mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-11-06 08:54:04 +01:00
test: repair native workflow observation and fixture isolation
This commit is contained in:
Garry Tan committed
1 parent
8d8537e5d3
commit
c9e7a422be
29 files changed
+3498
-69
No files matched your search
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
|
||||
import { afterEach, expect, test } from 'bun:test';
|
||||
import * as fs from 'node:fs';
|
||||
import * as os from 'node:os';
|
||||
import * as path from 'node:path';
|
||||
import { autoplanArtifactPermissionInput, pendingAutoplanArtifactPermissionInput, autoplanArtifactMenuKey } from './helpers/autoplan-artifact-permission';
|
||||
import type { NativePublicToolEvent } from './helpers/plan-count-transcript';
|
||||
import { E2E_TOUCHFILES, selectTests } from './helpers/touchfiles';
|
||||
import captured from './fixtures/autoplan-edit-header-ag.json';
|
||||
|
||||
const roots: string[] = [];
|
||||
afterEach(() => { for (const root of roots.splice(0)) fs.rmSync(root, {recursive:true,force:true}); });
|
||||
function replay() {
|
||||
const root = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'autoplan-edit-header-')); roots.push(root);
|
||||
const cwd = path.join(root,path.basename(captured.cwd));
|
||||
const ownedStateRoot = path.join(root,'home','.gstack');
|
||||
const file = captured.pending.file.replace(captured.ownedStateRoot,ownedStateRoot);
|
||||
fs.mkdirSync(cwd,{recursive:true}); fs.mkdirSync(path.dirname(file),{recursive:true});
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(file,captured.before);
|
||||
const beforeTime = new Date(Date.parse(captured.pending.timestamp)-1000);
|
||||
fs.utimesSync(file,beforeTime,beforeTime);
|
||||
const publicTools = structuredClone(captured.events) as NativePublicToolEvent[];
|
||||
for (const event of publicTools) if (event.input?.file_path === captured.pending.file) event.input.file_path = file;
|
||||
const pending = {...captured.pending,file,source:'pre_tool_use' as const,tool:'Edit' as const};
|
||||
const context = {cwd,ownedStateRoot,commandStartedAt:Date.parse(publicTools[0]!.timestamp)-1,
|
||||
now:Date.parse(captured.viewportCapturedAt),viewportCapturedAt:Date.parse(captured.viewportCapturedAt),
|
||||
transcriptStatus:'ready',publicTools,pending};
|
||||
const viewport = captured.viewport.replace(/^ (…[^\n]+)$/m,' …'+file.slice(root.length+1));
|
||||
return {root,file,context,viewport};
|
||||
}
|
||||
const pick = (r:ReturnType<typeof replay>, seen = new Set<string>()) =>
|
||||
pendingAutoplanArtifactPermissionInput(r.viewport,r.context,seen);
|
||||
|
||||
test('the captured native edit header preserves the current owned hook and diff', () => {
|
||||
const r = replay();
|
||||
expect(r.context.publicTools).toHaveLength(88);
|
||||
expect(autoplanArtifactPermissionInput(r.viewport,r.context,new Set())).toBeNull();
|
||||
expect(pick(r)).toEqual({input:'1\r',signature:captured.pending.sessionId+':'+captured.pending.toolUseId,file:r.file});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('exact absolute paths, full owned suffixes and launcher-owned aliases bind the same one-time request', () => {
|
||||
for (const absoluteTitle of [false,true]) for (const displayedPath of ['cropped','absolute','relative']) {
|
||||
const r = replay();
|
||||
if (absoluteTitle) r.viewport = r.viewport.replace(/^([●⏺] Update\()[^\n]+(?=\)$)/m,'$1'+r.file);
|
||||
if (displayedPath === 'absolute') r.viewport = r.viewport.replace(/^ …[^\n]+$/m,' '+r.file);
|
||||
if (displayedPath === 'relative') r.viewport = r.viewport.replace(/^ …[^\n]+$/m,' …'+path.relative(r.context.ownedStateRoot,r.file));
|
||||
const result = pick(r); expect(result?.input).toBe('1\r');
|
||||
expect(pick(r,new Set([result!.signature]))).toBeNull();
|
||||
expect(pick(r,new Set([autoplanArtifactMenuKey(r.viewport)]))).toBeNull();
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('a retained header does not permit unrelated, ambiguous or quoted prefix rows', () => {
|
||||
const changes = [
|
||||
(s:string) => s.replace('● Update(', '● Write('),
|
||||
(s:string) => s.replace(/^● Update\([^\n]+\)/, '● Update(/tmp/foreign.md)'),
|
||||
(s:string) => s.replace('~/.gstack/projects/', '~/.gstack/../projects/'),
|
||||
(s:string) => s.replace(/(^ …[^\n]+)dashboard.md/m, '$1other.md'),
|
||||
(s:string) => s.replace(/^ …[^\n]+$/m, ' …2026-09-10-user-dashboard.md'),
|
||||
(s:string) => s.replace(/^ …[^\n]+$/m, ' …projects/sibling/ceo-plans/2026-09-10-user-dashboard.md'),
|
||||
(s:string) => s.replace(' Edit file', ' Read file'),
|
||||
(s:string) => s.replace(' Edit file', ' Run this first\n Edit file'),
|
||||
(s:string) => s.replace(' Edit file', ' Edit file\n Edit file'),
|
||||
(s:string) => 'Example:\n'+s,
|
||||
(s:string) => '> '+s.replaceAll('\n','\n> '),
|
||||
(s:string) => '```text\n'+s+'\n```',
|
||||
(s:string) => s+'\nRun another action.',
|
||||
(s:string) => s.replace(' ❯ 1. Yes',' ❯ 1. Yes, always allow'),
|
||||
(s:string) => s.replace('to 2026-09-10-user-dashboard.md?','to sibling.md?'),
|
||||
];
|
||||
for (const change of changes) { const r=replay(); r.viewport=change(r.viewport); expect(pick(r),change.toString()).toBeNull(); }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('framed edits retain stale, wrong-tool, foreign-path and success-history gates', () => {
|
||||
const changes: Array<(r:ReturnType<typeof replay>)=>void> = [
|
||||
r=>{r.context.pending.tool='Write' as 'Edit';},
|
||||
r=>{r.context.pending.sessionId='foreign';},
|
||||
r=>{r.context.pending.file=r.file+'.sibling';},
|
||||
r=>{r.context.viewportCapturedAt=Date.parse(r.context.pending.timestamp)-1;},
|
||||
r=>{r.context.pending.timestamp=new Date(r.context.now+1000).toISOString();},
|
||||
r=>{r.context.publicTools.push({kind:'result',sessionId:r.context.pending.sessionId,toolUseId:r.context.pending.toolUseId,timestamp:new Date(r.context.now).toISOString(),isError:false});},
|
||||
r=>{r.context.publicTools.push({kind:'use',sessionId:r.context.pending.sessionId,toolUseId:'unresolved-other',name:'Write',timestamp:new Date(r.context.now).toISOString(),input:{file_path:r.file}});},
|
||||
r=>{for(const event of r.context.publicTools) if(event.kind==='result') event.isError=true;},
|
||||
r=>{fs.writeFileSync(r.file,'Unrelated replacement content');},
|
||||
r=>{fs.utimesSync(r.file,new Date(r.context.now+1000),new Date(r.context.now+1000));},
|
||||
];
|
||||
for(const change of changes) { const r=replay();change(r);expect(pick(r),change.toString()).toBeNull(); }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('the same header works for fully published synthetic Edit inputs without replacing their comparison', () => {
|
||||
const r = replay();
|
||||
const oldString = captured.before.split('\n')[0]!;
|
||||
const newString = oldString+' (revised)';
|
||||
const lines = r.viewport.split('\n');
|
||||
const menu = r.viewport.slice(r.viewport.indexOf(' Do you want'));
|
||||
r.viewport = lines.slice(0,6).join('\n')+'\n 1 -'+oldString+'\n 1 +'+newString+'\n────────\n'+menu;
|
||||
r.context.publicTools.push({kind:'use',sessionId:r.context.pending.sessionId,toolUseId:r.context.pending.toolUseId,
|
||||
name:'Edit',timestamp:r.context.pending.timestamp,input:{file_path:r.file,old_string:oldString,new_string:newString}});
|
||||
expect(pendingAutoplanArtifactPermissionInput(r.viewport,r.context,new Set())).toBeNull();
|
||||
expect(autoplanArtifactPermissionInput(r.viewport,r.context,new Set())?.input).toBe('1\r');
|
||||
r.context.publicTools.at(-1)!.input!.new_string='Different unpublished replacement';
|
||||
expect(autoplanArtifactPermissionInput(r.viewport,r.context,new Set())).toBeNull();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('the new native header evidence selects only the existing Autoplan paid case', () => {
|
||||
for(const file of ['test/autoplan-edit-header-ag.test.ts','test/fixtures/autoplan-edit-header-ag.json']) {
|
||||
expect(Object.entries(E2E_TOUCHFILES).filter(([,files])=>files.includes(file)).map(([owner])=>owner)).toEqual(['autoplan-chain-pty']);
|
||||
expect(selectTests([file],E2E_TOUCHFILES,[]).selected).toEqual(['autoplan-chain-pty']);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
|
||||
import { expect, test } from 'bun:test';
|
||||
import captured from './fixtures/ceo-contract-assertions-ag.json';
|
||||
import retry from './fixtures/ceo-contract-assertions-ag-retry.json';
|
||||
import { ceoFirstReviewAUQ, ceoStep0Boundary, nativePlanCallFingerprint, planCountQuestionPhase } from './helpers/claude-pty-runner';
|
||||
import type { NativePlanQuestionCall } from './helpers/plan-count-transcript';
|
||||
import { E2E_TOUCHFILES, selectTests } from './helpers/touchfiles';
|
||||
|
||||
const calls = () => structuredClone(captured.calls) as NativePlanQuestionCall[];
|
||||
const fp = (call: NativePlanQuestionCall) => nativePlanCallFingerprint(call, 0, true);
|
||||
function reanswer(call: NativePlanQuestionCall) {
|
||||
call.answers = { [call.questions[0]!.question]: call.questions[0]!.options[0]!.label };
|
||||
return call;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
test('actual declarative assertion defects start review after routing and approach', () => {
|
||||
let started = false;
|
||||
const counts = { setup: 0, review: 0 };
|
||||
for (const call of calls()) {
|
||||
const phase = planCountQuestionPhase(fp(call), started, ceoStep0Boundary, ceoFirstReviewAUQ);
|
||||
started = phase.reviewStarted;
|
||||
counts[phase.preReview ? 'setup' : 'review']++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
expect(counts).toEqual({ setup: 2, review: 2 });
|
||||
for (const call of calls().slice(2)) expect(ceoFirstReviewAUQ(fp(call))).toBe(true);
|
||||
// Correct classification cannot retroactively complete the original paid run.
|
||||
expect(captured.observedOutcome).toBe('no_review_questions');
|
||||
expect(captured.observedReviewCount).toBe(0);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('assertion briefs still require completed native identity and their actual remedy', () => {
|
||||
for (const original of calls().slice(2)) {
|
||||
for (const mutate of [
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.answered = false; },
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.failed = true; },
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.answers = {}; },
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.unansweredQuestionIndices = [0]; },
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.questions.push(structuredClone(c.questions[0]!)); },
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.questions[0]!.header = 'Issue 99'; },
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.questions[0]!.header = 'Approach'; },
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.questions[0]!.question = c.questions[0]!.question.replace(/Recommendation: \d[A-Z]/, 'Recommendation: 99Z'); },
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.questions[0]!.options.forEach((o, i) => { o.label = `${i + 1}A) Keep`; o.description = 'Keep the saved report.'; }); },
|
||||
]) {
|
||||
const call = structuredClone(original); mutate(call);
|
||||
if (call.answers && Object.keys(call.answers).length) reanswer(call);
|
||||
expect(ceoFirstReviewAUQ(fp(call))).toBe(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
expect(ceoFirstReviewAUQ({ ...fp(original), signature: 'foreign:call' })).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(ceoFirstReviewAUQ({ ...fp(original), options: [] })).toBe(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('historical, hypothetical, quoted and withdrawn assertion problems are not current findings', () => {
|
||||
for (const original of calls().slice(2)) {
|
||||
for (const prefix of ['If ', 'Example: ', 'Whether ', 'Unless ']) {
|
||||
const call = structuredClone(original);
|
||||
call.questions[0]!.question = call.questions[0]!.question.replace(/(Issue \d+: )/, `$1${prefix}`);
|
||||
expect(ceoFirstReviewAUQ(fp(reanswer(call)))).toBe(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (const replacement of [
|
||||
'test 2 can detect all retry or backoff regressions',
|
||||
'test 2 previously could not detect retry or backoff regressions',
|
||||
'test 1 does not accept any truthy value as a correct receipt',
|
||||
'"test 2 cannot detect retry or backoff regressions"',
|
||||
]) {
|
||||
const call = structuredClone(original);
|
||||
call.questions[0]!.question = call.questions[0]!.question.replace(/(Issue \d+: )[^\n]+/, `$1${replacement}`);
|
||||
expect(ceoFirstReviewAUQ(fp(reanswer(call)))).toBe(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
const withdrawn = structuredClone(original);
|
||||
withdrawn.questions[0]!.question = withdrawn.questions[0]!.question.replace(/(ELI10:[^\n]+)/, '$1 No current defect exists.');
|
||||
expect(ceoFirstReviewAUQ(fp(reanswer(withdrawn)))).toBe(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('the captured assertion regression selects the existing CEO count eval', () => {
|
||||
for (const file of ['test/ceo-contract-assertions-ag.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-contract-assertions-ag.json']) {
|
||||
expect(selectTests([file], E2E_TOUCHFILES).selected).toContain('plan-ceo-finding-count');
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
test('actual retry contract wording recognizes its first repair and counts three review decisions', () => {
|
||||
let started = false;
|
||||
const counts = { setup: 0, review: 0 };
|
||||
for (const call of structuredClone(retry.calls) as NativePlanQuestionCall[]) {
|
||||
const phase = planCountQuestionPhase(fp(call), started, ceoStep0Boundary, ceoFirstReviewAUQ);
|
||||
started = phase.reviewStarted;
|
||||
counts[phase.preReview ? 'setup' : 'review']++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
expect(counts).toEqual({ setup: 2, review: 3 });
|
||||
for (const original of retry.calls.slice(2, 4)) {
|
||||
const call = structuredClone(original) as NativePlanQuestionCall;
|
||||
expect(ceoFirstReviewAUQ(fp(call))).toBe(true);
|
||||
call.answers = { [call.questions[0]!.question]: call.questions[0]!.options.at(-1)!.label };
|
||||
expect(ceoFirstReviewAUQ(fp(call))).toBe(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
expect(retry.observedOutcome).toBe('no_review_questions');
|
||||
expect(retry.observedReviewCount).toBe(0);
|
||||
expect(selectTests(['test/fixtures/ceo-contract-assertions-ag-retry.json'], E2E_TOUCHFILES).selected).toContain('plan-ceo-finding-count');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('already complete assertions and layout-only choices do not invent a defect', () => {
|
||||
const cases = [
|
||||
[2, 'D2 — Issue 1: test 2 cannot detect retry regressions (historical assessment)', 'The assertion gap was fixed yesterday. The current test pins the retry count and delay; this choice only arranges the already complete tests.'],
|
||||
[3, 'D3 — Issue 2: test 1 accepts any truthy value as specified by its success contract', 'The contract intentionally accepts every truthy success marker. The current assertion covers the contract completely; this choice only arranges the existing test.'],
|
||||
] as const;
|
||||
for (const [index, title, explanation] of cases) {
|
||||
const call = calls()[index]!;
|
||||
const q = call.questions[0]!;
|
||||
q.question = `${title}\nELI10: ${explanation}\nRecommendation: A`;
|
||||
q.options = [{ label: 'A) Use a table-driven layout', description: 'Use a table-driven layout for the existing assertions.' }, { label: 'B) Keep the existing layout', description: 'Keep the existing assertions in place.' }];
|
||||
expect(ceoFirstReviewAUQ(fp(reanswer(call)))).toBe(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('retry assertion brief keeps native identity, exact contract and repair requirements', () => {
|
||||
for (const original of retry.calls.slice(2, 4)) {
|
||||
for (const mutate of [
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.answered = false; },
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.failed = true; },
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.questions[0]!.header = 'Finding 99'; },
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.questions[0]!.question = 'Example: ' + c.questions[0]!.question; },
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.questions[0]!.question = c.questions[0]!.question.replace('but the contract is', 'but there is no contract for'); },
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.questions[0]!.question = c.questions[0]!.question.replace(/^ELI10:.*$/m, 'ELI10: The current assertion covers the contract completely.'); },
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.questions[0]!.question = c.questions[0]!.question.replace('Fix the assertion?', 'Save the report?'); },
|
||||
(c: NativePlanQuestionCall) => { c.questions[0]!.options.forEach(o => { o.label = o.label.replace(/\).*/, ') Use the existing layout'); o.description = 'Use the existing layout.'; }); },
|
||||
]) {
|
||||
const call = structuredClone(original) as NativePlanQuestionCall;
|
||||
mutate(call);
|
||||
expect(ceoFirstReviewAUQ(fp(reanswer(call)))).toBe(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
test('one offered option must repair the assertion rather than borrow report and layout actions', () => {
|
||||
for (const original of [...captured.calls.slice(2), ...retry.calls.slice(2, 4)]) {
|
||||
for (const administrative of ['Verify the saved report', 'Assert the full report', 'Pin the exact saved plan', 'Verify the expected layout']) {
|
||||
const call = structuredClone(original) as NativePlanQuestionCall;
|
||||
const q = call.questions[0]!;
|
||||
const prefix = /^([1-9]\d*)?[A-Z]/.exec(q.options[0]!.label)![1] ?? '';
|
||||
q.options = [
|
||||
{ label: `${prefix}A) ${administrative}`, description: administrative + '.' },
|
||||
{ label: `${prefix}B) Use a table-driven layout`, description: 'Use a table-driven layout for the existing assertions.' },
|
||||
];
|
||||
expect(ceoFirstReviewAUQ(fp(reanswer(call)))).toBe(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
test('administrative report qualifiers cannot strengthen the unchanged assertion clause', () => {
|
||||
for (const suffix of [' and include a full report.', '; write an exact report.', '. Save the complete plan.']) {
|
||||
const call = calls()[2]!;
|
||||
const q = call.questions[0]!;
|
||||
q.options = [
|
||||
{ label: '1A) Assert the error class only', description: 'Assert the error class only' + suffix },
|
||||
{ label: '1B) Keep the current test', description: 'Leave the current rejection-only assertion unchanged.' },
|
||||
];
|
||||
expect(ceoFirstReviewAUQ(fp(reanswer(call)))).toBe(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
test('each assertion clause owns its strong qualifier and actual assertion target', () => {
|
||||
for (const suffix of [' and verify the full report.', ' and check the full report.', ' with a full report.', ' with a complete saved plan.']) {
|
||||
const call = calls()[2]!;
|
||||
call.questions[0]!.options = [
|
||||
{ label: '1A) Assert the error class only', description: 'Assert the error class only' + suffix },
|
||||
{ label: '1B) Keep the current test', description: 'Leave the current rejection-only assertion unchanged.' },
|
||||
];
|
||||
expect(ceoFirstReviewAUQ(fp(reanswer(call)))).toBe(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (const description of ['Assert the rejection class and exactly two Stripe attempts.', 'Assert the error class only and assert exactly two Stripe attempts.']) {
|
||||
const call = calls()[2]!;
|
||||
call.questions[0]!.options[0]!.label = '1A) Strengthen the assertions';
|
||||
call.questions[0]!.options[0]!.description = description;
|
||||
call.questions[0]!.options = [call.questions[0]!.options[0]!, { label: '1B) Keep the current test', description: 'Leave the rejection-only assertion unchanged.' }];
|
||||
expect(ceoFirstReviewAUQ(fp(reanswer(call)))).toBe(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
|
||||
import { expect, test } from 'bun:test';
|
||||
import { hasNativePostAnswerCeoPosture, nativeCeoModeAnswer } from './helpers/ceo-mode-option';
|
||||
import type { PlanCountTranscript } from './helpers/plan-count-transcript';
|
||||
import captured from './fixtures/ceo-hold-posture-ag.json';
|
||||
import { E2E_TOUCHFILES, selectTests } from './helpers/touchfiles';
|
||||
|
||||
const posture = /\b(rigor|bulletproof|hold\s*scope|maximum\s+rigor)\b/i;
|
||||
const original = captured.transcript.assistantMessages[0]!.text;
|
||||
const replay = () => structuredClone(captured.transcript) as PlanCountTranscript;
|
||||
const matches = (transcript = replay()) => hasNativePostAnswerCeoPosture(
|
||||
transcript, 'HOLD SCOPE', posture, captured.selectionStartedAt,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
test('the captured selected HOLD scope lock and hardening establish posture without a keyword', () => {
|
||||
const transcript = replay();
|
||||
expect(captured.provenance.actualState).toBe('failed');
|
||||
expect(nativeCeoModeAnswer(transcript, 'HOLD SCOPE', captured.selectionStartedAt)?.toolUseId)
|
||||
.toBe('toolu_011bt3yabPDSEsPNm97EhqV4');
|
||||
expect(posture.test(original)).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(matches(transcript)).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('ordinary current scope declarations preserve the same three obligations', () => {
|
||||
for (const text of [
|
||||
original.replace("I'm locking", 'We are keeping').replace('the four PLAN.md bullets from approach B', 'the agreed plan')
|
||||
.replace('flagging anything beyond', 'treating everything outside').replace('hunting', 'checking'),
|
||||
original.replace("I'm locking", 'I am holding').replace('four PLAN.md bullets from approach B', 'PLAN.md requirements')
|
||||
.replace('flagging', 'marking').replace('hunting', 'looking'),
|
||||
original.replace("I'm", 'I’m').replace('PLAN.md', '**PLAN.md**'),
|
||||
]) {
|
||||
const transcript = replay(); transcript.assistantMessages[0]!.text = text;
|
||||
expect(matches(transcript)).toBe(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('promises, conditions and quotation cannot establish the current posture', () => {
|
||||
for (const text of [
|
||||
original.replace("I'm locking", 'I will lock'),
|
||||
original.replace("I'm locking", 'I would lock'),
|
||||
'If you approve, ' + original,
|
||||
'Later, ' + original,
|
||||
'Example only: ' + original,
|
||||
'An unproven hypothesis: ' + original,
|
||||
'Example only. ' + original,
|
||||
'"' + original + '"',
|
||||
'> ' + original,
|
||||
'```text\n' + original + '\n```',
|
||||
'~~~~\n' + original + '\n~~~~',
|
||||
'Read(file)\n' + original,
|
||||
'The user said: ' + original,
|
||||
original.replace('and hunting', 'and not hunting'),
|
||||
]) {
|
||||
const transcript = replay(); transcript.assistantMessages[0]!.text = text;
|
||||
expect(matches(transcript), text).toBe(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('all three obligations refer to the selected current scope', () => {
|
||||
for (const text of [
|
||||
original.replace('PLAN.md', 'OTHER.md'),
|
||||
original.replace('PLAN.md', 'archive/PLAN.md'),
|
||||
original.replace('the four PLAN.md bullets from approach B', 'the future expanded plan'),
|
||||
original.replace('the four PLAN.md bullets from approach B', 'the two imagined requirements'),
|
||||
original.replace('out of scope', 'in scope'),
|
||||
original.replace('as out of scope', 'as not out of scope'),
|
||||
original.replace('flagging anything beyond that (defaults, sharing, deep links) as out of scope, and ', ''),
|
||||
original.replace(/, and hunting[^.]+\./, '.'),
|
||||
original.replace('constraints, error handling, UI edge cases, access-rule leaks', 'word choice and formatting'),
|
||||
original + ' I am expanding scope to include a new feature.',
|
||||
original + ' I am adding extra features to scope.',
|
||||
]) {
|
||||
const transcript = replay(); transcript.assistantMessages[0]!.text = text;
|
||||
expect(matches(transcript), text).toBe(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
const ambiguous = replay();
|
||||
const question = ambiguous.calls[0]!.questions[0]!;
|
||||
const oldQuestion = question.question;
|
||||
question.question = question.question.replace('reviewing PLAN.md', 'reviewing PLAN.md and OTHER.md');
|
||||
ambiguous.calls[0]!.answers = { [question.question]: ambiguous.calls[0]!.answers![oldQuestion]! };
|
||||
expect(matches(ambiguous)).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('explicit later corrections withdraw scope locking, while quoted examples do not', () => {
|
||||
const corrections = [
|
||||
'Correction: the previously excluded defaults, sharing, and deep links are now in scope.',
|
||||
'Correction: I am no longer locking scope to those requirements.',
|
||||
'I am not keeping scope to those requirements.',
|
||||
'The formerly excluded additions are in scope.',
|
||||
];
|
||||
for (const correction of corrections) {
|
||||
const transcript = replay();
|
||||
transcript.assistantMessages[0]!.text = original + '\n\n' + correction;
|
||||
expect(matches(transcript), correction).toBe(false);
|
||||
for (const quote of ['> ' + correction, '```text\n' + correction + '\n```',
|
||||
'~~~text\n' + correction + '\n~~~', 'An example of withdrawn wording is: "' + correction + '"']) {
|
||||
transcript.assistantMessages[0]!.text = original + '\n\n' + quote;
|
||||
expect(matches(transcript), quote).toBe(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('only a real selected HOLD answer followed by its own public statement supplies evidence', () => {
|
||||
for (const change of [
|
||||
(t: PlanCountTranscript) => { t.status = 'missing'; },
|
||||
(t: PlanCountTranscript) => { t.calls[0]!.answered = false; },
|
||||
(t: PlanCountTranscript) => { t.calls[0]!.failed = true; },
|
||||
(t: PlanCountTranscript) => { t.calls[0]!.answeredAt = new Date(captured.selectionStartedAt - 1).toISOString(); },
|
||||
(t: PlanCountTranscript) => { t.calls[0]!.answers![t.calls[0]!.questions[0]!.question] = 'Scope Expansion'; },
|
||||
(t: PlanCountTranscript) => { t.calls[0]!.answers![t.calls[0]!.questions[0]!.question] = 'Unknown'; },
|
||||
(t: PlanCountTranscript) => { t.assistantMessages[0]!.sessionId = 'foreign'; },
|
||||
(t: PlanCountTranscript) => { t.assistantMessages[0]!.timestamp = t.calls[0]!.answeredAt!; },
|
||||
(t: PlanCountTranscript) => { t.assistantMessages[0]!.timestamp = 'invalid'; },
|
||||
(t: PlanCountTranscript) => { t.assistantMessages[0]!.timestamp = new Date(Date.now() + 60_000).toISOString(); },
|
||||
(t: PlanCountTranscript) => { t.assistantMessages = []; },
|
||||
]) {
|
||||
const transcript = replay(); change(transcript); expect(matches(transcript)).toBe(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
const expansion = replay();
|
||||
expansion.calls[0]!.answers![expansion.calls[0]!.questions[0]!.question] = 'Scope Expansion';
|
||||
expect(hasNativePostAnswerCeoPosture(expansion, 'SCOPE EXPANSION', posture, captured.selectionStartedAt)).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('new evidence controls select only the existing mode paid owner', () => {
|
||||
for (const file of ['test/ceo-hold-posture-ag.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-hold-posture-ag.json']) {
|
||||
expect(Object.entries(E2E_TOUCHFILES).filter(([, files]) => files.includes(file)).map(([owner]) => owner))
|
||||
.toEqual(['plan-ceo-mode-routing']);
|
||||
expect(selectTests([file], E2E_TOUCHFILES, []).selected).toEqual(['plan-ceo-mode-routing']);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
|
||||
import { expect, test } from 'bun:test';
|
||||
import fixture from './fixtures/eng-regression-pinning-ag.json';
|
||||
import { evaluateEngSeedCoverage } from './helpers/eng-seeded-coverage';
|
||||
import type { PlanCountTranscript } from './helpers/plan-count-transcript';
|
||||
import { E2E_TOUCHFILES, selectTests } from './helpers/touchfiles';
|
||||
const transcript = fixture.transcript as PlanCountTranscript;
|
||||
const started = Math.min(...transcript.calls.map(c => Date.parse(c.answeredAt!))) - 1;
|
||||
const finished = Date.parse(fixture.finishedAt);
|
||||
const evaluate = (task: string) => evaluateEngSeedCoverage(transcript,
|
||||
task + '\n\n## GSTACK REVIEW REPORT\nCoverage fixture.\n', started, finished);
|
||||
|
||||
test('actual required characterization task pins existing legacy behavior before other work', () => {
|
||||
expect(evaluate(fixture.requiredTask).ok).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(evaluate(fixture.requiredTask).regression).toBe('plan');
|
||||
expect(fixture.requiredTask).toContain('before any other task lands');
|
||||
expect(fixture.observedOutcome).toBe('plan_ready');
|
||||
expect(fixture.observedFailure).toBe('mandatory legacy regression coverage absent');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('pinning instruction must target current legacy behavior, not borrow names from notes', () => {
|
||||
const task = fixture.requiredTask.split('\n')[0]!;
|
||||
for (const text of [
|
||||
task.replace('legacyAuthFlow()', 'newAuthFlow()') + '; legacyAuthFlow is mentioned in notes.',
|
||||
task.replace('pinning', 'describing'),
|
||||
task.replace('current behavior', 'future behavior'),
|
||||
task.replace('Write characterization tests', 'Write a report about characterization tests'),
|
||||
task.replace('Write characterization tests', 'Do not write characterization tests'),
|
||||
task.replace('Write characterization tests', 'Maybe write characterization tests'),
|
||||
'> ' + task,
|
||||
'\"' + task + '\"',
|
||||
'```\n' + task + '\n```',
|
||||
task.replace('Write characterization tests', 'If approved, write characterization tests'),
|
||||
]) expect(evaluate(text).regression, text).toBeUndefined();
|
||||
for (const tense of ['current', 'existing', 'prior']) {
|
||||
expect(evaluate(task.replace('current behavior', tense + ' behavior')).regression).toBe('plan');
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('regression task cannot replace absent distinct decisions or a final report', () => {
|
||||
const missing = structuredClone(transcript); missing.calls = [];
|
||||
expect(evaluateEngSeedCoverage(missing, fixture.requiredTask, started, finished).ok).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(evaluateEngSeedCoverage(transcript, fixture.requiredTask, started, finished).problems).toContain('final review report absent or empty');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('the new regression evidence selects the affected engineering count owners', () => {
|
||||
for (const file of ['test/eng-regression-pinning-ag.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-regression-pinning-ag.json']) {
|
||||
expect(selectTests([file], E2E_TOUCHFILES, []).selected.sort()).toEqual(['plan-eng-finding-count', 'plan-eng-multi-finding-batching']);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
+727
@@ -0,0 +1,727 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"provenance": {
|
||||
"sourceCommit": "8d8537e5d341cc9f3d186822f06efb245ec7b8fd",
|
||||
"evidenceDir": ".context/ship-source-ag-delta-paid-20260910-v1/autoplan-edit-pending-0209-v1",
|
||||
"observationSha256": "003ad8731d98f55ba02c894ed4d5c7a17fb0aa1f0dfd42848278e6b671905083",
|
||||
"screenSha256": "bca8523bdfd3681f59cb6f0fbd011e63a68b8793ad7f9642a2664b6653784680",
|
||||
"hookSha256": "60a61f738f4522833d7c362cffce4752d18ca2fa5b64e42f9b1ecb967c760186",
|
||||
"projection": "Exact current pending hook, viewport and owned file bytes. Public tool history retains only IDs/names/file paths/timestamps/error flags; edit bodies omitted.",
|
||||
"replayLimitation": "Free controls rebase owned filesystem paths only; any published current Edit input is explicitly synthetic because the actual input was unpublished."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"cwd": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-autoplan-chain-vsRLi1",
|
||||
"ownedStateRoot": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/skill-home-tlU9KV/.gstack",
|
||||
"pending": {
|
||||
"source": "pre_tool_use",
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_011MQGGjAj1xmUbr8Q1cUQ9T",
|
||||
"tool": "Edit",
|
||||
"file": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/skill-home-tlU9KV/.gstack/projects/gstack-autoplan-chain-vsRLi1/ceo-plans/2026-09-10-user-dashboard.md",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:07:26.812Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"viewportCapturedAt": "2026-09-10T02:09:10.779Z",
|
||||
"commandStartedAtMeaning": "Reconstructed 1ms before first retained public tool; every retained event included.",
|
||||
"viewport": "\u25cf Update(~/.gstack/projects/gstack-autoplan-chain-vsRLi1/ceo-plans/2026-09-10-user-dashboard.md)\n \n\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\n Edit file\n \u20264169247-CCA4dg/skill-home-tlU9KV/.gstack/projects/gstack-autoplan-chain-vsRLi1/ceo-plans/2026-09-10-user-dashboard.md\n\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\n 23 \n 24 | # | Proposal | Effort (human / CC) | Decision | Reasoning |\n 25 |---|----------|--------|----------|-----------|\n 26 -| E1 | Refetch on window focus/visibility, at most once per 60s, stale-while-revalidate; a 503, network or other re\n -quest-level error during a background refetch keeps the stale render and shows an error toast, never a blank page; \n -the refetch is suppressed while the mark-all-read dialog is open or its request is in flight, and the mutation's co\n -mpletion triggers the next refetch, so stale pre-mutation data can never repaint over a completed mutation | S (~2h\n - / ~10min) | ACCEPTED | In blast radius; removes the stale-dashboard-after-lunch failure | \n 26 +| E1 | Refetch on window focus/visibility, at most once per 60s, stale-while-revalidate; a 503, network or other re\n +quest-level error during a background refetch keeps the stale render and shows an error toast, never a blank page; \n +the refetch is suppressed while the mark-all-read dialog is open or its request is in flight, and the mutation's co\n +mpletion triggers the next refetch, so stale pre-mutation data can never repaint over a completed mutation. The 60s\n + throttle applies to focus/visibility triggers only, measured from completion of the most recent fetch of any kind;\n + a mutation-completion refetch bypasses the throttle and resets the window. On a background refetch, panels whose e\n +nvelope is `ok` update; panels whose envelope is `error` keep stale data and contribute to one deduplicated error t\n +oast; panel-level error states render only when there is no data to show (initial load or Retry from error) | S (~2\n +h / ~10min) | ACCEPTED | In blast radius; removes the stale-dashboard-after-lunch failure | \n 27 | E2 | Relative timestamps (\"4 min ago\") with the absolute value in `<time dateTime>` (JSX casing) and `title` | S \n (~1h / ~5min) | ACCEPTED | In blast radius; accessibility and scannability |\n 28 | E3 | Empty-state CTAs: QuickActions \u2192 none (empty means nothing to do); Notifications \u2192 link to the existing full\n notifications page; Activity \u2192 link to the registry's create-item action (the action the plan labels \"create an it\n em\"; confirm its stable ID from the registry) **only when that action is present in the member's eligible `quickAct\n ions` envelope**, otherwise no CTA, so an ineligible member is never routed into a permission error | S (~1h / ~5mi\n n) | ACCEPTED | In blast radius; empty states are onboarding moments |\n 29 | E4 | QuickActions first in DOM and visual order at sm, md and lg (the plan's three breakpoints; no others are def\n ined) | S (~30min / ~5min) | ACCEPTED | In blast radius; directly serves time-to-first-completed-task |\n\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254Line truncated
|
||||
"before": "---\nstatus: ACTIVE\n---\n# CEO Plan: User Dashboard Page\nGenerated by /plan-ceo-review (via /autoplan) on 2026-09-10\nBranch: main | Mode: SELECTIVE EXPANSION\nRepo: gstack-autoplan-chain-vsRLi1 (no remote)\n\n## Baseline scope (what is being expanded)\nA new post-login page at `/dashboard`, behind the feature flag `dashboard_landing` (default off, enabled per member cohort: 10% \u2192 50% \u2192 100%, gates defined in requirement R2 of the active plan). Three panels fed by one aggregate endpoint `GET /api/dashboard`: **QuickActions** (eligible actions from the existing action registry), **Notifications** (latest 20 member alerts with a \"Mark all as read\" confirmation modal), **Activity** (latest 20 audit-history records). Primary metric: login-to-first-completed-task time. Guardrails: completed-task rate and permission-error rate. A shared toast primitive provides non-blocking feedback. Detailed requirements live in the active plan file: R1-R14 are build requirements; R15 is the list of items deferred to TODOS.md (mirrored below).\n\n**Blast radius** (used as the acceptance criterion below) = the files and routes the baseline plan already touches: the dashboard page, its three panels, the dialog wrapper, the toast primitive, the panel-state hook, the aggregate endpoint and its tests. The login flow, global shell/navigation, schema and repositories are outside it.\n\n## Vision\n\n### 10x Check\nThe 10x version of a post-login home is one that acts before you read. It prefetches its data on the login response, lands the first Tab stop and the first thumb-reach on \"Resume assigned work\", shows a \"new since your last visit\" divider in both lists so a returning member scans only what changed, carries an unread badge into every page's navigation so the dashboard is never the only place alerts live, and lets a member undo a bulk action instead of confirming it. Every panel degrades independently: a slow audit query never blanks the actions panel. Effort beyond the baseline plan: human ~3 weeks / CC ~1 day; this total includes the integration, cross-page QA and rollout work that the itemized E4-E8 estimates below (\u22485 human-days / \u22482.5 CC-hours) do not carry individually.\n\n### Platonic Ideal\nNot produced: SELECTIVE EXPANSION mode skips this step by design.\n\n## Scope Decisions\n\n| # | Proposal | Effort (human / CC) | Decision | Reasoning |\n|---|----------|--------|----------|-----------|\n| E1 | Refetch on window focus/visibility, at most once per 60s, stale-while-revalidate; a 503, network or other request-level error during a background refetch keeps the stale render and shows an error toast, never a blank page; the refetch is suppressed while the mark-all-read dialog is open or its request is in flight, and the mutation's completion triggers the next refetch, so stale pre-mutation data can never repaint over a completed mutation | S (~2h / ~10min) | ACCEPTED | In blast radius; removes the stale-dashboard-after-lunch failure |\n| E2 | Relative timestamps (\"4 min ago\") with the absolute value in `<time dateTime>` (JSX casing) and `title` | S (~1h / ~5min) | ACCEPTED | In blast radius; accessibility and scannability |\n| E3 | Empty-state CTAs: QuickActions \u2192 none (empty means nothing to do); Notifications \u2192 link to the existing full notifications page; Activity \u2192 link to the registry's create-item action (the action the plan labels \"create an item\"; confirm its stable ID from the registry) **only when that action is present in the member's eligible `quickActions` envelope**, otherwise no CTA, so an ineligible member is never routed into a permission error | S (~1h / ~5min) | ACCEPTED | In blast radius; empty states are onboarding moments |\n| E4 | QuickActions first in DOM and visual order at sm, md and lg (the plan's three breakpoints; no others are defined) | S (~30min / ~5min) | ACCEPTED | In blast radius; directly serves time-to-first-completed-task |\n| E5 | Global nav unread badge | M (~1d / ~30min) | DEFERRED | Outside blast radius (global shell); needs an unread-count access path not in the contracts |\n| E6 | \"New since last visit\" divider | M (~2d / ~45min) | DEFERRED | Needs persistence; plan forbids schema changes; client-only variant is lossy across devices |\n| E7 | Prefetch dashboard payload on the login response | M (~1d / ~30min) | DEFERRED | Touches the auth flow; decide after R12's staging latency numbers (endpoint p95/p99) show the extra round trip matters |\n| E8 | Act-then-undo instead of the confirmation modal for \"Mark all as read\" | S (~3h / ~15min) if a bulk un-read API exists; **M (~1d / ~45min) otherwise**, because undo needs a server path to restore read state for the snapshot range, and the plan forbids schema changes and new mutation APIs | HELD \u2192 User Challenge UC1; **default: confirmation modal stands** | Changes the user's stated design; both reviewer voices favor it; user decides at the final gate with the effort caLine truncated
|
||||
"events": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:47:48.622Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_016vPGKxST443agxSKT32bVp",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:47:51.271Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_016vPGKxST443agxSKT32bVp",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:48:01.937Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01TgQf2DaPkoAu5mH4ypZapZ",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:48:03.225Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01TgQf2DaPkoAu5mH4ypZapZ",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:48:08.094Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01UY9aB1dCV21a5fXxXZFX3q",
|
||||
"name": "Read",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-autoplan-chain-vsRLi1/.claude/plans/ui-heavy-feature.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:48:08.122Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01UY9aB1dCV21a5fXxXZFX3q",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:48:08.848Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01417gReM1AvasfezCFharGF",
|
||||
"name": "Read",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-autoplan-chain-vsRLi1/README.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:48:08.872Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01417gReM1AvasfezCFharGF",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:48:13.191Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Xskm3S2e8yJ2TXTtkw5pcW",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:48:14.677Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Xskm3S2e8yJ2TXTtkw5pcW",
|
||||
"isError": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:48:40.764Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_015uqTSzvcpEvAgvxg8SoxCi",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:48:42.332Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_015uqTSzvcpEvAgvxg8SoxCi",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:48:46.628Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01U7ugLZ7UcuwsqFERDx6ptf",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:48:48.681Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01U7ugLZ7UcuwsqFERDx6ptf",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:07.768Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Tr1savkzHoX5P89psDYnN2",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:08.977Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_018ehwQ4gJRk9ZHTutLWo5yp",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:09.340Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Tr1savkzHoX5P89psDYnN2",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:09.404Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_018ehwQ4gJRk9ZHTutLWo5yp",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:21.417Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01N1A6HCcjbPqEn6VRJFKdMz",
|
||||
"name": "Read",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/with-skills/.claude/plans/sunny-finding-dream.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:21.438Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01N1A6HCcjbPqEn6VRJFKdMz",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:22.903Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01VD3PH16rpr8LnjewpCfPfZ",
|
||||
"name": "Read",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/skill-home-tlU9KV/.claude/skills/gstack/autoplan/sections/ceo-phase.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:22.927Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01VD3PH16rpr8LnjewpCfPfZ",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:24.972Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01WzFqXWccv2M6HJvga7CgCP",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:25.040Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01WzFqXWccv2M6HJvga7CgCP",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:35.769Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_011VtCpJeQZtiQmPUvUokDfZ",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:37.029Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_011VtCpJeQZtiQmPUvUokDfZ",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:37.459Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_019ySJkHQrpPgHsrAoNHmYmp",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:37.523Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_019ySJkHQrpPgHsrAoNHmYmp",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:45.036Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01BU3pV5UEkgU4nJWg38hfe3",
|
||||
"name": "Read",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/skill-home-tlU9KV/.gstack/projects/gstack-autoplan-chain-vsRLi1/autoplan-ceo-methodology-18ubmt/methodology.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:45.129Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01BU3pV5UEkgU4nJWg38hfe3",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:46.543Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_015EoxyxtEafv4SkHRDdxwdY",
|
||||
"name": "Read",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/skill-home-tlU9KV/.gstack/projects/gstack-autoplan-chain-vsRLi1/autoplan-ceo-methodology-18ubmt/methodology.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:46.657Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_015EoxyxtEafv4SkHRDdxwdY",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:48.043Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01JBhkDhQHE8tiYdDdJ1V58y",
|
||||
"name": "Read",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/skill-home-tlU9KV/.gstack/projects/gstack-autoplan-chain-vsRLi1/autoplan-ceo-methodology-18ubmt/methodology.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:48.141Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01JBhkDhQHE8tiYdDdJ1V58y",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:48.919Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Ka6V7YZUE8bDXPMUpzvAHK",
|
||||
