship-owned mode, spawned gates
-auto-choose the RECOMMENDED option, record it in the completion report, and continue:
+auto-choose the RECOMMENDED option, record it in the completion report, and continue
-never call AskUserQuestion or stop for a prose answer. The NEVER-do invariants below do
+through Step 9: never call AskUserQuestion or stop for a prose answer. The NEVER-do invariants below do
 not relax: skip any recommendation that rewrites CHANGELOG or changes VERSION and
 record why. Step 8 and cross-model review refer to this rule; narrower caller scope wins.
 
@@ -488,10 +488,10 @@ DOC_DIFF_BASE=$(git merge-base origin/<base> HEAD 2>/dev/null || git merge-base
 echo "DOC_DIFF_BASE: $DOC_DIFF_BASE"
 ```
 
-1. Check the current branch. In standalone mode, if on the base branch, **abort**: "You're on the base branch. Run from a feature branch." A ship-owned read-only store audit uses its supplied source scope instead.
+1. Check the current branch. In standalone mode, if on the base branch, **abort**: "You're on the base branch. Run from a feature branch." Ship-owned mode skips this gate.
 
-2. Gather the diff. In ship-owned mode, also read `git diff --cached`, `git diff`,
+2. Gather the diff. In ship-owned mode, `<diff-base>` is the supplied base SHA; also
-   and selected new-file content against the supplied base, not HEAD alone.
+   read `git diff --cached`, `git diff` and the candidate's selected new files.
 
 ```bash
 git diff <diff-base> HEAD --stat
@@ -546,16 +546,16 @@ Use these definitions:
 - **Tutorial** — learning-oriented: step-by-step walkthrough for newcomers (getting started guides)
 - **Explanation** — understanding-oriented: "why this works this way" (ARCHITECTURE decisions, design rationale)
 
-3. **Output the coverage map.** Items with zero coverage are **critical gaps** — flag them for
+3. **Output the coverage map.** Items with zero coverage are **critical gaps**; items with
-   Step 3. Items with reference-only coverage are **common gaps** — note them for the PR body.
+   reference-only coverage are **common gaps**. Report both as documentation debt.
 
 4. **Architecture diagram drift detection.** If ARCHITECTURE.md (or any doc) contains ASCII
    diagrams or Mermaid blocks, extract entity names (modules, services, data flows) from the
    diagrams. Cross-reference against the diff. Flag any diagram entities that were renamed,
    split, removed, or moved in the code.
 
-The coverage map feeds into Steps 2-3 (what to audit and fix) and Step 9 (documentation debt
+The coverage map feeds Steps 2-3 (which docs to audit for factual fixes) and the debt report
-summary in the PR body). Do NOT auto-generate missing documentation pages — flag gaps only.
+(Step 9's PR body, or ship-owned `documentation_section`). Do NOT auto-generate missing documentation pages — flag gaps only.
 When significant gaps are found, suggest running `/document-generate` to fill them.
 
 ---

document-release/SKILL.md.tmpl

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Make factual updates directly; ask about risky or subjective decisions in standa
 
 ## Ship-owned documentation mode
 
-With a ship candidate, require the actual spawned marker and audit-scope rules below.
+With a ship candidate, follow audit-scope's inputs, steps and JSON result below.
 Missing marking/inputs/assets returns `blocked`, never standalone execution. Ship
 authority overrides generic spawned recommendations and standalone steps.
 
@@ -50,8 +50,8 @@ authority overrides generic spawned recommendations and standalone steps.
 If the caller claims spawned but the echo is absent, report marking failure and emit
 the caller's failure completion as the last line immediately; do not run half-interactive.
 Otherwise stay interactive without the marker. Outside ship-owned mode, spawned gates
-auto-choose the RECOMMENDED option, record it in the completion report, and continue:
+auto-choose the RECOMMENDED option, record it in the completion report, and continue
-never call AskUserQuestion or stop for a prose answer. The NEVER-do invariants below do
+through Step 9: never call AskUserQuestion or stop for a prose answer. The NEVER-do invariants below do
 not relax: skip any recommendation that rewrites CHANGELOG or changes VERSION and
 record why. Step 8 and cross-model review refer to this rule; narrower caller scope wins.
 
@@ -92,10 +92,10 @@ DOC_DIFF_BASE=$(git merge-base origin/<base> HEAD 2>/dev/null || git merge-base
 echo "DOC_DIFF_BASE: $DOC_DIFF_BASE"
 ```
 
-1. Check the current branch. In standalone mode, if on the base branch, **abort**: "You're on the base branch. Run from a feature branch." A ship-owned read-only store audit uses its supplied source scope instead.
+1. Check the current branch. In standalone mode, if on the base branch, **abort**: "You're on the base branch. Run from a feature branch." Ship-owned mode skips this gate.
 
-2. Gather the diff. In ship-owned mode, also read `git diff --cached`, `git diff`,
+2. Gather the diff. In ship-owned mode, `<diff-base>` is the supplied base SHA; also
-   and selected new-file content against the supplied base, not HEAD alone.
+   read `git diff --cached`, `git diff` and the candidate's selected new files.
 