"name": "Read",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/skill-home-tlU9KV/.gstack/projects/gstack-autoplan-chain-vsRLi1/autoplan-ceo-methodology-18ubmt/methodology.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:49:48.995Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Ka6V7YZUE8bDXPMUpzvAHK",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:50:05.840Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01EPJsbfuP2AkG5xd1UnE7by",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:50:07.127Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01EPJsbfuP2AkG5xd1UnE7by",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:50:12.591Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01P5dLF9x6fwc9E8xZ2DDpC6",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:50:14.189Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01P5dLF9x6fwc9E8xZ2DDpC6",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:50:30.927Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Y6GyLqvgAg37SN84oFZD68",
|
||||
"name": "Agent",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:50:32.740Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Y6GyLqvgAg37SN84oFZD68",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:52:38.111Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01WtC5jjpW3gVY5EvcNdkXXx",
|
||||
"name": "ToolSearch",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:52:38.121Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01WtC5jjpW3gVY5EvcNdkXXx",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:52:42.415Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_0183AuKCPX6znTPeg9BMri2w",
|
||||
"name": "WebSearch",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:52:43.163Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_018ufyfdCe5U68acnvMiwFKs",
|
||||
"name": "WebSearch",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:52:43.707Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_015bKTUMHXVmT7CZWzgT2PGV",
|
||||
"name": "WebSearch",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:52:51.819Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_018ufyfdCe5U68acnvMiwFKs",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:52:52.900Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_0183AuKCPX6znTPeg9BMri2w",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:52:53.732Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_015bKTUMHXVmT7CZWzgT2PGV",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:59:39.245Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01S8gEETEUak6BfKp6y5CAqN",
|
||||
"name": "Edit",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/with-skills/.claude/plans/sunny-finding-dream.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:59:39.462Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01S8gEETEUak6BfKp6y5CAqN",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:59:52.291Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01DkRocCqN5MdazseULTFerm",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:59:53.552Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01DkRocCqN5MdazseULTFerm",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:00:12.606Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01SWuZH2gyaG4QwturgjtEzt",
|
||||
"name": "Write",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/skill-home-tlU9KV/.gstack/projects/gstack-autoplan-chain-vsRLi1/ceo-plans/2026-09-10-user-dashboard.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:00:13.098Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01SWuZH2gyaG4QwturgjtEzt",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:00:34.490Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_018vPP2UP7WmsTPzq64n1G3s",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:00:35.938Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_018vPP2UP7WmsTPzq64n1G3s",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:00:48.117Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01DNWQECqjxGf5S3ap25yBhJ",
|
||||
"name": "Read",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/with-skills/.claude/plans/sunny-finding-dream.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:00:48.146Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01DNWQECqjxGf5S3ap25yBhJ",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:00:53.799Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01FoVuX88bg62y9a9Qgof995",
|
||||
"name": "Agent",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:00:55.225Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01FoVuX88bg62y9a9Qgof995",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:01:31.370Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01NapNQ6ov3pUU3c3MG97DiA",
|
||||
"name": "Edit",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/with-skills/.claude/plans/sunny-finding-dream.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:01:31.479Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01NapNQ6ov3pUU3c3MG97DiA",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:02:45.553Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01XQv7K1vKnemUfVLuDKjW7p",
|
||||
"name": "Write",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/skill-home-tlU9KV/.gstack/projects/gstack-autoplan-chain-vsRLi1/ceo-plans/2026-09-10-user-dashboard.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:02:49.971Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_011hFg2d83rdFAf3T8sSjWsF",
|
||||
"name": "Edit",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/with-skills/.claude/plans/sunny-finding-dream.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:02:50.543Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01XQv7K1vKnemUfVLuDKjW7p",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:02:50.624Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_011hFg2d83rdFAf3T8sSjWsF",
|
||||
"isError": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:02:54.824Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_014msgPz4KvJjQArBUGKjjJ1",
|
||||
"name": "Edit",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/with-skills/.claude/plans/sunny-finding-dream.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:02:54.970Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_014msgPz4KvJjQArBUGKjjJ1",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:03:07.338Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01TAtd9EwVcJ9HyGX6st1qr7",
|
||||
"name": "Edit",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/with-skills/.claude/plans/sunny-finding-dream.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:03:07.446Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01TAtd9EwVcJ9HyGX6st1qr7",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:03:14.019Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01WmxovbDi9VQ6DrFzQWNLi1",
|
||||
"name": "Agent",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:03:15.551Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01WmxovbDi9VQ6DrFzQWNLi1",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:03:25.444Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01UXtFixemkSKpgd7PLMBiEj",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:03:27.107Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01UXtFixemkSKpgd7PLMBiEj",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:04:45.433Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01FApJ4hHXSQy2Tzt7gae5fZ",
|
||||
"name": "Edit",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/with-skills/.claude/plans/sunny-finding-dream.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:04:45.547Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01FApJ4hHXSQy2Tzt7gae5fZ",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:04:48.443Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01N8fqcTLvLZifZJ3KaXjhbL",
|
||||
"name": "Edit",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/with-skills/.claude/plans/sunny-finding-dream.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:04:48.569Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01N8fqcTLvLZifZJ3KaXjhbL",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:04:51.196Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Beth2Lm36y9jeJycLm94tm",
|
||||
"name": "Edit",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/with-skills/.claude/plans/sunny-finding-dream.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:04:51.306Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Beth2Lm36y9jeJycLm94tm",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:05:33.620Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01B7PEBmP6cr8pmoTRCnLKNL",
|
||||
"name": "Write",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"file_path": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-zmS3XD/tmp/gstack-hermetic-4169247-CCA4dg/skill-home-tlU9KV/.gstack/projects/gstack-autoplan-chain-vsRLi1/ceo-plans/2026-09-10-user-dashboard.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:05:37.560Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Um2qzJbqPPfSBVavuWFGBi",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:05:38.124Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01B7PEBmP6cr8pmoTRCnLKNL",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:05:39.644Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Um2qzJbqPPfSBVavuWFGBi",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:06:05.977Z",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01MgiCeDxdSZjAjQ4dL1Wj6L",
|
||||
"name": "Agent",
|
||||
"input": {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "49915381-304b-4c53-a36f-b421aa5f153c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:06:07.884Z",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01MgiCeDxdSZjAjQ4dL1Wj6L",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
+175
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sourceHead": "8d8537e5d341cc9f3d186822f06efb245ec7b8fd",
|
||||
"observedOutcome": "no_review_questions",
|
||||
"observedReviewCount": 0,
|
||||
"calls": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c191a3d0-0cb5-4b6e-a843-1299e8f38bc1",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01FvGteHSWL6xHhZLbYEwdPm",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"header": "Routing",
|
||||
"question": "D1 \u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, CEO review of the payment test-coverage plan.\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \u2192 /investigate, ship \u2192 /ship, and so on). Without it you invoke skills by hand every time. This is a one-time, per-project prompt.\nStakes if we pick wrong: pick A and you get a short routing block appended and committed to CLAUDE.md (after plan mode ends, since plan mode blocks edits right now); pick B and nothing changes and the prompt never returns.\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make later reviews and ships one command instead of a lookup.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nPros / cons:\nA) Add routing rules (recommended)\n \u2705 Future sessions auto-route requests like 'review this diff' to the right gstack skill\n \u2705 One small committed block; teammates get the same routing when they clone\n \u274c Adds a chore commit to CLAUDE.md that must wait until this plan-mode review finishes\nB) No thanks, invoke skills manually\n \u2705 CLAUDE.md stays exactly as-is with no extra commit on this fixture repo\n \u2705 Prompt is suppressed for this project going forward via routing_declined\n \u274c Every gstack skill has to be typed by name for the life of the project\nNet: convenience for future sessions versus keeping this repo's CLAUDE.md untouched.",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "A) Add routing rules (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "Append the skill routing section to CLAUDE.md and commit it once plan mode ends."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "B) No thanks, manual",
|
||||
"description": "Set routing_declined=true; invoke gstack skills by name. Re-enable later via gstack-config."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"header": "Learnings",
|
||||
"question": "D2 \u2014 Enable cross-project learnings search?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, CEO review of the payment test-coverage plan.\nELI10: gstack records small lessons per project (pitfalls, command fixes). It can also search lessons from your other projects on this machine so a pattern learned elsewhere shows up here. Everything stays local; no data leaves the machine.\nStakes if we pick wrong: enable it on a machine holding multiple client codebases and one client's project quirks may surface in another's review; keep it scoped and you lose cross-pollination between your own repos.\nRecommendation: A because for a solo developer the extra recall is free and local.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nPros / cons:\nA) Enable cross-project learnings (recommended)\n \u2705 Lessons from your other repos on this machine surface in this project's reviews\n \u2705 Purely local search; nothing is uploaded or shared outside the machine\n \u274c On a shared machine with multiple clients, unrelated project quirks can bleed across\nB) Keep learnings project-scoped\n \u2705 Strict isolation: only this project's own learnings ever appear here\n \u2705 Safe default when you work across client codebases that must not mix\n \u274c Patterns you already learned in a sibling repo have to be rediscovered here\nNet: broader recall versus strict per-project isolation.",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "A) Enable cross-project (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "Set cross_project_learnings=true; search learnings across all local projects."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "B) Project-scoped only",
|
||||
"description": "Set cross_project_learnings=false; only this project's learnings are searched."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D1 \u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, CEO review of the payment test-coverage plan.\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \u2192 /investigate, ship \u2192 /ship, and so on). Without it you invoke skills by hand every time. This is a one-time, per-project prompt.\nStakes if we pick wrong: pick A and you get a short routing block appended and committed to CLAUDE.md (after plan mode ends, since plan mode blocks edits right now); pick B and nothing changes and the prompt never returns.\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make later reviews and ships one command instead of a lookup.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nPros / cons:\nA) Add routing rules (recommended)\n \u2705 Future sessions auto-route requests like 'review this diff' to the right gstack skill\n \u2705 One small committed block; teammates get the same routing when they clone\n \u274c Adds a chore commit to CLAUDE.md that must wait until this plan-mode review finishes\nB) No thanks, invoke skills manually\n \u2705 CLAUDE.md stays exactly as-is with no extra commit on this fixture repo\n \u2705 Prompt is suppressed for this project going forward via routing_declined\n \u274c Every gstack skill has to be typed by name for the life of the project\nNet: convenience for future sessions versus keeping this repo's CLAUDE.md untouched.": "A) Add routing rules (recommended)",
|
||||
"D2 \u2014 Enable cross-project learnings search?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, CEO review of the payment test-coverage plan.\nELI10: gstack records small lessons per project (pitfalls, command fixes). It can also search lessons from your other projects on this machine so a pattern learned elsewhere shows up here. Everything stays local; no data leaves the machine.\nStakes if we pick wrong: enable it on a machine holding multiple client codebases and one client's project quirks may surface in another's review; keep it scoped and you lose cross-pollination between your own repos.\nRecommendation: A because for a solo developer the extra recall is free and local.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nPros / cons:\nA) Enable cross-project learnings (recommended)\n \u2705 Lessons from your other repos on this machine surface in this project's reviews\n \u2705 Purely local search; nothing is uploaded or shared outside the machine\n \u274c On a shared machine with multiple clients, unrelated project quirks can bleed across\nB) Keep learnings project-scoped\n \u2705 Strict isolation: only this project's own learnings ever appear here\n \u2705 Safe default when you work across client codebases that must not mix\n \u274c Patterns you already learned in a sibling repo have to be rediscovered here\nNet: broader recall versus strict per-project isolation.": "A) Enable cross-project (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T01:56:40.340Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c191a3d0-0cb5-4b6e-a843-1299e8f38bc1",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01TnZyN2iBDdvyhRQe1FtPEq",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"header": "Approach",
|
||||
"question": "D3 \u2014 Which implementation structure for the two new processPayment tests?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, HOLD SCOPE CEO review of the payment test-coverage plan.\nELI10: We are adding two tests to an existing suite. The only real structural question is whether the checks live inline in each test, or whether we first add small reusable assertion helpers to the shared payment test factory. Assertion content (what each test actually checks) is decided separately, finding by finding, later in the review.\nStakes if we pick wrong: over-abstract and we touch a shared factory for two call sites; under-abstract and a future third retry test copies the attempt/backoff checks.\nRecommendation: A because two call sites do not justify a shared helper yet, and A keeps the diff to tests only, matching the plan's 'production and factory unchanged' framing (engineered enough, right-sized diff).\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=10/10, C=4/10\nPros / cons:\nA) Inline tests in existing processPayment suite (recommended) (human: ~30 min / CC: ~3 min)\n \u2705 Smallest diff: two `it` blocks using the factory, mock history and sleeper directly\n \u2705 Every stated contract can be asserted inline with no new abstraction to maintain\n \u274c A third retry-shaped test later would repeat the attempt-count and backoff checks\nB) Inline tests plus shared helpers in the factory (human: ~1 h / CC: ~6 min)\n \u2705 expectReceipt/expectRetryExhausted give one home for 'attempts vs retries' semantics\n \u2705 Existing 502-recovery test could adopt the same helper later for consistency\n \u274c Changes the shared factory other suites import, widening a 'tests only' change\nC) Place the tests in the Stripe adapter suite (human: ~30 min / CC: ~3 min)\n \u2705 Sits next to the existing 502-recovery and 429 tests for discoverability\n \u2705 Reuses the adapter suite's mock arrangement helpers directly\n \u274c Wrong layer: the adapter cannot observe receipt assembly or PaymentUnavailable, so the caller's contracts stay unpinned\nNet: A pins the contracts with the least surface; B buys reuse we do not need yet; C loses the caller-level coverage the plan exists to add.",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "A) Inline in processPayment suite (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "Two it blocks, factory/mock/sleeper used directly, assertions inline. Tests-only diff."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "B) Inline + factory helpers",
|
||||
"description": "Add expectReceipt and expectRetryExhausted helpers to the payment test factory; tests call them."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "C) Stripe adapter suite",
|
||||
"description": "Add the tests alongside adapter tests. Loses caller-level observation of receipt and PaymentUnavailable."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D3 \u2014 Which implementation structure for the two new processPayment tests?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, HOLD SCOPE CEO review of the payment test-coverage plan.\nELI10: We are adding two tests to an existing suite. The only real structural question is whether the checks live inline in each test, or whether we first add small reusable assertion helpers to the shared payment test factory. Assertion content (what each test actually checks) is decided separately, finding by finding, later in the review.\nStakes if we pick wrong: over-abstract and we touch a shared factory for two call sites; under-abstract and a future third retry test copies the attempt/backoff checks.\nRecommendation: A because two call sites do not justify a shared helper yet, and A keeps the diff to tests only, matching the plan's 'production and factory unchanged' framing (engineered enough, right-sized diff).\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=10/10, C=4/10\nPros / cons:\nA) Inline tests in existing processPayment suite (recommended) (human: ~30 min / CC: ~3 min)\n \u2705 Smallest diff: two `it` blocks using the factory, mock history and sleeper directly\n \u2705 Every stated contract can be asserted inline with no new abstraction to maintain\n \u274c A third retry-shaped test later would repeat the attempt-count and backoff checks\nB) Inline tests plus shared helpers in the factory (human: ~1 h / CC: ~6 min)\n \u2705 expectReceipt/expectRetryExhausted give one home for 'attempts vs retries' semantics\n \u2705 Existing 502-recovery test could adopt the same helper later for consistency\n \u274c Changes the shared factory other suites import, widening a 'tests only' change\nC) Place the tests in the Stripe adapter suite (human: ~30 min / CC: ~3 min)\n \u2705 Sits next to the existing 502-recovery and 429 tests for discoverability\n \u2705 Reuses the adapter suite's mock arrangement helpers directly\n \u274c Wrong layer: the adapter cannot observe receipt assembly or PaymentUnavailable, so the caller's contracts stay unpinned\nNet: A pins the contracts with the least surface; B buys reuse we do not need yet; C loses the caller-level coverage the plan exists to add.": "A) Inline in processPayment suite (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T01:58:23.098Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c191a3d0-0cb5-4b6e-a843-1299e8f38bc1",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_014sQPk2u6cRqzr7L6nnZJok",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"header": "Finding 1",
|
||||
"question": "D4 \u2014 Test 1 asserts only that the receipt is truthy, but the contract is an exact receipt. Fix the assertion?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, HOLD SCOPE CEO review; PLAN.md lines 30-32 vs the contract on lines 18-21.\nELI10: The plan says a 1000-cent USD charge must return exactly { chargeId: \"ch_paid\", amountCents: 1000, currency: \"USD\" }. The proposed test only checks that some receipt came back. A receipt with amountCents 100000, currency \"usd\", or chargeId undefined would pass. That is a silent failure: the test is green while the customer is charged or shown the wrong amount.\nStakes if we pick wrong: a regression in receipt assembly (wrong amount, wrong currency, missing charge id) ships with a passing suite and is found by a customer or by finance reconciliation.\nRecommendation: 1A because the plan already states the exact expected value; translating it into a deep-equality assertion is the only assertion that rejects a wrong result (zero silent failures, well-tested code is non-negotiable).\nCompleteness: 1A=10/10, 1B=7/10, 1C=2/10\nPros / cons:\n1A) Deep-equal the whole receipt (recommended) (human: ~5 min / CC: <1 min)\n \u2705 Rejects wrong amount, wrong currency, wrong or missing chargeId, and extra keys in one assertion\n \u2705 Failure output shows the full expected-vs-actual diff, so the regression is diagnosable from CI alone\n \u274c If the receipt legitimately gains a field later, this test must be updated (that is the point)\n1B) Assert the three fields individually, ignore extra keys (human: ~5 min / CC: <1 min)\n \u2705 Still rejects a wrong amount, currency or chargeId\n \u2705 Tolerates additive fields on the receipt without touching this test\n \u274c Lets an unexpected extra key (for example a leaked raw Stripe object) pass unnoticed\n1C) Keep truthy-only as planned (human: 0 / CC: 0)\n \u2705 Smallest possible test body\n \u2705 Cannot flake on receipt shape changes\n \u274c Accepts any non-null value, so it cannot detect a single receipt regression the plan claims to cover\nNet: 1A turns the plan's stated contract into the test; 1C leaves the contract stated but unenforced.",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "1A) Deep-equal receipt (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "expect(receipt).toEqual({ chargeId: \"ch_paid\", amountCents: 1000, currency: \"USD\" }). Strict value match."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "1B) Assert three fields",
|
||||
"description": "Check chargeId, amountCents, currency individually; allow additional keys on the receipt."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "1C) Keep truthy-only",
|
||||
"description": "Leave the plan as written. Receipt contract stays stated but not enforced by the test."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D4 \u2014 Test 1 asserts only that the receipt is truthy, but the contract is an exact receipt. Fix the assertion?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, HOLD SCOPE CEO review; PLAN.md lines 30-32 vs the contract on lines 18-21.\nELI10: The plan says a 1000-cent USD charge must return exactly { chargeId: \"ch_paid\", amountCents: 1000, currency: \"USD\" }. The proposed test only checks that some receipt came back. A receipt with amountCents 100000, currency \"usd\", or chargeId undefined would pass. That is a silent failure: the test is green while the customer is charged or shown the wrong amount.\nStakes if we pick wrong: a regression in receipt assembly (wrong amount, wrong currency, missing charge id) ships with a passing suite and is found by a customer or by finance reconciliation.\nRecommendation: 1A because the plan already states the exact expected value; translating it into a deep-equality assertion is the only assertion that rejects a wrong result (zero silent failures, well-tested code is non-negotiable).\nCompleteness: 1A=10/10, 1B=7/10, 1C=2/10\nPros / cons:\n1A) Deep-equal the whole receipt (recommended) (human: ~5 min / CC: <1 min)\n \u2705 Rejects wrong amount, wrong currency, wrong or missing chargeId, and extra keys in one assertion\n \u2705 Failure output shows the full expected-vs-actual diff, so the regression is diagnosable from CI alone\n \u274c If the receipt legitimately gains a field later, this test must be updated (that is the point)\n1B) Assert the three fields individually, ignore extra keys (human: ~5 min / CC: <1 min)\n \u2705 Still rejects a wrong amount, currency or chargeId\n \u2705 Tolerates additive fields on the receipt without touching this test\n \u274c Lets an unexpected extra key (for example a leaked raw Stripe object) pass unnoticed\n1C) Keep truthy-only as planned (human: 0 / CC: 0)\n \u2705 Smallest possible test body\n \u2705 Cannot flake on receipt shape changes\n \u274c Accepts any non-null value, so it cannot detect a single receipt regression the plan claims to cover\nNet: 1A turns the plan's stated contract into the test; 1C leaves the contract stated but unenforced.": "1A) Deep-equal receipt (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T01:59:11.526Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c191a3d0-0cb5-4b6e-a843-1299e8f38bc1",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Pe6mNvqVGsedqVtfhdTH38",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"header": "Finding 2",
|
||||
"question": "D5 \u2014 Test 2 asserts only the PaymentUnavailable rejection, but the contract is exactly two attempts and one recorded 100 ms backoff. Fix the assertion?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, HOLD SCOPE CEO review; PLAN.md lines 33-36 vs the contract on lines 22-23.\nELI10: The plan says that with max_retries=1 and two 502s, processPayment must try Stripe exactly twice, wait once for 100 ms (recorded by the virtual sleeper, not actually slept), then reject with PaymentUnavailable. The proposed test only checks the rejection. Code that gives up after one attempt, or retries five times, or skips the backoff entirely, would still reject with PaymentUnavailable and the test would pass. The factory already exposes the mock call history and the sleeper record, so the checks cost one line each.\nStakes if we pick wrong: a retry regression (no retry, runaway retry hammering Stripe during an outage, or zero backoff) ships green; users see slower or spurious failures and Stripe sees a retry storm.\nRecommendation: 2A because the contract states exact counts, exact counts must not be weakened to lower bounds, and the probes already exist in the factory (zero silent failures, handle more edge cases).\nCompleteness: 2A=10/10, 2B=6/10, 2C=2/10\nPros / cons:\n2A) Assert rejection type + exactly 2 mock calls + sleeper record equals [100] (recommended) (human: ~10 min / CC: ~1 min)\n \u2705 Rejects under-retry, over-retry and missing or wrong backoff, each with a distinct failing line\n \u2705 Matching PaymentUnavailable by class (not message text) keeps the test stable if wording changes\n \u274c Depends on the sleeper record shape; implementer must read the factory to spell the exact expectation\n2B) Assert rejection type + exactly 2 mock calls, skip the sleeper check (human: ~5 min / CC: <1 min)\n \u2705 Catches under- and over-retry, the two most user-visible regressions\n \u2705 One fewer factory detail to depend on\n \u274c The stated 100 ms backoff stays unenforced; a zero-delay retry storm passes\n2C) Keep rejection-only as planned (human: 0 / CC: 0)\n \u2705 Smallest test body, no dependency on mock or sleeper internals\n \u2705 Still proves the terminal error class\n \u274c Cannot distinguish correct retry behaviour from no retry, runaway retry or no backoff\nNet: 2A enforces the whole stated retry contract with probes the factory already exposes; 2C proves only the last line of it.",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "2A) Type + 2 calls + [100] backoff (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "rejects.toBeInstanceOf(PaymentUnavailable); mock history length === 2; sleeper record deep-equals [100]."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "2B) Type + 2 calls only",
|
||||
"description": "Assert rejection class and exactly two Stripe attempts; leave the backoff record unchecked."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "2C) Keep rejection-only",
|
||||
"description": "Leave the plan as written. Attempt count and backoff stay stated but not enforced."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D5 \u2014 Test 2 asserts only the PaymentUnavailable rejection, but the contract is exactly two attempts and one recorded 100 ms backoff. Fix the assertion?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, HOLD SCOPE CEO review; PLAN.md lines 33-36 vs the contract on lines 22-23.\nELI10: The plan says that with max_retries=1 and two 502s, processPayment must try Stripe exactly twice, wait once for 100 ms (recorded by the virtual sleeper, not actually slept), then reject with PaymentUnavailable. The proposed test only checks the rejection. Code that gives up after one attempt, or retries five times, or skips the backoff entirely, would still reject with PaymentUnavailable and the test would pass. The factory already exposes the mock call history and the sleeper record, so the checks cost one line each.\nStakes if we pick wrong: a retry regression (no retry, runaway retry hammering Stripe during an outage, or zero backoff) ships green; users see slower or spurious failures and Stripe sees a retry storm.\nRecommendation: 2A because the contract states exact counts, exact counts must not be weakened to lower bounds, and the probes already exist in the factory (zero silent failures, handle more edge cases).\nCompleteness: 2A=10/10, 2B=6/10, 2C=2/10\nPros / cons:\n2A) Assert rejection type + exactly 2 mock calls + sleeper record equals [100] (recommended) (human: ~10 min / CC: ~1 min)\n \u2705 Rejects under-retry, over-retry and missing or wrong backoff, each with a distinct failing line\n \u2705 Matching PaymentUnavailable by class (not message text) keeps the test stable if wording changes\n \u274c Depends on the sleeper record shape; implementer must read the factory to spell the exact expectation\n2B) Assert rejection type + exactly 2 mock calls, skip the sleeper check (human: ~5 min / CC: <1 min)\n \u2705 Catches under- and over-retry, the two most user-visible regressions\n \u2705 One fewer factory detail to depend on\n \u274c The stated 100 ms backoff stays unenforced; a zero-delay retry storm passes\n2C) Keep rejection-only as planned (human: 0 / CC: 0)\n \u2705 Smallest test body, no dependency on mock or sleeper internals\n \u2705 Still proves the terminal error class\n \u274c Cannot distinguish correct retry behaviour from no retry, runaway retry or no backoff\nNet: 2A enforces the whole stated retry contract with probes the factory already exposes; 2C proves only the last line of it.": "2A) Type + 2 calls + [100] backoff (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T01:59:33.724Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c191a3d0-0cb5-4b6e-a843-1299e8f38bc1",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01ED2c6H4JDQq9YjezDnNzfw",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"header": "Finding 3",
|
||||
"question": "D6 \u2014 Section 6 (Tests): test 1 never checks how many times Stripe was charged on the success path. Add an exactly-one-attempt check?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, HOLD SCOPE CEO review; PLAN.md lines 30-32, hostile-QA pass on the success test.\nELI10: With 1A approved, test 1 proves the receipt is right. It still does not prove Stripe was charged once. If a retry-loop bug charged twice and returned the second receipt, the receipt would still equal { ch_paid, 1000, USD } and the test would pass while the customer is double-charged. The factory already exposes the mock call history and sleeper record, so the check is two lines: exactly one charge attempt, empty backoff record. This is beyond the plan's literally stated success contract, which is why it is a separate decision rather than folded into 1A.\nStakes if we pick wrong: add it and the test also guards the worst payment failure (double charge) for two lines; skip it and that failure mode relies on the adapter suite, which cannot observe processPayment's loop.\nRecommendation: 3A because a double charge is the highest-impact silent failure on a payment path and the probe is already in hand; it does not touch production code or add scope beyond the two planned tests (err toward handling more edge cases).\nCompleteness: 3A=10/10, 3B=7/10\nPros / cons:\n3A) Also assert exactly 1 Stripe call and an empty sleeper record (recommended) (human: ~5 min / CC: <1 min)\n \u2705 Rejects a double charge and any spurious backoff on the happy path, the two worst success-path regressions\n \u2705 Uses the same factory probes test 2 already relies on, so the two tests read symmetrically\n \u274c Goes one step past the plan's literal success contract; the plan text should record that the success path is single-attempt\n3B) Keep test 1 to the receipt assertion only (human: 0 / CC: 0)\n \u2705 Test 1 stays exactly the stated contract, nothing more\n \u2705 One fewer factory detail for the success test to depend on\n \u274c A retry-loop bug that charges twice and returns the second receipt passes this suite\nNet: two lines to close the double-charge hole versus keeping test 1 to the letter of the stated contract.",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "3A) Assert 1 call, empty backoff (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "In test 1 also expect mock history length === 1 and sleeper record toEqual([]). Record single-attempt success in the plan."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "3B) Receipt assertion only",
|
||||
"description": "Leave test 1 at 1A. Double-charge on the success path stays unguarded at the processPayment layer."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D6 \u2014 Section 6 (Tests): test 1 never checks how many times Stripe was charged on the success path. Add an exactly-one-attempt check?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, HOLD SCOPE CEO review; PLAN.md lines 30-32, hostile-QA pass on the success test.\nELI10: With 1A approved, test 1 proves the receipt is right. It still does not prove Stripe was charged once. If a retry-loop bug charged twice and returned the second receipt, the receipt would still equal { ch_paid, 1000, USD } and the test would pass while the customer is double-charged. The factory already exposes the mock call history and sleeper record, so the check is two lines: exactly one charge attempt, empty backoff record. This is beyond the plan's literally stated success contract, which is why it is a separate decision rather than folded into 1A.\nStakes if we pick wrong: add it and the test also guards the worst payment failure (double charge) for two lines; skip it and that failure mode relies on the adapter suite, which cannot observe processPayment's loop.\nRecommendation: 3A because a double charge is the highest-impact silent failure on a payment path and the probe is already in hand; it does not touch production code or add scope beyond the two planned tests (err toward handling more edge cases).\nCompleteness: 3A=10/10, 3B=7/10\nPros / cons:\n3A) Also assert exactly 1 Stripe call and an empty sleeper record (recommended) (human: ~5 min / CC: <1 min)\n \u2705 Rejects a double charge and any spurious backoff on the happy path, the two worst success-path regressions\n \u2705 Uses the same factory probes test 2 already relies on, so the two tests read symmetrically\n \u274c Goes one step past the plan's literal success contract; the plan text should record that the success path is single-attempt\n3B) Keep test 1 to the receipt assertion only (human: 0 / CC: 0)\n \u2705 Test 1 stays exactly the stated contract, nothing more\n \u2705 One fewer factory detail for the success test to depend on\n \u274c A retry-loop bug that charges twice and returns the second receipt passes this suite\nNet: two lines to close the double-charge hole versus keeping test 1 to the letter of the stated contract.": "3A) Assert 1 call, empty backoff (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T02:00:23.704Z"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
+131
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sourceHead": "8d8537e5d341cc9f3d186822f06efb245ec7b8fd",
|
||||
"observedOutcome": "no_review_questions",
|
||||
"observedReviewCount": 0,
|
||||
"calls": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "5311fa3e-a775-4865-840f-d11a8e890a23",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01NHQXhqHqGcPXE6LpoFSqDi",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Note: plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after this review exits plan mode.)",
|
||||
"header": "Routing",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "Appends a '## Skill routing' section mapping request types to gstack skills, then commits it. One-time per project."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually",
|
||||
"description": "Sets routing_declined=true in gstack config. Re-enable later via gstack-config set routing_declined false."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Note: plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after this review exits plan mode.)": "Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T01:48:03.927Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "5311fa3e-a775-4865-840f-d11a8e890a23",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_011uiqpgBypMdzfSv8sRdqtz",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "D1 \u2014 How should the two new processPayment tests be structured?\nProject/branch/task: main branch, adding two unit tests to the existing processPayment suite.\nELI10: We are adding two tests that pin down what processPayment already does. The only structural choice is where the tests live and whether we build any shared scaffolding for them. All options reuse the existing factory, Stripe mock and virtual sleeper; none touch production code. Assertion strength is reviewed separately in later sections, one finding at a time.\nStakes if we pick wrong: over-building scaffolding for two tests adds maintenance with no coverage gain; under-building is not a risk here since the factory already exists.\nRecommendation: A because it is the smallest diff that cleanly expresses the change and reuses the suite's existing setup (right-sized diff, DRY).\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: two inline tests versus premature shared fixtures for a two-test change.",
|
||||
"header": "Approach",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "A) Two inline tests in existing suite (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "Add two `it` blocks to the current processPayment suite, each arranging the Stripe mock via the existing factory. Effort: S (human ~1h / CC ~5min). Risk: Low. Reuses factory, mock, sleeper as-is. \u2705 Smallest diff, sits beside related tests, zero new abstractions. \u2705 Implementer needs no new helpers or files. \u274c Expected contract values are literals in the test rather than shared constants."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "B) Shared contract fixture + two tests",
|
||||
"description": "Extract a `chargeContract` fixture (expected receipt, expected attempts, expected backoff) reused by the processPayment suite and the Stripe adapter suite, then write the two tests against it. Effort: M (human ~3h / CC ~15min). Risk: Low-Med. \u2705 Contract values live once across suites. \u2705 Future contract tests slot in. \u274c Premature abstraction for two tests; touches the adapter suite the plan says stays as-is."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "C) New dedicated contract spec file",
|
||||
"description": "Create a separate processPayment.contract spec file with its own setup for the two tests. Effort: S-M (human ~2h / CC ~10min). Risk: Low. \u2705 Isolates contract tests from behavior tests. \u2705 Clear place for future contract cases. \u274c Duplicates the suite's factory setup and splits processPayment coverage across two files."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D1 \u2014 How should the two new processPayment tests be structured?\nProject/branch/task: main branch, adding two unit tests to the existing processPayment suite.\nELI10: We are adding two tests that pin down what processPayment already does. The only structural choice is where the tests live and whether we build any shared scaffolding for them. All options reuse the existing factory, Stripe mock and virtual sleeper; none touch production code. Assertion strength is reviewed separately in later sections, one finding at a time.\nStakes if we pick wrong: over-building scaffolding for two tests adds maintenance with no coverage gain; under-building is not a risk here since the factory already exists.\nRecommendation: A because it is the smallest diff that cleanly expresses the change and reuses the suite's existing setup (right-sized diff, DRY).\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: two inline tests versus premature shared fixtures for a two-test change.": "A) Two inline tests in existing suite (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T01:51:02.100Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "5311fa3e-a775-4865-840f-d11a8e890a23",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01M1ghsiVvKqEPyoBgXq7fhK",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "D2 \u2014 Issue 1: test 2 (repeated 502) cannot detect retry or backoff regressions\nProject/branch/task: main branch, processPayment unit coverage, the repeated-502 test.\nELI10: The contract says: on two 502s, processPayment tries Stripe exactly twice, waits one recorded 100 ms between tries, then fails with PaymentUnavailable. The planned test only checks the final failure. A change that retries zero times, retries five times, or sleeps for 5 seconds still fails with PaymentUnavailable, so the test stays green while the contract is broken. The factory already exposes the mock call history and the sleeper record, so the missing checks are cheap.\nStakes if we pick wrong: a retry-budget or backoff regression on the payment path ships undetected; users see slower or double-charged-looking failures and the test suite says nothing.\nRecommendation: 1A because the plan states an exact count and an exact delay, and a test that cannot reject a wrong count is not coverage of that contract (well-tested code is non-negotiable; explicit over clever).\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=6/10, C=3/10\nNet: pin the whole stated contract now for a few extra lines, or keep a test that only proves the error class.",
|
||||
"header": "Issue 1",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "1A) Assert error, exact 2 attempts, sleeper record [100] (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "Arrange two 502s with the mock configured to fail loudly on any third call; assert rejection is PaymentUnavailable; assert Stripe mock call history length is exactly 2; assert the virtual sleeper record is exactly one entry of 100 ms. Failure output names which of the three broke. Effort: human ~20min / CC ~2min. \u2705 Rejects zero-retry, over-retry and wrong-backoff regressions. \u2705 Uses only existing factory probes; no new helpers. \u274c A deliberate future change to the retry budget must update this test too."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "1B) Assert error and exact 2 attempts only",
|
||||
"description": "Add the call-history length check but leave the backoff delay unasserted. Effort: human ~10min / CC ~1min. \u2705 Catches retry-count regressions. \u2705 Slightly smaller test. \u274c A regression to 0 ms or 5000 ms backoff still passes; the stated 100 ms contract stays unguarded."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "1C) Keep as planned: error class only",
|
||||