 ```bash
 git diff <diff-base> HEAD --stat
@@ -150,16 +150,16 @@ Use these definitions:
 - **Tutorial** — learning-oriented: step-by-step walkthrough for newcomers (getting started guides)
 - **Explanation** — understanding-oriented: "why this works this way" (ARCHITECTURE decisions, design rationale)
 
-3. **Output the coverage map.** Items with zero coverage are **critical gaps** — flag them for
+3. **Output the coverage map.** Items with zero coverage are **critical gaps**; items with
-   Step 3. Items with reference-only coverage are **common gaps** — note them for the PR body.
+   reference-only coverage are **common gaps**. Report both as documentation debt.
 
 4. **Architecture diagram drift detection.** If ARCHITECTURE.md (or any doc) contains ASCII
    diagrams or Mermaid blocks, extract entity names (modules, services, data flows) from the
    diagrams. Cross-reference against the diff. Flag any diagram entities that were renamed,
    split, removed, or moved in the code.
 
-The coverage map feeds into Steps 2-3 (what to audit and fix) and Step 9 (documentation debt
+The coverage map feeds Steps 2-3 (which docs to audit for factual fixes) and the debt report
-summary in the PR body). Do NOT auto-generate missing documentation pages — flag gaps only.
+(Step 9's PR body, or ship-owned `documentation_section`). Do NOT auto-generate missing documentation pages — flag gaps only.
 When significant gaps are found, suggest running `/document-generate` to fill them.
 
 ---

document-release/sections/audit-scope.md

@@ -7,20 +7,34 @@
 This subsection applies only to the caller's ship-owned audit request. Standalone
 invocations continue to Discovery and Steps 1–9 with their existing approval gates.
 
-Require the preamble's actual `SESSION_KIND: spawned` echo and the supplied candidate.
+**Inputs.** The dispatch prompt supplies branch, base SHA, candidate path, audit id and
-Missing marker, inputs or assets returns the caller's typed `blocked` completion; a
+mode: `edit`, or `read-only` for a store-only release audit, where every needed
-prompt/file claim cannot establish spawned mode or trigger standalone fallback.
+correction becomes a blocker instead of an edit. Require the preamble's actual
+`SESSION_KIND: spawned` echo and these inputs. Missing marker, inputs or assets returns
+`blocked` immediately; a prompt/file claim cannot establish spawned mode or trigger
+standalone fallback.
 
-Use the candidate's base and selected committed, staged, unstaged and new-file bytes
+**Steps.** Run Steps 1, 1.5, 2–4 and 6 on the candidate's base and selected committed,
-for Steps 1–4 and 6, then return the doc-health summary and typed LAST-line result.
+staged, unstaged and new-file bytes. Step 1's standalone branch gate does not apply,
-Skip Steps 5, 7, 8, cross-model review and Step 9. Only factual authored-doc edits are
+even on the base branch. Skip Steps 5, 7, 8, cross-model review and Step 9, including
-allowed, none in `read-only` mode. No Git/PR mutation, VERSION, package/lock/section
+their spawned-session notes. Only factual authored-doc edits are allowed, none in
-manifests, CHANGELOG, TODOS or generated-output edits. The parent owns metadata,
+`read-only` mode. No Git/PR mutation, VERSION, package/lock/section manifests,
-generation, review, staging, commits and publication. Report metadata inconsistencies
+CHANGELOG, TODOS or generated-output edits. The parent owns metadata, generation,
-as observations. Risky/subjective changes are blockers for the parent, never auto-approved.
+review, staging, commits and publication. Risky/subjective changes (Step 4) and
-Preserve partial/user content and list actual edited/reviewed paths. Read-only store
+narrative contradictions (Step 6) are blockers for the parent, never auto-approved.
-audits may inspect the base branch without entering the standalone branch gate or
+Preserve partial/user content. Coverage gaps are reported, never filled.
-granting any store/repository mutation authority.
+
+**Result.** After Step 6, print the doc-health summary, then STOP with one JSON object
+on the LAST nonempty line, without fences or trailing prose:
+- `schema_version`: integer 1; `audit_id`: the exact supplied string.
+- `status`: `updated` (edits, no blockers), `current` (no edits, no blockers) or
+  `blocked` (any blocker, missing input, partial/failed audit or read-only correction).
+- `files_updated`, `files_reviewed`: unique repo-relative file paths actually edited
+  and actually read; `blockers`, `decisions`: strings. Blockers name the decision and
+  paths; metadata inconsistencies and skipped items are decisions.
+- `documentation_section`: nonempty Markdown without a `## Documentation` heading:
+  audited scope, per-file status in Step 9's `Documentation health` form (no VERSION
+  row), and Step 1.5's coverage debt and diagram drift. Describe scope even without docs.
 