"description": "Assert only that processPayment rejects with PaymentUnavailable. Effort: none. \u2705 Smallest possible test. \u2705 Still proves the terminal error class. \u274c Any retry or backoff regression passes; the plan's own stated contract for attempts and backoff has no coverage."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D2 \u2014 Issue 1: test 2 (repeated 502) cannot detect retry or backoff regressions\nProject/branch/task: main branch, processPayment unit coverage, the repeated-502 test.\nELI10: The contract says: on two 502s, processPayment tries Stripe exactly twice, waits one recorded 100 ms between tries, then fails with PaymentUnavailable. The planned test only checks the final failure. A change that retries zero times, retries five times, or sleeps for 5 seconds still fails with PaymentUnavailable, so the test stays green while the contract is broken. The factory already exposes the mock call history and the sleeper record, so the missing checks are cheap.\nStakes if we pick wrong: a retry-budget or backoff regression on the payment path ships undetected; users see slower or double-charged-looking failures and the test suite says nothing.\nRecommendation: 1A because the plan states an exact count and an exact delay, and a test that cannot reject a wrong count is not coverage of that contract (well-tested code is non-negotiable; explicit over clever).\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=6/10, C=3/10\nNet: pin the whole stated contract now for a few extra lines, or keep a test that only proves the error class.": "1A) Assert error, exact 2 attempts, sleeper record [100] (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T01:51:45.799Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "5311fa3e-a775-4865-840f-d11a8e890a23",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01PAebxxghdR9Thch3JtW4bu",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "D3 \u2014 Issue 2: test 1 (successful charge) accepts any truthy value as a correct receipt\nProject/branch/task: main branch, processPayment unit coverage, the successful-charge test.\nELI10: The contract says a 1000-cent USD charge with Stripe id ch_paid returns exactly { chargeId: \"ch_paid\", amountCents: 1000, currency: \"USD\" }. The planned test only checks that the result is truthy. An empty object, a receipt with chargeId undefined, amountCents 10.00, or currency \"usd\" all pass. The test would be green while every field in the stated contract is wrong.\nStakes if we pick wrong: a receipt-shape regression (wrong id, wrong amount, wrong currency) reaches customers and downstream accounting while the suite reports success.\nRecommendation: 2A because the plan already states the exact expected receipt, and a deep-equality assertion is the direct translation of that contract (well-tested code is non-negotiable; explicit over clever).\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=7/10, C=2/10\nNet: one deep-equality line that pins the whole receipt, versus a smoke check that proves almost nothing.",
|
||||
"header": "Issue 2",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "2A) Deep-equal the full receipt (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "Assert the returned receipt deep-equals { chargeId: \"ch_paid\", amountCents: 1000, currency: \"USD\" }. Rejects missing, extra, or wrong-typed fields and prints a field-level diff on failure. Effort: human ~10min / CC ~1min. \u2705 Every stated field and type is pinned in one assertion. \u2705 Extra unexpected fields are caught too. \u274c Adding a field to the receipt later requires updating this expectation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "2B) Assert the three fields individually",
|
||||
"description": "Assert chargeId, amountCents and currency each equal the expected value; ignore any other fields. Effort: human ~10min / CC ~1min. \u2705 Pins all three stated values. \u2705 Tolerates additive receipt fields without test changes. \u274c An unexpected extra or renamed field on the receipt passes silently."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "2C) Keep as planned: truthy only",
|
||||
"description": "Assert only that the receipt is truthy. Effort: none. \u2705 Smallest possible test. \u2705 Proves the call resolves. \u274c Any wrong chargeId, amount, or currency passes; the plan's stated receipt contract has no coverage."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D3 \u2014 Issue 2: test 1 (successful charge) accepts any truthy value as a correct receipt\nProject/branch/task: main branch, processPayment unit coverage, the successful-charge test.\nELI10: The contract says a 1000-cent USD charge with Stripe id ch_paid returns exactly { chargeId: \"ch_paid\", amountCents: 1000, currency: \"USD\" }. The planned test only checks that the result is truthy. An empty object, a receipt with chargeId undefined, amountCents 10.00, or currency \"usd\" all pass. The test would be green while every field in the stated contract is wrong.\nStakes if we pick wrong: a receipt-shape regression (wrong id, wrong amount, wrong currency) reaches customers and downstream accounting while the suite reports success.\nRecommendation: 2A because the plan already states the exact expected receipt, and a deep-equality assertion is the direct translation of that contract (well-tested code is non-negotiable; explicit over clever).\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=7/10, C=2/10\nNet: one deep-equality line that pins the whole receipt, versus a smoke check that proves almost nothing.": "2A) Deep-equal the full receipt (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T01:52:17.451Z"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
+58
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"provenance": {
|
||||
"source": ".context/ship-source-ag-delta-paid-20260910-v1/mode-hold-first-evidence-v1/observation.json",
|
||||
"sha256": "b910133feb5451f3619617b04fc5aa09b94593616bdb3be1149e0de3292622c6",
|
||||
"sourceCommit": "8d8537e5d341cc9f3d186822f06efb245ec7b8fd",
|
||||
"actualState": "failed",
|
||||
"projection": "Exact parsed public mode call and assistant message; surrounding setup and unrelated decisions omitted. No private blocks included."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"selectionStartedAt": 1789005223823,
|
||||
"transcript": {
|
||||
"status": "ready",
|
||||
"calls": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "4ed728c7-5e5f-437a-9037-a83ea82de1a6",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_011bt3yabPDSEsPNm97EhqV4",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "D2 \u2014 Which review mode should I apply to this plan? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-mode>\nProject/branch/task: main, reviewing PLAN.md (saved project views) with approach B (canonical validated view entity) approved.\nELI10: The approach is settled. Now choose my posture for the rest of the review. I can push the plan bigger and pitch every expansion for your approval, hold the current scope as the baseline and let you cherry-pick extras one at a time, hold scope with no extras and only harden it, or strip it to the smallest version that still fixes the pain. Every scope change in every mode is your explicit opt-in.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Too ambitious and the two-week pilot ships late with features nobody asked for. Too narrow and we ship a picker that cannot be updated in place, the failure the research flags most.\nRecommendation: Selective Expansion because this is a feature added to an existing task list: the baseline scope is sound, and there are a handful of small adjacent wins (default view, deep link, shared views) worth an individual yes or no.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: how much I argue for more versus how much I only harden what is already written.",
|
||||
"header": "Review mode",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "Selective Expansion (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Baseline scope reviewed with full rigor; nothing added without your explicit yes.\n\u2705 Each expansion candidate shown individually with effort and risk, neutral posture.\n\u274c More decision prompts than Hold Scope; you must judge each cherry-pick."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "Scope Expansion",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 I describe the 10x version and pitch each expansion enthusiastically.\n\u2705 Best if you want saved views to become the primary navigation model now.\n\u274c Risks a much bigger first release before the pilot proves demand."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "Hold Scope",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Maximum rigor on exactly what PLAN.md says; no expansions surfaced at all.\n\u2705 Fewest decisions; fastest path to a bulletproof baseline.\n\u274c Adjacent 30-minute wins like a default view or deep links go unmentioned."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "Scope Reduction",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Finds the smallest version that still removes the filter-rebuilding pain.\n\u2705 Fastest pilot; defers anything not essential to a follow-up.\n\u274c Approach B's validator and dirty-state UI may get cut, reintroducing silent breakage."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D2 \u2014 Which review mode should I apply to this plan? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-mode>\nProject/branch/task: main, reviewing PLAN.md (saved project views) with approach B (canonical validated view entity) approved.\nELI10: The approach is settled. Now choose my posture for the rest of the review. I can push the plan bigger and pitch every expansion for your approval, hold the current scope as the baseline and let you cherry-pick extras one at a time, hold scope with no extras and only harden it, or strip it to the smallest version that still fixes the pain. Every scope change in every mode is your explicit opt-in.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Too ambitious and the two-week pilot ships late with features nobody asked for. Too narrow and we ship a picker that cannot be updated in place, the failure the research flags most.\nRecommendation: Selective Expansion because this is a feature added to an existing task list: the baseline scope is sound, and there are a handful of small adjacent wins (default view, deep link, shared views) worth an individual yes or no.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: how much I argue for more versus how much I only harden what is already written.": "Hold Scope"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T01:53:43.872Z"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"assistantMessages": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "4ed728c7-5e5f-437a-9037-a83ea82de1a6",
|
||||
"text": "I'm locking scope to the four PLAN.md bullets from approach B, flagging anything beyond that (defaults, sharing, deep links) as out of scope, and hunting for silent failure modes\u2014constraints, error handling, UI edge cases, access-rule leaks\u2014that need explicit yes/no repairs. The file count (10\u201312) crosses the smell line but is justified by standard layering, so next I'll surface the implementer's hour-2 decisions one at a time, starting with whether to defer the position column.\n\n",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:54:26.393Z"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
+126
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"scope": "Exact owned public assistant and Skill-use/result projection. Full source snapshots retain Write/results separately. No private text.",
|
||||
"observations": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"source": {
|
||||
"path": ".context/ship-source-ag-delta-paid-20260910-v1/design-plan-mode-evidence-v1/plan-design-review-1789007179653-n3jdJd.json",
|
||||
"sha256": "9c5b3d45dd34f975ab6b28e8573d93525cd5476da6fdf2592b65666cb34fcece"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"opts": {
|
||||
"seed": "\n# Plan: Marketing landing page\n\n## Layout\nAll headings, taglines, and body copy will be center-aligned for a\n\"clean modern look.\" The hero h1 sits 8px above the subhead; the CTA\nbutton has the same visual weight as the \"Learn more\" link beside it.\n\n## Pages\n- / (hero, 3-column features grid, testimonials carousel, footer)\n- /pricing (3 tier cards)\n\n## States\nOnly the happy path is designed. No empty states, no error states,\nno loading states. Mobile: \"stacks on mobile.\"\n",
|
||||
"skillName": "plan-design-review",
|
||||
"sessionId": "9d275b27-7c60-4f06-b2af-82617b1c5e2c",
|
||||
"commandStartedAt": 1789007077511
|
||||
},
|
||||
"transcript": {
|
||||
"status": "ready",
|
||||
"calls": [],
|
||||
"assistantMessages": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "9d275b27-7c60-4f06-b2af-82617b1c5e2c",
|
||||
"text": "I'll run the design review skill on your draft landing page plan.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:24:42.925Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "9d275b27-7c60-4f06-b2af-82617b1c5e2c",
|
||||
"text": "Running the skill preamble first.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:24:48.496Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "9d275b27-7c60-4f06-b2af-82617b1c5e2c",
|
||||
"text": "A DESIGN.md exists, so every design call will calibrate against it. Reading it plus the design-related TODOs.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:25:15.585Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "9d275b27-7c60-4f06-b2af-82617b1c5e2c",
|
||||
"text": "Audit done. Writing the initial plan artifact (your draft copied verbatim, gaps recorded as pending), then Step 0.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:25:28.973Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "9d275b27-7c60-4f06-b2af-82617b1c5e2c",
|
||||
"text": "**Pre-review audit findings**\n\n- **UI scope:** two marketing pages, `/` and `/pricing`. Design review applies.\n- **DESIGN.md exists** and is specific: Industrial/Utilitarian, dark default, amber accent used sparingly, Satoshi display + DM Sans body + JetBrains Mono as the personality font, 4px spacing base, 12-col grid at 1200px, and an explicit \"editorial hero for landing page\" layout direction. The draft plan contradicts it on several points.\n- **Prior design reviews:** none logged for this branch. Recent commits are all eval infrastructure, so nothing to be extra aggressive about.\n- **Designer binary:** `DESIGN_READY`. Mockups will be generated after Step 0.\n- **Base branch:** `main` (GitHub).\n\n**Step 0A. Initial design rating: 2/10 on design completeness.**\n\nIt's a 2 because the plan names page sections, but every actual design decision it does make is wrong or missing. \"Clean modern look\" is a vibe, not a decision. Center-aligning everything contradicts the editorial hero your DESIGN.md already chose. An 8px gap between a 72px hero and its subhead is spacing for a caption, not a headline. A CTA with the same weight as \"Learn more\" means there is no primary action, so the page has no job. The three-column features grid plus testimonials carousel is the exact template every AI-generated site ships. \"Stacks on mobile\" and \"only the happy path\" together mean roughly half the users' actual experience is undesigned.\n\nA 10 for this plan: hero composition specified in DESIGN.md tokens (Satoshi at clamp(40px, 6vw, 72px), subhead at `lg`/`xl` spacing, left-aligned editorial layout, one amber CTA, \"Learn more\" as a quiet text link). One scannable proof section that earns its layout instead of a card grid. Testimonials with a narrative purpose or cut entirely. Pricing with a recommended tier, per-tier CTA, and a FAQ. Every state named: font loading, fetch failure, 404, form success/error. Mobile designed per viewport with 44px touch targets and a real nav. Contrast, focus rings, and reduced-motion specified. One authored motion moment on the first viewport.\n\n**Step 0B.** DESIGN.md found. All design decisions will be calibrated against your stated design system.\n\n**Step 0C. Existing leverage.** The whole token set is already decided: fonts, color roles, the spacing scale, radii, the grain texture, easing curves. The plan should bind to those tokens by name rather than invent anything. The Decisions Log also settled that the live-feed pulse is the one authored motion moment, so a landing hero would need its own explicit decision if it wants motion.\n\n**Step 0D.** Focus areas.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:26:01.369Z"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tools": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "9d275b27-7c60-4f06-b2af-82617b1c5e2c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:24:42.968Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01KviY5jExf7Nmwsy5d5wxVf",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Skill",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"skill": "plan-design-review"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "9d275b27-7c60-4f06-b2af-82617b1c5e2c",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:24:44.365Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01KviY5jExf7Nmwsy5d5wxVf",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "Launching skill: plan-design-review",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"source": {
|
||||
"path": ".context/ship-source-ag-delta-paid-20260910-v1/design-plan-mode-evidence-v1/plan-design-review-1789007300958-g4QVMs.json",
|
||||
"sha256": "91caf7e1e5edce281f5ceb3e44e5988839ac43e3d6ba17f20ed7e452b356061c"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"opts": {
|
||||
"seed": "\n# Plan: Marketing landing page\n\n## Layout\nAll headings, taglines, and body copy will be center-aligned for a\n\"clean modern look.\" The hero h1 sits 8px above the subhead; the CTA\nbutton has the same visual weight as the \"Learn more\" link beside it.\n\n## Pages\n- / (hero, 3-column features grid, testimonials carousel, footer)\n- /pricing (3 tier cards)\n\n## States\nOnly the happy path is designed. No empty states, no error states,\nno loading states. Mobile: \"stacks on mobile.\"\n",
|
||||
"skillName": "plan-design-review",
|
||||
"sessionId": "76d68e6c-2f79-40b9-a432-1010c1ee7668",
|
||||
"commandStartedAt": 1789007191011
|
||||
},
|
||||
"transcript": {
|
||||
"status": "ready",
|
||||
"calls": [],
|
||||
"assistantMessages": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "76d68e6c-2f79-40b9-a432-1010c1ee7668",
|
||||
"text": "I'll invoke the /plan-design-review skill to review the draft landing page plan.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:26:35.166Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "76d68e6c-2f79-40b9-a432-1010c1ee7668",
|
||||
"text": "I've selected reviewing the pasted \"Marketing landing page\" draft plan since we're in plan mode. Now I'll run the pre-review audit, design setup probe, context recovery, and brain context checks in parallel.\n\n",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:26:53.055Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "76d68e6c-2f79-40b9-a432-1010c1ee7668",
|
||||
"text": "Base branch is main. DESIGN.md exists, so design decisions will calibrate against it. Reading DESIGN.md, design TODOs, and the review sections now.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:27:09.985Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "76d68e6c-2f79-40b9-a432-1010c1ee7668",
|
||||
"text": "## Pre-review system audit\n\n**UI scope:** two pages. `/` has a hero, a 3-column features grid, a testimonials carousel, and a footer. `/pricing` has three tier cards. This is a PERSUADE surface (marketing landing page), so Landing Page Rules apply.\n\n**DESIGN.md:** exists, open format with tokens in front matter. Direction is Industrial/Utilitarian, dark default, restrained amber accent, Satoshi display + DM Sans body + JetBrains Mono for data, 12-col grid at 1200px, 4px spacing base. It explicitly calls for an \"editorial hero for landing page.\" All design decisions calibrate against it.\n\n**TODOS.md:** no landing-page design TODOs. The design entries there are about the detector and skill internals.\n\n**Prior reviews:** none logged for this branch. Git log is skill infrastructure work, no landing page history, so no retrospective hot spots.\n\n**Existing leverage:** the DESIGN.md token set and its Decisions Log (light-mode amber-600 rationale, grain texture, \"one authored motion moment\" already spent on the live-feed pulse). No landing page code exists in the repo yet.\n\n## Step 0: Design Scope Assessment\n\n**0A. Initial rating: 2/10** on design completeness. The draft names pages and components but nearly every stated decision violates a principle, and the omissions are total. Specifically: it has no primary action (CTA and \"Learn more\" carry equal weight), it centers everything for a \"clean modern look\" (a vibe, not a decision), it puts 8px between hero h1 and subhead, it uses the 3-column features grid and a testimonials carousel (both on the slop list, the carousel a hard rejection), it defaults pricing to cards, it designs zero non-happy states, it hand-waves mobile as \"stacks,\" and it never mentions type, color, motion, or accessibility despite a full DESIGN.md sitting in the repo.\n\n**A 10 for this plan** would: name the one thing a visitor sees first in the hero and what they click, cite DESIGN.md tokens by path for every type size, color, and spacing value, give each section one job with one headline, replace the grid and carousel with sections that earn their pixels, specify loading/empty/error states for every dynamic element (pricing fetch, testimonials, any form), lay out 375px, 768px, and 1200px intentionally, and spec keyboard nav, landmarks, 44px targets, focus rings, and 4.5:1 contrast.\n\n**0B. DESIGN.md status:** present. All design decisions will be calibrated against your stated design system.\n\n**0C. Existing design leverage:** reuse the DESIGN.md tokens (`{typography.display}` Satoshi for hero, `{colors.primary-dark-mode}` for the one CTA, `{spacing.*}` scale, `{rounded.md}` for buttons), the grain texture treatment, and the 12-col/1200px grid. Note the Decisions Log already spends the \"one authored motion moment\" on the live-feed pulse, so the landing page's first-viewport motion needs its own decision.\n\nI've recorded ten pending gaps (G1 to G10) in the plan file. None is approved yet.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:28:08.900Z"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tools": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "76d68e6c-2f79-40b9-a432-1010c1ee7668",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:26:35.988Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01MW4bfwniQhj4Cscv8CuPyo",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Skill",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"skill": "plan-design-review"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "76d68e6c-2f79-40b9-a432-1010c1ee7668",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:26:37.340Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01MW4bfwniQhj4Cscv8CuPyo",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "Launching skill: plan-design-review",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
+382
@@ -0,0 +1,382 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sourceHead": "8d8537e5d341cc9f3d186822f06efb245ec7b8fd",
|
||||
"observedOutcome": "plan_ready",
|
||||
"observedFailure": "mandatory legacy regression coverage absent",
|
||||
"transcript": {
|
||||
"status": "ready",
|
||||
"calls": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_0149VZPkVTXkUE2DpWT4UaHE",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "D1 \u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-X1N3st on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that saying \"review the architecture\" or \"ship it\" automatically invokes the right skill. This is a one-time setup prompt per project. Plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after this review exits plan mode.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without routing, you invoke skills by name manually; with it, an unwanted auto-invoke could surprise you.\nRecommendation: A because routing removes friction and is trivially reversible (delete the section).\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: convenience of auto-routing vs. keeping CLAUDE.md minimal.",
|
||||
"header": "Routing",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "A) Add routing rules (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Natural-language requests route to the right gstack skill without remembering names. \u2705 One-time append, reversible by deleting the section. \u274c Adds a block to CLAUDE.md and one commit; deferred until plan mode exits."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "B) No thanks, invoke manually",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 CLAUDE.md stays exactly as it is, no extra commit on this fixture repo. \u2705 You keep full control over when a skill runs. \u274c You must type /skill-name each time; records routing_declined so this is not re-asked."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "D2 \u2014 Run /office-hours first, or proceed with the standard eng review?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-X1N3st on main, PLAN.md has no design doc behind it.\nELI10: No design doc found for this branch. /office-hours produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives, which gives this review sharper input (about 10 minutes). The design doc is per-feature, not per-product. Without it, I review the plan as written and infer the problem statement from it.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Skipping means the review may lock in an approach whose premise was never challenged; running it costs ten minutes before any architecture findings land.\nRecommendation: B because the plan already states its architecture and the user request asks for the reviewed plan directly; premise questions surface in Step 0 anyway.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: sharper upstream input vs. getting to the architecture findings now.",
|
||||
"header": "Design doc",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "B) Skip \u2014 standard review (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Review starts immediately against PLAN.md as written, matching the stated request. \u2705 Step 0 scope challenge still questions the premise (4 new classes, 12 files). \u274c No formal alternatives-explored record; premise challenge is lighter."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "A) Run /office-hours now",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Produces a design doc with problem statement and alternatives (human: ~1h / CC: ~10 min). \u2705 Review then has a source of truth for constraints and chosen approach. \u274c Delays architecture findings and adds a doc to maintain for a refactor whose direction is already chosen."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "D3 \u2014 Enable cross-project learnings search?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-X1N3st on main; first time this setting is checked on this machine.\nELI10: gstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that might apply here. This stays local, no data leaves your machine. Recommended for solo developers. Skip if you work on multiple client codebases where cross-contamination would be a concern.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Enabling on a multi-client machine could surface one client's patterns while reviewing another's; disabling loses reusable pitfalls you already learned elsewhere.\nRecommendation: A because learnings compound and the search is local-only and reversible via gstack-config.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: compounding knowledge across repos vs. strict per-project isolation.",
|
||||
"header": "Learnings",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "A) Enable cross-project (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Past pitfalls and patterns from other repos inform this review automatically. \u2705 Local only; one config flag, reversible any time. \u274c On a machine shared across client codebases, unrelated patterns could bleed into findings."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "B) Keep project-scoped only",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Strict isolation; nothing from other repos appears in this review. \u2705 Safest choice for consultants working across clients. \u274c Zero learnings exist for this project yet, so the search returns nothing this session."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D1 \u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-X1N3st on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that saying \"review the architecture\" or \"ship it\" automatically invokes the right skill. This is a one-time setup prompt per project. Plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after this review exits plan mode.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without routing, you invoke skills by name manually; with it, an unwanted auto-invoke could surprise you.\nRecommendation: A because routing removes friction and is trivially reversible (delete the section).\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: convenience of auto-routing vs. keeping CLAUDE.md minimal.": "A) Add routing rules (recommended)",
|
||||
"D2 \u2014 Run /office-hours first, or proceed with the standard eng review?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-X1N3st on main, PLAN.md has no design doc behind it.\nELI10: No design doc found for this branch. /office-hours produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives, which gives this review sharper input (about 10 minutes). The design doc is per-feature, not per-product. Without it, I review the plan as written and infer the problem statement from it.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Skipping means the review may lock in an approach whose premise was never challenged; running it costs ten minutes before any architecture findings land.\nRecommendation: B because the plan already states its architecture and the user request asks for the reviewed plan directly; premise questions surface in Step 0 anyway.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: sharper upstream input vs. getting to the architecture findings now.": "B) Skip \u2014 standard review (recommended)",
|
||||
"D3 \u2014 Enable cross-project learnings search?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-X1N3st on main; first time this setting is checked on this machine.\nELI10: gstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that might apply here. This stays local, no data leaves your machine. Recommended for solo developers. Skip if you work on multiple client codebases where cross-contamination would be a concern.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Enabling on a multi-client machine could surface one client's patterns while reviewing another's; disabling loses reusable pitfalls you already learned elsewhere.\nRecommendation: A because learnings compound and the search is local-only and reversible via gstack-config.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: compounding knowledge across repos vs. strict per-project isolation.": "A) Enable cross-project (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T01:58:49.206Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01DAykHz9Gmq1NGY244gtmeC",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "D4 \u2014 Scope: reduce the 5 new types to 2, or proceed as planned?\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (PLAN.md:19-20, 34-36).\nELI10: The plan adds AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache, TokenStore and RequestPolicy across 12 files. But AuthCache is described as a facade over the existing cache adapter with one backing cache (PLAN.md:11-13), which means it is a wrapper that adds no rules of its own. TokenStore and RequestPolicy are named once and never given a job. That is three cache-shaped things (adapter, AuthCache, TokenStore) where one exists and works, plus a policy class with no stated behavior. Every extra type is a place a 3am bug can hide and a file a new engineer has to learn.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Too much scope means a 12-file auth diff nobody can review in one sitting; too little means we cut a type that had a real purpose the plan just failed to write down.\nRecommendation: A because the existing adapter already carries the tenant-key and invalidation rules, so injecting it directly into the two real services keeps every behavior and deletes two wrappers and one mystery class. Maps to your preference for engineered-enough and right-sized diff.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: two services with an injected, already-tested dependency vs. five types and a global singleton for the same behavior.",
|
||||
"header": "Scope",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "A) Reduce to AuthBroker + SessionMint (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Both services take the existing cache adapter via constructor injection; AuthCache facade and TokenStore are dropped, RequestPolicy becomes a plain typed config object plus one pure function (human: ~2 days / CC: ~30 min). \u2705 Roughly 7-8 files instead of 12, and the adapter's existing tests keep covering the cache contract. \u274c If TokenStore or RequestPolicy had a real distinct responsibility, the plan must be amended to state it before this reduction holds."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "B) Proceed as-is with all 5 types",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 No re-planning; implementation starts from the current document (human: ~1 week / CC: ~1.5 h). \u2705 Each concept gets its own named home, which some teams prefer for future growth. \u274c 12-file auth diff with a global mutable singleton and two undocumented classes; review sections will still flag the singleton separately."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "C) Middle: keep AuthCache as the one injected boundary, drop TokenStore",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 AuthCache stays as a named service-facing type but is passed in, not exported as a global; TokenStore is removed; RequestPolicy kept as a class (human: ~3 days / CC: ~45 min). \u2705 Preserves a seam for future cache-policy changes without the singleton. \u274c Still a facade with no rules of its own over one backing cache, and RequestPolicy remains undefined."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D4 \u2014 Scope: reduce the 5 new types to 2, or proceed as planned?\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (PLAN.md:19-20, 34-36).\nELI10: The plan adds AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache, TokenStore and RequestPolicy across 12 files. But AuthCache is described as a facade over the existing cache adapter with one backing cache (PLAN.md:11-13), which means it is a wrapper that adds no rules of its own. TokenStore and RequestPolicy are named once and never given a job. That is three cache-shaped things (adapter, AuthCache, TokenStore) where one exists and works, plus a policy class with no stated behavior. Every extra type is a place a 3am bug can hide and a file a new engineer has to learn.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Too much scope means a 12-file auth diff nobody can review in one sitting; too little means we cut a type that had a real purpose the plan just failed to write down.\nRecommendation: A because the existing adapter already carries the tenant-key and invalidation rules, so injecting it directly into the two real services keeps every behavior and deletes two wrappers and one mystery class. Maps to your preference for engineered-enough and right-sized diff.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: two services with an injected, already-tested dependency vs. five types and a global singleton for the same behavior.": "A) Reduce to AuthBroker + SessionMint (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T02:00:05.936Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01A9TG1GinwD4comJmBJK5m8",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "D5 \u2014 Issue 1 [P1] (confidence 8/10) PLAN.md:10,19-20: who owns writes to the shared cache?\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, Architecture section.\nELI10: The plan says both AuthBroker and SessionMint mutate the same cache and that the cache rules \"do not serialize mutations\" (PLAN.md:10). Picture this: a tenant is suspended, the adapter's hook invalidates every entry for that tenant, and a millisecond later SessionMint finishes minting a session it started before the suspension and writes it back. The suspended tenant now has a live cached session until it expires. Same story for logout and token revocation. Injection (D4) fixes the global-variable smell but not this race; two writers with no ordering rule is still two writers.\nStakes if we pick wrong: A revoked or suspended tenant keeps working against your system for up to a token lifetime, silently, with nothing in the logs.\nRecommendation: 1A because a single writer plus an epoch check is explicit, easy to test, and the adapter already has the invalidation hooks to bump the epoch. Maps to your explicit-over-clever preference.\nCompleteness: 1A=10/10, 1B=7/10, 1C=3/10\nNet: an ordering rule that costs one integer compare vs. a race that only shows up in production.",
|
||||
"header": "Cache writes",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "1A) Single writer + invalidation epoch (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Only AuthBroker writes to the adapter; SessionMint returns minted material to the broker, which stores it (human: ~1 day / CC: ~20 min). \u2705 Adapter keeps a per-tenant invalidation epoch, bumped by the existing logout/revoke/suspend hooks; a write whose captured epoch is stale is dropped and logged. Test: suspend-during-mint asserts no entry lands. \u274c SessionMint gains a return value and the adapter gains one epoch counter per tenant; slightly larger diff."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "1B) Both write, but every write checks the epoch",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 No ownership change; each service reads the tenant epoch before its work and passes it on write (human: ~half day / CC: ~15 min). \u2705 Still closes the suspend-during-mint window with the same drop-and-log rule. \u274c Two writers means two places to forget the epoch check; the invariant lives in convention, not structure."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "1C) Accept the race, document it",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Zero code; plan gains a paragraph naming the window and its bound (token TTL) (human: ~10 min / CC: ~2 min). \u2705 Fine if token TTLs are seconds and suspension is rare. \u274c Suspended tenants stay live for a full TTL; no test can prove the window is as small as you think."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D5 \u2014 Issue 1 [P1] (confidence 8/10) PLAN.md:10,19-20: who owns writes to the shared cache?\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, Architecture section.\nELI10: The plan says both AuthBroker and SessionMint mutate the same cache and that the cache rules \"do not serialize mutations\" (PLAN.md:10). Picture this: a tenant is suspended, the adapter's hook invalidates every entry for that tenant, and a millisecond later SessionMint finishes minting a session it started before the suspension and writes it back. The suspended tenant now has a live cached session until it expires. Same story for logout and token revocation. Injection (D4) fixes the global-variable smell but not this race; two writers with no ordering rule is still two writers.\nStakes if we pick wrong: A revoked or suspended tenant keeps working against your system for up to a token lifetime, silently, with nothing in the logs.\nRecommendation: 1A because a single writer plus an epoch check is explicit, easy to test, and the adapter already has the invalidation hooks to bump the epoch. Maps to your explicit-over-clever preference.\nCompleteness: 1A=10/10, 1B=7/10, 1C=3/10\nNet: an ordering rule that costs one integer compare vs. a race that only shows up in production.": "1A) Single writer + invalidation epoch (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T02:00:48.065Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_012tpZo4sR2eYvYzf1Sajrwo",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "D6 \u2014 Issue 2 [P1] (confidence 8/10) PLAN.md:27-28: how does the new flow replace legacyAuthFlow()?\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, Architecture section.\nELI10: The plan says legacyAuthFlow() \"will get rewritten as part of this work\" and nothing more. That is a big-bang swap of the login path for every tenant at once. If the new AuthBroker path has a bug that only one tenant's IDP configuration triggers, every tenant is down until you revert the whole deploy. The alternative is a strangler fig: keep legacyAuthFlow() intact, put a per-tenant switch in front, route a canary tenant to AuthBroker, widen, then delete the legacy function in a follow-up PR once it takes zero traffic.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Auth is the front door. A bad big-bang means every user of every tenant sees login failures at the same moment, and rollback means redeploying.\nRecommendation: 2A because a per-tenant flag makes the cost of being wrong one tenant for one minute, and the legacy path stays as the oracle for the regression tests Section 3 will require. Maps to your right-sized-diff preference: this is a necessary two-step, not a compressed rewrite.\nCompleteness: 2A=10/10, 2B=7/10, 2C=3/10\nNet: two small PRs with a kill switch vs. one large PR with a redeploy as the only undo.",
|
||||
"header": "Cutover",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "2A) Per-tenant flag, strangler fig, delete later (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 A routing function reads a per-tenant flag (default: legacy) and dispatches to legacyAuthFlow() or AuthBroker; both paths log the same structured outcome so they can be compared (human: ~1 day / CC: ~20 min). \u2705 Rollback is a flag flip, not a deploy; legacy stays as the regression oracle; deletion is a separate trivial PR. \u274c Two code paths coexist for the rollout window; the flag plumbing is a small amount of code that gets deleted later."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "2B) Global flag, all tenants at once, flip in prod",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 One boolean, no per-tenant plumbing; still reversible without a deploy (human: ~2 h / CC: ~10 min). \u2705 Legacy path stays available as the oracle during the window. \u274c No canary: the first flip exposes every tenant simultaneously, so a tenant-specific IDP quirk hits everyone."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "2C) Rewrite in place as planned",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Smallest final codebase immediately; no flag to clean up (human: ~0 extra / CC: ~0 extra). \u2705 No dual-path period to reason about. \u274c Rollback is a redeploy; no live oracle for behavior comparison; a single bug takes down login for all tenants."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D6 \u2014 Issue 2 [P1] (confidence 8/10) PLAN.md:27-28: how does the new flow replace legacyAuthFlow()?\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, Architecture section.\nELI10: The plan says legacyAuthFlow() \"will get rewritten as part of this work\" and nothing more. That is a big-bang swap of the login path for every tenant at once. If the new AuthBroker path has a bug that only one tenant's IDP configuration triggers, every tenant is down until you revert the whole deploy. The alternative is a strangler fig: keep legacyAuthFlow() intact, put a per-tenant switch in front, route a canary tenant to AuthBroker, widen, then delete the legacy function in a follow-up PR once it takes zero traffic.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Auth is the front door. A bad big-bang means every user of every tenant sees login failures at the same moment, and rollback means redeploying.\nRecommendation: 2A because a per-tenant flag makes the cost of being wrong one tenant for one minute, and the legacy path stays as the oracle for the regression tests Section 3 will require. Maps to your right-sized-diff preference: this is a necessary two-step, not a compressed rewrite.\nCompleteness: 2A=10/10, 2B=7/10, 2C=3/10\nNet: two small PRs with a kill switch vs. one large PR with a redeploy as the only undo.": "2A) Per-tenant flag, strangler fig, delete later (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T02:01:10.134Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_019NSiGCnXy7P5FbxvdYezug",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "D7 \u2014 Issue 3 [P1] (confidence 9/10) PLAN.md:23-24: validateAndDispatch() swallows three error classes in nested try/catch.\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, Code Quality section.\nELI10: The plan describes a 60-line function with three nested try/catch blocks where \"each catch swallows a different error class.\" Swallowing means the error is caught and the function keeps going as if nothing happened. In an auth path that is the worst possible default: a signature-verification error that gets swallowed becomes a request that proceeds. Nested try/catch also hides which stage failed, so the on-call engineer at 3am sees \"dispatch failed\" with no cause. The plan does not say whether this function is being touched, but the refactor routes through it, so it is in scope.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Silent auth failures that look like success, and error logs that cannot tell you which of three stages broke.\nRecommendation: 3A because splitting into one function per stage with a single typed error boundary is explicit, removes the nesting, and makes each catch a tested branch. Maps to your explicit-over-clever and DRY preferences: one error mapper instead of three ad hoc catches.\nCompleteness: 3A=10/10, 3B=6/10, 3C=2/10\nNet: three small pure functions and one error mapper vs. a 60-line function whose failure modes are invisible.",
|
||||