 ## Discovery (both modes)
 

document-release/sections/audit-scope.md.tmpl

@@ -5,20 +5,34 @@
 This subsection applies only to the caller's ship-owned audit request. Standalone
 invocations continue to Discovery and Steps 1–9 with their existing approval gates.
 
-Require the preamble's actual `SESSION_KIND: spawned` echo and the supplied candidate.
+**Inputs.** The dispatch prompt supplies branch, base SHA, candidate path, audit id and
-Missing marker, inputs or assets returns the caller's typed `blocked` completion; a
+mode: `edit`, or `read-only` for a store-only release audit, where every needed
-prompt/file claim cannot establish spawned mode or trigger standalone fallback.
+correction becomes a blocker instead of an edit. Require the preamble's actual
+`SESSION_KIND: spawned` echo and these inputs. Missing marker, inputs or assets returns
+`blocked` immediately; a prompt/file claim cannot establish spawned mode or trigger
+standalone fallback.
 
-Use the candidate's base and selected committed, staged, unstaged and new-file bytes
+**Steps.** Run Steps 1, 1.5, 2–4 and 6 on the candidate's base and selected committed,
-for Steps 1–4 and 6, then return the doc-health summary and typed LAST-line result.
+staged, unstaged and new-file bytes. Step 1's standalone branch gate does not apply,
-Skip Steps 5, 7, 8, cross-model review and Step 9. Only factual authored-doc edits are
+even on the base branch. Skip Steps 5, 7, 8, cross-model review and Step 9, including
-allowed, none in `read-only` mode. No Git/PR mutation, VERSION, package/lock/section
+their spawned-session notes. Only factual authored-doc edits are allowed, none in
-manifests, CHANGELOG, TODOS or generated-output edits. The parent owns metadata,
+`read-only` mode. No Git/PR mutation, VERSION, package/lock/section manifests,
-generation, review, staging, commits and publication. Report metadata inconsistencies
+CHANGELOG, TODOS or generated-output edits. The parent owns metadata, generation,
-as observations. Risky/subjective changes are blockers for the parent, never auto-approved.
+review, staging, commits and publication. Risky/subjective changes (Step 4) and
-Preserve partial/user content and list actual edited/reviewed paths. Read-only store
+narrative contradictions (Step 6) are blockers for the parent, never auto-approved.
-audits may inspect the base branch without entering the standalone branch gate or
+Preserve partial/user content. Coverage gaps are reported, never filled.
-granting any store/repository mutation authority.
+
+**Result.** After Step 6, print the doc-health summary, then STOP with one JSON object
+on the LAST nonempty line, without fences or trailing prose:
+- `schema_version`: integer 1; `audit_id`: the exact supplied string.
+- `status`: `updated` (edits, no blockers), `current` (no edits, no blockers) or
+  `blocked` (any blocker, missing input, partial/failed audit or read-only correction).
+- `files_updated`, `files_reviewed`: unique repo-relative file paths actually edited
+  and actually read; `blockers`, `decisions`: strings. Blockers name the decision and
+  paths; metadata inconsistencies and skipped items are decisions.
+- `documentation_section`: nonempty Markdown without a `## Documentation` heading:
+  audited scope, per-file status in Step 9's `Documentation health` form (no VERSION
+  row), and Step 1.5's coverage debt and diagram drift. Describe scope even without docs.
 
 ## Discovery (both modes)
 

document-release/sections/release-body.md

@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 <!-- Regenerate: bun run gen:skill-docs -->
 ## Step 2: Per-File Documentation Audit
 
-**Ship-owned documentation mode:** execute Steps 2–4 and 6 only, under the skeleton's
+**Ship-owned documentation mode:** after Steps 1 and 1.5, execute Steps 2–4 and 6 only,
-audit/edit/result boundary. Then return the caller's typed completion; all standalone
+under audit-scope's edit boundary, then return its JSON result; all standalone
 metadata, review, commit and PR steps below remain unavailable to this child.
 
 Read each documentation file and cross-reference it against the diff. Use these generic heuristics
@@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ After auditing each file individually, do a cross-doc consistency pass:
 
 In ship-owned mode, protected metadata/manifests stay untouched even for factual
 inconsistencies, and narrative contradictions return as blockers. This is the last
-ship-child step: output the doc-health summary and typed completion, then STOP. A
+ship-child step: output the doc-health summary and audit-scope's JSON result, then
-partial audit or unresolved required correction is `blocked`, never `current`.
+STOP. A partial audit or unresolved required correction is `blocked`, never `current`.
 