"header": "Error paths",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "3A) Split per stage, one typed error boundary, fail closed (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Extract validateToken(), resolvePolicy(), dispatch() as pure-ish stage functions; a single outer boundary maps each error class to a typed AuthError with a stage tag, logs it with tenant and stage, and fails closed (human: ~1 day / CC: ~20 min). \u2705 Every former swallow becomes an explicit branch with its own unit test; the stage tag makes 3am triage a one-line grep. \u274c Behavior change: callers that relied on a swallowed error proceeding will now get a rejection, so the characterization tests in Section 3 must pin the current behavior first."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "3B) Keep the shape, stop swallowing",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Minimal edit: each catch logs and rethrows a typed error instead of returning silently (human: ~2 h / CC: ~10 min). \u2705 Closes the silent-success hole without restructuring. \u274c Nesting and the 60-line body remain; stage attribution still depends on reading the stack trace."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "3C) Leave it alone this PR",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Zero risk of changing behavior callers depend on; smallest diff (human: 0 / CC: 0). \u2705 Can be revisited after the flag rollout stabilizes. \u274c The new AuthBroker path inherits three silent failure modes on day one, and auth is the wrong place to carry that debt."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D7 \u2014 Issue 3 [P1] (confidence 9/10) PLAN.md:23-24: validateAndDispatch() swallows three error classes in nested try/catch.\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, Code Quality section.\nELI10: The plan describes a 60-line function with three nested try/catch blocks where \"each catch swallows a different error class.\" Swallowing means the error is caught and the function keeps going as if nothing happened. In an auth path that is the worst possible default: a signature-verification error that gets swallowed becomes a request that proceeds. Nested try/catch also hides which stage failed, so the on-call engineer at 3am sees \"dispatch failed\" with no cause. The plan does not say whether this function is being touched, but the refactor routes through it, so it is in scope.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Silent auth failures that look like success, and error logs that cannot tell you which of three stages broke.\nRecommendation: 3A because splitting into one function per stage with a single typed error boundary is explicit, removes the nesting, and makes each catch a tested branch. Maps to your explicit-over-clever and DRY preferences: one error mapper instead of three ad hoc catches.\nCompleteness: 3A=10/10, 3B=6/10, 3C=2/10\nNet: three small pure functions and one error mapper vs. a 60-line function whose failure modes are invisible.": "3A) Split per stage, one typed error boundary, fail closed (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T02:01:34.215Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_017uViFdvdYjbyR8qLnMQLKi",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "D8 \u2014 Issue 4 [P1] (confidence 9/10) PLAN.md:14-16: how deep does coverage go for the new components?\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, Test section.\nELI10: The plan promises unit and integration coverage for \"success/error paths\" of the new components, which is a happy-path-plus-one-error promise. The diagram above shows 24 gaps. The ones that matter most are not the obvious ones: the suspend-during-mint race from 1A, the flag switch from 2A, and the one-of-five IDP calls failing. Those are the paths that only break in production, and they are exactly the ones \"success/error paths\" tends to skip. The legacyAuthFlow() and validateAndDispatch() characterization tests are already required by the regression rule and are not part of this question.\nStakes if we pick wrong: The two remedies you just approved (epoch drop, per-tenant flag) ship with no proof they work, and the first evidence is a suspended tenant still logged in.\nRecommendation: 4A because with CC the full set costs about the same as the shortcut in wall-clock, and you said too many tests beats too few.\nCompleteness: 4A=10/10, 4B=7/10, 4C=4/10\nNet: every branch in the diagram gets a test now vs. finding the untested branches in an incident.",
|
||||
"header": "Test depth",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "4A) Every diagram branch + contract + race + E2E (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Unit tests for every branch above; contract tests running AuthBroker against the real adapter (not a mock) for hit/miss/invalidate/epoch; a deterministic race test that suspends between mint start and write and asserts no entry lands; three E2E flows (canary login, suspended, revoked) per flag state (human: ~3 days / CC: ~45 min). \u2705 Both approved remedies are proven before the flag ever flips. \u274c Largest test diff; the race test needs an injectable clock or hook to be deterministic."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "4B) Unit for all branches + E2E happy path",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Every code branch in the diagram gets a unit test; one E2E login per flag state (human: ~1.5 days / CC: ~25 min). \u2705 Fast to run, no real-adapter wiring in tests. \u274c Adapter is mocked, so the epoch drop and hook wiring are never exercised together; suspended/revoked E2E flows are not covered."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "4C) Unit success + one error path per component",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Matches the plan as written; smallest test diff (human: ~half day / CC: ~10 min). \u2705 Enough to catch compile-level and obvious logic mistakes. \u274c Race, flag switch, and partial IDP failure remain untested; the paths most likely to page you have no proof."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D8 \u2014 Issue 4 [P1] (confidence 9/10) PLAN.md:14-16: how deep does coverage go for the new components?\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, Test section.\nELI10: The plan promises unit and integration coverage for \"success/error paths\" of the new components, which is a happy-path-plus-one-error promise. The diagram above shows 24 gaps. The ones that matter most are not the obvious ones: the suspend-during-mint race from 1A, the flag switch from 2A, and the one-of-five IDP calls failing. Those are the paths that only break in production, and they are exactly the ones \"success/error paths\" tends to skip. The legacyAuthFlow() and validateAndDispatch() characterization tests are already required by the regression rule and are not part of this question.\nStakes if we pick wrong: The two remedies you just approved (epoch drop, per-tenant flag) ship with no proof they work, and the first evidence is a suspended tenant still logged in.\nRecommendation: 4A because with CC the full set costs about the same as the shortcut in wall-clock, and you said too many tests beats too few.\nCompleteness: 4A=10/10, 4B=7/10, 4C=4/10\nNet: every branch in the diagram gets a test now vs. finding the untested branches in an incident.": "4A) Every diagram branch + contract + race + E2E (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T02:02:36.452Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_0145d7pZYYGys2UkLPs41477",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "D9 \u2014 Issue 5 [P2] (confidence 7/10) PLAN.md:31-32: parallelize the 5 IDP calls, but with which failure rule, and are all 5 needed?\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, Performance section.\nELI10: Five sequential network calls to the identity provider on every token validation means login latency is five round trips added together. Promise.all makes that one round trip, and the plan is right that the calls are independent. But Promise.all also changes failure behavior: it rejects on the first failure and abandons the rest, which is exactly what you want in auth (fail closed, fast). The trap is that some engineers reach for Promise.allSettled to \"handle partial failure,\" which in auth means deciding a token is valid when one check never ran. Second question the plan skips: in most IDP integrations, two of those five calls fetch data that changes rarely (discovery document, signing keys). Those belong in the existing cache adapter, which drops the per-request count to three or fewer.\nStakes if we pick wrong: allSettled with a lenient merge silently accepts tokens when the IDP is flaky; five parallel calls per request also multiplies IDP load five-fold at peak and can hit their rate limits.\nRecommendation: 5A because Promise.all with a per-call timeout is the fail-closed, explicit choice, and caching the static IDP metadata reuses the adapter you already have. Maps to explicit-over-clever and to reuse before building.\nCompleteness: 5A=10/10, 5B=7/10, 5C=5/10\nNet: fewer, faster, fail-closed calls vs. five parallel calls with undefined partial-failure behavior.",
|
||||
"header": "IDP calls",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "5A) Promise.all + per-call timeout + cache static IDP metadata (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Promise.all over the per-request calls with an AbortController timeout on each; any rejection or timeout fails validation closed with the failing call named in the error (human: ~half day / CC: ~15 min). \u2705 Discovery document and JWKS cached through the existing adapter with TTL from the IDP's cache headers; per-request IDP calls drop to 3 or fewer and cold-start still works. \u274c Adds a key-rotation edge: a JWKS miss on an unknown kid must trigger one refetch before rejecting, which is one more branch to test."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "5B) Promise.all + per-call timeout, no metadata caching",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Latency drops from 5 round trips to 1 with the fail-closed rule made explicit (human: ~2 h / CC: ~10 min). \u2705 No new cache keys or TTL handling. \u274c Still 5 IDP calls per request at peak; rate limits and IDP outages hit 5x harder than necessary."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "5C) Plain Promise.all as the plan states",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 One-line change, exactly what PLAN.md:32 describes (human: ~15 min / CC: ~2 min). \u2705 Latency win is captured. \u274c No timeout means one hung IDP call hangs the login indefinitely; failure semantics are left implicit for the next engineer to guess."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D9 \u2014 Issue 5 [P2] (confidence 7/10) PLAN.md:31-32: parallelize the 5 IDP calls, but with which failure rule, and are all 5 needed?\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, Performance section.\nELI10: Five sequential network calls to the identity provider on every token validation means login latency is five round trips added together. Promise.all makes that one round trip, and the plan is right that the calls are independent. But Promise.all also changes failure behavior: it rejects on the first failure and abandons the rest, which is exactly what you want in auth (fail closed, fast). The trap is that some engineers reach for Promise.allSettled to \"handle partial failure,\" which in auth means deciding a token is valid when one check never ran. Second question the plan skips: in most IDP integrations, two of those five calls fetch data that changes rarely (discovery document, signing keys). Those belong in the existing cache adapter, which drops the per-request count to three or fewer.\nStakes if we pick wrong: allSettled with a lenient merge silently accepts tokens when the IDP is flaky; five parallel calls per request also multiplies IDP load five-fold at peak and can hit their rate limits.\nRecommendation: 5A because Promise.all with a per-call timeout is the fail-closed, explicit choice, and caching the static IDP metadata reuses the adapter you already have. Maps to explicit-over-clever and to reuse before building.\nCompleteness: 5A=10/10, 5B=7/10, 5C=5/10\nNet: fewer, faster, fail-closed calls vs. five parallel calls with undefined partial-failure behavior.": "5A) Promise.all + per-call timeout + cache static IDP metadata (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T02:03:00.529Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_019XZGYquVgMspt1moGkwmP8",
|
||||
"questions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "D10 \u2014 TODO 1: delete legacyAuthFlow() and the per-tenant flag after rollout completes.\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, TODOS.md updates (no TODOS.md exists yet; it would be created).\nELI10: Decision 2A keeps the legacy login path alive behind a flag during rollout. That is deliberate, but it leaves two login implementations in the codebase. Once every tenant is on AuthBroker and the flag has been at 100% for an agreed soak period, the legacy function, the routing switch, and the characterization tests that pin legacy behavior should all be removed in one small PR. Without a written TODO, dual paths tend to live forever.\nWhat: Remove legacyAuthFlow(), the flag router, and legacy characterization tests. Why: two auth paths is permanent cognitive and security surface. Pros: smaller codebase, one path to audit. Cons: must wait for soak; deleting the oracle means the new path is now the only truth. Context: flag rollout per D6/2A; AuthBroker per D4. Depends on: 100% flag rollout + soak period (suggest 2 weeks) with zero legacy traffic.\nRecommendation: A because the plan otherwise has no owner for the cleanup and it cannot be done in this PR by design.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: written follow-up vs. a dead code path nobody remembers to remove.",
|
||||
"header": "TODO legacy",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "A) Add to TODOS.md (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Cleanup has a written owner, trigger, and dependency; /ship and /retro will surface it (human: ~2 min / CC: ~1 min, write deferred until plan mode exits). \u2705 Deletion PR later is trivial because the scope is recorded now. \u274c Creates TODOS.md in a repo that has none; one more file to keep current."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "B) Skip \u2014 not valuable enough",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 No new file; team relies on memory or issue tracker. \u2705 Zero effort now. \u274c Dual login paths have no recorded expiry; this is how legacy code becomes permanent."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "C) Build it now in this PR",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 No follow-up needed; codebase ends with one path. \u2705 Smallest final surface. \u274c Contradicts 2A: deleting legacy in the same PR removes the rollback path and the regression oracle."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "D11 \u2014 TODO 2: metrics and alerts for stale-epoch drops and fail-closed IDP rejections.\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, TODOS.md updates.\nELI10: Decisions 1A and 5A both add a \"drop and log\" branch: a cache write with a stale epoch is discarded, and a failed or timed-out IDP call denies the login. Both are correct fail-closed behavior, and both are invisible unless someone reads logs. A counter per branch and an alert when the rate spikes tells you the difference between \"one suspension raced a mint\" and \"the IDP is down and every tenant is locked out.\" This is observability, not core behavior, so it can follow the main PR.\nWhat: emit counters for stale-epoch drops and IDP fail-closed rejections, tagged by tenant and cause; alert on rate. Why: fail-closed without visibility looks like random login failures to users and support. Pros: 3am triage becomes a dashboard glance. Cons: depends on whatever metrics stack exists, which the plan does not describe. Context: branches introduced by 1A and 5A. Depends on: main refactor PR landing; knowing the metrics library in use.\nRecommendation: A because the fail-closed branches were just approved and shipping them blind is the one gap left; adding it now (C) is also defensible if the metrics library is already wired.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: know when fail-closed fires vs. learn about it from support tickets.",
|
||||
"header": "TODO metrics",
|
||||
"multiSelect": false,
|
||||
"options": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "A) Add to TODOS.md (recommended)",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Captured with cause, tags, and dependency so it lands right after the main PR (human: ~2 min / CC: ~1 min, write deferred until plan mode exits). \u2705 Keeps this PR focused on behavior and tests. \u274c Fail-closed branches ship without a counter for the gap between PRs."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "B) Skip \u2014 not valuable enough",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Structured logs from 3A already carry stage and tenant; grep works. \u2705 Zero effort. \u274c No alert means an IDP outage locking out every tenant is discovered by users first."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "C) Build it now in this PR",
|
||||
"description": "\u2705 Counters land with the branches that need them; no gap (human: ~2 h / CC: ~10 min). \u2705 Tests for the branches can assert the counter increments. \u274c Widens this PR into the metrics stack, which the plan has not described; adds a dependency to discover during implementation."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"answered": true,
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"answers": {
|
||||
"D10 \u2014 TODO 1: delete legacyAuthFlow() and the per-tenant flag after rollout completes.\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, TODOS.md updates (no TODOS.md exists yet; it would be created).\nELI10: Decision 2A keeps the legacy login path alive behind a flag during rollout. That is deliberate, but it leaves two login implementations in the codebase. Once every tenant is on AuthBroker and the flag has been at 100% for an agreed soak period, the legacy function, the routing switch, and the characterization tests that pin legacy behavior should all be removed in one small PR. Without a written TODO, dual paths tend to live forever.\nWhat: Remove legacyAuthFlow(), the flag router, and legacy characterization tests. Why: two auth paths is permanent cognitive and security surface. Pros: smaller codebase, one path to audit. Cons: must wait for soak; deleting the oracle means the new path is now the only truth. Context: flag rollout per D6/2A; AuthBroker per D4. Depends on: 100% flag rollout + soak period (suggest 2 weeks) with zero legacy traffic.\nRecommendation: A because the plan otherwise has no owner for the cleanup and it cannot be done in this PR by design.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: written follow-up vs. a dead code path nobody remembers to remove.": "A) Add to TODOS.md (recommended)",
|
||||
"D11 \u2014 TODO 2: metrics and alerts for stale-epoch drops and fail-closed IDP rejections.\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, TODOS.md updates.\nELI10: Decisions 1A and 5A both add a \"drop and log\" branch: a cache write with a stale epoch is discarded, and a failed or timed-out IDP call denies the login. Both are correct fail-closed behavior, and both are invisible unless someone reads logs. A counter per branch and an alert when the rate spikes tells you the difference between \"one suspension raced a mint\" and \"the IDP is down and every tenant is locked out.\" This is observability, not core behavior, so it can follow the main PR.\nWhat: emit counters for stale-epoch drops and IDP fail-closed rejections, tagged by tenant and cause; alert on rate. Why: fail-closed without visibility looks like random login failures to users and support. Pros: 3am triage becomes a dashboard glance. Cons: depends on whatever metrics stack exists, which the plan does not describe. Context: branches introduced by 1A and 5A. Depends on: main refactor PR landing; knowing the metrics library in use.\nRecommendation: A because the fail-closed branches were just approved and shipping them blind is the one gap left; adding it now (C) is also defensible if the metrics library is already wired.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: know when fail-closed fires vs. learn about it from support tickets.": "A) Add to TODOS.md (recommended)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T02:03:54.747Z"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"assistantMessages": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"text": "Scope gate: plan mode \u2014 auto-selected B (reviewing `PLAN.md` in the repo root). Running the skill preamble first.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:57:12.328Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"text": "I've finished the preamble check: no design doc, no prior learnings, codex reviews disabled, and only a plan exists (no code yet). Before starting the review, I need your input on three setup gates.\n\n",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:58:17.036Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"text": "Recorded: routing rules will be appended and committed once plan mode exits (CLAUDE.md is off-limits in plan mode). Enabling cross-project learnings and re-running the search now, then Step 0.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:58:57.623Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"text": "I've confirmed the plan reuses the existing cache adapter but introduces unexplained new types (`AuthBroker`, `TokenStore`, `RequestPolicy`) and exceeds the file/type complexity thresholds, while research supports constructor injection over singletons and characterization tests before touching the legacy flow. No TODOS.md or new artifact type exists, so I'll proceed to evaluate the complexity gate against these findings.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T01:59:57.053Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"text": "I've logged the scope reduction from D4 and am moving into the Architecture section. First finding: two services writing to one cache with no serialization (PLAN.md:10) creates a write-after-invalidate race.\n\n",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:00:32.026Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"text": "Architecture section closed: 2 issues, both resolved. Section 2, Code Quality. One finding: `validateAndDispatch()` (PLAN.md:23-24).",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:01:16.302Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"text": "Code Quality closed: 1 issue, resolved. Section 3, Tests. No test framework is detectable in this repo (no package.json or test config), so the coverage diagram below names paths and I'll name test files as TypeScript pending framework detection at implementation time.\n\n**REGRESSION RULE applied, no question asked:** `legacyAuthFlow()` is existing behavior being replaced with zero existing coverage (PLAN.md:14-16, 27-28). Characterization tests pinning its current behavior are added to the plan as CRITICAL. Same rule covers the three swallow paths in `validateAndDispatch()` that 3A turns into rejections.\n\n```\nCODE PATHS USER FLOWS\n[+] auth/AuthBroker.authenticate() [+] Login via new path (flag on)\n \u251c\u2500\u2500 [GAP] cache hit \u2192 return \u251c\u2500\u2500 [GAP] [\u2192E2E] canary tenant logs in\n \u251c\u2500\u2500 [GAP] cache miss \u2192 validate \u2192 store \u251c\u2500\u2500 [GAP] [\u2192E2E] login while tenant suspended \u2192 denied\n \u251c\u2500\u2500 [GAP] stale-epoch write dropped + logged (1A) \u2514\u2500\u2500 [GAP] [\u2192E2E] login after logout/revoke \u2192 denied\n \u2514\u2500\u2500 [GAP] adapter throws \u2192 AuthError, fail closed [+] Rollout switch (2A)\n[+] auth/SessionMint.mint() \u251c\u2500\u2500 [GAP] flag off \u2192 legacyAuthFlow()\n \u251c\u2500\u2500 [GAP] happy: returns material, writes nothing (1A) \u251c\u2500\u2500 [GAP] flag on \u2192 AuthBroker\n \u251c\u2500\u2500 [GAP] IDP rejects \u2192 typed error \u2514\u2500\u2500 [GAP] flag flips mid-session \u2192 no crash\n \u2514\u2500\u2500 [GAP] IDP timeout \u2192 typed error [+] Error states\n[~] validateAndDispatch() \u2192 3 stage fns + boundary (3A) \u251c\u2500\u2500 [GAP] IDP down \u2192 clear 401/503, never silent\n \u251c\u2500\u2500 [GAP] validate error \u2192 AuthError{stage:validate} \u2514\u2500\u2500 [GAP] 1 of 5 IDP calls fails \u2192 denied, cause logged\n \u251c\u2500\u2500 [GAP] policy error \u2192 AuthError{stage:policy}\n \u251c\u2500\u2500 [GAP] dispatch error \u2192 AuthError{stage:dispatch}\n \u2514\u2500\u2500 [GAP] REGRESSION: pin current 3 swallow behaviors before change\n[~] legacyAuthFlow()\n \u2514\u2500\u2500 [GAP] REGRESSION CRITICAL: characterization (ok, bad sig, expired, wrong tenant, revoked)\n[~] cache adapter (+ epoch, 1A)\n \u251c\u2500\u2500 [\u2605\u2605\u2605 TESTED] key/evict/invalidate \u2014 existing adapter tests\n \u2514\u2500\u2500 [GAP] epoch bumps on logout / revoke / suspend hooks\n[~] validateToken() 5 IDP calls \u2192 parallel\n \u251c\u2500\u2500 [GAP] all succeed [GAP] one rejects \u2192 fail closed\n \u2514\u2500\u2500 [GAP] one hangs \u2192 per-call timeout\n\nCOVERAGE: 1/25 paths tested (4%) | Code paths: 1/17 (6%) | User flows: 0/8 (0%)\nQUALITY: \u2605\u2605\u2605:1 | GAPS: 24 (3 E2E, 2 REGRESSION)\n```",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:02:09.056Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"text": "Section 4A and both regression suites pass. Moving to Section 4 (Performance), where I found that the plan's \"parallelize trivially\" claim for the 5 IDP calls glosses over failure semantics and doesn't question whether all five calls are actually needed per request.\n\n",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:02:43.139Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"text": "Performance issue closed and resolved. Codex reviews are disabled so that step is skipped per the skill (logged, no fallback), leaving two TODO candidates from the review that need your decision.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:03:18.233Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"text": "All decisions are in: 5 issues resolved, 2 TODOs accepted, 0 unresolved. Now persisting the review log, tasks artifact, and learnings, then writing the reviewed plan.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:04:22.420Z"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"planReadyRequests": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "3134fb4e-addd-4e9a-b57f-168203c09d4c",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01GGRkUmDFkcaDgbQ1wCdcDS",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:07:12.587Z",
|
||||
"failed": false,
|
||||
"source": "pre_tool_use"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"finishedAt": "2026-09-10T02:07:14.134Z",
|
||||
"requiredTask": "- [ ] **T1 (P1, human: ~1 day / CC: ~20 min)** \u2014 auth/legacy \u2014 Write characterization tests pinning `legacyAuthFlow()` current behavior\n - Surfaced by: Test review, REGRESSION RULE \u2014 PLAN.md:27-28 rewrites legacy with no regression test\n - Files: `test/auth/legacyAuthFlow.characterization.test.ts`\n - Verify: suite green against unchanged legacy code before any other task lands",
|
||||
"sourceTaskLines": [
|
||||
208,
|
||||
211
|
||||
],
|
||||
"sourceWriteId": "toolu_01JHdA2Chzhr7i2YJbGNcs9r"
|
||||
}
|
||||
+456
@@ -0,0 +1,456 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sourceHead": "8d8537e5d341cc9f3d186822f06efb245ec7b8fd",
|
||||
"actualOutcome": "both attempts timed out after 600000ms despite exact public annotations",
|
||||
"attempts": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"source": {
|
||||
"path": ".context/ship-source-ag-delta-paid-20260910-v1/evals/job-28/shards/skill-e2e-auto-decide-preserved/pty-count/ship-source-ag-delta-paid-20260910-v1-28/plan-ceo-review-1789007246982-tzNur0/observation.json",
|
||||
"sha256": "a7780e10ffc70f0198abaff0f23ef1d5d73224e25b8a076b73e2026171084c7f"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"options": {
|
||||
"skillName": "plan-ceo-review",
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"commandStartedAt": 1789006645373,
|
||||
"now": 1789006747218.0
|
||||
},
|
||||
"transcript": {
|
||||
"status": "ready",
|
||||
"calls": [],
|
||||
"assistantMessages": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"text": "I'll load the /plan-ceo-review skill and run it against your draft plan.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:17:29.731Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"text": "Preamble ran. This is a Conductor session, so decision briefs render as prose. Gathering the base branch and the question-tuning check for the mode question now.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:08.263Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"text": "Mode question preference is set to auto-decide for this project. Logging the decision and closing out the skill run.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:50.195Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"text": "Auto-decided review mode \u2192 **HOLD SCOPE** (your preference). Change with /plan-tune.\n\n**Why HOLD SCOPE is the fit.** The draft is a small correctness fix to an existing listing path, with output formats and membership frozen by design. The skill's own defaults map bug fixes and small refactors to HOLD SCOPE. The right review posture is maximum rigor on what is there: sort stability, case-folding rules for mixed-case names, the two output formats staying byte-compatible, and tests that force different directory enumeration orders. No expansions get surfaced in this mode.\n\n**What was and was not done this invocation:**\n\n- Preamble ran. Session is interactive inside Conductor, so any later decision briefs render as prose rather than tool calls.\n- Base branch detected as `main` on GitHub. No open PR for this branch.\n- Three onboarding prompts fired from skill-start (continuous checkpoint, Boil the Ocean intro, first-run tip). Per your instruction to handle setup separately, I did not act on them or mark them seen, so they will re-fire on the next healthy run. The first-run tip was: unshipped work on this branch, run /review then /ship.\n- Office Hours offer, approach alternatives, and the eleven-section deep review were all deferred as you asked. No plan file was written and no review report exists yet.\n- Question logged to the tuning store. Skill-end recorded the run as stopped early by request.\n\n**Status: DONE.** Mode is settled as HOLD SCOPE for the deterministic skill-list ordering draft. When you run the substantive review, start from 0C-bis approach alternatives with that mode already fixed. No durable learnings this session.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:19:07.217Z"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tools": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:17:32.892Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_016y3VKBXHSuYFdjnvfnDFJy",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Skill",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"skill": "plan-ceo-review",
|
||||
"args": "Draft: deterministic skill-list ordering. Users compare skill listings in scripts and reviews. Make the existing listing path sort registered skill names deterministically before rendering them. Keep skill membership, aliases, metadata and text/JSON output formats unchanged. Cover mixed-case names and differing directory enumeration order with tests. This draft is the review target, not the current branch. For this invocation, I want only the review-mode decision; I will handle optional Office Hours and setup separately, and run the substantive review later. No review mode has been selected."
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:17:34.623Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_016y3VKBXHSuYFdjnvfnDFJy",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "Launching skill: plan-ceo-review",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:17:51.040Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01VDdq9WVH2mQzhXEpSbxxPk",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"command": "_SS=\"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-skill-start\"\n[ -x \"$_SS\" ] || _SS=\".claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-skill-start\"\n\"$_SS\" --skill \"plan-ceo-review\" --model \"claude\" --parent-pid \"$PPID\" \\\n || echo \"SKILL_START: unavailable \u2014 stale install; run ./setup or /gstack-upgrade (preamble degraded, continue the user's task)\"",
|
||||
"description": "Run gstack skill-start preamble"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:17:53.284Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01VDdq9WVH2mQzhXEpSbxxPk",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "SKILL_START_PROTO: 1\nBRANCH: edinburgh-v1\nPROACTIVE: true\nPROACTIVE_PROMPTED: no\nSKILL_PREFIX: false\nREPO_MODE: collaborative\nSESSION_KIND: interactive\nCONDUCTOR_SESSION: true\nACTIVATED: no\nFIRST_LOOP_SHOWN: no\nFIRST_TASK: branch_ahead\nLAKE_INTRO: no\nTELEMETRY: off\nTEL_PROMPTED: no\nSESSION_ID: 50406-1789006673-17d85022\nTEL_START: 1789006673\nEXPLAIN_LEVEL: default\nQUESTION_TUNING: true\nUPDATE_CHECK: true\nLEARNINGS: 0\nHAS_ROUTING: yes\nROUTING_DECLINED: false\nVENDORED_GSTACK: no\nMODEL_OVERLAY: claude\nCHECKPOINT_MODE: explicit\nCHECKPOINT_PUSH: false\nGSTACK_PLAN_MODE: inactive\nARTIFACTS_SYNC: off\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_BEGIN: feature-checkpoint 50406-1789006673-17d85022\nFeature discovery: AskUserQuestion for Continuous checkpoint auto-commits. If accepted, run `/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-NuDcmO/tmp/gstack-hermetic-50295-M5gXin/skill-home-mg2O11/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set checkpoint_mode continuous`. Always run: `touch \"/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-NuDcmO/tmp/gstack-auto-decide-btpgj4/.feature-prompted-continuous-checkpoint\"`.\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_END\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_BEGIN: lake-intro 50406-1789006673-17d85022\nSay: \"gstack follows the **Boil the Ocean** principle \u2014 do the complete thing when AI makes marginal cost near-zero. Read more: https://garryslist.org/posts/boil-the-ocean\" and offer to open it. Only run `open https://garryslist.org/posts/boil-the-ocean` if the user says yes. Always run: `touch \"/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-NuDcmO/tmp/gstack-auto-decide-btpgj4/.completeness-intro-seen\"`.\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_END\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_BEGIN: first-run-tip 50406-1789006673-17d85022\nShow this one project-specific line as a heads-up, then CONTINUE with whatever the user actually asked \u2014 do NOT halt their task: Unshipped work on this branch \u2014 `/review` then `/ship`.\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_END",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:11.359Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01EgyX2WJVMHVgC3ambvJDZd",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"command": "git remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null; echo \"---PR\"; gh pr view --json baseRefName -q .baseRefName 2>/dev/null || echo \"no-pr\"; echo \"---REPO\"; gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef -q .defaultBranchRef.name 2>/dev/null || echo \"gh-fail\"; echo \"---HEAD\"; git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's|refs/remotes/origin/||'; git rev-parse --verify origin/main >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo \"origin/main exists\"",
|
||||
"description": "Detect platform and base branch"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:12.951Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01EgyX2WJVMHVgC3ambvJDZd",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "https://github.com/garrytan/gstack\n---PR\nno-pr\n---REPO\ngh-fail\n---HEAD\nmain\norigin/main exists",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:13.170Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01NmCs2q9hSdUHbUfTxqxneJ",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"command": "grep -n -i \"mode\" \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/scripts/question-registry.ts\" 2>/dev/null | head -20; echo \"---PREF\"; printf '%s' \"Select CEO review mode for the plan\" | \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-question-preference\" --check \"plan-ceo-review-mode-selection\" --summary-stdin 2>&1",
|
||||
"description": "Find mode question id and check tuning preference"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:15.007Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01NmCs2q9hSdUHbUfTxqxneJ",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "26: * - `one-way` for destructive ops, architecture/data-model forks,\n42: | 'routing' // which path to take (modes, strategies)\n213: 'office-hours-mode-goal': {\n214: id: 'office-hours-mode-goal',\n219: signal_key: 'session-mode',\n220: description: \"What's your goal with this session? (Sets mode: startup vs builder)\",\n230: 'office-hours-cross-model-run': {\n231: id: 'office-hours-cross-model-run',\n236: description: \"Want a second-opinion cross-model review of your brainstorm?\",\n267: 'plan-ceo-review-mode': {\n268: id: 'plan-ceo-review-mode',\n274: description: \"Review mode: push scope up, cherry-pick expansions, hold scope, or cut to minimum?\",\n291: description: \"Cross-model challenged an agreed premise \u2014 revise or keep?\",\n360: 'plan-design-review-mode': {\n361: id: 'plan-design-review-mode',\n389: 'plan-devex-review-mode': {\n390: id: 'plan-devex-review-mode',\n536: description: \"This repo has vendored gstack (deprecated) \u2014 migrate to team mode?\",\n599: description: \"Both models agree your direction should change \u2014 accept, reject, or revise the plan?\",\n---PREF\nASK_NORMALLY",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:20.096Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01FzdC1EmPzkfRuziJgv15yB",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"command": "printf '%s' \"Review mode: push scope up, cherry-pick expansions, hold scope, or cut to minimum?\" | \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-question-preference\" --check \"plan-ceo-review-mode\" --summary-stdin 2>&1",
|
||||
"description": "Check tuning preference for registered mode question id"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:21.537Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01FzdC1EmPzkfRuziJgv15yB",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "AUTO_DECIDE",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:52.489Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01VbEe1aNfrDEMT87VDTC5pv",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"command": "\"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-question-log\" '{\"skill\":\"plan-ceo-review\",\"question_id\":\"plan-ceo-review-mode\",\"question_summary\":\"Review mode for deterministic skill-list ordering draft\",\"category\":\"routing\",\"door_type\":\"two-way\",\"options_count\":4,\"user_choice\":\"C\",\"recommended\":\"C\",\"session_id\":\"50406-1789006673-17d85022\",\"auto_decided\":true}' 2>&1 || true",
|
||||
"description": "Log auto-decided mode question"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:53.843Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01VbEe1aNfrDEMT87VDTC5pv",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "(Bash completed with no output)",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:53.886Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_012kVuN9V5Wjaf5uaneFHHZ2",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"command": "\"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-skill-end\" --skill \"plan-ceo-review\" --outcome abort \\\n --session-id \"50406-1789006673-17d85022\" --tel-start \"1789006673\" --used-browse no \\\n --error-message \"\" --failed-step \"\" 2>&1 || true",
|
||||
"description": "Run skill-end telemetry hook"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:55.348Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_012kVuN9V5Wjaf5uaneFHHZ2",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "SKILL_END: recorded outcome=abort duration_s=62",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"source": {
|
||||
"path": ".context/ship-source-ag-delta-paid-20260910-v1/evals/job-28/shards/skill-e2e-auto-decide-preserved/pty-count/ship-source-ag-delta-paid-20260910-v1-28/plan-ceo-review-1789007860055-WWpRU4/observation.json",
|
||||
"sha256": "ce7944e2472b6070651a7f7995356452cf4cb60a804052b44deda605224ffadc"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"options": {
|
||||
"skillName": "plan-ceo-review",
|
||||
"sessionId": "c08eacbe-9daf-448a-9cf8-cc25061c63d1",
|
||||
"commandStartedAt": 1789007258385,
|
||||
"now": 1789007347955.0
|
||||
},
|
||||
"transcript": {
|
||||
"status": "ready",
|
||||
"calls": [],
|
||||
"assistantMessages": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"text": "I'll load the /plan-ceo-review skill and run it against your draft plan.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:17:29.731Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"text": "Preamble ran. This is a Conductor session, so decision briefs render as prose. Gathering the base branch and the question-tuning check for the mode question now.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:08.263Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"text": "Mode question preference is set to auto-decide for this project. Logging the decision and closing out the skill run.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:50.195Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"text": "Auto-decided review mode \u2192 **HOLD SCOPE** (your preference). Change with /plan-tune.\n\n**Why HOLD SCOPE is the fit.** The draft is a small correctness fix to an existing listing path, with output formats and membership frozen by design. The skill's own defaults map bug fixes and small refactors to HOLD SCOPE. The right review posture is maximum rigor on what is there: sort stability, case-folding rules for mixed-case names, the two output formats staying byte-compatible, and tests that force different directory enumeration orders. No expansions get surfaced in this mode.\n\n**What was and was not done this invocation:**\n\n- Preamble ran. Session is interactive inside Conductor, so any later decision briefs render as prose rather than tool calls.\n- Base branch detected as `main` on GitHub. No open PR for this branch.\n- Three onboarding prompts fired from skill-start (continuous checkpoint, Boil the Ocean intro, first-run tip). Per your instruction to handle setup separately, I did not act on them or mark them seen, so they will re-fire on the next healthy run. The first-run tip was: unshipped work on this branch, run /review then /ship.\n- Office Hours offer, approach alternatives, and the eleven-section deep review were all deferred as you asked. No plan file was written and no review report exists yet.\n- Question logged to the tuning store. Skill-end recorded the run as stopped early by request.\n\n**Status: DONE.** Mode is settled as HOLD SCOPE for the deterministic skill-list ordering draft. When you run the substantive review, start from 0C-bis approach alternatives with that mode already fixed. No durable learnings this session.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:19:07.217Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c08eacbe-9daf-448a-9cf8-cc25061c63d1",
|
||||
"text": "I'll invoke the /plan-ceo-review skill to determine the review-mode decision for this draft plan.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:27:43.649Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c08eacbe-9daf-448a-9cf8-cc25061c63d1",
|
||||
"text": "Heads-up from gstack: this branch has unshipped work. Run `/review` then `/ship` when you're ready.\n\n**Review mode: HOLD SCOPE.**\n\nAuto-decided \"Review mode: push scope up, cherry-pick expansions, hold scope, or cut to minimum?\" \u2192 HOLD SCOPE (your preference). Change with /plan-tune.\n\nWhy HOLD SCOPE fits this draft:\n\n- **It is a correctness fix, not a feature.** Skill order already exists as behavior. Users who diff listings in scripts and reviews see spurious churn when directory enumeration order shifts. The draft removes that churn and adds nothing new.\n- **The draft states its own invariants.** Membership, aliases, metadata, and text/JSON formats stay unchanged. That is a hold-scope contract. Expansion would put those invariants at risk for no user gain.\n- **The context-dependent default agrees.** The skill's table maps bug fixes and refactors to HOLD SCOPE. This draft is both.\n- **Reduction has nothing left to cut.** The plan is one sort call plus two test cases. Stripping the mixed-case or enumeration-order test would leave the fix unproven, which is the failure the plan exists to prevent.\n\nWhat HOLD SCOPE means for the later review: I will hold the scope as written and push on rigor only. Expected pressure points are the collation rule for mixed-case names, whether the sort happens once at the listing path or leaks into other consumers, and how the enumeration-order test forces a non-sorted order rather than relying on the filesystem.\n\nSkipped this invocation, per your instructions: the Office Hours offer, the onboarding prompts, Step 0 platform detection, and the 0C-bis approach comparison. Note that the skill normally requires the approach decision before mode selection, so the substantive review will still need to run 0C-bis before it can proceed to the deep sections. No plan file was written and ExitPlanMode was not called, since the review report does not exist yet.",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:29:07.954Z"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tools": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:17:32.892Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_016y3VKBXHSuYFdjnvfnDFJy",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Skill",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"skill": "plan-ceo-review",
|
||||
"args": "Draft: deterministic skill-list ordering. Users compare skill listings in scripts and reviews. Make the existing listing path sort registered skill names deterministically before rendering them. Keep skill membership, aliases, metadata and text/JSON output formats unchanged. Cover mixed-case names and differing directory enumeration order with tests. This draft is the review target, not the current branch. For this invocation, I want only the review-mode decision; I will handle optional Office Hours and setup separately, and run the substantive review later. No review mode has been selected."
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:17:34.623Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_016y3VKBXHSuYFdjnvfnDFJy",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "Launching skill: plan-ceo-review",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:17:51.040Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01VDdq9WVH2mQzhXEpSbxxPk",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"command": "_SS=\"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-skill-start\"\n[ -x \"$_SS\" ] || _SS=\".claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-skill-start\"\n\"$_SS\" --skill \"plan-ceo-review\" --model \"claude\" --parent-pid \"$PPID\" \\\n || echo \"SKILL_START: unavailable \u2014 stale install; run ./setup or /gstack-upgrade (preamble degraded, continue the user's task)\"",
|
||||
"description": "Run gstack skill-start preamble"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:17:53.284Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01VDdq9WVH2mQzhXEpSbxxPk",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "SKILL_START_PROTO: 1\nBRANCH: edinburgh-v1\nPROACTIVE: true\nPROACTIVE_PROMPTED: no\nSKILL_PREFIX: false\nREPO_MODE: collaborative\nSESSION_KIND: interactive\nCONDUCTOR_SESSION: true\nACTIVATED: no\nFIRST_LOOP_SHOWN: no\nFIRST_TASK: branch_ahead\nLAKE_INTRO: no\nTELEMETRY: off\nTEL_PROMPTED: no\nSESSION_ID: 50406-1789006673-17d85022\nTEL_START: 1789006673\nEXPLAIN_LEVEL: default\nQUESTION_TUNING: true\nUPDATE_CHECK: true\nLEARNINGS: 0\nHAS_ROUTING: yes\nROUTING_DECLINED: false\nVENDORED_GSTACK: no\nMODEL_OVERLAY: claude\nCHECKPOINT_MODE: explicit\nCHECKPOINT_PUSH: false\nGSTACK_PLAN_MODE: inactive\nARTIFACTS_SYNC: off\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_BEGIN: feature-checkpoint 50406-1789006673-17d85022\nFeature discovery: AskUserQuestion for Continuous checkpoint auto-commits. If accepted, run `/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-NuDcmO/tmp/gstack-hermetic-50295-M5gXin/skill-home-mg2O11/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set checkpoint_mode continuous`. Always run: `touch \"/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-NuDcmO/tmp/gstack-auto-decide-btpgj4/.feature-prompted-continuous-checkpoint\"`.\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_END\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_BEGIN: lake-intro 50406-1789006673-17d85022\nSay: \"gstack follows the **Boil the Ocean** principle \u2014 do the complete thing when AI makes marginal cost near-zero. Read more: https://garryslist.org/posts/boil-the-ocean\" and offer to open it. Only run `open https://garryslist.org/posts/boil-the-ocean` if the user says yes. Always run: `touch \"/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-NuDcmO/tmp/gstack-auto-decide-btpgj4/.completeness-intro-seen\"`.\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_END\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_BEGIN: first-run-tip 50406-1789006673-17d85022\nShow this one project-specific line as a heads-up, then CONTINUE with whatever the user actually asked \u2014 do NOT halt their task: Unshipped work on this branch \u2014 `/review` then `/ship`.\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_END",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:11.359Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01EgyX2WJVMHVgC3ambvJDZd",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"command": "git remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null; echo \"---PR\"; gh pr view --json baseRefName -q .baseRefName 2>/dev/null || echo \"no-pr\"; echo \"---REPO\"; gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef -q .defaultBranchRef.name 2>/dev/null || echo \"gh-fail\"; echo \"---HEAD\"; git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's|refs/remotes/origin/||'; git rev-parse --verify origin/main >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo \"origin/main exists\"",
|
||||
"description": "Detect platform and base branch"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:12.951Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01EgyX2WJVMHVgC3ambvJDZd",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "https://github.com/garrytan/gstack\n---PR\nno-pr\n---REPO\ngh-fail\n---HEAD\nmain\norigin/main exists",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:13.170Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01NmCs2q9hSdUHbUfTxqxneJ",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"command": "grep -n -i \"mode\" \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/scripts/question-registry.ts\" 2>/dev/null | head -20; echo \"---PREF\"; printf '%s' \"Select CEO review mode for the plan\" | \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-question-preference\" --check \"plan-ceo-review-mode-selection\" --summary-stdin 2>&1",
|
||||
"description": "Find mode question id and check tuning preference"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:15.007Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01NmCs2q9hSdUHbUfTxqxneJ",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "26: * - `one-way` for destructive ops, architecture/data-model forks,\n42: | 'routing' // which path to take (modes, strategies)\n213: 'office-hours-mode-goal': {\n214: id: 'office-hours-mode-goal',\n219: signal_key: 'session-mode',\n220: description: \"What's your goal with this session? (Sets mode: startup vs builder)\",\n230: 'office-hours-cross-model-run': {\n231: id: 'office-hours-cross-model-run',\n236: description: \"Want a second-opinion cross-model review of your brainstorm?\",\n267: 'plan-ceo-review-mode': {\n268: id: 'plan-ceo-review-mode',\n274: description: \"Review mode: push scope up, cherry-pick expansions, hold scope, or cut to minimum?\",\n291: description: \"Cross-model challenged an agreed premise \u2014 revise or keep?\",\n360: 'plan-design-review-mode': {\n361: id: 'plan-design-review-mode',\n389: 'plan-devex-review-mode': {\n390: id: 'plan-devex-review-mode',\n536: description: \"This repo has vendored gstack (deprecated) \u2014 migrate to team mode?\",\n599: description: \"Both models agree your direction should change \u2014 accept, reject, or revise the plan?\",\n---PREF\nASK_NORMALLY",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:20.096Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01FzdC1EmPzkfRuziJgv15yB",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"command": "printf '%s' \"Review mode: push scope up, cherry-pick expansions, hold scope, or cut to minimum?\" | \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-question-preference\" --check \"plan-ceo-review-mode\" --summary-stdin 2>&1",
|
||||
"description": "Check tuning preference for registered mode question id"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:21.537Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01FzdC1EmPzkfRuziJgv15yB",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "AUTO_DECIDE",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:52.489Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01VbEe1aNfrDEMT87VDTC5pv",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"command": "\"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-question-log\" '{\"skill\":\"plan-ceo-review\",\"question_id\":\"plan-ceo-review-mode\",\"question_summary\":\"Review mode for deterministic skill-list ordering draft\",\"category\":\"routing\",\"door_type\":\"two-way\",\"options_count\":4,\"user_choice\":\"C\",\"recommended\":\"C\",\"session_id\":\"50406-1789006673-17d85022\",\"auto_decided\":true}' 2>&1 || true",
|
||||
"description": "Log auto-decided mode question"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:53.843Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01VbEe1aNfrDEMT87VDTC5pv",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "(Bash completed with no output)",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:53.886Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_012kVuN9V5Wjaf5uaneFHHZ2",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"command": "\"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-skill-end\" --skill \"plan-ceo-review\" --outcome abort \\\n --session-id \"50406-1789006673-17d85022\" --tel-start \"1789006673\" --used-browse no \\\n --error-message \"\" --failed-step \"\" 2>&1 || true",
|
||||
"description": "Run skill-end telemetry hook"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "380ab4b8-5bc9-4895-b64a-223281a14246",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:18:55.348Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_012kVuN9V5Wjaf5uaneFHHZ2",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "SKILL_END: recorded outcome=abort duration_s=62",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c08eacbe-9daf-448a-9cf8-cc25061c63d1",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:27:44.623Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_015dq63UiQ4SvSNZj9FZqfKm",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Skill",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"skill": "plan-ceo-review"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c08eacbe-9daf-448a-9cf8-cc25061c63d1",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:27:46.582Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_015dq63UiQ4SvSNZj9FZqfKm",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "Launching skill: plan-ceo-review",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c08eacbe-9daf-448a-9cf8-cc25061c63d1",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:28:05.051Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01W2FX5kbWibGJ2f7ftUjhCJ",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"command": "_SS=\"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-skill-start\"\n[ -x \"$_SS\" ] || _SS=\".claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-skill-start\"\n\"$_SS\" --skill \"plan-ceo-review\" --model \"claude\" --parent-pid \"$PPID\" \\\n || echo \"SKILL_START: unavailable \u2014 stale install; run ./setup or /gstack-upgrade (preamble degraded, continue the user's task)\"",
|
||||
"description": "Run gstack skill-start preamble"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c08eacbe-9daf-448a-9cf8-cc25061c63d1",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:28:06.920Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01W2FX5kbWibGJ2f7ftUjhCJ",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "SKILL_START_PROTO: 1\nBRANCH: edinburgh-v1\nPROACTIVE: true\nPROACTIVE_PROMPTED: no\nSKILL_PREFIX: false\nREPO_MODE: collaborative\nSESSION_KIND: interactive\nCONDUCTOR_SESSION: true\nACTIVATED: no\nFIRST_LOOP_SHOWN: no\nFIRST_TASK: branch_ahead\nLAKE_INTRO: no\nTELEMETRY: off\nTEL_PROMPTED: no\nSESSION_ID: 85093-1789007286-d721b449\nTEL_START: 1789007286\nEXPLAIN_LEVEL: default\nQUESTION_TUNING: true\nUPDATE_CHECK: true\nLEARNINGS: 0\nHAS_ROUTING: yes\nROUTING_DECLINED: false\nVENDORED_GSTACK: no\nMODEL_OVERLAY: claude\nCHECKPOINT_MODE: explicit\nCHECKPOINT_PUSH: false\nGSTACK_PLAN_MODE: inactive\nARTIFACTS_SYNC: off\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_BEGIN: feature-checkpoint 85093-1789007286-d721b449\nFeature discovery: AskUserQuestion for Continuous checkpoint auto-commits. If accepted, run `/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-NuDcmO/tmp/gstack-hermetic-50295-M5gXin/skill-home-mg2O11/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set checkpoint_mode continuous`. Always run: `touch \"/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-NuDcmO/tmp/gstack-auto-decide-CAA7fU/.feature-prompted-continuous-checkpoint\"`.\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_END\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_BEGIN: lake-intro 85093-1789007286-d721b449\nSay: \"gstack follows the **Boil the Ocean** principle \u2014 do the complete thing when AI makes marginal cost near-zero. Read more: https://garryslist.org/posts/boil-the-ocean\" and offer to open it. Only run `open https://garryslist.org/posts/boil-the-ocean` if the user says yes. Always run: `touch \"/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-NuDcmO/tmp/gstack-auto-decide-CAA7fU/.completeness-intro-seen\"`.\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_END\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_BEGIN: first-run-tip 85093-1789007286-d721b449\nShow this one project-specific line as a heads-up, then CONTINUE with whatever the user actually asked \u2014 do NOT halt their task: Unshipped work on this branch \u2014 `/review` then `/ship`.\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_END",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c08eacbe-9daf-448a-9cf8-cc25061c63d1",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:28:26.725Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01SdBCofKktG5yJHn3NXuiod",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"command": "grep -n -i \"mode\" \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/scripts/question-registry.ts\" | head -20; echo \"---\"; printf '%s' \"Select CEO review mode (expansion/selective/hold/reduction) for deterministic skill-list ordering plan\" | \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-question-preference\" --check \"plan-ceo-review-mode-selection\" --summary-stdin 2>&1",
|
||||
"description": "Look up mode question id and check auto-decide preference"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c08eacbe-9daf-448a-9cf8-cc25061c63d1",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:28:28.393Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01SdBCofKktG5yJHn3NXuiod",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "26: * - `one-way` for destructive ops, architecture/data-model forks,\n42: | 'routing' // which path to take (modes, strategies)\n213: 'office-hours-mode-goal': {\n214: id: 'office-hours-mode-goal',\n219: signal_key: 'session-mode',\n220: description: \"What's your goal with this session? (Sets mode: startup vs builder)\",\n230: 'office-hours-cross-model-run': {\n231: id: 'office-hours-cross-model-run',\n236: description: \"Want a second-opinion cross-model review of your brainstorm?\",\n267: 'plan-ceo-review-mode': {\n268: id: 'plan-ceo-review-mode',\n274: description: \"Review mode: push scope up, cherry-pick expansions, hold scope, or cut to minimum?\",\n291: description: \"Cross-model challenged an agreed premise \u2014 revise or keep?\",\n360: 'plan-design-review-mode': {\n361: id: 'plan-design-review-mode',\n389: 'plan-devex-review-mode': {\n390: id: 'plan-devex-review-mode',\n536: description: \"This repo has vendored gstack (deprecated) \u2014 migrate to team mode?\",\n599: description: \"Both models agree your direction should change \u2014 accept, reject, or revise the plan?\",\n---\nASK_NORMALLY",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c08eacbe-9daf-448a-9cf8-cc25061c63d1",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:28:35.075Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Mt68DcNjJdfjw1mCfSmbD9",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"command": "printf '%s' \"Review mode: push scope up, cherry-pick expansions, hold scope, or cut to minimum? (deterministic skill-list ordering)\" | \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-question-preference\" --check \"plan-ceo-review-mode\" --summary-stdin 2>&1",
|
||||
"description": "Check auto-decide preference for registered mode question id"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c08eacbe-9daf-448a-9cf8-cc25061c63d1",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:28:36.969Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Mt68DcNjJdfjw1mCfSmbD9",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "AUTO_DECIDE",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c08eacbe-9daf-448a-9cf8-cc25061c63d1",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:28:53.051Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Finw98Wx5dx9xFMQuEWcps",
|
||||
"kind": "use",
|
||||
"name": "Bash",
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"command": "\"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-question-log\" '{\"skill\":\"plan-ceo-review\",\"question_id\":\"plan-ceo-review-mode\",\"question_summary\":\"Review mode for deterministic skill-list ordering plan\",\"category\":\"routing\",\"door_type\":\"two-way\",\"options_count\":4,\"user_choice\":\"C\",\"recommended\":\"C\",\"session_id\":\"85093-1789007286-d721b449\"}' 2>&1 || true\n\"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-skill-end\" --skill \"plan-ceo-review\" --outcome success --session-id \"85093-1789007286-d721b449\" --tel-start \"1789007286\" --used-browse no --error-message \"\" --failed-step \"\" 2>/dev/null || true; echo done",
|
||||
"description": "Log auto-decided mode question and end skill telemetry"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "c08eacbe-9daf-448a-9cf8-cc25061c63d1",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:28:55.182Z",
|
||||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01Finw98Wx5dx9xFMQuEWcps",
|
||||
"kind": "result",
|
||||
"content": "SKILL_END: recorded outcome=success duration_s=49\ndone",
|
||||
"isError": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
Vendored
+21
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"description": "Exact public completed PLAN.md artifacts for the AG SDK semantic assertion failures; not a live pass.",
|
||||
"first": {
|
||||
"sourceProof": ".context/ship-source-ag-delta-paid-20260910-v1/sdk-first-report-native-v1/proof.json",
|
||||
"sourceProofSha256": "e2e5849b7ee71acce22dc2e3a56df20e9a5c94caf1d9fe203cb564c6fcb542a0",
|
||||
"reportSha256": "60d0f6a690c6fb2e25c145ded7d19e7c370f26cfc00e557c1e6cbc5614b9c756",
|
||||
"report": "# Plan: cache profile summaries in one process\n\nReviewed by /plan-ceo-review on 2026-09-10 (mode: HOLD SCOPE). Original plan content is\npreserved below; accepted amendments are marked `[Amended: D<n>]` and cross-reference the\ndecision and finding registries in the review record.\n\n## Measured problem and accepted scope\nThe existing profile-summary service has one active process. A one-week trace\nshows repeated reads of about 900 hot keys: DB CPU is 70%, with read p95 120 ms.\nAdd a process-local LRU wrapper to the existing repository. Acceptance targets\nare at least 60% cache hits, DB CPU below 50%, and read p95 below 60 ms, with the\nexisting error-rate and correctness SLOs unchanged. This is an internal backend\nchange with no UI, API, schema, pricing, or developer onboarding change.\n\n## Existing contracts retained\n- All reads and writes use this repository in the same process; there are no\n external DB writers. Multi-process operation remains unsupported and startup\n rejects that configuration while caching is enabled.\n- Authentication and authorization run before repository access. Keys encode\n the authenticated tenant ID and validated profile ID without ambiguity.\n Values are immutable profile-summary DTOs; secrets and cache keys are never\n logged. Cached results cannot bypass authorization.\n- The existing LRU adapter supports 1000 entries, a 16 MiB byte cap, and a\n 30-second TTL. Recorded hot data fits those limits. Absent records use a\n distinct sentinel with a 10-second TTL; undefined means a cache miss.\n- Cache operations are synchronous and atomic in the single JS event loop.\n On any cache failure the existing adapter bypasses the cache until an empty\n cache is reinitialized; repository errors keep the current typed API error\n mapping. The existing per-key\n single-flight wrapper coalesces simultaneous misses and releases on failure.\n- A read already in progress when a write commits may return its earlier DB\n snapshot to that caller. Every read begun after that write completes must\n observe the committed version. TTL expiry is not a substitute for this rule.\n\n## Proposed wrapper integration\nKeep the current read-through repository interface and shared adapters.\n\n`[Amended: D3, D4, D5, D7]` The original sketch stated that no coordination between a\ncache fill and a write was needed. Review finding F1 shows that claim violates the\nretained read-after-write contract (see Async schedule in the review record). The\ncomplete read/write ordering rules are now:\n\n1. A miss registers an in-flight fill for the key in the existing single-flight\n wrapper. The fill handle carries an `invalidated` flag.\n2. A write marks and detaches the key's in-flight fill before awaiting the DB, and\n again after the write settles (success, typed failure, or indeterminate failure),\n then deletes the key. A detached fill still resolves for its own waiters (allowed by\n the contract) but never populates the cache; it increments `profile_cache.fill_discarded`.\n3. Absent results are stored as the sentinel with the 10-second TTL and mapped back to\n the repository's existing absent result on a hit, so callers see identical behavior\n with and without the cache. Values use the 30-second TTL.\n4. The feature flag is evaluated once per operation with the same deterministic key\n hash for reads and writes. A flag-read failure evaluates as disabled. Any change to\n the flag value (off/on or percentage) reinitializes an empty cache and invalidates\n all in-flight fills.\n\n```javascript\n// Fill/write ordering (F1, F3): a fill that overlaps any write never populates.\n// miss \u2500\u25b6 flight{invalidated:false} \u2500\u25b6 await repository.read \u2500\u25b6 invalidated ? discard : set\n// write \u2500\u25b6 invalidate(key) \u2500\u25b6 await repository.write \u2500\u25b6 finally: invalidate(key); cache.delete(key)\nasync function readProfile(key) {\n if (!flag.enabledFor(key)) return repository.read(key); // flag error => disabled (F5)\n const cached = cache.get(key);\n if (cached !== undefined) return fromCacheValue(cached); // sentinel -> existing absent result (F2)\n return singleFlight.run(key, async (flight) => {\n const value = await repository.read(key); // typed errors propagate; nothing cached\n if (flight.invalidated) metrics.increment('profile_cache.fill_discarded');\n else cache.set(key, toCacheValue(value), ttlFor(value)); // 30 s value / 10 s sentinel (F2)\n return value;\n });\n}\n\nasync function writeProfile(key, update) {\n if (!flag.enabledFor(key)) return repository.write(key, update);\n singleFlight.invalidate(key); // fills started before the write cannot populate (F1)\n try {\n return await repository.write(key, update);\n } finally {\n singleFlight.invalidate(key); // fills issued during the write are pre-commit snapshots (F1)\n cache.delete(key)Line truncated
|
||||
"finding": "| F1 | 1, 4 | CRITICAL GAP (fixed by D3) | Contract: \"Every read begun after that write completes must observe the committed version.\" Sketch: `cache.set(key, value)` after `await repository.read` with \"no additional version checks or coordination\". Schedule below shows a post-write reader receiving the pre-write snapshot via a stale fill or via single-flight coalescing. | D3: single-flight `invalidate(key)` before and after the write; invalidated fills never `set`; `fill_discarded` metric | Fills overlapping a write are not cached (bounded hit-rate cost, visible in metric) | T1 tests: both completion orders plus during-write fill; assert post-write reader sees v2 and cache never holds v1 |",
|
||||
"heading": "**3. Async schedule (F1) with one column per operation and shared state**",
|
||||
"trace": " t | R1 readProfile(k) | W writeProfile(k, v2) | R2 readProfile(k) | cache[k] | inflight[k]\n 1 | miss; flight f1; await read | | | - | f1\n 2 | | await write ... commit v2 | | - | f1\n 3 | | delete(k) no-op; return | | - | f1\n 4 | | | begins; miss; joins f1 | - | f1\n 5 | read resolves v1; set(k, v1) | | receives v1 VIOLATION | v1 BAD | -\n Order B: R2 begins after t5 -> cache hit v1 VIOLATION (until TTL or next write)\n Contract: R2 began after W completed, so R2 must observe v2. Sketch has no preventing mechanism.\n\n AMENDED (D3):\n 2 | (f1.invalidated = true; inflight.delete(k) at write start)\n 4 | | | begins; miss; new flight f2 (post-commit read -> v2)\n 5 | f1 resolves v1 -> returned to R1 only (R1 began before W: allowed); not cached; fill_discarded+1\n During-write fill: f2 issued between write start and commit reads v1 pre-commit; finally-invalidate marks f2; discarded."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"retry": {
|
||||
"sourceProof": ".context/ship-source-ag-delta-paid-20260910-v1/sdk-retry-report-native-v1/proof.json",
|
||||
"sourceProofSha256": "abc769713669f6759b934c7ae23306d411f2bfc1fb2f8ba1ff022e19c9e24bce",
|
||||
"reportSha256": "02bcd206f50606a61b5f6240d5d455f1330f3df2608149d2a402294ea697456e",
|
||||
"report": "# Plan: cache profile summaries in one process\n\nReviewed by /plan-ceo-review on 2026-09-10 (HOLD SCOPE, spawned run: every decision\nauto-selected the recommended option; see Decision Register). Original plan content is\npreserved below; amendments are marked `[Amended: F#]` and point at the finding record.\n\n## Measured problem and accepted scope\nThe existing profile-summary service has one active process. A one-week trace\nshows repeated reads of about 900 hot keys: DB CPU is 70%, with read p95 120 ms.\nAdd a process-local LRU wrapper to the existing repository. Acceptance targets\nare at least 60% cache hits, DB CPU below 50%, and read p95 below 60 ms, with the\nexisting error-rate and correctness SLOs unchanged. This is an internal backend\nchange with no UI, API, schema, pricing, or developer onboarding change.\n\n`[Amended: F7]` Targets are unchanged. Hit rate is measured over flag-enabled keys\nonly, and read latency is recorded separately for hits and misses so the owner can\nattribute any p95 result (see Metric Schema).\n\n## Existing contracts retained\n- All reads and writes use this repository in the same process; there are no\n external DB writers. Multi-process operation remains unsupported and startup\n rejects that configuration while caching is enabled.\n- Authentication and authorization run before repository access. Keys encode\n the authenticated tenant ID and validated profile ID without ambiguity.\n Values are immutable profile-summary DTOs; secrets and cache keys are never\n logged. Cached results cannot bypass authorization.\n- The existing LRU adapter supports 1000 entries, a 16 MiB byte cap, and a\n 30-second TTL. Recorded hot data fits those limits. Absent records use a\n distinct sentinel with a 10-second TTL; undefined means a cache miss.\n- Cache operations are synchronous and atomic in the single JS event loop.\n On any cache failure the existing adapter bypasses the cache until an empty\n cache is reinitialized; repository errors keep the current typed API error\n mapping. The existing per-key\n single-flight wrapper coalesces simultaneous misses and releases on failure.\n- A read already in progress when a write commits may return its earlier DB\n snapshot to that caller. Every read begun after that write completes must\n observe the committed version. TTL expiry is not a substitute for this rule.\n\n`[Amended: F1]` Boundary definition used by this plan: a write \"completes\" when\n`writeProfile` resolves to its caller. `invalidate()` runs synchronously inside that\nsame continuation, before resolution, so any read that begins after the caller\nobserves completion cannot hit a pre-write entry or join a pre-write DB read.\n\n## Proposed wrapper integration\nKeep the current read-through repository interface and shared adapters.\n\n`[Amended: F1, F2, F4, F10]` The original sketch stated that no coordination between a\ncache fill and a write was proposed. The review showed that omission violates the\nretained read-after-write contract (F1). The rules below replace it and are the\ncomplete read/write ordering rules.\n\n```javascript\n// Composition (read): flag \u2500\u25b6 cache.get \u2500\u25b6 pending-fill token \u2500\u25b6 single-flight \u2500\u25b6 repository.read \u2500\u25b6 guarded fill\n// Composition (write): repository.write \u2500\u25b6 invalidate(key) [always, flag-independent]\nconst pendingFills = new Map(); // key -> Set<{cancelled:boolean}>; entries exist only while a miss is in flight\n\nasync function readProfile(key) {\n if (!cacheFlag.enabledFor(key)) return repository.read(key); // F10: flag gates reads only\n const cached = cache.get(key); // undefined = miss or adapter bypass\n if (cached !== undefined) return cached === ABSENT ? null : cached; // F4: unwrap sentinel (null = existing absent result)\n const token = { cancelled: false };\n track(pendingFills, key, token);\n let value;\n try {\n value = await singleFlight.run(key, () => repository.read(key)); // existing wrapper; releases on failure\n } finally {\n untrack(pendingFills, key, token);\n }\n if (token.cancelled) { // F1: a write invalidated this key mid-read\n metrics.inc('profile_cache_fill_cancelled_total');\n } else {\n cache.set(key, value === null ? ABSENT : value); // adapter applies 10 s / 30 s TTL, byte cap, oversize reject (F6)\n }\n return value; // caller keeps its own snapshot (allowed by contract)\n}\n\nasync function writeProfile(key, update) {\n let saved;\n try {\n saved = await repository.write(key, update);\n } catch (err) {\n if (isIndeterminateWriteError(err)) invalidate(key, 'write_indeterminate'); // F2: DB state unknown\n throw err; // existing typed Line truncated
|
||||
"finding": "| F1 | 1, 4 | CRITICAL | \"no additional version checks or coordination between a cache fill and a write\" vs contract \"every read begun after that write completes must observe the committed version\". Schedule S1: R1 misses, W commits and deletes, R1 fills stale v1, R2 hits v1. S2: R2 joins R1's in-flight single-flight read after commit. | `invalidate()` cancels pending fills, detaches single-flight slot, deletes entry; runs before `writeProfile` resolves. Counter `fill_cancelled_total`. | Contract boundary defined as caller-visible completion; owner may confirm | Tests S1\u2013S4 with pause/release |",
|
||||
"heading": "### 4. Async schedule (F1)",
|
||||
"trace": "step | R1 read (began before commit) | W write | R2 read (began after W resolves) | cache / pending\n1 | get\u2192miss; token t1 | | | \u2205 / {t1}\n2 | await singleFlight(repo.read) | | |\n3 | | await repo.write \u2192 v2 committed | |\n4 | | invalidate: cancel t1, detach, delete | | \u2205 / {t1\u2717}\n4' | | writeProfile resolves (write \"complete\") | |\n5 | | | get\u2192miss; token t2; fresh DB read | \u2205 / {t1\u2717,t2}\n6 | read resolves v1; t1\u2717 \u2192 no fill | | | \u2205 / {t2}\n7 | | | resolves v2; fill; return v2 | v2 / \u2205\nAlternate order (6 before 4): R1 fills v1, then step 4 deletes it; R2 misses and reads v2. Safe.\nOriginal sketch: step 6 fills v1 after step 4 \u2192 R2 hits v1 \u2192 VIOLATION (S1).\nWithout detach: R2 at step 5 joins R1's promise \u2192 v1 \u2192 VIOLATION (S2).\nS3: W commits before R1 issues read \u2192 R1 reads v2, fill v2 (t1 not cancelled since invalidate preceded track): correct.\nS4: indeterminate write error after commit \u2192 invalidate on error path \u2192 R2 reads v2 (F2)."
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -18,6 +18,25 @@ interface ArtifactPermissionContext {
|
||||
const MAX_BYTES = 1024 * 1024;
|
||||
const compact = (text: string) => text.replace(/\s/g, '');
|
||||
|
||||
/** The native header may remain above the diff; both displayed paths must bind. */
|
||||
function ownedEditDiffRows(rows: string[], file: string, ownedStateRoot?: string): string[] | null {
|
||||
const update = /^[●⏺] Update\(([^\n]+)\)$/.exec(rows[0] ?? '');
|
||||
if (!update) return rows; // Existing cropped-only row guards still apply.
|
||||
if (!ownedStateRoot || rows[1]?.trim() !== '' || !/^[─╌]{8,}$/.test(rows[2] ?? '') ||
|
||||
rows[3]?.trim() !== 'Edit file' || !/^[─╌]{8,}$/.test(rows[5] ?? '')) return null;
|
||||
const relative = path.relative(ownedStateRoot,file).split(path.sep).join('/');
|
||||
const alias = path.basename(ownedStateRoot) === '.gstack' ? `~/.gstack/${relative}` : undefined;
|
||||
if (update[1] !== file && update[1] !== alias) return null;
|
||||
const displayed = rows[4]?.trim() ?? '';
|
||||
if (displayed !== file && displayed !== alias) {
|
||||
const suffix = displayed.startsWith('…') ? displayed.slice(1) : '';
|
||||
// A truncated prefix must still retain the complete owned project/artifact
|
||||
// path. A basename or sibling-project suffix cannot bind this request.
|
||||
if ((suffix !== relative && !suffix.endsWith('/'+relative)) || !file.endsWith(suffix)) return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return rows.slice(6);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export function ownedAutoplanArtifact(file: string, context: Pick<ArtifactPermissionContext, 'cwd' | 'ownedStateRoot'>): boolean {
|
||||
if (!context.ownedStateRoot || !path.isAbsolute(file) || path.resolve(file) !== file) return false;
|
||||
const project = path.join(context.ownedStateRoot, 'projects', path.basename(context.cwd));
|
||||
@@ -37,15 +56,18 @@ export function ownedAutoplanArtifact(file: string, context: Pick<ArtifactPermis
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Require the whole current cropped diff, exact menu, and requested edit text. */
|
||||
function matchesCroppedEdit(viewport: string, file: string, before: string, removed: string, after: string): boolean {
|
||||
function matchesCroppedEdit(viewport: string, file: string, before: string, removed: string, after: string,
|
||||
ownedStateRoot?: string): boolean {
|
||||
if (viewport.length > MAX_BYTES) return false;
|
||||
const text = viewport.replace(/\r\n?/g, '\n');
|
||||
const menu = /^ {0,3}Do you want to make this edit to ([^\n?]+)\? *\n {0,3}❯ *1\. Yes *\n {0,3}2\. Yes, and switch to accept edits \(auto-approve file edits and common file commands\) for this session(?: \(shift\+tab\))? *\n {0,3}3\. No *\n\s*Esc to cancel [·•] Tab to amend\s*$/m.exec(text);
|
||||
if (!menu || menu.index + menu[0].length !== text.length || menu[1] !== path.basename(file)) return false;
|
||||
const rows = text.slice(0, menu.index).trimEnd().split('\n');
|
||||
if (!/^[╌─]{8,}$/.test(rows.pop() ?? '')) return false;
|
||||
const diffRows = ownedEditDiffRows(rows,file,ownedStateRoot);
|
||||
if (!diffRows) return false;
|
||||
const chunks: Array<{ kind: string; text: string }> = [];
|
||||
for (const row of rows) {
|
||||
for (const row of diffRows) {
|
||||
const numbered = /^ {0,3}(\d+) ([+ -])(.*)$/.exec(row);
|
||||
if (numbered) {
|
||||
const line = Number(numbered[1]);
|
||||
@@ -110,7 +132,8 @@ export function autoplanArtifactPermissionInput(
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const before = fs.readFileSync(edit.input.file_path, 'utf8');
|
||||
if (!before.includes(edit.input.old_string) ||
|
||||
!matchesCroppedEdit(viewport, edit.input.file_path, before, edit.input.old_string, edit.input.new_string)) return null;
|
||||
!matchesCroppedEdit(viewport, edit.input.file_path, before, edit.input.old_string, edit.input.new_string,
|
||||
context.ownedStateRoot)) return null;
|
||||
return { input: '1\r', signature, file: edit.input.file_path };
|
||||
} catch { return null; }
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -159,11 +182,13 @@ export function pendingAutoplanArtifactPermissionInput(viewport: string,
|
||||
if (!menu || menu.index + menu[0].length !== text.length || menu[1] !== path.basename(p.file)) return null;
|
||||
const rows = text.slice(0, menu.index).trimEnd().split('\n');
|
||||
if (!/^[╌─]{8,}$/.test(rows.pop() ?? '')) return null;
|
||||
const diffRows = ownedEditDiffRows(rows,p.file,context.ownedStateRoot);
|
||||
if (!diffRows) return null;
|
||||
if (Math.floor(fs.statSync(p.file).mtimeMs) > pendingTime) return null;
|
||||
const originals = fs.readFileSync(p.file, 'utf8').split('\n').map(compact);
|
||||
const chunks: Array<{kind:string; text:string; partial?:boolean}> = [];
|
||||
let numbered = 0;
|
||||
for (const row of rows) {
|
||||
for (const row of diffRows) {
|
||||
const full = /^ {0,3}(\d+) ([+ -])(.*)$/.exec(row);
|
||||
if (full) {
|
||||
if (!Number.isSafeInteger(Number(full[1])) || Number(full[1]) < 1) return null;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -146,6 +146,35 @@ function hasNativePostureProse(text: string, posture: RegExp): boolean {
|
||||
return hasPostAnswerCeoPosture(`● ${prose}`, posture);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Current scope lock + exclusion + hardening can apply HOLD without naming it. */
|
||||
function hasCurrentHoldScopePosture(text: string, selected: NativePlanQuestionCall): boolean {
|
||||
const plain = text.replace(/\*\*/g, '').replace(/’/g, "'").trim();
|
||||
// Require the declaration itself, not a quote, promise, example or comparison.
|
||||
const sentence = /^[\s\S]*?[.!?](?=\s|$)/.exec(plain)?.[0] ?? '';
|
||||
if (/\b(?:not|never|won't|can't|don't|isn't|aren't|if|unless|until|may|might|could|would|will|later|example|hypothetical)\b/i.test(sentence)) return false;
|
||||
const declaration = /^(?:I'm|I am|We're|We are) (?:locking|keeping|holding) (?:the )?scope (?:to|at) ([^,\n]+),\s*(?:flagging|treating|marking) (?:anything|everything) (?:beyond|outside) that(?: \([^()\n]+\))? as out of scope,? and (?:hunting|checking|looking) for (?:silent )?(?:failure modes|errors|edge cases)\b([^.!?\n]*)\.$/i.exec(sentence);
|
||||
if (!declaration) return false;
|
||||
// A later current correction can withdraw the declaration. Quoted examples
|
||||
// cannot; the opening declaration was matched before removing quoted blocks.
|
||||
const currentProse = plain.replace(/```[\s\S]*?(?:```|$)|~~~[\s\S]*?(?:~~~|$)/g, '')
|
||||
.replace(/^\s*>.*$/gm, '').replace(/"[^"\n]*"|“[^”\n]*”/g, '');
|
||||
if (/\b(?:expand\w*|widen\w*|reduc(?:e|ing)|shrink\w*)\s+(?:the\s+)?scope\b/i.test(currentProse) ||
|
||||
/\b(?:add|adding)\b[^.!?\n]*\b(?:to|into)\s+(?:the\s+)?scope\b/i.test(currentProse) ||
|
||||
/\b(?:no longer|not)\s+(?:locking|keeping|holding)\s+(?:the\s+)?scope\b/i.test(currentProse) ||
|
||||
/\b(?:previously|formerly) excluded\b[^.!?\n]*\b(?:now )?in scope\b/i.test(currentProse)) return false;
|
||||
const context = selected.questions.map(q => /^Project\/branch\/task:([^\n]*)/im.exec(q.question)?.[1] ?? '').join(' ');
|
||||
const plans = new Set(context.match(/\b[\w./-]+\.md\b/gi) ?? []);
|
||||
const baseline = declaration[1]!.trim();
|
||||
const namedPlan = /^(?:the )?(?:(?:\d+|one|two|three|four|five|six|seven|eight|nine|ten) )?([\w./-]+\.md) (?:bullets|requirements|scope)(?: from approach [A-Z])?$/i.exec(baseline);
|
||||
if (namedPlan ? plans.size !== 1 || !plans.has(namedPlan[1]!)
|
||||
: !/^the (?:current|agreed|approved|existing) (?:plan|scope)$/i.test(baseline)) return false;
|
||||
// Concrete failure surfaces distinguish review rigor from merely retaining scope.
|
||||
const hardening = declaration[2]!;
|
||||
return [/\bconstraints\b/i, /\berror handling\b/i, /\bedge cases\b/i,
|
||||
/\baccess(?:-rule)? leaks\b/i, /\bsecurity\b/i, /\btest(?:ing|s)\b/i]
|
||||
.filter(surface => surface.test(hardening)).length >= 2;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** A native successful answer, not the key we intended to send to the menu. */
|
||||
export function nativeCeoModeAnswer(
|
||||
transcript: PlanCountTranscript,
|
||||
@@ -295,7 +324,10 @@ export function hasNativePostAnswerCeoPosture(
|
||||
const answeredAt = Date.parse(selected.answeredAt!);
|
||||
return transcript.assistantMessages.some(message => {
|
||||
if (message.sessionId !== selected.sessionId || Date.parse(message.timestamp) <= answeredAt) return false;
|
||||
return hasNativePostureProse(message.text, posture);
|
||||
return hasNativePostureProse(message.text, posture) ||
|
||||
(targetMode === 'HOLD SCOPE' && Number.isFinite(Date.parse(message.timestamp)) &&
|
||||
Date.parse(message.timestamp) <= Date.now() &&
|
||||
hasCurrentHoldScopePosture(message.text, selected));
|
||||
}) || (targetMode === 'SCOPE EXPANSION' && hasAnsweredExpansionPosture(transcript, selected, posture, publicTools)) ||
|
||||
(targetMode === 'HOLD SCOPE' && hasAnsweredHoldPosture(transcript, selected, posture, publicTools));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -139,6 +139,91 @@ function columnarStaleFillTrace(text: string): { tail: string; reader: string; o
|
||||
return { tail, reader: reader[1]!, old };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** An explicitly named alternate order can supply the later cache-hit reader. */
|
||||
function alternateOrderStaleFillTrace(text: string): string | undefined {
|
||||
const lines = text.split('\n').map(line => line.trim().replace(/\s+/g, ' ')).filter(Boolean);
|
||||
const cells = (line: string) => line.replace(/^\|\s*|\s*\|$/g, '').split('|').map(cell => cell.trim());
|
||||
const header = cells(lines[0] ?? '');
|
||||
if (header.length !== 6 || header[0] !== 't') return;
|
||||
const identifier = String.raw`([A-Za-z_$][\w$]*)`;
|
||||
const read = new RegExp(String.raw`^(R[1-9]\d*) readProfile\(${identifier}\)$`);
|
||||
const first = read.exec(header[1]!);
|
||||
const writer = new RegExp(String.raw`^(W[1-9]\d*|W) writeProfile\(${identifier},\s*${identifier}\)$`).exec(header[2]!);
|
||||
const later = read.exec(header[3]!);
|
||||
if (!first || !writer || !later || first[1] === later[1] || first[2] !== writer[2] || first[2] !== later[2]
|
||||
|| header[4] !== `cache[${first[2]}]` || header[5] !== `inflight[${first[2]}]`) return;
|
||||
const rows = lines.slice(1, 6).map(cells);
|
||||
if (rows.length !== 5 || rows.some((row, i) => row.length !== 6 || row[0] !== String(i + 1))) return;
|
||||
const flight = new RegExp(String.raw`^miss; flight ${identifier}; await read$`).exec(rows[0]![1]!);
|
||||
const fill = new RegExp(String.raw`^read resolves ${identifier}; set\(${identifier},\s*${identifier}\)$`).exec(rows[4]![1]!);
|
||||
if (!flight || !fill || fill[2] !== first[2] || fill[1] !== fill[3] || fill[1] === writer[3]) return;
|
||||
const old = fill[1]!, fresh = writer[3]!, key = first[2]!;
|
||||
const expected = [
|
||||
[rows[0]![1]!, '', '', '-', flight[1]!],
|
||||
['', `await write ... commit ${fresh}`, '', '-', flight[1]!],
|
||||
['', `delete(${key}) no-op; return`, '', '-', flight[1]!],
|
||||
['', '', `begins; miss; joins ${flight[1]}`, '-', flight[1]!],
|
||||
[rows[4]![1]!, '', `receives ${old} VIOLATION`, `${old} BAD`, '-'],
|
||||
];
|
||||
if (rows.some((row, i) => row.slice(1).some((cell, j) => cell !== expected[i]![j]))) return;
|
||||
// The ordinary row 4 joins an old flight. It is not a later cache hit.
|
||||
// Order B explicitly moves that same reader after the stale fill at row 5.
|
||||
const order = `Order B: ${later[1]} begins after t5 -> cache hit ${old} VIOLATION (until TTL or next write)`;
|
||||
const contract = `Contract: ${later[1]} began after ${writer[1]} completed, so ${later[1]} must observe ${fresh}. Sketch has no preventing mechanism.`;
|
||||
if (lines[6]?.replace(/→/g, '->') !== order || lines[7] !== contract) return;
|
||||
// The separately labelled amended execution cannot supply original evidence.
|
||||
// Keep original assessment text, including any later dismissal, authoritative.
|
||||
const amended = lines.findIndex((line, i) => i > 7 && /^AMENDED \(D[1-9]\d*\):$/.test(line));
|
||||
const assessment = lines.slice(6, amended < 0 ? undefined : amended).join(' ');
|
||||
if (lines.slice(amended < 0 ? lines.length : amended + 1).some(line =>
|
||||
/\b(?:original|this|the)\s+(?:trace|schedule|scenario|race)\s+(?:is|was)\s+(?:impossible|not\s+(?:a\s+)?(?:bug|defect|violation))\b/i.test(line))) return;
|
||||
return assessment;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Read an explicit original-sketch override without crediting the amended fill. */
|
||||
function originalSketchStaleFillTrace(text: string): { assessment: string; summary: string } | undefined {
|
||||
const lines = text.split('\n').map(line => line.trim().replace(/\s+/g, ' ').replace(/→/g, '->')).filter(Boolean);
|
||||
const cells = (line: string) => line.split('|').map(cell => cell.trim());
|
||||
const header = cells(lines[0] ?? '');
|
||||
if (header.length !== 5 || header[0] !== 'step' || header[4] !== 'cache / pending') return;
|
||||
const first = /^(R[1-9]\d*) read \(began before commit\)$/.exec(header[1]!);
|
||||
const writer = /^(W[1-9]\d*|W) write$/.exec(header[2]!);
|
||||
const later = /^(R[1-9]\d*) read \(began after (W[1-9]\d*|W) resolves\)$/.exec(header[3]!);
|
||||
if (!first || !writer || !later || first[1] === later[1] || writer[1] !== later[2]) return;
|
||||
const rows = lines.slice(1, 9).map(cells);
|
||||
const steps = ['1', '2', '3', '4', "4'", '5', '6', '7'];
|
||||
if (rows.length !== 8 || rows.some((row, i) => row.length !== 5 || row[0] !== steps[i])) return;
|
||||
const token = /^get->miss; token ([A-Za-z_$][\w$]*)$/.exec(rows[0]![1]!);
|
||||
const next = /^get->miss; token ([A-Za-z_$][\w$]*); fresh DB read$/.exec(rows[5]![3]!);
|
||||
const write = /^await repo\.write -> ([A-Za-z_$][\w$]*) committed$/.exec(rows[2]![2]!);
|
||||
const read = /^read resolves ([A-Za-z_$][\w$]*); ([A-Za-z_$][\w$]*)✗ -> no fill$/.exec(rows[6]![1]!);
|
||||
if (!token || !next || !write || !read || token[1] === next[1] || read[2] !== token[1] || read[1] === write[1]) return;
|
||||
const old = read[1]!, fresh = write[1]!, pending = token[1]!, newPending = next[1]!;
|
||||
// One cache/pending column owns this execution. The writer cancels the
|
||||
// original reader's exact token; no other key, token or actor may borrow it.
|
||||
const expected = [
|
||||
[`get->miss; token ${pending}`, '', '', `∅ / {${pending}}`],
|
||||
['await singleFlight(repo.read)', '', '', ''],
|
||||
['', `await repo.write -> ${fresh} committed`, '', ''],
|
||||
['', `invalidate: cancel ${pending}, detach, delete`, '', `∅ / {${pending}✗}`],
|
||||
['', 'writeProfile resolves (write "complete")', '', ''],
|
||||
['', '', `get->miss; token ${newPending}; fresh DB read`, `∅ / {${pending}✗,${newPending}}`],
|
||||
[`read resolves ${old}; ${pending}✗ -> no fill`, '', '', `∅ / {${newPending}}`],
|
||||
['', '', `resolves ${fresh}; fill; return ${fresh}`, `${fresh} / ∅`],
|
||||
];
|
||||
if (rows.some((row, i) => row.slice(1).some((cell, j) => cell !== expected[i]![j]))) return;
|
||||
const alternate = `Alternate order (6 before 4): ${first[1]} fills ${old}, then step 4 deletes it; ${later[1]} misses and reads ${fresh}. Safe.`;
|
||||
if (lines[9] !== alternate) return;
|
||||
const original = /^Original sketch: step 6 fills ([A-Za-z_$][\w$]*) after step 4 -> (R[1-9]\d*) hits ([A-Za-z_$][\w$]*) -> VIOLATION \((S[1-9]\d*)\)\.$/.exec(lines[10] ?? '');
|
||||
if (!original || original[1] !== old || original[3] !== old || original[2] !== later[1]) return;
|
||||
const assessment = lines.slice(10).join(' ');
|
||||
if (/\b(?:(?:this|that|the|original)\s+(?:trace|scenario|execution|sequence)|this|that|it)\s+(?:is|was|remains)\s+impossible\b/i.test(assessment)) return;
|
||||
return {
|
||||
assessment,
|
||||
summary: `Schedule ${original[4]}: ${first[1]} misses, ${writer[1]} commits and deletes, ${first[1]} fills stale ${old}, ${later[1]} hits ${old}.`,
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** A named finding may put its ordering evidence in a trace, not one paragraph. */
|
||||
function hasStructuredStaleFillFinding(report: string): boolean {
|
||||
const lines = report.split('\n');
|
||||
@@ -161,6 +246,44 @@ function hasStructuredStaleFillFinding(report: string): boolean {
|
||||
// closing delimiter. They cannot supply an asserted prose violation.
|
||||
if (!fence && !/^\s*>/.test(line) && !/^(?: {4}|\t)/.test(line)) prose[i] = line;
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (const trace of traces) {
|
||||
let heading = trace.start - 1;
|
||||
while (heading >= 0 && !prose[heading]!.trim()) heading--;
|
||||
const identity = /^(?:#{1,6}\s+)?(?:\*\*)?[1-9]\d*\. Async schedule \((F[1-9]\d*)\)(?: with one column per operation and shared state)?(?:\*\*)?$/.exec(prose[heading] ?? '');
|
||||
if (!identity) continue;
|
||||
// Unheaded prose immediately introducing this finding or schedule owns
|
||||
// its assertion status, regardless of whether it ends in ':' or '.'.
|
||||
// Require a fresh structural boundary instead of dropping that context.
|
||||
const framed = (prefix: string) => !prefix || /^(?:\||#{1,6}\s|\*\*\d+\.\s)/.test(prefix);
|
||||
const prefix = prose.slice(0, heading).filter(line => line.trim()).at(-1) ?? '';
|
||||
if (!framed(prefix)) continue;
|
||||
const findings = prose.slice(0, heading).map((line, index) => ({ index, cells: line.split('|').map(cell => cell.trim()) }))
|
||||
.filter(({ cells }) => cells[0] === '' && cells[1] === identity[1] && /^CRITICAL(?: GAP(?: \(fixed by D[1-9]\d*\))?)?$/.test(cells[3] ?? ''));
|
||||
if (findings.length !== 1) continue;
|
||||
const findingPrefix = prose.slice(0, findings[0]!.index).filter(line => line.trim()).at(-1) ?? '';
|
||||
if (!framed(findingPrefix)) continue;
|
||||
const alternate = alternateOrderStaleFillTrace(trace.text);
|
||||
const original = originalSketchStaleFillTrace(trace.text);
|
||||
const evidence = findings[0]!.cells[4] ?? '';
|
||||
const ordered = alternate && /(?:^|[.;]\s+)Schedule below shows\b/.test(evidence) ? alternate
|
||||
: original && evidence.split(/(?<=\.)\s+/).includes(original.summary) ? original.assessment : undefined;
|
||||
if (!ordered) continue;
|
||||
const assessment: string[] = [];
|
||||
for (let i = trace.end + 1; i < prose.length; i++) {
|
||||
if (/^(?:#{1,6}\s|\*\*\d+\.|[DSF][1-9]\d*\b|\|)/.test(prose[i]!)) break;
|
||||
assessment.push(prose[i]!);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (/\b(?:(?:this|that|the|original)\s+(?:trace|scenario|execution|sequence)|this|that|it)\s+(?:is|was|remains)\s+impossible\b/i.test([ordered, ...assessment].join(' '))) continue;
|
||||
// A selected repair's invalidated-fill rule describes the amendment. It
|
||||
// does not assert that the original late fill was already impossible.