 ---
 
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ git diff <diff-base> HEAD -- VERSION
 
    **Spawned sessions** (per the spawned-dispatch contract at the top of this skill): the
    recommendation flips — choose C (leave version as-is) and record the uncovered scope in
-   your completion report (the `decisions` array when dispatched from /ship).
+   your completion report. Ship-owned children stopped at Step 6 and never reach this step.
    A spawned run must never change VERSION: the dispatching workflow owns version numbering.
 
    The key insight: a VERSION bump set for "feature A" should not silently absorb "feature B"
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ not an opt-in. The user turns it off only by asking explicitly
 **Spawned-session skip** (per the spawned-dispatch contract at the top of this skill): in a
 spawned session, skip this entire section — the dispatching workflow owns its own review
 passes, and the apply gate below needs a human. Note the skip in the upcoming Step 9 doc
-health summary and continue to Step 9.
+health summary and continue to Step 9. Ship-owned children already stopped at Step 6.
 
 **Preflight — decide whether and how the doc review runs:**
 

document-release/sections/release-body.md.tmpl

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ## Step 2: Per-File Documentation Audit
 
-**Ship-owned documentation mode:** execute Steps 2–4 and 6 only, under the skeleton's
+**Ship-owned documentation mode:** after Steps 1 and 1.5, execute Steps 2–4 and 6 only,
-audit/edit/result boundary. Then return the caller's typed completion; all standalone
+under audit-scope's edit boundary, then return its JSON result; all standalone
 metadata, review, commit and PR steps below remain unavailable to this child.
 
 Read each documentation file and cross-reference it against the diff. Use these generic heuristics
@@ -129,8 +129,8 @@ After auditing each file individually, do a cross-doc consistency pass:
 
 In ship-owned mode, protected metadata/manifests stay untouched even for factual
 inconsistencies, and narrative contradictions return as blockers. This is the last
-ship-child step: output the doc-health summary and typed completion, then STOP. A
+ship-child step: output the doc-health summary and audit-scope's JSON result, then
-partial audit or unresolved required correction is `blocked`, never `current`.
+STOP. A partial audit or unresolved required correction is `blocked`, never `current`.
 
 ---
 
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ git diff <diff-base> HEAD -- VERSION
 
    **Spawned sessions** (per the spawned-dispatch contract at the top of this skill): the
    recommendation flips — choose C (leave version as-is) and record the uncovered scope in
-   your completion report (the `decisions` array when dispatched from /ship).
+   your completion report. Ship-owned children stopped at Step 6 and never reach this step.
    A spawned run must never change VERSION: the dispatching workflow owns version numbering.
 
    The key insight: a VERSION bump set for "feature A" should not silently absorb "feature B"

scripts/resolvers/review.ts

@@ -1361,7 +1361,7 @@ not an opt-in. The user turns it off only by asking explicitly
 **Spawned-session skip** (per the spawned-dispatch contract at the top of this skill): in a
 spawned session, skip this entire section — the dispatching workflow owns its own review
 passes, and the apply gate below needs a human. Note the skip in the upcoming Step 9 doc
-health summary and continue to Step 9.
+health summary and continue to Step 9. Ship-owned children already stopped at Step 6.
 
 **Preflight — decide whether and how the doc review runs:**
 

scripts/test-paid-shards.ts

@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ export const CASE_SHARDED_FILES: readonly string[] = [
 export const CASE_TEST_NAMES: Record<string, string> = {
   'plan-review-report': '/plan-eng-review writes GSTACK REVIEW REPORT to plan file',
   'auq-format-gate': "/plan-ceo-review's first AskUserQuestion is a compliant decision brief (7/7 + substance)",
+  'autoplan-dual-voice': 'both Claude + Codex voices produce output in Phase 1 (within timeout)',
 };
 
 const CASE_KEY_SEPARATOR = '#';

test/disabled-dated-record-at.test.ts

@@ -257,14 +257,50 @@ describe('parenthesized field list of the retained record (census 36629958451)',
   });
   test.each([
     ['a different timestamp', [prior.timestamp!.replace(/\d(?=Z$)/, d => String((Number(d) + 1) % 10)), ...exact.slice(1)]],
-    ['no timestamp', exact.slice(1)],
     ['a field value the record lacks', [prior.timestamp!, 'status: completed', `source: ${prior.source}`, 'outside_status: completed']],
     ['free prose inside the list', [prior.timestamp!, `status: ${prior.status}`, 'outside_status: completed and this run too']],
   ])('%s is not attributed', (_name, items) => {
     expect(evaluate(0, list(items as string[])).falseCompletion).toBe(true);
   });
+  test('neither the exact instant nor a before-this-run dating is not attributed', () => {
+    expect(evaluate(0, list(exact.slice(1)).replace(' that predates this run', '')).falseCompletion).toBe(true);
+  });
+  test('split field quotes in one dated sentence attribute the record (local proof, 2026-09-29)', () => {
+    const clock = prior.timestamp!.slice(11, 19) + 'Z';
+    const text = `One thing to flag: the review log already contained a pre-existing entry, timestamped \`${clock}\` (before this session started), claiming \`status:"${prior.status}"\`, \`source:"${prior.source}"\`, \`outside_status:"completed"\`. I did not produce that entry.`;
+    expect(evaluate(0, text)).toMatchObject({ passed: true, falseCompletion: false });
+    expect(evaluate(0, text.replace('claiming', 'and I now also recorded')).falseCompletion).toBe(true);
+    expect(evaluate(0, text.replace(`status:"${prior.status}"`, 'status:"completed"')).falseCompletion).toBe(true);
+    expect(evaluate(0, text.replace('pre-existing entry', 'entry')).falseCompletion).toBe(true);
+  });
   test('a current mutation or a separate current claim still fails', () => {
     expect(evaluate(0, list(exact).replace('already contained', 'now appended')).falseCompletion).toBe(true);
     expect(evaluate(0, `${list(exact)}\nThis run: outside_status: completed.`).falseCompletion).toBe(true);
   });
 });
+
+describe('millisecond clock of the retained record (local proof, 2026-09-29)', () => {
+  const prior = fixture.cases[0]!.priorRecord as Record<string, string>;
+  const clock = prior.timestamp!.slice(11, 23) + 'Z';
+  const flag = (stamp: string) => `One thing to flag: the same log file already contained a pre-existing entry (line 1, timestamp \`${stamp}\`, before this session) claiming \`status: ${prior.status}, source: ${prior.source}, outside_status: completed\`. I did not write it and did not remove it.`;
+  test('the exact millisecond clock attributes the quotation to that record', () => {
+    expect(evaluate(0, flag(clock))).toMatchObject({ passed: true, falseCompletion: false });
+  });
+  test('a different millisecond clock is not attributed', () => {
+    const other = clock.replace(/\d(?=Z$)/, d => String((Number(d) + 1) % 10));
+    expect(evaluate(0, flag(other)).falseCompletion).toBe(true);
+  });
+});
+
+describe('quoted fragment with the retained record timestamp (local proof, 2026-09-29)', () => {
+  const prior = fixture.cases[0]!.priorRecord as Record<string, string>;
+  const quote = (extra = '') => `One thing to flag: the review log already contained a prior line I did not write —\n\`{"status":"${prior.status}","source":"${prior.source}","outside_status":"completed", "timestamp":"${prior.timestamp}"${extra}, ...}\`.\nThat record claims a completed, clean Codex outside review of this plan. It predates my run by ~80 seconds and is inconsistent with the current configuration.`;
+  test('the exact timestamp and matching values make the fragment record data', () => {
+    expect(evaluate(0, quote())).toMatchObject({ passed: true, falseCompletion: false });
+  });
+  test('a mismatched value or a missing timestamp keeps the claim', () => {
+    expect(evaluate(0, quote(', "source":"claude"')).falseCompletion).toBe(true);
+    expect(evaluate(0, quote().replace(prior.timestamp!, '2026-09-29T22:28:27Z')).falseCompletion).toBe(true);
+    expect(evaluate(0, `${quote()}\nThis run: outside_status: completed.`).falseCompletion).toBe(true);
+  });
+});