|
||||
const registry = [...findings[0]!.cells];
|
||||
const repair = /\(fixed by (D[1-9]\d*)\)$/.exec(registry[3] ?? '')?.[1];
|
||||
if (repair && registry[5]?.startsWith(`${repair}: `)) {
|
||||
registry[5] = registry[5].replace(/\binvalidated fills never `?set`?\b/g, 'discard invalidated fills');
|
||||
}
|
||||
const claim = `Concurrent cache read fills an old value after the write committed and invalidated the same key. A new reader receives that stale value, which violates the read-after-write contract. ${registry.join(' | ')} ${ordered} ${assessment.join(' ')}`;
|
||||
if (hasProseStaleFillFinding(claim)) return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (const trace of traces) {
|
||||
let heading = trace.start - 1;
|
||||
while (heading >= 0 && !prose[heading]!.trim()) heading--;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ import { withHermeticSkillRuntime } from './hermetic-skill-runtime';
|
||||
import { createPlanCountFixture } from './plan-count-fixture';
|
||||
import { createPlanCountSnapshotWriter } from './plan-count-artifacts';
|
||||
import { nativeSeededPlanSelection } from './plan-scope-selection';
|
||||
import { findNativeAutoDecision, type NativeAutoDecision } from './native-auto-decide';
|
||||
import { readPlanCountTranscript, unresolvedPlanQuestionCalls, type NativePlanQuestionCall, type PlanCountTranscript, type NativePublicToolEvent } from './plan-count-transcript';
|
||||
import { createPendingExitRecorder, withPendingExit, isCurrentPlanApprovalScreen } from './plan-count-pending-exit';
|
||||
import { createPendingQuestionRecorder } from './plan-count-pending-question';
|
||||
@@ -2152,6 +2153,32 @@ export const ceoStep0Boundary: Step0BoundaryPredicate = (fp) =>
|
||||
// directly to review-phase. Boundary fires on the scope AUQ itself.
|
||||
fp.options.some((o) => /skip\s+interview|plan\s+immediately/i.test(o.label));
|
||||
|
||||
/** Complete native assertion briefs distinguish a current gap from test layout. */
|
||||
function ceoAssertionMismatchBrief(q: NativePlanQuestionCall['questions'][number]): boolean {
|
||||
const explanation = (/^ELI10:\s*(.+)$/m.exec(q.question)?.[1] ?? '')
|
||||
.replace(/"(?:[^"\\]|\\.)*"|“[^”]*”|`[^`]*`/g, '""');
|
||||
return /\bcontract\b/i.test(q.question.split('\n')[0] + ' ' + explanation) &&
|
||||
/\b(?:planned|proposed|current)\s+(?:test|assertion)\s+only\s+checks?\b/i.test(explanation) &&
|
||||
!/\b(?:gap|defect|issue|problem)\b[^.!?]{0,80}\b(?:was|were|already|now|has been|have been)\s+(?:resolved|fixed|closed)\b/i.test(explanation) &&
|
||||
q.options.some(option => {
|
||||
const label = option.label.replace(/^([1-9]\d*)?[A-Z][):.]\s*/i, '');
|
||||
if (/^(?:keep|leave|preserve)\b/i.test(label)) return false;
|
||||
const artifactTarget = (target: string) => /^(?:(?:the|a|an|this|prior|previous|completed|reviewed|current|saved|stored|exact|expected|full|complete|whole)\s+)*(?:(?:contents?|text|format|structure)\s+of\s+(?:(?:the|saved|current)\s+)*)?(?:review\s+)?(?:plan|report|summary|note|record|document|log|layout)s?\b/i.test(target);
|
||||
// Each assertion clause owns its qualifier and object. An independent
|
||||
// report instruction cannot make an unchanged assertion stronger.
|
||||
return [label, option.description ?? ''].some(text => text.trim()
|
||||
.split(/[.;]\s+|\s+(?:and|then)\s+(?=(?:assert|pin|verify|deep-equal|check|include|add|record|save|write|document|update|render|produce)\b)/i)
|
||||
.some(clause => {
|
||||
const action = /^(assert|pin|verify|deep-equal)\s+(.+)/i.exec(clause);
|
||||
if (!action || artifactTarget(action[2]!)) return false;
|
||||
if (action[1]!.toLowerCase() === 'deep-equal') return true;
|
||||
return [...action[2]!.matchAll(/\b(?:exact|exactly|full|complete|whole|expected)\s+/gi)].some(qualifier =>
|
||||
!/\bonly\b/i.test(action[2]!.slice(0, qualifier.index)) &&
|
||||
!artifactTarget(action[2]!.slice(qualifier.index! + qualifier[0].length)));
|
||||
}));
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Native finding evidence when CEO mode selection is omitted or left unanswered. */
|
||||
function ceoNumberedBriefDecision(q: NativePlanQuestionCall['questions'][number], subject: string): boolean {
|
||||
// A numbered title may be declarative. Its current problem and proposed
|
||||
@@ -2169,10 +2196,13 @@ function ceoNumberedBriefDecision(q: NativePlanQuestionCall['questions'][number]
|
||||
/^(?:there\s+(?:is|are)\s+no\s+(?:current\s+)?|no\s+current\s+)(?:defect|gap|issue|problem)s?\b/i.test(clause.trim())))) return false;
|
||||
const currentProblem = [subject, explanation].some(text => {
|
||||
const statement = publicText(text).split(/[.!?]\s+/)[0]!;
|
||||
// A numbered test may state its assertion gap through the regression it
|
||||
// cannot reject, without using the word "missing" or a question mark.
|
||||
const assertionGap = /^test\s+[1-9]\d*(?:\s+\([^()\n]*\))?\s+(?:cannot\s+(?:detect|catch|reject)\b[^.!?\n]*\bregressions|accepts\s+any\s+truthy\s+value)\b/i.test(statement.trim()) && ceoAssertionMismatchBrief(q);
|
||||
return !/^(?:if|unless|whether|example|template|hypothetical|quoted)\b|\b(?:already resolved|no (?:current )?(?:defect|gap|issue|problem)s?\b|not true)\b/i.test(statement.trim()) &&
|
||||
!/\b(?:not|never|no longer|isn't)\s+(?:missing|unspecified|unvalidated|unhandled)\b/i.test(statement) &&
|
||||
!/\b(?:was|were)\s+(?:missing|unspecified|unvalidated|unhandled)\b/i.test(statement) &&
|
||||
/\b(?:missing|unspecified|unvalidated|unhandled)\b|\b(?:(?:has|with|leaves)\s+no|without)\s+(?:error handling|tests?|checks?|validation|coordination)\b|\b(?:asserts?|checks?)\s+only\b|\b(?:does not|doesn't|never)\s+(?:say|says|state|define|specify|cover|handle)\b/i.test(statement);
|
||||
(assertionGap || /\b(?:missing|unspecified|unvalidated|unhandled)\b|\b(?:(?:has|with|leaves)\s+no|without)\s+(?:error handling|tests?|checks?|validation|coordination)\b|\b(?:asserts?|checks?)\s+only\b|\b(?:does not|doesn't|never)\s+(?:say|says|state|define|specify|cover|handle)\b/i.test(statement));
|
||||
});
|
||||
const amendment = q.options.some(option => [option.label.replace(/^([1-9]\d*)?[A-Z][):.]\s*/i, ''), option.description ?? ''].some(text =>
|
||||
publicText(text).split(/[.;]\s+/).some(clause =>
|
||||
@@ -2211,6 +2241,16 @@ function nativeExplicitCeoFinding(fp: AskUserQuestionFingerprint, allowQuestionI
|
||||
!/\b(?:if|unless|hypothetical|no|not|already)\b/i.test(normalized) &&
|
||||
q.options.some(o => /^(?:[A-Z][).]\s*)?(?:Assert|Pin|Verify)\b/i.test(o.label) && Boolean(o.description?.trim())) &&
|
||||
q.options.some(o => /^(?:[A-Z][).]\s*)?Keep\b.*\bassertion\b/i.test(o.label) && Boolean(o.description?.trim()))) return true;
|
||||
// The title may name the affected test while the native header carries
|
||||
// its finding number. Require the complete current mismatch and repair
|
||||
// brief, and bind that header to the numbered recommendation.
|
||||
const directAssertion = /^Test [1-9]\d* asserts only [^,\n?]+, but (?:the plan states|the contract is) ([^.!?\n]+)\. (?:Pin|Assert|Verify|Fix) [^\n?]+\?$/i.exec(normalized);
|
||||
const assertionNumber = /^Finding ([1-9]\d*)$/i.exec(q.header.trim());
|
||||
const recommendedNumber = /^Recommendation:\s*([1-9]\d*)[A-Z]\b/im.exec(q.question);
|
||||
if (directAssertion && assertionNumber && recommendedNumber && assertionNumber[1] === recommendedNumber[1] &&
|
||||
/\b(?:exact|exactly|full|complete)\b/i.test(directAssertion[1]!) &&
|
||||
!/\b(?:if|unless|hypothetical|no|not|already)\b/i.test(normalized) &&
|
||||
ceoAssertionMismatchBrief(q) && ceoNumberedBriefDecision(q, normalized)) return true;
|
||||
const identity = /^(Finding|Issue)\s+F?([1-9]\d*(?:\.[1-9]\d*)*)(?:\s+\(Section\s+[1-9]\d*\))?\s*:\s*([^\n]+)$/i.exec(normalized);
|
||||
const numberedSubject = /^([1-9]\d*(?:\.[1-9]\d*)+)\s+([^:\n]+):\s*([^\n]+)$/.exec(normalized);
|
||||
const parenthesized = /^D[1-9]\d*\s+\(issue\s+([1-9]\d*(?:\.[1-9]\d*)*)\)\s*[—–-]\s*[^\n?]+\?$/i.exec(title);
|
||||
@@ -2934,6 +2974,8 @@ export async function invokeAndObserve(
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
export interface PlanSkillObservation {
|
||||
/** Exact owned public-native annotation when terminal redraws lose it. */
|
||||
nativeAutoDecide?: NativeAutoDecision;
|
||||
/** Persisted public diagnostics for this attempt, when eval recording is enabled. */
|
||||
artifactDir?: string;
|
||||
artifactError?: string;
|
||||
@@ -3142,6 +3184,8 @@ export async function runPlanSkillObservation(opts: {
|
||||
let scopeGateAutoSelectObserved = false;
|
||||
let scopeTranscript: PlanCountTranscript = { status: 'missing', calls: [], assistantMessages: [] };
|
||||
let scopeTools: NativePublicToolEvent[] = [];
|
||||
let nativeAutoDecide: NativeAutoDecision | null = null;
|
||||
let nativePolledAt: number | null = null;
|
||||
const saveSnapshot = createPlanCountSnapshotWriter();
|
||||
const tokensObserved: Record<string, boolean> = {};
|
||||
for (const t of opts.trackTokens ?? []) tokensObserved[t] = false;
|
||||
@@ -3152,6 +3196,7 @@ export async function runPlanSkillObservation(opts: {
|
||||
const highWaterFlags = () => {
|
||||
const flags = { proseAUQEverObserved, waitingEverObserved,
|
||||
scopeGateQuestionObserved, scopeGateAutoSelectObserved,
|
||||
...(nativeAutoDecide ? { nativeAutoDecide } : {}),
|
||||
...(opts.trackTokens?.length ? { tokensObserved } : {}) };
|
||||
// Preserve the measured terminal flags and public evidence before the
|
||||
// hermetic session is removed, including when a later assertion fails.
|
||||
@@ -3160,7 +3205,7 @@ export async function runPlanSkillObservation(opts: {
|
||||
raw: session.rawOutput(), visible: session.visibleSince(since),
|
||||
observation: { state: 'plan_skill_observation_terminal', ...flags,
|
||||
commandStartedAt, scopeSessionId, native: scopeTranscript, publicTools: scopeTools,
|
||||
nativeScope: 'Last scope-selection poll; polling stops when selection is observed. This is not a terminal native snapshot.' } });
|
||||
nativePolledAt, nativeScope: 'Latest owned native poll, refreshed while observing; not an exhaustive terminal journal.' } });
|
||||
return { ...flags, ...artifacts };
|
||||
};
|
||||
const JUDGE_AFTER_MS = 60_000;
|
||||
@@ -3207,11 +3252,14 @@ export async function runPlanSkillObservation(opts: {
|
||||
if (!scopeGateAutoSelectObserved && isScopeGateAutoSelectVisible(visible)) {
|
||||
scopeGateAutoSelectObserved = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!scopeGateAutoSelectObserved && scopeSessionId && opts.initialPlanContent && session.hermeticConfigDir) {
|
||||
// Keep reading after scope selection: an AUTO_DECIDE annotation may
|
||||
// arrive later, and a prior poll cannot establish its current ownership.
|
||||
if (scopeSessionId && opts.initialPlanContent && session.hermeticConfigDir) {
|
||||
scopeTools = [];
|
||||
scopeTranscript = readPlanCountTranscript(session.hermeticConfigDir,
|
||||
path.resolve(opts.cwd ?? process.cwd()), event => scopeTools.push(event));
|
||||
scopeGateAutoSelectObserved = nativeSeededPlanSelection(scopeTranscript, scopeTools, {
|
||||
nativePolledAt = Date.now();
|
||||
if (!scopeGateAutoSelectObserved) scopeGateAutoSelectObserved = nativeSeededPlanSelection(scopeTranscript, scopeTools, {
|
||||
seed: opts.initialPlanContent, skillName: opts.skillName, sessionId: scopeSessionId, commandStartedAt,
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -3241,6 +3289,20 @@ export async function runPlanSkillObservation(opts: {
|
||||
return obs;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Terminal classification retains precedence (including actual questions
|
||||
// and writes). Only an unclassified frame may use exact owned native prose.
|
||||
if (scopeSessionId) {
|
||||
nativeAutoDecide = findNativeAutoDecision(scopeTranscript, scopeTools, {
|
||||
skillName: opts.skillName, sessionId: scopeSessionId, commandStartedAt, now: Date.now(),
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (nativeAutoDecide) return {
|
||||
outcome: 'auto_decided',
|
||||
summary: 'owned native session emitted the exact AUTO_DECIDE preference annotation after loading the invoked skill',
|
||||
evidence: visible.slice(-2000), elapsedMs: Date.now() - startedAt,
|
||||
...highWaterFlags(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// LLM judge fallback: if regex detectors didn't classify and we've
|
||||
// burned >60s with periodic ticks, ask Haiku "is the model waiting,
|
||||
// working, or hung?" Treat 'waiting' as 'asked' (model surfaced a
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -78,8 +78,10 @@ function regressionEvidence(text: string): boolean {
|
||||
const legacySubject = /^legacyAuthFlow(?:\(\))?\s*[—–:-]\s*/i;
|
||||
const action = task.replace(legacySubject, '');
|
||||
const instruction = action.match(/^(?:(?:I|we)\s+)?(?:add(?:ed)?|record(?:ed)?|write|wrote|require(?:d)?|include(?:d)?)\s+((?:(?:a|the|new|required|legacyAuthFlow(?:\(\))?|regression|characterization|baseline|prior-behavior)\s+)*(?:tests?|fixtures?|suites?))\b([^.;\n]*)/i);
|
||||
const explicitTarget = instruction && /^\s+(?:for|of|covering|characterizing)\b/i.test(instruction[2]!);
|
||||
const legacyTarget = instruction && /^\s+(?:for|of|covering|characterizing)\s+(?:the\s+)?(?:prior behavior of\s+)?legacyAuthFlow\b/i.test(instruction[2]!);
|
||||
const explicitTarget = instruction && /^\s+(?:for|of|covering|characterizing|pinning)\b/i.test(instruction[2]!);
|
||||
const legacyTarget = instruction && (
|
||||
/^\s+(?:for|of|covering|characterizing)\s+(?:the\s+)?(?:prior behavior of\s+)?legacyAuthFlow\b/i.test(instruction[2]!) ||
|
||||
/^\s+pinning\s+(?:the\s+)?legacyAuthFlow(?:\(\))?(?:'s)?\s+(?:current|existing|prior)\s+behavior\b/i.test(instruction[2]!));
|
||||
const target = instruction && (!explicitTarget || legacyTarget) &&
|
||||
(legacySubject.test(task) || /\blegacyAuthFlow\b/.test(instruction[1]!) || legacyTarget);
|
||||
// An affirmative task or completed addition, not an example, quotation,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
|
||||
import type { NativePublicToolEvent, PlanCountTranscript } from './plan-count-transcript';
|
||||
|
||||
export interface NativeAutoDecision {
|
||||
sessionId: string;
|
||||
skillToolUseId: string;
|
||||
timestamp: string;
|
||||
summary: string;
|
||||
option: string;
|
||||
annotation: string;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const plain = (text: string) => text.replace(/\*\*([^*]+)\*\*/g, '$1').trim();
|
||||
const annotationLine = /^Auto-decided ([^\r\n→]{1,240}) → ([^\r\n→]{1,200}) \(your preference\)\. Change with \/plan-tune\.$/;
|
||||
|
||||
/** Asserted prose only; later quoted examples cannot retract a current decision. */
|
||||
function publicProse(text: string): string {
|
||||
const lines: string[] = [];
|
||||
let fence: { char: string; length: number } | undefined;
|
||||
for (const line of text.split(/\r?\n/)) {
|
||||
const marker = /^ {0,3}(`{3,}|~{3,})/.exec(line);
|
||||
if (marker) {
|
||||
if (!fence) fence = { char: marker[1]![0]!, length: marker[1]!.length };
|
||||
else if (marker[1]![0] === fence.char && marker[1]!.length >= fence.length && /^\s*$/.test(line.slice(marker[0].length))) fence = undefined;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (fence || /^(?: {4}|\t|\s*>)/.test(line)) continue;
|
||||
const current = plain(line);
|
||||
// A direct correction owns its quoted verdict; an attributed example does not.
|
||||
if (/^(?:Correction|Actually|Update):\s*/i.test(current)) lines.push(current.replace(/["“”`]/g, ''));
|
||||
else lines.push(current.replace(/"(?:[^"\\]|\\.)*"|“[^”]*”|`[^`]*`/g, '""'));
|
||||
}
|
||||
return lines.join('\n');
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function withdrawn(text: string, option: string): boolean {
|
||||
const prose = publicProse(text);
|
||||
if (/\b(?:I|we)\s+(?:retract|withdraw|revoke|cancel)\b[^.!?\n]{0,100}\b(?:auto[- ]decision|annotation|decision|selection|choice)\b/i.test(prose) ||
|
||||
/\b(?:I|we)\s+(?:did not|didn't|have not|haven't|will not|won't|no longer)\s+auto-decide\b/i.test(prose) ||
|
||||
/\b(?:I|we)\s+(?:did not|didn't|have not|haven't)\s+make\s+(?:this|that|the)\s+(?:decision|selection|choice)\b/i.test(prose) ||
|
||||
/\b(?:this|that|the)\s+(?:auto[- ]decision|annotation|statement|decision|selection|choice)\b[^.!?\n]{0,100}\b(?:withdrawn|retracted|revoked|cancelled|canceled|hypothetical|conditional|example)\b/i.test(prose)) return true;
|
||||
return [...prose.matchAll(/^Review mode:\s*([^\n.]+)\.?$/gmi)].some(m => plain(m[1]!).toLowerCase() !== option.toLowerCase());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function assertedAnnotation(text: string): RegExpExecArray | null {
|
||||
const paragraphs = text.replace(/^(?:[ \t]*\r?\n)+|(?:\r?\n[ \t]*)+$/g, '').split(/\r?\n\s*\r?\n/);
|
||||
let index = 0;
|
||||
// A preamble notice is independent of the immediately following current
|
||||
// mode declaration. No arbitrary source/example prefix is skipped.
|
||||
if (/^Heads-up from gstack: this branch has unshipped work\. Run `\/review` then `\/ship` when you're ready\.$/.test(paragraphs[0] ?? '')) index++;
|
||||
const mode = /^\*\*Review mode:\s*([^*\n.]+)\.\*\*$/.exec(paragraphs[index] ?? '');
|
||||
if (mode) index++;
|
||||
if (index && !mode) return null;
|
||||
const paragraph = paragraphs[index];
|
||||
if (!paragraph || /^(?: {4}|\t)/.test(paragraph) || paragraph.includes('\n')) return null;
|
||||
const match = annotationLine.exec(paragraph);
|
||||
if (!match || !plain(match[1]!) || !plain(match[2]!)) return null;
|
||||
// The printed skill template is not a concrete observed choice.
|
||||
if (/<[^>\r\n]+>/.test(match[1]!) || /<[^>\r\n]+>/.test(match[2]!)) return null;
|
||||
if (mode && (plain(mode[1]!).toLowerCase() !== plain(match[2]!).toLowerCase() ||
|
||||
!/^(?:review mode|"Review mode:[^"]+\?")$/i.test(match[1]!))) return null;
|
||||
return match;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Exact public annotation after a successful invocation in the owned native session. */
|
||||
export function findNativeAutoDecision(
|
||||
transcript: PlanCountTranscript,
|
||||
tools: NativePublicToolEvent[],
|
||||
opts: { skillName: string; sessionId: string; commandStartedAt: number; now: number },
|
||||
): NativeAutoDecision | null {
|
||||
if (transcript.status !== 'ready' || !opts.sessionId || !opts.skillName ||
|
||||
!Number.isFinite(opts.commandStartedAt) || !Number.isFinite(opts.now) || opts.now < opts.commandStartedAt) return null;
|
||||
const at = (timestamp: string) => Date.parse(timestamp);
|
||||
const timely = (timestamp: string) => Number.isFinite(at(timestamp)) && at(timestamp) >= opts.commandStartedAt && at(timestamp) <= opts.now;
|
||||
const uses = tools.filter(e => e.kind === 'use' && e.sessionId === opts.sessionId && e.name === 'Skill' &&
|
||||
[opts.skillName, `gstack:${opts.skillName}`].includes(String(e.input?.skill ?? '')) && timely(e.timestamp));
|
||||
if (uses.length !== 1 || !uses[0]!.toolUseId) return null;
|
||||
const use = uses[0]!;
|
||||
const results = tools.filter(e => e.kind === 'result' && e.sessionId === opts.sessionId && e.toolUseId === use.toolUseId);
|
||||
if (results.length !== 1 || results[0]!.isError !== false || !timely(results[0]!.timestamp) || at(results[0]!.timestamp) < at(use.timestamp)) return null;
|
||||
// A native question actually surfaced; the annotation cannot erase it.
|
||||
if (transcript.calls.some(call => call.sessionId === opts.sessionId)) return null;
|
||||
const messages = transcript.assistantMessages.filter(m => m.sessionId === opts.sessionId);
|
||||
if (messages.some(m => !Number.isFinite(at(m.timestamp)) || at(m.timestamp) > opts.now)) return null;
|
||||
const loadedAt = at(results[0]!.timestamp);
|
||||
for (const message of messages) {
|
||||
if (at(message.timestamp) < loadedAt) continue;
|
||||
const match = assertedAnnotation(message.text);
|
||||
if (!match) continue;
|
||||
const option = plain(match[2]!);
|
||||
const current = messages.filter(m => at(m.timestamp) >= at(message.timestamp)).map(m => m.text).join('\n\n');
|
||||
if (withdrawn(current, option)) continue;
|
||||
return { sessionId: opts.sessionId, skillToolUseId: use.toolUseId, timestamp: message.timestamp,
|
||||
summary: plain(match[1]!), option, annotation: match[0] };
|
||||
}
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -29,10 +29,20 @@ export function nativeSeededPlanSelection(
|
||||
const line = message.text.split(/\r?\n/).find(value => value.trim());
|
||||
if (!line || /^(?: {4}|\t)/.test(line)) continue;
|
||||
const text = line.trim();
|
||||
const selected = /^(?:I'll review|I will review|I'm proceeding with reviewing|I am proceeding with reviewing)\s+(?:the\s+)?(?:"([^"\n]+)"|“([^”\n]+)”|`([^`\n]+)`)\s+(?:draft(?:\s+plan)?|plan)\s+(?:you pasted|pasted here)(.*)$/i.exec(text);
|
||||
const selectedNow = /^(?:I've|I have) selected (?:reviewing|to review)\s+(?:the\s+)?pasted\s+(?:"([^"\n]+)"|“([^”\n]+)”|`([^`\n]+)`)\s+(?:draft(?:\s+plan)?|plan)(.*)$/i.exec(text);
|
||||
const selected = selectedNow ?? /^(?:I'll review|I will review|I'm proceeding with reviewing|I am proceeding with reviewing)\s+(?:the\s+)?(?:"([^"\n]+)"|“([^”\n]+)”|`([^`\n]+)`)\s+(?:draft(?:\s+plan)?|plan)\s+(?:you pasted|pasted here)(.*)$/i.exec(text);
|
||||
if (!selected || (selected[1] ?? selected[2] ?? selected[3])!.trim().toLowerCase() !== title.toLowerCase()) continue;
|
||||
const tail = selected[4]!;
|
||||
if (/\b(?:if|unless|assuming|pending|only after|instead|not|won't|cannot)\b/i.test(tail)) continue;
|
||||
if (selectedNow) {
|
||||
// A completed selection may name the pasted target before its plan-mode
|
||||
// reason. Keep the first assertion bound; later work is not a new target.
|
||||
if (/\b(?:retract|withdraw|cancel|disregard|ignore)\s+(?:that|this|the|my)\s+(?:selection|declaration)\b/i.test(tail)) continue;
|
||||
if (/\b(?:treat|consider|regard)\s+(?:that|this|the|my)\s+(?:selection|declaration)\s+as\s+(?:a\s+)?(?:hypothetical|example|proposal)\b/i.test(tail)) continue;
|
||||
// Internal token dots (DESIGN.md) do not open another sentence.
|
||||
if (/^(?:\s+(?:since|because)\s+(?:we're|we are|I'm|I am)\s+in plan mode)?\.(?:\s+(?:Now|Next,|Then)\s+(?:I'll|I will)\s+(?:run|start|begin)\s+(?:the\s+)?(?:pre-review\s+)?audit\b(?:[^.!?]|\.(?=\S))*\.)?$/i.test(tail)) return true;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (/^(?:\.(?:\s+(?:Next,|Then\b).*)?|,\s*(?:starting|beginning)\s+with\b.*|)$/.test(tail)) return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -81,8 +81,8 @@ export const E2E_TOUCHFILES: Record<string, string[]> = {
|
||||
|
||||
// Office Hours
|
||||
'office-hours-spec-review': ['office-hours/**', 'scripts/gen-skill-docs.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan.test.ts'],
|
||||
'office-hours-forcing-energy': ['office-hours/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'test/fixtures/mode-posture/**', 'test/helpers/llm-judge.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-office-hours.test.ts'],
|
||||
'office-hours-builder-wildness': ['office-hours/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'test/fixtures/mode-posture/**', 'test/helpers/llm-judge.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-office-hours.test.ts'],
|
||||
'office-hours-forcing-energy': ['office-hours/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'test/fixtures/mode-posture/**', 'test/helpers/llm-judge.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-office-hours.test.ts', 'test/office-posture-recording.test.ts'],
|
||||
'office-hours-builder-wildness': ['office-hours/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'test/fixtures/mode-posture/**', 'test/helpers/llm-judge.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-office-hours.test.ts', 'test/office-posture-recording.test.ts'],
|
||||
|
||||
// Plan reviews
|
||||
'plan-ceo-review': ['plan-ceo-review/**', 'test/skill-e2e-plan.test.ts'],
|
||||
@@ -100,17 +100,17 @@ export const E2E_TOUCHFILES: Record<string, string[]> = {
|
||||
// include question-tuning.ts and generate-ask-user-format.ts because the
|
||||
// AUTO_DECIDE preamble injection lives there and changes can flip the
|
||||
// regression test outcome between 'asked' and 'auto_decided'.
|
||||
'plan-ceo-review-plan-mode': ['bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-ceo-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/question-tuning.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/review.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-plan-mode.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/helpers/plan-scope-selection.ts', 'test/plan-scope-selection.test.ts'],
|
||||
'plan-eng-review-plan-mode': ['bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-eng-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/question-tuning.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/review.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-eng-plan-mode.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/helpers/plan-scope-selection.ts', 'test/plan-scope-selection.test.ts'],
|
||||
'plan-design-review-plan-mode': ['bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-design-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/question-tuning.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/review.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-design-plan-mode.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-design.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/helpers/plan-scope-selection.ts', 'test/plan-scope-selection.test.ts'],
|
||||
'plan-devex-review-plan-mode': ['bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-devex-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/question-tuning.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/review.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-devex-plan-mode.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/helpers/plan-scope-selection.ts', 'test/plan-scope-selection.test.ts'],
|
||||
'plan-ceo-review-plan-mode': ['bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-ceo-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/question-tuning.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/review.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-plan-mode.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/helpers/plan-scope-selection.ts', 'test/plan-scope-selection.test.ts', 'test/helpers/native-auto-decide.ts', 'test/native-auto-decide.test.ts', 'test/native-auto-decide-pty.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/native-auto-decide-ag.json'],
|
||||
'plan-eng-review-plan-mode': ['bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-eng-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/question-tuning.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/review.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-eng-plan-mode.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/helpers/plan-scope-selection.ts', 'test/plan-scope-selection.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/design-plan-scope-ag.json', 'test/helpers/native-auto-decide.ts', 'test/native-auto-decide.test.ts', 'test/native-auto-decide-pty.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/native-auto-decide-ag.json'],
|
||||
'plan-design-review-plan-mode': ['bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-design-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/question-tuning.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/review.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-design-plan-mode.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-design.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/helpers/plan-scope-selection.ts', 'test/plan-scope-selection.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/design-plan-scope-ag.json', 'test/helpers/native-auto-decide.ts', 'test/native-auto-decide.test.ts', 'test/native-auto-decide-pty.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/native-auto-decide-ag.json'],
|
||||
'plan-devex-review-plan-mode': ['bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-devex-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/question-tuning.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/review.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-devex-plan-mode.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/helpers/plan-scope-selection.ts', 'test/plan-scope-selection.test.ts', 'test/helpers/native-auto-decide.ts', 'test/native-auto-decide.test.ts', 'test/native-auto-decide-pty.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/native-auto-decide-ag.json'],
|
||||
// Covers ceo (preamble misfire) + eng/design (scope-gate bypass must not
|
||||
// fire outside plan mode) + the named-target exception case. 4 PTY runs;
|
||||
// in CI these run CONCURRENT with the rest of the pty-plan-smoke suite
|
||||
// (--max-concurrency + --retry 1), so worst-case cost is ~2x a single
|
||||
// pass of each, sharing the API budget with sibling tests — not the
|
||||
// sequential ~+10min a local read suggests.
|
||||
'plan-mode-no-op': ['bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-ceo-review/**', 'plan-eng-review/**', 'plan-design-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-mode-no-op.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/helpers/plan-scope-selection.ts', 'test/plan-scope-selection.test.ts'],
|
||||
'plan-mode-no-op': ['bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-ceo-review/**', 'plan-eng-review/**', 'plan-design-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-mode-no-op.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/helpers/plan-scope-selection.ts', 'test/plan-scope-selection.test.ts', 'test/helpers/native-auto-decide.ts', 'test/native-auto-decide.test.ts', 'test/native-auto-decide-pty.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/native-auto-decide-ag.json'],
|
||||
|
||||
// v1.21+ AskUserQuestion-blocked regression tests — Conductor launches
|
||||
// claude with `--disallowedTools AskUserQuestion --permission-mode default`
|
||||
@@ -128,18 +128,18 @@ export const E2E_TOUCHFILES: Record<string, string[]> = {
|
||||
// written a never-ask preference, AUQ should still auto-decide rather than
|
||||
// surfacing the question. Touches the question-tuning + preference
|
||||
// infrastructure plus the resolvers that own the AUTO_DECIDE preamble.
|
||||
'auto-decide-preserved': ['bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'bin/gstack-session-kind', 'scripts/resolvers/question-tuning.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-preamble-bash.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'plan-ceo-review/**', 'bin/gstack-question-preference', 'bin/gstack-config', 'bin/gstack-slug', 'hosts/claude/hooks/question-preference-hook.ts', 'hosts/claude/hooks/spawned-directive.ts', 'lib/is-conductor.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-auto-decide-preserved.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt'],
|
||||
'auto-decide-preserved': ['bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'bin/gstack-session-kind', 'scripts/resolvers/question-tuning.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-preamble-bash.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'plan-ceo-review/**', 'bin/gstack-question-preference', 'bin/gstack-config', 'bin/gstack-slug', 'hosts/claude/hooks/question-preference-hook.ts', 'hosts/claude/hooks/spawned-directive.ts', 'lib/is-conductor.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-auto-decide-preserved.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/helpers/native-auto-decide.ts', 'test/native-auto-decide.test.ts', 'test/native-auto-decide-pty.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/native-auto-decide-ag.json'],
|
||||
|
||||
// Conductor → prose decision brief (Conductor signal makes prose the default;
|
||||
// the PreToolUse hook denies the flaky tool). Touches the resolver that owns
|
||||
// the Conductor rule, the preamble signal, the hook, and the detection helper.
|
||||
'conductor-prose': ['bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'bin/gstack-session-kind', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-preamble-bash.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'plan-eng-review/**', 'hosts/claude/hooks/question-preference-hook.ts', 'hosts/claude/hooks/spawned-directive.ts', 'lib/is-conductor.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-conductor-prose.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt'],
|
||||
'conductor-prose': ['bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'bin/gstack-session-kind', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-preamble-bash.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'plan-eng-review/**', 'hosts/claude/hooks/question-preference-hook.ts', 'hosts/claude/hooks/spawned-directive.ts', 'lib/is-conductor.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-conductor-prose.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/helpers/native-auto-decide.ts', 'test/native-auto-decide.test.ts', 'test/native-auto-decide-pty.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/native-auto-decide-ag.json'],
|
||||
|
||||
// Real-PTY E2E batch (#6 new tests on the harness).
|
||||
// Each one tests behavior the SDK harness can't observe (rendered TTY,
|
||||
// numbered-option lists, multi-phase ordering, idempotency state echo).
|
||||
'auq-format-gate': ['plan-ceo-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completeness-section.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'test/helpers/auq-sdk-capture.ts', 'test/helpers/session-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/llm-judge.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-ask-user-question-format-compliance.test.ts'],
|
||||
'plan-ceo-mode-routing': ['plan-ceo-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/plan-count-native-input.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-screen.ts', 'test/pty-screen.test.ts', 'test/pty-screen-session.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pty-screen/**', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/helpers/ceo-mode-option.ts', 'test/ceo-mode-option.test.ts', 'test/pty-option-selection.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-transcript.ts', 'test/autoplan-public-narration.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-public-narration-ad.json', 'test/plan-count-transcript.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-fixture.ts', 'test/plan-count-fixture.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-prerequisite-n.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-prerequisite-n-call.json', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-mode-routing.test.ts', 'test/ceo-mode-posture-native.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-hold-posture-l.json', 'test/ceo-mode-labels-native.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-mode-labels-l.json', 'test/plan-count-checkbox.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-checkbox-l.screen.txt', 'test/ceo-mode-prerequisite.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-mode-prerequisite-o-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-mode-prerequisite-q-call.json', 'test/plan-count-preview-footer.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-screen.txt', 'test/ceo-posture-packet.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/design-preview-v-screen.txt', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/ceo-mode-preview-aa-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-mode-preview-aa-screen.txt', 'test/ceo-expansion-auq.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-expansion-auq-ac.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-pending-question.ts', 'test/autoplan-pending-question.test.ts', 'test/plan-pending-question-pty.test.ts', 'test/ceo-barless-submit.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-barless-submit-ac.json', 'test/pending-question-completion.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pending-question-completion-ad.json', 'test/ceo-mode-posture-ad.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-mode-posture-ad.json', 'test/ceo-mode-full-ad.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-mode-full-ad.json', 'test/ceo-prerequisite-ad-v2.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-prerequisite-ad-v2.json'],
|
||||
'plan-ceo-mode-routing': ['plan-ceo-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/plan-count-native-input.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-screen.ts', 'test/pty-screen.test.ts', 'test/pty-screen-session.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pty-screen/**', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/helpers/ceo-mode-option.ts', 'test/ceo-mode-option.test.ts', 'test/pty-option-selection.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-transcript.ts', 'test/autoplan-public-narration.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-public-narration-ad.json', 'test/plan-count-transcript.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-fixture.ts', 'test/plan-count-fixture.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-prerequisite-n.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-prerequisite-n-call.json', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-mode-routing.test.ts', 'test/ceo-mode-posture-native.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-hold-posture-l.json', 'test/ceo-mode-labels-native.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-mode-labels-l.json', 'test/plan-count-checkbox.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-checkbox-l.screen.txt', 'test/ceo-mode-prerequisite.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-mode-prerequisite-o-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-mode-prerequisite-q-call.json', 'test/plan-count-preview-footer.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-screen.txt', 'test/ceo-posture-packet.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/design-preview-v-screen.txt', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/ceo-mode-preview-aa-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-mode-preview-aa-screen.txt', 'test/ceo-expansion-auq.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-expansion-auq-ac.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-pending-question.ts', 'test/autoplan-pending-question.test.ts', 'test/plan-pending-question-pty.test.ts', 'test/ceo-barless-submit.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-barless-submit-ac.json', 'test/pending-question-completion.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pending-question-completion-ad.json', 'test/ceo-mode-posture-ad.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-mode-posture-ad.json', 'test/ceo-mode-full-ad.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-mode-full-ad.json', 'test/ceo-prerequisite-ad-v2.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-prerequisite-ad-v2.json', 'test/ceo-hold-posture-ag.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-hold-posture-ag.json'],
|
||||
'plan-design-with-ui-scope': ['plan-design-review/**', 'test/fixtures/plans/ui-heavy-feature.md', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-design-with-ui.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt'],
|
||||
'ship-idempotency-pty': ['ship/**', 'bin/gstack-next-version', 'bin/gstack-version-bump', 'scripts/resolvers/sections.ts', 'lib/worktree.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-ship-idempotency.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt'],
|
||||
'tpa-present': ['scripts/resolvers/third-party-actions.ts', 'ship/SKILL.md.tmpl', 'ship/sections/apple-release.md.tmpl', 'scripts/gen-skill-docs.ts', 'test/helpers/session-runner.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-third-party-actions.test.ts', 'test/helpers/third-party-actions.ts'],
|
||||
@@ -148,20 +148,20 @@ export const E2E_TOUCHFILES: Record<string, string[]> = {
|
||||
'tpa-absent-darwin': ['scripts/resolvers/third-party-actions.ts', 'ship/SKILL.md.tmpl', 'ship/sections/apple-release.md.tmpl', 'scripts/gen-skill-docs.ts', 'test/helpers/session-runner.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-third-party-actions.test.ts', 'test/helpers/third-party-actions.ts'],
|
||||
'tpa-apple-ban': ['scripts/resolvers/third-party-actions.ts', 'ship/SKILL.md.tmpl', 'ship/sections/apple-release.md.tmpl', 'scripts/gen-skill-docs.ts', 'test/helpers/session-runner.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-third-party-actions.test.ts', 'test/helpers/third-party-actions.ts'],
|
||||
'ship-section-loading': ['ship/**', 'scripts/resolvers/sections.ts', 'scripts/gen-skill-docs.ts', 'test/helpers/auq-sdk-capture.ts', 'test/helpers/session-runner.ts', 'test/session-runner-tools.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-ship-section-loading.test.ts'],
|
||||
'plan-ceo-section-loading': ['plan-ceo-review/**', 'test/skill-ceo-section-ordering.test.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/sections.ts', 'scripts/gen-skill-docs.ts', 'test/helpers/auq-sdk-capture.ts', 'test/helpers/session-runner.ts', 'test/session-runner-tools.test.ts', 'test/helpers/ceo-section-loading-fixture.ts', 'test/ceo-section-loading-fixture.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-review-section-loading.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-section-loading-l-report.md', 'test/fixtures/ceo-section-loading-q-report.md', 'test/fixtures/ceo-section-r-rejected-report.md', 'test/fixtures/ceo-section-s-trace-report.md', 'test/fixtures/ceo-section-u-report.md', 'test/fixtures/ceo-section-y-report.md', 'test/fixtures/ceo-section-aa-report.md', 'test/sdk-stale-table-ad-v3.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/sdk-stale-table-ad-v3.json', 'test/sdk-ordering-ae.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/sdk-ordering-ae.json', 'test/sdk-columnar-af.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/sdk-columnar-af.json'],
|
||||
'plan-ceo-section-loading': ['plan-ceo-review/**', 'test/skill-ceo-section-ordering.test.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/sections.ts', 'scripts/gen-skill-docs.ts', 'test/helpers/auq-sdk-capture.ts', 'test/helpers/session-runner.ts', 'test/session-runner-tools.test.ts', 'test/helpers/ceo-section-loading-fixture.ts', 'test/ceo-section-loading-fixture.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-review-section-loading.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-section-loading-l-report.md', 'test/fixtures/ceo-section-loading-q-report.md', 'test/fixtures/ceo-section-r-rejected-report.md', 'test/fixtures/ceo-section-s-trace-report.md', 'test/fixtures/ceo-section-u-report.md', 'test/fixtures/ceo-section-y-report.md', 'test/fixtures/ceo-section-aa-report.md', 'test/sdk-stale-table-ad-v3.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/sdk-stale-table-ad-v3.json', 'test/sdk-ordering-ae.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/sdk-ordering-ae.json', 'test/sdk-columnar-af.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/sdk-columnar-af.json', 'test/sdk-order-b-ag.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/sdk-order-b-ag.json'],
|
||||
// Data-driven behavioral guard for the 'plan'/'prompt' carves (eng, design,
|
||||
// devex, office-hours + future PR2 carves). One file iterating CARVE_GUARDS;
|
||||
// the selector sets GSTACK_CARVE_SKILL=<name> to scope cost to the changed
|
||||
// skill (D-CODEX A). Touching the registry/helper or sections.ts runs all.