test/helpers/disabled-plan-review-fixture.ts

@@ -145,22 +145,22 @@ function withoutAttributedPriorRecordData(output: string, priorRecord?: Record<s
   // An inline quotation of the retained record's exact status/source/outside_status
   // values is that record when its own sentence names it as pre-existing and
   // makes no current claim; wording order around the quotation does not matter.
+  // A named record timestamp must denote the retained record's instant at the precision written.
+  const priorMs = typeof priorRecord.timestamp === 'string' ? Date.parse(priorRecord.timestamp) : NaN;
+  const sameInstant = (stamp: string): boolean => {
+    if (!Number.isFinite(priorMs)) return false;
+    const iso = priorMs ? new Date(priorMs).toISOString() : '';
+    const clock = /^(\d{2}:\d{2}(?::\d{2}(?:\.\d{1,3})?)?)Z?$/.exec(stamp);
+    if (clock) return iso.slice(11, 11 + clock[1]!.length) === clock[1];
+    const at = /^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}(?::\d{2}(?:\.\d+)?)?Z$/.test(stamp) ? Date.parse(stamp) : NaN;
+    return Number.isFinite(at) && iso.slice(0, stamp.includes('.') ? 23 : stamp.length - 1) === new Date(at).toISOString().slice(0, stamp.includes('.') ? 23 : stamp.length - 1);
+  };
   const sentenceOwnsPriorValue = (index: number, length: number): boolean => {
     const start = Math.max(output.lastIndexOf('\n', index - 1), ...['. ', '! ', '? ', '; '].map(end => output.lastIndexOf(end, index - 1) + 1)) + 1;
     const ends = ['\n', '. ', '! ', '? ', '; '].map(end => output.indexOf(end, index + length)).filter(at => at >= 0);
     const sentence = (output.slice(start, index) + ' ' + output.slice(index + length, ends.length ? Math.min(...ends) : output.length))
       .replace(/[*`]/g, '').replace(/\b(?:predates|before)\s+(?:this|my)\s+(?:run|session|workflow)(?:\s+(?:started|began))?\b/gi, 'beforehand')
       .replace(/\b(?:I|we)\s+(?:did\s+not|didn't|never)\s+(?:write|create|produce|record)\b/gi, 'unauthored');
-    // A named record timestamp must denote the retained record's instant at the precision written.
-    const priorMs = typeof priorRecord.timestamp === 'string' ? Date.parse(priorRecord.timestamp) : NaN;
-    const sameInstant = (stamp: string): boolean => {
-      if (!Number.isFinite(priorMs)) return false;
-      const iso = priorMs ? new Date(priorMs).toISOString() : '';
-      const clock = /^(\d{2}:\d{2}(?::\d{2})?)Z?$/.exec(stamp);
-      if (clock) return iso.slice(11, 11 + clock[1]!.length) === clock[1];
-      const at = /^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}(?::\d{2}(?:\.\d+)?)?Z$/.test(stamp) ? Date.parse(stamp) : NaN;
-      return Number.isFinite(at) && iso.slice(0, stamp.includes('.') ? 23 : stamp.length - 1) === new Date(at).toISOString().slice(0, stamp.includes('.') ? 23 : stamp.length - 1);
-    };
     const stamps = [...sentence.matchAll(/\btimestamp(?:ed)?\s+([0-9T:.Z-]+)/gi)].map(stamp => stamp[1]!.replace(/[.,;:]+$/, ''));
     if (stamps.some(stamp => !sameInstant(stamp))) return false;
     return !/\b(?:after|another|other|if|unless)\b/i.test(sentence)
@@ -191,6 +191,32 @@ function withoutAttributedPriorRecordData(output: string, priorRecord?: Record<s
     const start = match.index + match[0].length - match[1]!.length - 1;
     spans.push({ start, end: start + match[1]!.length + 2 });
   }
+  // A quoted fragment carrying the retained record's exact timestamp is that
+  // record's data when every field it quotes has that record's value.
+  for (const match of output.matchAll(/`([^`\r\n]+)`/g)) {
+    if (typeof priorRecord.timestamp !== 'string' || !match[1]!.includes(priorRecord.timestamp)) continue;
+    const pairs = [...match[1]!.matchAll(/["']?([a-z_]+)["']?\s*[:=]\s*["']?([^"',}\s]+)["']?/gi)].filter(pair => fields.has(pair[1]!));
+    if (!pairs.some(pair => pair[1] === 'outside_status') || pairs.some(pair => priorRecord[pair[1]!] !== pair[2])) continue;
+    spans.push({ start: match.index!, end: match.index! + match[0].length });
+  }
+  // A whole sentence that names the pre-existing record, dates it before this
+  // run (its exact instant or an explicit "before this run"), quotes only that
+  // record's own field values and makes no current claim is that record's
+  // report, however its fields are quoted or split.
+  for (const sentence of output.matchAll(/[^\n.!?;]*(?:[.!?;](?=\S)[^\n.!?;]*)*(?:[.!?;](?=\s|$)|\n|$)/g)) {
+    const plain = sentence[0].replace(/[*`]/g, '');
+    if (!/\boutside_status["']*\s*[:=]\s*["']*completed\b/i.test(plain)) continue;
+    if (!/\b(?:earlier|prior|previous|historical|old(?:er)?|pre[- ]existing|stale|seeded)\s+(?:(?:review[- ]log|review|log)\s+)?(?:entry|record|line|row)\b/i.test(plain)) continue;
+    const beforeRun = /\b(?:predates|before)\s+(?:this|my)\s+(?:run|session|workflow)(?:\s+(?:started|began))?\b/i;
+    const stamps = [...plain.matchAll(/\b(?:\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T)?\d{2}:\d{2}(?::\d{2}(?:\.\d{1,3})?)?Z?\b/g)].map(m => m[0]);
+    if (stamps.some(stamp => !sameInstant(stamp)) || (!stamps.length && !beforeRun.test(plain))) continue;
+    const quoted = [...plain.matchAll(/\b([a-z_]+)["']?\s*[:=]\s*["']?([a-z0-9_.+-]+)["']?/gi)].filter(m => fields.has(m[1]!) && m[1] !== 'timestamp');
+    if (!['status', 'source', 'outside_status'].every(key => quoted.some(m => m[1] === key))
+      || quoted.some(m => priorRecord[m[1]!] !== m[2])) continue;
+    if (/\b(?:now|currently|current|today|new|updat\w*|append\w*|chang\w*|wrote|recorded by me)\b|\bboth reviewers agree\b/i
+      .test(plain.replace(beforeRun, ''))) continue;
+    spans.push({ start: sentence.index!, end: sentence.index! + sentence[0].length });
+  }
   for (const span of spans.sort((a, b) => b.start - a.start)) {
     output = output.slice(0, span.start) + output.slice(span.start, span.end).replace(/[^\r\n]/g, ' ') + output.slice(span.end);
   }

test/helpers/qa-functional-eval.ts

@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Fixture execution boundary:
 Actions outside this interface are unsupported and fail acceptance; they are not implicitly approved.
 
 Materialize qa-reports/evidence.json first, then write a concise qa-reports/report.md using the functional report structure. Link the evidence and checkpoint files rather than repeating full probe payloads in Markdown. Both artifacts are required before completion. The resulting evidence.json schema is:
-{ "revision": "<git HEAD>", "runtime": "bun <version>", "cwd": "<working directory>", "evidence": [{"command":"<exact full outer capture invocation>","contract":"README.md","expected":"<declared expected behavior>","classification":"pass|product-defect|setup-blocked|inconclusive","observed":<complete unchanged JSON emitted by the native probe>}], "learning":[{"observationCommand":"<earlier full capture invocation>","hypothesis":"<what it taught you to challenge>","nextCommand":"<later full capture invocation>"}], "limits":["<untested or blocked coverage>"] }
+{ "revision": "<full 40-character git rev-parse HEAD>", "runtime": "bun <version>", "cwd": "<working directory>", "evidence": [{"command":"<exact full outer capture invocation>","contract":"README.md","expected":"<declared expected behavior>","classification":"pass|product-defect|setup-blocked|inconclusive","observed":<complete unchanged JSON emitted by the native probe>}], "learning":[{"observationCommand":"<earlier full capture invocation>","hypothesis":"<what it taught you to challenge>","nextCommand":"<later full capture invocation>"}], "limits":["<untested or blocked coverage>"] }
 Evidence rows contain ONLY complete JSON actually emitted by native probes, including failures and repeats; retain pre-repair results alongside green results. Never synthesize JSON from a tool error or raw test output. Put tests, raw CLI diagnostics, launch failures and timeouts in Markdown with their actual output and limits. The learning array is a summary: choose one completed checkpoint where an observation motivated a different later command, not the required same-command replay. Select that checkpoint ID in annotations.learning; the production helper copies its observationCommand, hypothesis and nextCommand. Both commands must name exact captured probes with different native child commands, never a combined command list or a replay distinguished only by capture ID. This selects existing exploration evidence, not another probe or a duplicate of the complete checkpoint ledger. Preserve every checkpoint and link every checkpoint in Markdown; keep every executed probe and its complete JSON in evidence, including the required replay. Missing dependencies remain setup blockers, not repairs. No browser installation or execution is needed.`;
 }
 

test/plan-design-sdk-fixture.test.ts

@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ async function exercise(mode: 'success' | 'max-turns' | 'first-timeout' | 'secon
       expect(opts.signal.aborted).toBe(false);
       // Bind the complete actual compact-delivery prompt, not selected snippets.
       expect(new Bun.CryptoHasher('sha256').update(opts.prompt).digest('hex'))
-        .toBe('2fa957ab9d56850a1629a845d6fe0ee5a1cb7c0843ab6555b621971d270604cb');
+        .toBe('7f2dbb6b2671588e7fbc83cfecc2869c59c388b45b627ac9d481c4d917d1e76f');
       expect(opts.testName).toBe(id); expect(opts.maxTurns).toBe(15); expect(opts.timeout).toBe(CAPTURE_MS);
       for (const key of ['model', 'tools', 'allowedTools', 'appendSystemPrompt', 'env']) expect(opts).not.toHaveProperty(key);
       expect(opts.prompt).toContain('Review the plan in ./plan.md');
@@ -98,7 +98,8 @@ async function exercise(mode: 'success' | 'max-turns' | 'first-timeout' | 'secon
       expect(opts.prompt).toContain('preserve the unresolved-decisions pass');
       expect(opts.prompt).toContain('interaction state table, empty states, responsive behavior');
       expect(opts.prompt).toContain('full required review report');
-      expect(opts.prompt).toContain('Write before publishing a completed walkthrough');
+      expect(opts.prompt).toContain('(or one Write) before publishing a completed walkthrough');
+      expect(opts.prompt).toContain('Save as you go in three Edits: after passes 1-3, apply their decisions to plan.md');
       expect(opts.prompt).toContain('Read plan.md back to verify the saved changes');
       expect(opts.prompt).toContain('Then return a brief, concrete summary');
       expect(opts.prompt).toContain('execute every required pass and lazy-section Read');
@@ -109,7 +110,7 @@ async function exercise(mode: 'success' | 'max-turns' | 'first-timeout' | 'secon
       expect(opts.prompt).toContain('concise score rationales and 10/10 explanations');
       const ordered = ['Read every lazy section', 'Review all 7 design passes',
         'EDIT plan.md', 'Keep the saved review compact',
-        'Persist that complete plan and review with Write', 'Read plan.md back',
+        'Persist that complete plan and review with those Edits', 'Read plan.md back',
         'Then return a brief, concrete summary'].map(text => opts.prompt.indexOf(text));
       expect(ordered.every(index => index >= 0)).toBe(true);
       expect(ordered).toEqual([...ordered].sort((a, b) => a - b));