|
||||
'carve-section-loading': ['scripts/resolvers/composition.ts', 'test/autoplan-review-discovery.test.ts', 'test/autoplan-phase-order.test.ts', 'design-html/**', 'design-shotgun/**', 'qa/**', 'browse/**', 'retro/**', 'autoplan/**', 'spec/**', 'setup-gbrain/**', 'review/**', 'codex/**', 'land-and-deploy/**', 'plan-eng-review/**', 'plan-design-review/**', 'plan-devex-review/**', 'office-hours/**', 'document-release/**', 'design-consultation/**', 'cso/**', 'test/helpers/carve-guards.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/sections.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/redact-doc.ts', 'scripts/gen-skill-docs.ts', 'test/helpers/auq-sdk-capture.ts', 'test/helpers/session-runner.ts', 'test/session-runner-tools.test.ts', 'test/carve-section-loading.test.ts', 'bin/gstack-autoplan-snapshot.ts', 'test/autoplan-snapshot.test.ts', 'test/autoplan-init.test.ts', 'test/autoplan-obligations.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan/t-ceo-omitted-obligations.json', 'test/fixtures/autoplan/u-ceo-original-loss.json', 'test/fixtures/autoplan/v-ceo-dangling-references.json'],
|
||||
'autoplan-chain-pty': ['scripts/resolvers/composition.ts', 'test/autoplan-review-discovery.test.ts', 'test/autoplan-phase-order.test.ts', 'autoplan/**', 'plan-ceo-review/**', 'plan-design-review/**', 'plan-eng-review/**', 'plan-devex-review/**', 'test/fixtures/plans/autoplan-dashboard.md', 'test/autoplan-chain-fixture.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-fixture.ts', 'test/plan-count-fixture.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-prerequisite-n.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-prerequisite-n-call.json', 'bin/gstack-config', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/plan-count-native-input.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-screen.ts', 'test/pty-screen.test.ts', 'test/pty-screen-session.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pty-screen/**', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/helpers/autoplan-setup-question.ts', 'test/autoplan-setup-question.test.ts', 'test/helpers/autoplan-phase-observer.ts', 'test/autoplan-phase-observer.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-transcript.ts', 'test/autoplan-public-narration.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-public-narration-ad.json', 'test/plan-count-transcript.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-artifacts.ts', 'test/plan-count-artifacts.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-autoplan-chain.test.ts', 'bin/gstack-autoplan-snapshot.ts', 'test/autoplan-snapshot.test.ts', 'test/autoplan-init.test.ts', 'test/autoplan-obligations.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan/t-ceo-omitted-obligations.json', 'test/plan-count-checkbox.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-checkbox-l.screen.txt', 'test/helpers/eval-budgets.ts', 'test/autoplan-eval-budget.test.ts', 'test/eval-budgets-policy.test.ts', 'test/eval-detach-timeout-floor.test.ts', 'scripts/test-paid-shards.ts', '.github/workflows/evals-periodic.yml', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-routing-n-screen.txt', 'test/autoplan-routing-o.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-routing-o-screen.txt', 'test/autoplan-setup-packet-o.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-setup-packet-o-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-setup-packet-o-call.json', 'test/fixtures/autoplan/u-ceo-original-loss.json', 'test/fixtures/autoplan/v-ceo-dangling-references.json', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-setup-z-packet.json', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/helpers/autoplan-method-read-audit.ts', 'test/autoplan-method-read-audit.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-method-read-aa-events.json', 'test/autoplan-routing-manual-skills.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-routing-manual-skills-ac.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-pending-question.ts', 'test/autoplan-pending-question.test.ts', 'test/plan-pending-question-pty.test.ts', 'test/pending-question-completion.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pending-question-completion-ad.json', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-setup-ad-v2-packet.json', 'test/helpers/autoplan-artifact-permission.ts', 'test/autoplan-artifact-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-artifact-permission-ad-v3.json', 'scripts/resolvers/testing.ts', 'test/helpers/autoplan-artifact-recorder.ts', 'test/autoplan-artifact-recorder.test.ts', 'test/autoplan-pending-artifact.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-pending-artifact-ae.json'],
|
||||
'autoplan-chain-pty': ['scripts/resolvers/composition.ts', 'test/autoplan-review-discovery.test.ts', 'test/autoplan-phase-order.test.ts', 'autoplan/**', 'plan-ceo-review/**', 'plan-design-review/**', 'plan-eng-review/**', 'plan-devex-review/**', 'test/fixtures/plans/autoplan-dashboard.md', 'test/autoplan-chain-fixture.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-fixture.ts', 'test/plan-count-fixture.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-prerequisite-n.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-prerequisite-n-call.json', 'bin/gstack-config', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/plan-count-native-input.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-screen.ts', 'test/pty-screen.test.ts', 'test/pty-screen-session.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pty-screen/**', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/helpers/autoplan-setup-question.ts', 'test/autoplan-setup-question.test.ts', 'test/helpers/autoplan-phase-observer.ts', 'test/autoplan-phase-observer.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-transcript.ts', 'test/autoplan-public-narration.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-public-narration-ad.json', 'test/plan-count-transcript.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-artifacts.ts', 'test/plan-count-artifacts.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-autoplan-chain.test.ts', 'bin/gstack-autoplan-snapshot.ts', 'test/autoplan-snapshot.test.ts', 'test/autoplan-init.test.ts', 'test/autoplan-obligations.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan/t-ceo-omitted-obligations.json', 'test/plan-count-checkbox.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-checkbox-l.screen.txt', 'test/helpers/eval-budgets.ts', 'test/autoplan-eval-budget.test.ts', 'test/eval-budgets-policy.test.ts', 'test/eval-detach-timeout-floor.test.ts', 'scripts/test-paid-shards.ts', '.github/workflows/evals-periodic.yml', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-routing-n-screen.txt', 'test/autoplan-routing-o.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-routing-o-screen.txt', 'test/autoplan-setup-packet-o.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-setup-packet-o-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-setup-packet-o-call.json', 'test/fixtures/autoplan/u-ceo-original-loss.json', 'test/fixtures/autoplan/v-ceo-dangling-references.json', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-setup-z-packet.json', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/helpers/autoplan-method-read-audit.ts', 'test/autoplan-method-read-audit.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-method-read-aa-events.json', 'test/autoplan-routing-manual-skills.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-routing-manual-skills-ac.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-pending-question.ts', 'test/autoplan-pending-question.test.ts', 'test/plan-pending-question-pty.test.ts', 'test/pending-question-completion.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pending-question-completion-ad.json', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-setup-ad-v2-packet.json', 'test/helpers/autoplan-artifact-permission.ts', 'test/autoplan-artifact-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-artifact-permission-ad-v3.json', 'scripts/resolvers/testing.ts', 'test/helpers/autoplan-artifact-recorder.ts', 'test/autoplan-artifact-recorder.test.ts', 'test/autoplan-pending-artifact.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-pending-artifact-ae.json', 'test/autoplan-edit-header-ag.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-edit-header-ag.json'],
|
||||
|
||||
// Per-finding AskUserQuestion count + review-report-at-bottom assertion.
|
||||
// Each test drives its skill end-to-end; touchfiles include preamble +
|
||||
// completion-status resolvers because they affect question cadence and
|
||||
// terminal output (the regression surface this test catches).
|
||||
'plan-ceo-finding-count': ['bin/gstack-config', 'bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-ceo-review/**', 'test/skill-ceo-section-ordering.test.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/plan-count-native-input.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-screen.ts', 'test/pty-screen.test.ts', 'test/pty-screen-session.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pty-screen/**', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.unit.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-completion.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-dx-handoff.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-handoff-n-call.json', 'test/helpers/ceo-completion-handoff.ts', 'test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts', 'test/ceo-count-s-terminals.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-s-paired.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-j-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-k-calls.json', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-transcript.ts', 'test/autoplan-public-narration.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-public-narration-ad.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-pending-exit.ts', 'test/plan-count-pending-exit.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-transcript.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-artifacts.ts', 'test/plan-count-artifacts.test.ts', 'test/helpers/eval-store.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-fixture.ts', 'test/plan-count-fixture.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-timeout.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-navigation-r.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-prerequisite-n.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-prerequisite-n-call.json', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-finding-count.test.ts', 'test/ceo-completion-handoff-l.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-l-calls.json', 'test/ceo-completion-handoff-m.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-m-call.json', 'test/fixtures/devex-review-l-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-checkbox.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-checkbox-l.screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/ceo-handoff-n-calls.json', 'test/ceo-completion-handoff-o.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-o-call.json', 'test/plan-count-empty-review.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-s-distinct.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-design-questionless-report.md', 'test/plan-count-dx-handoff-o.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-handoff-o-call.json', 'test/helpers/ceo-approach-pick.ts', 'test/ceo-approach-pick.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-q-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-r-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-r-distinct-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-q-paired-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-q-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-r-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-t-call.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-file-permission.ts', 'test/plan-count-file-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-edit-permission-t.json', 'test/plan-count-preview-footer.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-u-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-v-call.json', 'test/fixtures/design-preview-v-screen.txt', 'test/plan-count-owned-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-owned-permission-v.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-questionless-w-native.json', 'test/plan-count-ceo-body-finding.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-w-paired.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-w-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-y-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-y-screen.txt', 'test/ceo-handoff-y.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-handoff-y-call.json', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/ceo-handoff-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-aa-call.json', 'test/review-handoffs-aa.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/review-handoff-aa-ceo.json', 'test/fixtures/review-handoff-aa-dx.json', 'test/helpers/ceo-mode-option.ts', 'test/ceo-count-mode.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-mode-ab-call.json', 'test/ceo-count-ac.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-ac-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-ac-later-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-permission-ac.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ac.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ad.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ae.json', 'test/ceo-count-ad-v2.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-ad-v2.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-target-ad-v2.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-finding-alias-af.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-numbered-brief-af.json'],
|
||||
'plan-eng-finding-count': ['bin/gstack-config', 'bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-eng-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/plan-count-native-input.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-screen.ts', 'test/pty-screen.test.ts', 'test/pty-screen-session.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pty-screen/**', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.unit.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-completion.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-dx-handoff.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-handoff-n-call.json', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-transcript.ts', 'test/autoplan-public-narration.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-public-narration-ad.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-pending-exit.ts', 'test/plan-count-pending-exit.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-transcript.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-artifacts.ts', 'test/plan-count-artifacts.test.ts', 'test/helpers/eval-store.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-fixture.ts', 'test/plan-count-fixture.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-timeout.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-navigation-r.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-prerequisite-n.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-prerequisite-n-call.json', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-eng-finding-count.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-review-l-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-checkbox.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-checkbox-l.screen.txt', 'test/plan-count-empty-review.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-s-distinct.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-design-questionless-report.md', 'test/plan-count-dx-handoff-o.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-handoff-o-call.json', 'test/eng-devex-s-count.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-devex-s-first-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/eng-devex-s-retry-calls.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-file-permission.ts', 'test/plan-count-file-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-edit-permission-t.json', 'test/eng-first-review-t.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-batching-t-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-preview-footer.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/design-preview-v-screen.txt', 'test/plan-count-owned-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-owned-permission-v.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-questionless-w-native.json', 'test/eng-scope-y.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-scope-y-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/eng-binding-z.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-binding-z-calls.json', 'test/eng-binding-retry-z.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-binding-retry-z-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-permission-ac.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ac.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ad.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ae.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-target-ad-v2.json', 'test/helpers/eng-completion-handoff.ts', 'test/eng-count-ad-v2.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-count-ad-v2.json', 'test/helpers/eng-seeded-coverage.ts', 'test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts', 'test/eng-seeded-packet-ae.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-seeded-packet-ae.json', 'test/eng-first-category-af.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-first-category-af.json'],
|
||||
'plan-ceo-finding-count': ['bin/gstack-config', 'bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-ceo-review/**', 'test/skill-ceo-section-ordering.test.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/plan-count-native-input.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-screen.ts', 'test/pty-screen.test.ts', 'test/pty-screen-session.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pty-screen/**', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.unit.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-completion.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-dx-handoff.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-handoff-n-call.json', 'test/helpers/ceo-completion-handoff.ts', 'test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts', 'test/ceo-count-s-terminals.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-s-paired.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-j-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-k-calls.json', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-transcript.ts', 'test/autoplan-public-narration.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-public-narration-ad.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-pending-exit.ts', 'test/plan-count-pending-exit.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-transcript.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-artifacts.ts', 'test/plan-count-artifacts.test.ts', 'test/helpers/eval-store.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-fixture.ts', 'test/plan-count-fixture.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-timeout.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-navigation-r.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-prerequisite-n.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-prerequisite-n-call.json', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-finding-count.test.ts', 'test/ceo-completion-handoff-l.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-l-calls.json', 'test/ceo-completion-handoff-m.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-m-call.json', 'test/fixtures/devex-review-l-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-checkbox.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-checkbox-l.screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/ceo-handoff-n-calls.json', 'test/ceo-completion-handoff-o.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-o-call.json', 'test/plan-count-empty-review.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-s-distinct.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-design-questionless-report.md', 'test/plan-count-dx-handoff-o.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-handoff-o-call.json', 'test/helpers/ceo-approach-pick.ts', 'test/ceo-approach-pick.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-q-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-r-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-r-distinct-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-q-paired-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-q-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-r-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-t-call.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-file-permission.ts', 'test/plan-count-file-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-edit-permission-t.json', 'test/plan-count-preview-footer.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-u-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-v-call.json', 'test/fixtures/design-preview-v-screen.txt', 'test/plan-count-owned-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-owned-permission-v.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-questionless-w-native.json', 'test/plan-count-ceo-body-finding.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-w-paired.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-completion-handoff-w-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-y-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-y-screen.txt', 'test/ceo-handoff-y.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-handoff-y-call.json', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/ceo-handoff-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-aa-call.json', 'test/review-handoffs-aa.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/review-handoff-aa-ceo.json', 'test/fixtures/review-handoff-aa-dx.json', 'test/helpers/ceo-mode-option.ts', 'test/ceo-count-mode.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-mode-ab-call.json', 'test/ceo-count-ac.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-ac-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-ac-later-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-permission-ac.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ac.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ad.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ae.json', 'test/ceo-count-ad-v2.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-ad-v2.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-target-ad-v2.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-finding-alias-af.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-numbered-brief-af.json', 'test/ceo-contract-assertions-ag.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-contract-assertions-ag.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-contract-assertions-ag-retry.json'],
|
||||
'plan-eng-finding-count': ['bin/gstack-config', 'bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-eng-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/plan-count-native-input.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-screen.ts', 'test/pty-screen.test.ts', 'test/pty-screen-session.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pty-screen/**', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.unit.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-completion.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-dx-handoff.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-handoff-n-call.json', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-transcript.ts', 'test/autoplan-public-narration.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-public-narration-ad.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-pending-exit.ts', 'test/plan-count-pending-exit.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-transcript.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-artifacts.ts', 'test/plan-count-artifacts.test.ts', 'test/helpers/eval-store.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-fixture.ts', 'test/plan-count-fixture.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-timeout.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-navigation-r.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-prerequisite-n.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-prerequisite-n-call.json', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-eng-finding-count.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-review-l-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-checkbox.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-checkbox-l.screen.txt', 'test/plan-count-empty-review.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-s-distinct.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-design-questionless-report.md', 'test/plan-count-dx-handoff-o.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-handoff-o-call.json', 'test/eng-devex-s-count.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-devex-s-first-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/eng-devex-s-retry-calls.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-file-permission.ts', 'test/plan-count-file-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-edit-permission-t.json', 'test/eng-first-review-t.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-batching-t-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-preview-footer.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/design-preview-v-screen.txt', 'test/plan-count-owned-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-owned-permission-v.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-questionless-w-native.json', 'test/eng-scope-y.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-scope-y-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/eng-binding-z.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-binding-z-calls.json', 'test/eng-binding-retry-z.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-binding-retry-z-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-permission-ac.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ac.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ad.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ae.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-target-ad-v2.json', 'test/helpers/eng-completion-handoff.ts', 'test/eng-count-ad-v2.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-count-ad-v2.json', 'test/helpers/eng-seeded-coverage.ts', 'test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts', 'test/eng-seeded-packet-ae.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-seeded-packet-ae.json', 'test/eng-first-category-af.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-first-category-af.json', 'test/eng-regression-pinning-ag.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-regression-pinning-ag.json'],
|
||||
'plan-design-finding-count': ['bin/gstack-config', 'bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-design-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/plan-count-native-input.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-screen.ts', 'test/pty-screen.test.ts', 'test/pty-screen-session.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pty-screen/**', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.unit.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-completion.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-dx-handoff.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-handoff-n-call.json', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-transcript.ts', 'test/autoplan-public-narration.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-public-narration-ad.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-pending-exit.ts', 'test/plan-count-pending-exit.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-transcript.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-artifacts.ts', 'test/plan-count-artifacts.test.ts', 'test/helpers/eval-store.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-fixture.ts', 'test/plan-count-fixture.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-timeout.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-navigation-r.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-prerequisite-n.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-prerequisite-n-call.json', 'test/helpers/design-count-review.ts', 'test/design-count-review.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/design-review-j-calls.json', 'test/helpers/design-count-outside.ts', 'test/design-count-outside.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-design-finding-count.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/design-review-l-calls.json', 'test/design-completion-handoff.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/design-handoff-l-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/devex-review-l-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-checkbox.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-checkbox-l.screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/design-review-n-calls.json', 'test/design-completion-handoff-scored.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/design-handoff-n-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/design-handoff-q-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-empty-review.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-s-distinct.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-design-questionless-report.md', 'test/plan-count-dx-handoff-o.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-handoff-o-call.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-file-permission.ts', 'test/plan-count-file-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-edit-permission-t.json', 'test/plan-count-preview-footer.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-screen.txt', 'test/design-completion-handoff-u.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/design-handoff-u-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/design-preview-v-screen.txt', 'test/plan-count-owned-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-owned-permission-v.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-questionless-w-native.json', 'test/helpers/design-artifact-question.ts', 'test/design-artifact-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/design-artifacts-w-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/design-outside-y-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/design-boundaries-y-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/design-gap-z-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-permission-ac.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ac.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ad.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ae.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-target-ad-v2.json', 'test/design-count-ad-v2.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/design-count-ad-v2.json', 'test/design-first-decision-af.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/design-first-decision-af.json', 'test/fixtures/design-first-decision-af-retry.json'],
|
||||
'plan-devex-finding-count': ['bin/gstack-config', 'bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-devex-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/plan-count-native-input.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-screen.ts', 'test/pty-screen.test.ts', 'test/pty-screen-session.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pty-screen/**', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.unit.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-completion.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-dx-handoff.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-handoff-n-call.json', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-transcript.ts', 'test/autoplan-public-narration.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-public-narration-ad.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-pending-exit.ts', 'test/plan-count-pending-exit.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-transcript.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-artifacts.ts', 'test/plan-count-artifacts.test.ts', 'test/helpers/eval-store.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-fixture.ts', 'test/plan-count-fixture.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-timeout.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-navigation-r.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-prerequisite-n.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-prerequisite-n-call.json', 'test/helpers/devex-count-fixture.ts', 'test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-devex-finding-count.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/dx-prerequisite-r-call.json', 'test/fixtures/devex-review-l-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-checkbox.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-checkbox-l.screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/devex-review-n-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-empty-review.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-count-s-distinct.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-design-questionless-report.md', 'test/devex-output-o.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-review-o-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/devex-output-o-retry-call.json', 'test/devex-setup-remedy-o.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-review-o-retry-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-dx-handoff-o.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-handoff-o-call.json', 'test/eng-devex-s-count.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-devex-s-first-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/eng-devex-s-retry-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/devex-review-t-calls.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-file-permission.ts', 'test/plan-count-file-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-edit-permission-t.json', 'test/plan-count-preview-footer.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/devex-count-u-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/devex-count-u-retry-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/devex-empathy-v-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/devex-handoff-v-call.json', 'test/fixtures/design-preview-v-screen.txt', 'test/plan-count-owned-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-owned-permission-v.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-questionless-w-native.json', 'test/fixtures/devex-count-y-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/devex-count-z-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/devex-handoff-z-call.json', 'test/review-handoffs-aa.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/review-handoff-aa-ceo.json', 'test/fixtures/review-handoff-aa-dx.json', 'test/devex-empathy-ab.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-empathy-ab-calls.json', 'test/devex-ac-accounting.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-ac-first-attempt-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-permission-ac.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ac.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ad.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ae.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-target-ad-v2.json', 'test/devex-reconfirmation-ad-v2.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-reconfirmation-ad-v2.json', 'test/plan-count-history.test.ts', 'test/helpers/devex-seed-coverage.ts', 'test/devex-seed-coverage.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/devex-seed-coverage-ad-v3.json'],
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ export const E2E_TOUCHFILES: Record<string, string[]> = {
|
||||
// a model fires one AUQ then batches the rest into a "## Decisions to
|
||||
// confirm" plan write. runPlanSkillFloorCheck cannot detect that shape
|
||||
// (it exits on first AUQ); runPlanSkillCounting can.
|
||||
'plan-eng-multi-finding-batching': ['bin/gstack-config', 'bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-eng-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/review.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/plan-count-native-input.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-screen.ts', 'test/pty-screen.test.ts', 'test/pty-screen-session.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pty-screen/**', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.unit.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-transcript.ts', 'test/autoplan-public-narration.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-public-narration-ad.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-pending-exit.ts', 'test/plan-count-pending-exit.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-transcript.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-artifacts.ts', 'test/plan-count-artifacts.test.ts', 'test/helpers/eval-store.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-fixture.ts', 'test/plan-count-fixture.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-timeout.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-navigation-r.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-prerequisite-n.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-prerequisite-n-call.json', 'test/fixtures/forcing-finding-seeds.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-eng-multi-finding-batching.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-checkbox.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-checkbox-l.screen.txt', 'test/eng-devex-s-count.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-devex-s-first-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/eng-devex-s-retry-calls.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-file-permission.ts', 'test/plan-count-file-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-edit-permission-t.json', 'test/eng-first-review-t.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-batching-t-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-preview-footer.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/design-preview-v-screen.txt', 'test/plan-count-owned-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-owned-permission-v.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-questionless-w-native.json', 'test/eng-scope-y.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-scope-y-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/eng-binding-z.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-binding-z-calls.json', 'test/eng-binding-retry-z.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-binding-retry-z-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-permission-ac.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ac.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ad.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ae.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-target-ad-v2.json', 'test/eng-count-ad-v2.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-count-ad-v2.json', 'test/eng-first-category-af.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-first-category-af.json'],
|
||||
'plan-eng-multi-finding-batching': ['bin/gstack-config', 'bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'plan-eng-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/review.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/plan-count-native-input.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-screen.ts', 'test/pty-screen.test.ts', 'test/pty-screen-session.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pty-screen/**', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.unit.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-transcript.ts', 'test/autoplan-public-narration.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-public-narration-ad.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-pending-exit.ts', 'test/plan-count-pending-exit.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-transcript.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-artifacts.ts', 'test/plan-count-artifacts.test.ts', 'test/helpers/eval-store.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-fixture.ts', 'test/plan-count-fixture.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-timeout.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-navigation-r.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-prerequisite-n.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-prerequisite-n-call.json', 'test/fixtures/forcing-finding-seeds.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-eng-multi-finding-batching.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-checkbox.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-checkbox-l.screen.txt', 'test/eng-devex-s-count.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-devex-s-first-calls.json', 'test/fixtures/eng-devex-s-retry-calls.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-file-permission.ts', 'test/plan-count-file-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-edit-permission-t.json', 'test/eng-first-review-t.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-batching-t-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-preview-footer.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-preview-u-screen.txt', 'test/fixtures/design-preview-v-screen.txt', 'test/plan-count-owned-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-owned-permission-v.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-questionless-w-native.json', 'test/eng-scope-y.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-scope-y-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/eng-binding-z.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-binding-z-calls.json', 'test/eng-binding-retry-z.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-binding-retry-z-calls.json', 'test/plan-count-permission-ac.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ac.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ad.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ae.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-target-ad-v2.json', 'test/eng-count-ad-v2.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-count-ad-v2.json', 'test/eng-first-category-af.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-first-category-af.json', 'test/eng-regression-pinning-ag.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/eng-regression-pinning-ag.json'],
|
||||
'plan-ceo-split-overflow': ['bin/gstack-config', 'plan-ceo-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'bin/gstack-question-preference', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts', 'test/plan-count-native-input.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-screen.ts', 'test/pty-screen.test.ts', 'test/pty-screen-session.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/pty-screen/**', 'test/helpers/hermetic-skill-runtime.ts', 'test/hermetic-skill-runtime.test.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.unit.test.ts', 'test/helpers/pty-trust-dialog.ts', 'test/pty-trust-dialog.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-transcript.ts', 'test/autoplan-public-narration.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/autoplan-public-narration-ad.json', 'test/helpers/plan-count-pending-exit.ts', 'test/plan-count-pending-exit.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-transcript.test.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-artifacts.ts', 'test/plan-count-artifacts.test.ts', 'test/helpers/eval-store.ts', 'test/helpers/plan-count-fixture.ts', 'test/plan-count-fixture.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-timeout.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-navigation-r.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-prerequisite-n.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-prerequisite-n-call.json', 'test/fixtures/forcing-finding-seeds.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-split-overflow.test.ts', 'test/plan-count-checkbox.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-checkbox-l.screen.txt', 'test/helpers/plan-count-file-permission.ts', 'test/plan-count-file-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-edit-permission-t.json', 'test/plan-count-owned-permission.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-owned-permission-v.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-questionless-w-native.json', 'test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-call.json', 'test/fixtures/ceo-approach-z-screen.txt', 'test/plan-count-permission-ac.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ac.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ad.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-ae.json', 'test/fixtures/plan-count-permission-target-ad-v2.json'],
|
||||
'brain-privacy-gate': ['bin/gstack-skill-start', 'bin/gstack-skill-end', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-brain-sync-block.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'bin/gstack-brain-sync', 'bin/gstack-artifacts-init', 'bin/gstack-config', 'test/helpers/agent-sdk-runner.ts', 'test/skill-e2e-brain-privacy-gate.test.ts'],
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
|
||||
import { expect, test } from 'bun:test';
|
||||
import * as fs from 'node:fs';
|
||||
import * as os from 'node:os';
|
||||
import * as path from 'node:path';
|
||||
import { pathToFileURL } from 'node:url';
|
||||
|
||||
const fixture = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(path.join(import.meta.dir, 'fixtures/native-auto-decide-ag.json'), 'utf8'));
|
||||
const retry = fixture.attempts[1];
|
||||
const annotation = retry.transcript.assistantMessages.find((m: any) => m.sessionId === retry.options.sessionId && m.text.includes('Auto-decided')).text;
|
||||
|
||||
test('owned native AUTO_DECIDE survives damaged terminal and polls again after scope selection', async () => {
|
||||
const dir=fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(),'auto-decide-pty-')), cli=path.join(dir,'fake-claude');
|
||||
const working=path.join(dir,'repo');fs.mkdirSync(working);
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(cli, `#!/usr/bin/env bun
|
||||
const fs=require('node:fs'),path=require('node:path');
|
||||
const args=process.argv.slice(2),id=args[args.indexOf('--session-id')+1];
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(process.env.AUTO_TEST_ARGV,JSON.stringify(args));
|
||||
let sent=false;
|
||||
process.stdin.on('data',chunk=>{
|
||||
if(sent||!chunk.toString().includes('/plan-ceo-review'))return;sent=true;
|
||||
const root=path.join(process.env.CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR,'projects','fixture');fs.mkdirSync(root,{recursive:true});
|
||||
const file=path.join(root,id+'.jsonl'),base=Date.now();
|
||||
const record=(type,n,content)=>JSON.stringify({type,isSidechain:false,cwd:process.cwd(),sessionId:id,timestamp:new Date(base+n).toISOString(),message:{role:type,content}});
|
||||
const rows=[record('assistant',1,[{type:'tool_use',id:'load',name:'Skill',input:{skill:'plan-ceo-review'}}]),record('user',2,[{type:'tool_result',tool_use_id:'load',content:'loaded',is_error:false}]),record('assistant',3,[{type:'text',text:'I will review the "Auto decision fixture" draft plan pasted here.'}])];
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(file,rows.join('\\n')+'\\n');process.stdout.write('Working on the current review.\\n');
|
||||
setTimeout(()=>{fs.appendFileSync(file,record('assistant',Date.now()-base-1,[{type:'text',text:${JSON.stringify(annotation)}}])+'\\n');process.stdout.write('Auto-dcided review mode: HOLD SCOPE. DONE.\\n');},4500);
|
||||
});
|
||||
setInterval(()=>{},1000);
|
||||
`,{mode:0o755});
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const runner=pathToFileURL(path.join(import.meta.dir,'helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts')).href;
|
||||
const childFile=path.join(dir,'observe.ts');
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(childFile,`import {runPlanSkillObservation,resolveClaudeBinary} from ${JSON.stringify(runner)};
|
||||
if(resolveClaudeBinary()!==process.env.BROWSE_TERMINAL_BINARY)throw new Error('Fake CLI resolution failed');
|
||||
const obs=await runPlanSkillObservation({skillName:'plan-ceo-review',inPlanMode:true,initialPlanContent:'# Plan: Auto decision fixture\\n\\nReview this current draft.',cwd:${JSON.stringify(working)},extraArgs:['--disallowedTools','AskUserQuestion'],timeoutMs:12000,env:{AUTO_TEST_ARGV:process.env.AUTO_TEST_ARGV}});
|
||||
console.log(JSON.stringify(obs));
|
||||
`);
|
||||
const child=Bun.spawn([process.execPath,childFile],{cwd:process.cwd(),env:{...process.env,BROWSE_TERMINAL_BINARY:cli,AUTO_TEST_ARGV:path.join(dir,'argv.json'),EVALS_RUN_ID:'native-auto-fake',GSTACK_EVAL_DIR:path.join(dir,'evidence')},stdout:'pipe',stderr:'pipe'});
|
||||
const [stdout,stderr,exitCode]=await Promise.all([new Response(child.stdout).text(),new Response(child.stderr).text(),child.exited]);
|
||||
expect(exitCode,stderr).toBe(0);const obs=JSON.parse(stdout.trim().split('\n').at(-1)!);
|
||||
expect(obs.scopeGateAutoSelectObserved,JSON.stringify(obs)).toBe(true);expect(obs.outcome,JSON.stringify(obs)).toBe('auto_decided');
|
||||
const argv=JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(path.join(dir,'argv.json'),'utf8'));expect(argv.filter((x:string)=>x==='--session-id')).toHaveLength(1);
|
||||
expect(argv).toContain('--disallowedTools');expect(argv).toContain('AskUserQuestion');const id=argv[argv.indexOf('--session-id')+1];
|
||||
const saved=JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(path.join(obs.artifactDir,'observation.json'),'utf8'));
|
||||
expect(saved.scopeSessionId).toBe(id);expect(saved.nativeAutoDecide.sessionId).toBe(id);
|
||||
expect(saved.native.assistantMessages.some((m:any)=>m.sessionId===id&&m.text===annotation)).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(saved.publicTools.some((e:any)=>e.toolUseId==='load'&&e.kind==='result'&&!e.isError)).toBe(true);
|
||||
} finally {fs.rmSync(dir,{recursive:true,force:true});}
|
||||
},40000);
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
|
||||
import { expect, test } from 'bun:test';
|
||||
import * as fs from 'node:fs';
|
||||
import * as os from 'node:os';
|
||||
import * as path from 'node:path';
|
||||
import { findNativeAutoDecision } from './helpers/native-auto-decide';
|
||||
import { classifyVisible } from './helpers/claude-pty-runner';
|
||||
import { readPlanCountTranscript, type NativePublicToolEvent } from './helpers/plan-count-transcript';
|
||||
import { E2E_TOUCHFILES, selectTests } from './helpers/touchfiles';
|
||||
const captured = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(path.join(import.meta.dir,'fixtures/native-auto-decide-ag.json'),'utf8'));
|
||||
const clone = (i=0) => structuredClone(captured.attempts[i]);
|
||||
const verdict = (f=clone()) => findNativeAutoDecision(f.transcript,f.tools,f.options);
|
||||
const ownedMessage = (f:any) => f.transcript.assistantMessages.find((m:any)=>m.sessionId===f.options.sessionId&&m.text.includes('Auto-decided'));
|
||||
const literal = 'Auto-decided review mode → **HOLD SCOPE** (your preference). Change with /plan-tune.';
|
||||
|
||||
test('both exact native attempts preserve the asserted preference annotation despite terminal damage',()=>{
|
||||
for(const [i,attempt] of captured.attempts.entries()){
|
||||
const actual=verdict(attempt);expect(actual).not.toBeNull();expect(actual!.sessionId).toBe(attempt.options.sessionId);
|
||||
expect(actual!.option).toBe('HOLD SCOPE');expect(actual!.annotation).toContain('(your preference). Change with /plan-tune.');
|
||||
expect(ownedMessage(attempt).text).toContain(actual!.annotation);
|
||||
if(i===1)expect(attempt.transcript.assistantMessages.some((m:any)=>m.sessionId!==attempt.options.sessionId&&m.text.includes('Auto-decided'))).toBe(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
expect(classifyVisible('Auto-dcided review mode: HOLD SCOPE. DONE.')).toBeNull();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('native annotation needs one successful post-command load in the owned session',()=>{
|
||||
const mutations:Array<(f:any)=>void>=[
|
||||
f=>{f.transcript.status='missing';},f=>{f.transcript.status='error';},f=>{f.options.sessionId='foreign';},
|
||||
f=>{f.options.commandStartedAt=f.options.now;},f=>{f.options.commandStartedAt=NaN;},f=>{f.options.now=Infinity;},
|
||||
f=>{f.options.now=f.options.commandStartedAt-1;},f=>{f.options.skillName='other-skill';},
|
||||
f=>{const use=f.tools.find((e:any)=>e.kind==='use'&&e.name==='Skill');use.name='Read';},
|
||||
f=>{const use=f.tools.find((e:any)=>e.kind==='use'&&e.name==='Skill');f.tools.push({...use});},
|
||||
f=>{const use=f.tools.find((e:any)=>e.kind==='use'&&e.name==='Skill');f.tools=f.tools.filter((e:any)=>e.kind!=='result'||e.toolUseId!==use.toolUseId);},
|
||||
f=>{const use=f.tools.find((e:any)=>e.kind==='use'&&e.name==='Skill');f.tools.find((e:any)=>e.kind==='result'&&e.toolUseId===use.toolUseId).isError=true;},
|
||||
f=>{const use=f.tools.find((e:any)=>e.kind==='use'&&e.name==='Skill');const result=f.tools.find((e:any)=>e.kind==='result'&&e.toolUseId===use.toolUseId);f.tools.push({...result});},
|
||||
f=>{const use=f.tools.find((e:any)=>e.kind==='use'&&e.name==='Skill');f.tools.find((e:any)=>e.kind==='result'&&e.toolUseId===use.toolUseId).timestamp=new Date(f.options.commandStartedAt-1).toISOString();},
|
||||
f=>{ownedMessage(f).timestamp='invalid';},f=>{ownedMessage(f).timestamp=new Date(f.options.now+1).toISOString();},
|
||||
f=>{ownedMessage(f).timestamp=new Date(f.options.commandStartedAt-1).toISOString();},
|
||||
f=>{f.transcript.calls.push({sessionId:f.options.sessionId,toolUseId:'asked',questions:[{header:'Mode',question:'Choose mode?',options:[{label:'A'},{label:'B'}]}],answered:false});},
|
||||
];
|
||||
for(const mutate of mutations){const f=clone();mutate(f);expect(verdict(f)).toBeNull();}
|
||||
const f=clone();f.tools.find((e:any)=>e.kind==='use'&&e.name==='Skill').input.skill='gstack:plan-ceo-review';expect(verdict(f)).not.toBeNull();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('quotes, source introductions, conditions and incomplete template prose are not annotations',()=>{
|
||||
for(const text of [
|
||||
`> ${literal}`,` ${literal}`,`\t${literal}`,`"${literal}"`,`\`\`\`text\n${literal}\n\`\`\``,
|
||||
`Example:\n\n${literal}`,`An unproven hypothesis.\n\n${literal}`,`Previous transcript:\n\n${literal}`,
|
||||
`If approved, ${literal}`,literal.replace('(your preference)','(if you approve)'),literal.replace('Auto-decided','Auto-dcided'),
|
||||
literal.replace('Change with /plan-tune.',''),`**Review mode: EXPANSION.**\n\n${literal}`,
|
||||
`Example:\n\n**Review mode: HOLD SCOPE.**\n\n${literal}`,
|
||||
'Auto-decided <summary> → <option> (your preference). Change with /plan-tune.',
|
||||
'Auto-decided review mode → <selected option> (your preference). Change with /plan-tune.',
|
||||
`**Review mode: HOLD SCOPE.**\n\n ${literal}`,`**Review mode: HOLD SCOPE.**\n\n\t${literal}`,
|
||||
]){const f=clone();ownedMessage(f).text=text;expect(verdict(f),text).toBeNull();}
|
||||
const f=clone(1);ownedMessage(f).text=ownedMessage(f).text.replace('Heads-up from gstack: this branch has unshipped work.', 'Heads-up from gstack: the following is a hypothetical example.');expect(verdict(f)).toBeNull();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('same-session current retractions override an earlier annotation without borrowing quoted examples',()=>{
|
||||
for(const text of [
|
||||
'Correction: I withdraw this auto-decision.',
|
||||
'The annotation is only an example.',
|
||||
'This decision is withdrawn.',
|
||||
'Correction: "I retract this decision."',
|
||||
'I did not auto-decide the review mode.',
|
||||
'Correction: that statement was only an example.',
|
||||
'I did not make this choice.',
|
||||
'**Review mode: SCOPE EXPANSION.**',
|
||||
]){
|
||||
const f=clone();ownedMessage(f).text+='\n\n'+text;expect(verdict(f),text).toBeNull();
|
||||
const g=clone();g.options.now++;g.transcript.assistantMessages.push({sessionId:g.options.sessionId,timestamp:new Date(g.options.now).toISOString(),text});expect(verdict(g),text).toBeNull();
|
||||
}
|
||||
for(const text of ['> I withdraw this decision.','Quoted example: "I withdraw this decision."','```text\nI withdraw this decision.\n```','Example: "I did not make this choice."','Example: "that statement was only an example."']){
|
||||
const f=clone();ownedMessage(f).text+='\n\n'+text;expect(verdict(f),text).not.toBeNull();
|
||||
}
|
||||
const f=clone();f.transcript.assistantMessages.push({sessionId:'foreign',timestamp:new Date(f.options.now).toISOString(),text:'I withdraw this decision.'});expect(verdict(f)).not.toBeNull();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('the native reader cannot promote foreign cwd, child, user or tool-result text to an annotation',()=>{
|
||||
const dir=fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(),'auto-native-'));
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const config=path.join(dir,'config'),journals=path.join(config,'projects','fixture');fs.mkdirSync(journals,{recursive:true});
|
||||
const start=Date.now()-100,session='owned';
|
||||
const make=()=>[
|
||||
{type:'assistant',isSidechain:false,cwd:dir,sessionId:session,timestamp:new Date(start+1).toISOString(),message:{role:'assistant',content:[{type:'tool_use',id:'load',name:'Skill',input:{skill:'plan-ceo-review'}}]}},
|
||||
{type:'user',isSidechain:false,cwd:dir,sessionId:session,timestamp:new Date(start+2).toISOString(),message:{role:'user',content:[{type:'tool_result',tool_use_id:'load',content:'loaded',is_error:false}]}},
|
||||
{type:'assistant',isSidechain:false,cwd:dir,sessionId:session,timestamp:new Date(start+3).toISOString(),message:{role:'assistant',content:[{type:'text',text:literal}]}},
|
||||
];
|
||||
const cases:Array<[(rows:any[])=>void,boolean]>=[
|
||||
[()=>{},true],[rows=>{for(const r of rows)r.cwd=dir+'-foreign';},false],
|
||||
[rows=>{rows[2].isSidechain=true;},false],[rows=>{rows[2].message.role='user';},false],
|
||||
[rows=>{rows[2].message.content=[{type:'tool_result',tool_use_id:'other',content:literal}];},false],
|
||||
];
|
||||
for(const [mutate,expected]of cases){const rows=make();mutate(rows);fs.writeFileSync(path.join(journals,session+'.jsonl'),rows.map(r=>JSON.stringify(r)).join('\n')+'\n');
|
||||
const tools:NativePublicToolEvent[]=[];const transcript=readPlanCountTranscript(config,dir,e=>tools.push(e));
|
||||
expect(Boolean(findNativeAutoDecision(transcript,tools,{sessionId:session,skillName:'plan-ceo-review',commandStartedAt:start,now:Date.now()}))).toBe(expected);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}finally{fs.rmSync(dir,{recursive:true,force:true});}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('new native annotation dependencies retain all existing observation caller owners',()=>{
|
||||
const expected=['plan-ceo-review-plan-mode','plan-eng-review-plan-mode','plan-design-review-plan-mode','plan-devex-review-plan-mode','plan-mode-no-op','auto-decide-preserved','conductor-prose'];
|
||||
for(const file of ['test/helpers/native-auto-decide.ts','test/native-auto-decide.test.ts','test/native-auto-decide-pty.test.ts','test/fixtures/native-auto-decide-ag.json']){
|
||||
const owners=Object.entries(E2E_TOUCHFILES).filter(([,paths])=>paths.includes(file)).map(([name])=>name);expect(owners).toEqual(expected);
|
||||
expect(selectTests([file],E2E_TOUCHFILES).selected).toContain('auto-decide-preserved');
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
|
||||
import { expect, test } from 'bun:test';
|
||||
import * as fs from 'node:fs';
|
||||
import * as path from 'node:path';
|
||||
import { CAPTURE_MS, CAPTURE_LONG_MS } from './helpers/eval-budgets';
|
||||
import { E2E_TOUCHFILES } from './helpers/touchfiles';
|
||||
|
||||
const source = fs.readFileSync(path.join(import.meta.dir, 'skill-e2e-office-hours.test.ts'), 'utf8');
|
||||
const owners = ['office-hours-forcing-energy', 'office-hours-builder-wildness'] as const;
|
||||
type Owner = typeof owners[number];
|
||||
type Scenario = { exitReason?: string; artifact?: 'missing' | 'short'; scores?: { axis_a: number; axis_b: number; reasoning: string }; judgeError?: Error };
|
||||
|
||||
async function exercise(owner: Owner, scenarios: Scenario[]) {
|
||||
// Evaluate the actual callbacks with all external effects replaced. No SDK or judge module is imported.