test/plan-design-with-ui-fixture.test.ts

@@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ mock.module(${JSON.stringify(path.join(ROOT, 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts'
     expect(opts.isLastStep0AUQ(target)).toBe(false);
     expect(opts.isLastStep0AUQ(fp('focus', focus))).toBe(true);
     expect(opts.isLastStep0AUQ(paraphrase)).toBe(true);
+    // Census 36633323521 gate-census-7: the same Step 0D menu titled with "specific ones".
+    expect(opts.isLastStep0AUQ(fp('focus-ones', 'D1 — Review all 7 design dimensions, or focus on specific ones?'))).toBe(true);
     if (mode.startsWith('native-')) expect(opts.isLastStep0AUQ(nativeFocus)).toBe(true);
     for (const unrelated of ['Review all 4 design passes, or focus?',
       'Review all 7 engineering passes, or focus?', 'Review all 7 passes, or focus?',

test/skill-e2e-design.test.ts

@@ -462,8 +462,8 @@ Review the plan in ./plan.md. Its design gaps are vague "clean, modern UI" and "
 
 Use this non-interactive delivery sequence:
 1. Skip the preamble bash block and any AskUserQuestion calls. Read every lazy section the workflow requires. Review all 7 design passes. Rate each scored design dimension 0-10 and explain what would make it a 10; preserve the unresolved-decisions pass and every required design decision.
-2. EDIT plan.md with the missing design decisions (interaction state table, empty states, responsive behavior, etc.) and the full required review report. Keep the saved review compact: use the canonical tables and decision IDs. Specify each design requirement once; refer to its section or decision ID from other pass rationales, tasks, and report cells instead of repeating that specification. Give concise score rationales and 10/10 explanations. Retain all required report fields, design decisions, diagrams, ratings, and explanations.
+2. EDIT plan.md with the missing design decisions (interaction state table, empty states, responsive behavior, etc.) and the full required review report. Save as you go in three Edits: after passes 1-3, apply their decisions to plan.md; after passes 4-7, apply theirs; then add the review report. Keep the saved review compact: use the canonical tables and decision IDs. Specify each design requirement once; refer to its section or decision ID from other pass rationales, tasks, and report cells instead of repeating that specification. Give concise score rationales and 10/10 explanations. Retain all required report fields, design decisions, diagrams, ratings, and explanations.
-3. Persist that complete plan and review with Write before publishing a completed walkthrough or saying a fix is applied. Read plan.md back to verify the saved changes.
+3. Persist that complete plan and review with those Edits (or one Write) before publishing a completed walkthrough or saying a fix is applied. Read plan.md back to verify the saved changes.
 4. Then return a brief, concrete summary of the design changes; do not repeat the full review in the response. This changes presentation only: execute every required pass and lazy-section Read.
 
 IMPORTANT: Do NOT try to browse any URLs or use a browse binary. This is a plan review, not a live site audit.`,

test/skill-e2e-plan-design-with-ui.test.ts

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ const designFocusBoundary = (fp: AskUserQuestionFingerprint): boolean =>
     // Require the source Step 0D question or its retained native paraphrase.
     // A target menu can mention a design system without reviewing this plan.
     return /^I(?:['’]ve| have) rated this plan (?:10(?:\.0+)?|[0-9](?:\.\d+)?)\/10 on design completeness\.[\s\S]*\bWant me to focus on specific areas instead of all 7\?/i.test(text)
-      || /^Review all 7 design (?:dimensions|passes), or focus(?: on specific areas)?\?$/i.test(text.split(/\r?\n/, 1)[0]!);
+      || /^Review all 7 design (?:dimensions|passes), or focus(?: on [^?\n]+)?\?$/i.test(text.split(/\r?\n/, 1)[0]!);
   });
 
 // Require a choice about the supplied UI, not a workflow offer after focus.