|
||||
let executable = source;
|
||||
for (const declaration of source.matchAll(/^import[\s\S]*?;\n/gm)) executable = executable.replace(declaration[0], '');
|
||||
const js = new Bun.Transpiler({ loader: 'ts', target: 'bun' }).transformSync(executable);
|
||||
const setups: Array<() => void> = [], finalizers: Array<() => void> = [];
|
||||
const callbacks = new Map<string, () => Promise<void>>();
|
||||
const files = new Map<string, string>(), records: any[] = [], calls: any[] = [], judged: any[] = [], removed: string[] = [];
|
||||
const collector = {};
|
||||
let index = -1, current: Scenario = {}, currentResult: any;
|
||||
const args: Record<string, any> = {
|
||||
expect, beforeAll: (fn: () => void) => setups.push(fn), afterAll: (fn: () => void) => finalizers.push(fn),
|
||||
CAPTURE_MS, CAPTURE_LONG_MS, ROOT: '/source', runId: 'synthetic-posture-run', evalsEnabled: true,
|
||||
describeIfSelected: (_title: string, _names: string[], fn: () => void) => fn(),
|
||||
testConcurrentIfSelected: (name: string, fn: () => Promise<void>, timeout: number) => { expect(timeout).toBe(CAPTURE_LONG_MS); callbacks.set(name, fn); },
|
||||
createEvalCollector: () => collector, finalizeEvalCollector: () => {}, logCost: () => {}, console: { log: () => {} },
|
||||
recordE2E: (target: unknown, name: string, suite: string, result: unknown, extra: any) => {
|
||||
expect(target).toBe(collector); expect(result).toBe(currentResult); expect(name).toBe('/' + owner);
|
||||
records.push({ attempt: index, name, suite, result, ...structuredClone(extra) });
|
||||
},
|
||||
spawnSync: () => ({ status: 0 }), path, os: { tmpdir: () => '/tmp' },
|
||||
fs: {
|
||||
mkdtempSync: (prefix: string) => prefix + 'owned', mkdirSync: () => {}, copyFileSync: () => {}, cpSync: () => {},
|
||||
rmSync: (file: string) => removed.push(file), existsSync: (file: string) => files.has(file),
|
||||
writeFileSync: (file: string, body: string) => files.set(file, body),
|
||||
readFileSync: (file: string) => file.startsWith('/source/') ? 'synthetic source fixture' : files.get(file),
|
||||
},
|
||||
runSkillTest: async (opts: any) => {
|
||||
index++; current = scenarios[index]!; expect(current).toBeDefined(); calls.push(opts);
|
||||
expect(opts.testName).toBe(owner); expect(opts.maxTurns).toBe(8); expect(opts.timeout).toBe(CAPTURE_MS);
|
||||
expect(opts.model).toBe('claude-sonnet-4-6'); expect(opts.runId).toBe('synthetic-posture-run');
|
||||
expect(opts.prompt).toContain('Skip any AskUserQuestion');
|
||||
const file = path.join(opts.workingDirectory, owner === owners[0] ? 'q3.md' : 'unlocks.md');
|
||||
files.delete(file);
|
||||
if (current.artifact !== 'missing') files.set(file, current.artifact === 'short' ? 'short' : 'public response '.repeat(30));
|
||||
currentResult = { exitReason: current.exitReason ?? 'success', browseErrors: [], durationMs: 123 + index, costUsd: 0.11, output: 'public completion' };
|
||||
return currentResult;
|
||||
},
|
||||
judgePosture: async (mode: string, text: string) => {
|
||||
expect(mode).toBe(owner === owners[0] ? 'forcing' : 'builder'); expect(text.length).toBeGreaterThan(200);
|
||||
judged.push({ attempt: index, mode });
|
||||
if (current.judgeError) throw current.judgeError;
|
||||
return current.scores ?? { axis_a: 4, axis_b: 4, reasoning: 'both required posture axes met' };
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
new Function(...Object.keys(args), js)(...Object.values(args));
|
||||
expect([...callbacks.keys()]).toEqual([...owners]); for (const setup of setups) setup();
|
||||
const thrown: unknown[] = [];
|
||||
for (const _scenario of scenarios) { try { await callbacks.get(owner)!(); thrown.push(undefined); } catch (error) { thrown.push(error); } }
|
||||
for (const finalize of finalizers) finalize();
|
||||
expect(calls).toHaveLength(scenarios.length); expect(removed).toHaveLength(2);
|
||||
return { records, thrown, judged };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (const owner of owners) test(`posture late axis_b failure records false exactly once: ${owner}`, async () => {
|
||||
const scores = { axis_a: 4, axis_b: 3, reasoning: 'actual-style posture quality miss' };
|
||||
const x = await exercise(owner, [{ scores }]);
|
||||
expect(x.thrown[0]).toBeDefined(); expect(x.records).toHaveLength(1); expect(x.records[0].passed).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(x.records[0].judge_scores).toEqual({ axis_a: 4, axis_b: 3 }); expect(x.records[0].judge_reasoning).toBe(scores.reasoning);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('posture returned timeout and missing or short artifacts remain failed without a judge call', async () => {
|
||||
for (const owner of owners) for (const scenario of [{ exitReason: 'timeout' }, { artifact: 'missing' }, { artifact: 'short' }] as Scenario[]) {
|
||||
const x = await exercise(owner, [scenario]); expect(x.thrown[0]).toBeDefined(); expect(x.judged).toHaveLength(0);
|
||||
expect(x.records).toHaveLength(1); expect(x.records[0].passed).toBe(false); expect(x.records[0].judge_scores).toBeUndefined();
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('posture both axis failures and thrown judge preserve failed verdict and original exception', async () => {
|
||||
for (const owner of owners) {
|
||||
for (const scores of [{ axis_a: 3, axis_b: 4, reasoning: 'first axis miss' }, { axis_a: 3, axis_b: 3, reasoning: 'both axes miss' }]) {
|
||||
const x = await exercise(owner, [{ scores }]); expect(x.thrown[0]).toBeDefined(); expect(x.judged).toHaveLength(1);
|
||||
expect(x.records).toHaveLength(1); expect(x.records[0].passed).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(x.records[0].judge_scores).toEqual({ axis_a: scores.axis_a, axis_b: scores.axis_b }); expect(x.records[0].judge_reasoning).toBe(scores.reasoning);
|
||||
}
|
||||
const error = new Error('synthetic judge service failure'); const x = await exercise(owner, [{ judgeError: error }]);
|
||||
expect(x.thrown[0]).toBe(error); expect(x.records).toHaveLength(1); expect(x.records[0].passed).toBe(false); expect(x.records[0].judge_scores).toBeUndefined();
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('posture success and existing max-turn allowance require both actual judge axes', async () => {
|
||||
for (const owner of owners) for (const exitReason of ['success', 'error_max_turns']) {
|
||||
const x = await exercise(owner, [{ exitReason }]); expect(x.thrown[0]).toBeUndefined(); expect(x.judged).toHaveLength(1);
|
||||
expect(x.records).toHaveLength(1); expect(x.records[0].passed).toBe(true); expect(x.records[0].judge_scores).toEqual({ axis_a: 4, axis_b: 4 });
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('posture consecutive failed and passing callbacks retain separate final verdicts', async () => {
|
||||
for (const owner of owners) {
|
||||
const x = await exercise(owner, [{ scores: { axis_a: 4, axis_b: 3, reasoning: 'first fails' } }, {}]);
|
||||
expect(x.thrown[0]).toBeDefined(); expect(x.thrown[1]).toBeUndefined(); expect(x.records).toHaveLength(2);
|
||||
expect(x.records.map(r => r.passed)).toEqual([false, true]); expect(x.records.map(r => r.attempt)).toEqual([0, 1]);
|
||||
expect(x.records[0].judge_scores).toEqual({ axis_a: 4, axis_b: 3 }); expect(x.records[1].judge_scores).toEqual({ axis_a: 4, axis_b: 4 });
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('posture recorder controls select exactly the two existing paid owners', () => {
|
||||
expect(Object.entries(E2E_TOUCHFILES).filter(([, paths]) => paths.includes('test/office-posture-recording.test.ts')).map(([name]) => name)).toEqual([...owners]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
|
||||
import { expect, test } from 'bun:test';
|
||||
import agFixture from './fixtures/design-plan-scope-ag.json';
|
||||
import * as fs from 'node:fs';
|
||||
import * as os from 'node:os';
|
||||
import * as path from 'node:path';
|
||||
@@ -15,6 +16,7 @@ const announcements = [
|
||||
`I'll review the "Marketing landing page" draft plan pasted here, starting with a parallel check of the pre-review audit, base branch, design setup, and brain context.`,
|
||||
`I'm proceeding with reviewing the "Marketing landing page" draft you pasted. Next, I'll run the pre-review audit: checking git context, DESIGN.md/TODOS.md, design binary setup, and brain context.`,
|
||||
];
|
||||
const agAnnouncement = agFixture.observations[1]!.transcript.assistantMessages.find(message => message.text.startsWith("I've selected"))!.text;
|
||||
const fixture = (text = announcements[0]!) => ({
|
||||
transcript: { status: 'ready', calls: [], assistantMessages: [{ sessionId: 'owned', timestamp: timestamp(3), text }] } as PlanCountTranscript,
|
||||
tools: [
|
||||
@@ -53,7 +55,14 @@ test('a late seed reply, wrong parent, failed load or missing native data suppli
|
||||
test('quotes, examples, questions, wrong targets and conditional intentions remain negative', () => {
|
||||
const text = announcements[0]!;
|
||||
for (const invalid of [
|
||||
`> ${text}`, ` ${text}`, `\t${text}`, `"${text}"`, `Example:\n${text}`, `Expected output:\n\n${text}`, `Original message:\n${text}`, `An unproven hypothesis:\n${text}`, `A proposed response:\n\n${text}`,
|
||||
`> ${text}`, ` ${text}`, ` ${text}`, `"${text}"`, `Example:
|
||||
${text}`, `Expected output:
|
||||
|
||||
${text}`, `Original message:
|
||||
${text}`, `An unproven hypothesis:
|
||||
${text}`, `A proposed response:
|
||||
|
||||
${text}`,
|
||||
`\`\`\`text\n${text}\n\`\`\``, `\`\`\`\`markdown\n\`\`\`\n${text}\n\`\`\`\``,
|
||||
text.replace("I'll review", 'Should I review'), text.replace("I'll review", 'I might review'),
|
||||
text.replace("I'll review", "I won't review"), text.replace('Marketing landing page', 'Other plan'),
|
||||
@@ -110,7 +119,7 @@ process.stdin.on('data', chunk => {
|
||||
const rows = [
|
||||
['assistant', 1, [{type:'tool_use',id:'load',name:'Skill',input:{skill:'plan-design-review'}}]],
|
||||
['user', 2, [{type:'tool_result',tool_use_id:'load',content:'loaded',is_error:false}]],
|
||||
['assistant', 3, [{type:'text',text:${JSON.stringify(announcements[1])}}]],
|
||||
['assistant', 3, [{type:'text',text:${JSON.stringify(agAnnouncement)}}]],
|
||||
].map(([type,n,content]) => JSON.stringify({type,isSidechain:false,cwd:process.cwd(),sessionId:id,timestamp:new Date(base+n).toISOString(),message:{role:type,content}}));
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(root,id+'.jsonl'), rows.join('\\n')+'\\n');
|
||||
process.stdout.write('Reviewing the named draft.\\nA) Fix hierarchy\\nB) Keep hierarchy\\nRecommendation: A because the primary action needs emphasis.\\nReply with A or B.\\n');
|
||||
@@ -143,3 +152,78 @@ console.log(JSON.stringify(obs));
|
||||
expect(saved.scopeGateAutoSelectObserved).toBe(true);
|
||||
} finally { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); }
|
||||
}, 40_000);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
test('AG actual first declaration absence stays negative while the explicit retry selection binds', () => {
|
||||
const [first, retry] = agFixture.observations;
|
||||
expect(nativeSeededPlanSelection(first!.transcript as PlanCountTranscript, first!.tools as NativePublicToolEvent[], first!.opts)).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(nativeSeededPlanSelection(retry!.transcript as PlanCountTranscript, retry!.tools as NativePublicToolEvent[], retry!.opts)).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
test('AG completed selection accepts ordinary grammar and the exact named pasted target', () => {
|
||||
for (const text of [
|
||||
`I've selected reviewing the pasted "Marketing landing page" draft plan since we're in plan mode. Now I'll run the pre-review audit.`,
|
||||
'I have selected to review the pasted “Marketing landing page” plan because we are in plan mode. Next, I will run the audit.',
|
||||
'I have selected reviewing the pasted `Marketing landing page` draft.',
|
||||
]) expect(verdict(fixture(text)), text).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(verdict(fixture('I have selected to review the pasted "Other page" plan.')), 'wrong seed title').toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('AG completed selection rejects source text, conditional intent, wrong scope and questions', () => {
|
||||
const text = `I've selected reviewing the pasted "Marketing landing page" draft plan since we're in plan mode.`;
|
||||
for (const invalid of [
|
||||
`> ${text}`, ` ${text}`, `\t${text}`, `"${text}"`, `Example:\n${text}`, `Expected output:\n\n${text}`,
|
||||
`Original message:\n${text}`, `An unproven hypothesis:\n${text}`, `A proposed response:\n\n${text}`,
|
||||
`\`\`\`text\n${text}\n\`\`\``,
|
||||
text.replace("I've selected", 'I will select'), text.replace("I've selected", 'I might select'),
|
||||
text.replace("I've selected", 'Have I selected'), text.replace("I've selected", "I haven't selected"),
|
||||
text.replace('reviewing', 'not reviewing'), text.replace('since', 'if'),
|
||||
text.replace("since we're in plan mode.", 'pending approval.'),
|
||||
text.replace("since we're in plan mode.", 'tomorrow.'),
|
||||
text.replace("since we're in plan mode.", 'unless you object.'),
|
||||
text.replace("since we're in plan mode.", 'only after approval.'),
|
||||
text.replace('draft plan since', 'branch diff since'), text.replace(/\.$/, '?'),
|
||||
text + " Now I'll review the branch diff instead.",
|
||||
'I have selected reviewing the supplied plan.',
|
||||
]) expect(verdict(fixture(invalid)), invalid).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('AG completed selection still requires this parent and a successful prior skill load', () => {
|
||||
const text = `I've selected reviewing the pasted "Marketing landing page" draft plan since we're in plan mode.`;
|
||||
for (const mutate of [
|
||||
(f: ReturnType<typeof fixture>) => { f.transcript.status = 'missing'; },
|
||||
(f: ReturnType<typeof fixture>) => { f.transcript.assistantMessages[0]!.sessionId = 'foreign'; },
|
||||
(f: ReturnType<typeof fixture>) => { f.transcript.assistantMessages[0]!.timestamp = timestamp(0); },
|
||||
(f: ReturnType<typeof fixture>) => { f.tools[0]!.input!.skill = 'plan-eng-review'; },
|
||||
(f: ReturnType<typeof fixture>) => { f.tools[1]!.isError = true; },
|
||||
(f: ReturnType<typeof fixture>) => { f.tools[1]!.sessionId = 'foreign'; },
|
||||
(f: ReturnType<typeof fixture>) => { f.tools[1]!.toolUseId = 'other'; },
|
||||
(f: ReturnType<typeof fixture>) => { f.tools.pop(); },
|
||||
(f: ReturnType<typeof fixture>) => { f.tools.push({ ...f.tools[1]! }); },
|
||||
]) { const f = fixture(text); mutate(f); expect(verdict(f)).toBe(false); }
|
||||
expect(verdict(fixture(text), { ...opts, commandStartedAt: START + 10 })).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(verdict(fixture(text), { ...opts, sessionId: '' })).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(verdict(fixture(text), { ...opts, seed: opts.seed + '\n# Another plan' })).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('AG actual scope fixture has exactly the existing two plan-mode owners', () => {
|
||||
const selected = selectTests(['test/fixtures/design-plan-scope-ag.json'], E2E_TOUCHFILES).selected;
|
||||
expect([...selected].sort()).toEqual(['plan-design-review-plan-mode', 'plan-eng-review-plan-mode']);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
test('AG audit continuation cannot withdraw or relabel the current selection', () => {
|
||||
const text = `I've selected reviewing the pasted "Marketing landing page" draft plan since we're in plan mode.`;
|
||||
for (const tail of [
|
||||
' Now I retract that selection.',
|
||||
' Then cancel that selection; review the branch diff.',
|
||||
' Next, treat that declaration as a hypothetical example.',
|
||||
" Now I'll run the audit and retract that selection.",
|
||||
" Next, I will start the audit and treat that declaration as a hypothetical example.",
|
||||
" Now I'll run the audit. That selection was hypothetical.",
|
||||
" Now I'll run the audit. That selection is cancelled.",
|
||||
]) expect(verdict(fixture(text + tail)), tail).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(verdict(fixture(text + " Now I'll run the audit, including the examples in DESIGN.md."))).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(verdict(fixture(text + '\n\n> Example: cancel that selection.'))).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ const ROOT = path.resolve(import.meta.dir, '..');
|
||||
const source = fs.readFileSync(path.join(import.meta.dir, 'skill-e2e-plan-tune-cathedral.test.ts'), 'utf8');
|
||||
const names = ['plan-tune-hook-capture', 'plan-tune-enforcement', 'plan-tune-annotation', 'plan-tune-codex-import', 'plan-tune-dream-cycle'];
|
||||
|
||||
async function exercise(selected = names, fault?: 'missing-log-lib' | 'missing-hook-lib' | 'first-hook' | 'setup') {
|
||||
async function exercise(selected = names, fault?: 'missing-log-lib' | 'missing-hook-lib' | 'first-hook' | 'setup', hostEnv: Record<string, string> = {}) {
|
||||
// Execute the actual selected callbacks with real local bins. Never import
|
||||
// E2E initialization, call a provider, or pass ambient auth/host state.
|
||||
const scratch = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'cathedral-contract-'));
|
||||
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ async function exercise(selected = names, fault?: 'missing-log-lib' | 'missing-h
|
||||
const invoked: string[] = [];
|
||||
let current: any, failedHook = false;
|
||||
const owned = (p: string) => { if (!p.startsWith(scratch + path.sep)) throw new Error('Foreign fixture path'); };
|
||||
const env = { PATH: process.env.PATH, HOME: path.join(scratch, 'home'), GIT_CONFIG_NOSYSTEM: '1', GIT_CONFIG_GLOBAL: process.platform === 'win32' ? 'NUL' : '/dev/null' };
|
||||
const env = { PATH: process.env.PATH, HOME: path.join(scratch, 'home'), GIT_CONFIG_NOSYSTEM: '1', GIT_CONFIG_GLOBAL: process.platform === 'win32' ? 'NUL' : '/dev/null', ...hostEnv };
|
||||
fs.mkdirSync(env.HOME);
|
||||
const args: Record<string, any> = {
|
||||
ROOT, path, os: {tmpdir:()=>scratch}, process: {env}, expect,
|
||||
@@ -113,3 +113,17 @@ test('Cathedral fixture controls and copied libraries select all five existing o
|
||||
}
|
||||
expect(Object.entries(E2E_TOUCHFILES).filter(([,paths])=>paths.includes('test/plan-tune-cathedral-fixture.test.ts')).map(([name])=>name)).toEqual(names);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
test('Plain Claude cathedral contracts stay isolated from either inherited Conductor marker', async () => {
|
||||
for (const hostEnv of [
|
||||
{ CONDUCTOR_WORKSPACE_PATH: '/synthetic/conductor/workspace' },
|
||||
{ CONDUCTOR_PORT: '55070', GSTACK_SESSION_KIND: 'spawned', OPENCLAW_SESSION: 'synthetic-session' },
|
||||
]) {
|
||||
const x = await exercise(['plan-tune-annotation', 'plan-tune-dream-cycle'], undefined, hostEnv);
|
||||
expect(x.attempts).toHaveLength(4);
|
||||
expect(x.rows.map(row => row.passed)).toEqual([true, true, true, true]);
|
||||
for (const attempt of x.attempts) expect(attempt.error).toBeUndefined();
|
||||
expect(x.allRemoved).toBe(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
|
||||
import { expect, test } from 'bun:test';
|
||||
import captured from './fixtures/sdk-order-b-ag.json';
|
||||
import { hasStaleFillRaceFinding } from './helpers/ceo-section-loading-fixture';
|
||||
import { E2E_TOUCHFILES, selectTests } from './helpers/touchfiles';
|
||||
|
||||
const compactFirst = () => `${captured.first.finding}\n\n${captured.first.heading}\n\`\`\`\n${captured.first.trace}\n\`\`\``;
|
||||
const compactRetry = () => `${captured.retry.finding}\n\n${captured.retry.heading}\n\`\`\`\n${captured.retry.trace}\n\`\`\``;
|
||||
|
||||
test('actual first completed report proves a later stale cache hit', () => {
|
||||
expect(hasStaleFillRaceFinding(captured.first.report)).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('isolated Order B proves a later stale cache hit', () => {
|
||||
expect(hasStaleFillRaceFinding(compactFirst())).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('actual retry and its explicit original-sketch override establish the unsafe execution', () => {
|
||||
expect(hasStaleFillRaceFinding(captured.retry.report)).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(hasStaleFillRaceFinding(compactRetry())).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
function replaceOnce(text: string, before: string, after: string): string {
|
||||
expect(text.includes(before)).toBe(true);
|
||||
return text.replace(before, after);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
test('original-caller return or flight joining alone cannot supply the later cache reader', () => {
|
||||
for (const [before, after] of [
|
||||
[' Order B: R2 begins after t5 -> cache hit v1 VIOLATION (until TTL or next write)\n', ''],
|
||||
['Order B: R2 begins after t5', 'Order B: R1 begins after t5'],
|
||||
['Order B: R2 begins after t5', 'Order B: R2 begins before t3'],
|
||||
['Order B: R2 begins after t5', 'Order B: R2 begins after t2'],
|
||||
['cache hit v1 VIOLATION', 'fresh DB read v2'],
|
||||
['cache hit v1 VIOLATION', 'cache hit v2 SAFE'],
|
||||
]) expect(hasStaleFillRaceFinding(replaceOnce(compactFirst(), before!, after!))).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('all read, commit, invalidation and late-fill operations retain shared key and version ownership', () => {
|
||||
for (const [before, after] of [
|
||||
['R1 readProfile(k)', 'R1 readProfile(other)'],
|
||||
['W writeProfile(k, v2)', 'W writeProfile(other, v2)'],
|
||||
['R2 readProfile(k)', 'R2 readProfile(other)'],
|
||||
['cache[k]', 'cache[other]'],
|
||||
['inflight[k]', 'inflight[other]'],
|
||||
['set(k, v1)', 'set(other, v1)'],
|
||||
['set(k, v1)', 'set(k, v2)'],
|
||||
['read resolves v1; set(k, v1)', 'read resolves v2; set(k, v1)'],
|
||||
['miss; flight f1; await read', 'cache hit v1; return'],
|
||||
['await write ... commit v2', 'await write ... abort'],
|
||||
['delete(k) no-op; return', 'delete(other) no-op; return'],
|
||||
['delete(k) no-op; return', 'write still pending'],
|
||||
['read resolves v1; set(k, v1)', 'read resolves v1; return to R1 only'],
|
||||
['v1 BAD | -', 'v2 SAFE | -'],
|
||||
]) expect(hasStaleFillRaceFinding(replaceOnce(compactFirst(), before!, after!))).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('quoted, conditional and impossible schedules are not actual asserted execution', () => {
|
||||
const report = compactFirst();
|
||||
for (const changed of [
|
||||
report.split('\n').map(line => `> ${line}`).join('\n'),
|
||||
`\`\`\`markdown\n${report}\n\`\`\``,
|
||||
`An unproven hypothesis:\n${report}`,
|
||||
replaceOnce(report, 'Schedule below shows', 'An unproven hypothesis: Schedule below shows'),
|
||||
replaceOnce(report, 'Order B: R2 begins', 'Order B: If R2 begins'),
|
||||
replaceOnce(report, 'Order B: R2 begins', 'Order B: R2 never begins'),
|
||||
replaceOnce(report, 'Order B: R2 begins after t5 -> cache hit v1 VIOLATION', 'Order B: R2 begins after t5 -> cache hit v1 VIOLATION?'),
|
||||
report + '\nThis trace is impossible.',
|
||||
report + '\n\nThe trace is impossible.',
|
||||
]) expect(hasStaleFillRaceFinding(changed)).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('one finding owns the original trace and every same-row assessment', () => {
|
||||
const report = compactFirst();
|
||||
for (const changed of [
|
||||
replaceOnce(report, 'Async schedule (F1)', 'Async schedule (F9)'),
|
||||
replaceOnce(report, '| F1 |', '| F9 |'),
|
||||
replaceOnce(report, 'Fills overlapping a write are not cached (bounded hit-rate cost, visible in metric)', 'There is no stale-fill race.'),
|
||||
replaceOnce(report, 'Fills overlapping a write are not cached (bounded hit-rate cost, visible in metric)', 'Rejected: "There is no stale-fill race."'),
|
||||
replaceOnce(report, 'D3: single-flight `invalidate(key)` before and after the write; invalidated fills never `set`; `fill_discarded` metric', 'The stale-fill behavior is accepted. No guard is required.'),
|
||||
]) expect(hasStaleFillRaceFinding(changed)).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('retry amendment alone and unasserted original-sketch annotations cannot prove a stale fill', () => {
|
||||
const original = 'Original sketch: step 6 fills v1 after step 4 → R2 hits v1 → VIOLATION (S1).';
|
||||
for (const replacement of [
|
||||
'',
|
||||
`"${original}"`,
|
||||
`> ${original}`,
|
||||
`If ${original}`,
|
||||
`Example: ${original}`,
|
||||
original.replace('fills v1', 'does not fill v1'),
|
||||
original.replace('VIOLATION (S1).', 'VIOLATION (S1)?'),
|
||||
original.replace('fills v1', 'fills v2'),
|
||||
original.replace('after step 4', 'before step 4'),
|
||||
original.replace('after step 4', 'after step 3'),
|
||||
original.replace('step 6 fills', 'step 7 fills'),
|
||||
original.replace('R2 hits v1', 'R1 receives v1'),
|
||||
original.replace('R2 hits v1', 'R2 hits v2'),
|
||||
original.replace('(S1)', '(S9)'),
|
||||
]) expect(hasStaleFillRaceFinding(replaceOnce(compactRetry(), original, replacement))).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(hasStaleFillRaceFinding(compactRetry() + '\n\nThe trace is impossible.')).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('retry original override is bound to the same actors, cancelled token and completed write', () => {
|
||||
for (const [before, after] of [
|
||||
['R1 read (began before commit)', 'R1 read (began after commit)'],
|
||||
['R2 read (began after W resolves)', 'R2 read (began before W resolves)'],
|
||||
['R2 read (began after W resolves)', 'R2 read (other key, began after W resolves)'],
|
||||
['invalidate: cancel t1, detach, delete', 'invalidate: cancel other, detach, delete'],
|
||||
['writeProfile resolves (write "complete")', 'writeProfile still pending'],
|
||||
['await repo.write → v2 committed', 'await repo.write → aborted'],
|
||||
['read resolves v1; t1✗ → no fill', 'read resolves v2; t1✗ → no fill'],
|
||||
['read resolves v1; t1✗ → no fill', 'read resolves v1; other✗ → no fill'],
|
||||
['S1: R1 misses, W commits and deletes, R1 fills stale v1, R2 hits v1.', 'S1: R1 misses, W commits and deletes, R1 fills stale v1, R1 receives v1.'],
|
||||
['### 4. Async schedule (F1)', '### 4. Async schedule (F9)'],
|
||||
]) expect(hasStaleFillRaceFinding(replaceOnce(compactRetry(), before!, after!))).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('consistent actor, key, version and pending-identity renaming preserves each causal proof', () => {
|
||||
const names: Record<string, string> = {
|
||||
R1: 'R7', R2: 'R8', W: 'W9', k: 'profile_key', v1: 'oldValue', v2: 'newValue',
|
||||
f1: 'flight_old', f2: 'flight_new', t1: 'token_old', t2: 'token_new',
|
||||
};
|
||||
for (const report of [compactFirst(), compactRetry()]) {
|
||||
const renamed = report.replace(/\b(?:R1|R2|W|k|v1|v2|f1|f2|t1|t2)\b/g, token => names[token]!);
|
||||
expect(hasStaleFillRaceFinding(renamed)).toBe(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('current findings cannot borrow assertion authority from a hypothetical preceding frame', () => {
|
||||
for (const report of [compactFirst(), compactRetry()]) {
|
||||
for (const prefix of ['An unproven hypothesis.', 'Historical example only.', 'The following is a hypothetical example.']) {
|
||||
expect(hasStaleFillRaceFinding(`${prefix}\n\n${report}`)).toBe(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
expect(hasStaleFillRaceFinding(`## Prior example\nA completed historical illustration.\n\n## Current findings\n${report}`)).toBe(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('new replay inputs select exactly the existing SDK section-loading owner', () => {
|
||||
for (const file of ['test/sdk-order-b-ag.test.ts', 'test/fixtures/sdk-order-b-ag.json']) {
|
||||
expect(Object.entries(E2E_TOUCHFILES).filter(([, files]) => files.includes(file)).map(([owner]) => owner))
|
||||
.toEqual(['plan-ceo-section-loading']);
|
||||
expect(selectTests([file], E2E_TOUCHFILES, []).selected).toEqual(['plan-ceo-section-loading']);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -79,22 +79,32 @@ Write Q3 output — the forcing question you would ask this founder — to ${wor
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
logCost('/office-hours (FORCING)', result);
|
||||
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/office-hours-forcing-energy', 'Office Hours Forcing Energy E2E', result, {
|
||||
passed: ['success', 'error_max_turns'].includes(result.exitReason),
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(['success', 'error_max_turns']).toContain(result.exitReason);
|
||||
let passed = false;
|
||||
let scores: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof judgePosture>> | undefined;
|
||||
try {
|
||||
expect(['success', 'error_max_turns']).toContain(result.exitReason);
|
||||
|
||||
const q3Path = path.join(workDir, 'q3.md');
|
||||
if (!fs.existsSync(q3Path)) {
|
||||
throw new Error('Agent did not emit q3.md — forcing energy eval requires Q3 output');
|
||||
const q3Path = path.join(workDir, 'q3.md');
|
||||
if (!fs.existsSync(q3Path)) {
|
||||
throw new Error('Agent did not emit q3.md — forcing energy eval requires Q3 output');
|
||||
}
|
||||
const q3Text = fs.readFileSync(q3Path, 'utf-8');
|
||||
expect(q3Text.length).toBeGreaterThan(80);
|
||||
|
||||
scores = await judgePosture('forcing', q3Text);
|
||||
console.log('Forcing energy scores:', JSON.stringify(scores, null, 2));
|
||||
expect(scores.axis_a).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(4); // stacking_preserved
|
||||
expect(scores.axis_b).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(4); // domain_matched_consequence
|
||||
passed = true;
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/office-hours-forcing-energy', 'Office Hours Forcing Energy E2E', result, {
|
||||
passed,
|
||||
...(scores ? {
|
||||
judge_scores: { axis_a: scores.axis_a, axis_b: scores.axis_b },
|
||||
judge_reasoning: scores.reasoning,
|
||||
} : {}),
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
const q3Text = fs.readFileSync(q3Path, 'utf-8');
|
||||
expect(q3Text.length).toBeGreaterThan(80);
|
||||
|
||||
const scores = await judgePosture('forcing', q3Text);
|
||||
console.log('Forcing energy scores:', JSON.stringify(scores, null, 2));
|
||||
expect(scores.axis_a).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(4); // stacking_preserved
|
||||
expect(scores.axis_b).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(4); // domain_matched_consequence
|
||||
}, CAPTURE_LONG_MS);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -151,22 +161,32 @@ Write your response — the three adjacent unlocks — to ${workDir}/unlocks.md.
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
logCost('/office-hours (BUILDER)', result);
|
||||
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/office-hours-builder-wildness', 'Office Hours Builder Wildness E2E', result, {
|
||||
passed: ['success', 'error_max_turns'].includes(result.exitReason),
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(['success', 'error_max_turns']).toContain(result.exitReason);
|
||||
let passed = false;
|
||||
let scores: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof judgePosture>> | undefined;
|
||||
try {
|
||||
expect(['success', 'error_max_turns']).toContain(result.exitReason);
|
||||
|
||||
const unlocksPath = path.join(workDir, 'unlocks.md');
|
||||
if (!fs.existsSync(unlocksPath)) {
|
||||
throw new Error('Agent did not emit unlocks.md — builder wildness eval requires output');
|
||||
const unlocksPath = path.join(workDir, 'unlocks.md');
|
||||
if (!fs.existsSync(unlocksPath)) {
|
||||
throw new Error('Agent did not emit unlocks.md — builder wildness eval requires output');
|
||||
}
|
||||
const unlocksText = fs.readFileSync(unlocksPath, 'utf-8');
|
||||
expect(unlocksText.length).toBeGreaterThan(200);
|
||||
|
||||
scores = await judgePosture('builder', unlocksText);
|
||||
console.log('Builder wildness scores:', JSON.stringify(scores, null, 2));
|
||||
expect(scores.axis_a).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(4); // unexpected_combinations
|
||||
expect(scores.axis_b).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(4); // excitement_over_optimization
|
||||
passed = true;
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/office-hours-builder-wildness', 'Office Hours Builder Wildness E2E', result, {
|
||||
passed,
|
||||
...(scores ? {
|
||||
judge_scores: { axis_a: scores.axis_a, axis_b: scores.axis_b },
|
||||
judge_reasoning: scores.reasoning,
|
||||
} : {}),
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
const unlocksText = fs.readFileSync(unlocksPath, 'utf-8');
|
||||
expect(unlocksText.length).toBeGreaterThan(200);
|
||||
|
||||
const scores = await judgePosture('builder', unlocksText);
|
||||
console.log('Builder wildness scores:', JSON.stringify(scores, null, 2));
|
||||
expect(scores.axis_a).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(4); // unexpected_combinations
|
||||
expect(scores.axis_b).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(4); // excitement_over_optimization
|
||||
}, CAPTURE_LONG_MS);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ afterAll(() => {
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
/** Scaffold a fixture project with the bins + scripts the cathedral needs. */
|
||||
function scaffoldFixture(workDir: string): { workDir: string; stateRoot: string; slug: string } {
|
||||
function scaffoldFixture(workDir: string): { workDir: string; stateRoot: string; slug: string; env: NodeJS.ProcessEnv } {
|
||||
const stateRoot = path.join(workDir, '.gstack-state');
|
||||
fs.mkdirSync(stateRoot, { recursive: true });
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -96,7 +96,14 @@ function scaffoldFixture(workDir: string): { workDir: string; stateRoot: string;
|
||||
copyDirSync(path.join(ROOT, 'hosts', 'claude', 'hooks'), path.join(workDir, 'hosts', 'claude', 'hooks'));
|
||||
|
||||
const slug = path.basename(workDir).replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9._-]/g, '');
|
||||
return { workDir, stateRoot, slug };
|
||||
// These contracts exercise ordinary Claude Code hook delivery. Conductor's
|
||||
// question redirection has its own tests and must not replace this branch.
|
||||
const env = { ...process.env };
|
||||
delete env.CONDUCTOR_WORKSPACE_PATH;
|
||||
delete env.CONDUCTOR_PORT;
|
||||
delete env.OPENCLAW_SESSION;
|
||||
delete env.GSTACK_SESSION_KIND;
|
||||
return { workDir, stateRoot, slug, env };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function cleanupFixture(workDir: string): void {
|
||||
@@ -160,7 +167,7 @@ describeIfSelected('PlanTune cathedral E2E: hook capture', ['plan-tune-hook-capt
|
||||
};
|
||||
const res = spawnSync(hookPath, [], {
|
||||
env: {
|
||||
...process.env,
|
||||
...fixture.env,
|
||||
GSTACK_STATE_ROOT: fixture.stateRoot,
|
||||
GSTACK_QUESTION_LOG_NO_DERIVE: '1',
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -214,7 +221,7 @@ describeIfSelected('PlanTune cathedral E2E: enforcement', ['plan-tune-enforcemen
|
||||
};
|
||||
const res = spawnSync(hookPath, [], {
|
||||
env: {
|
||||
...process.env,
|
||||
...fixture.env,
|
||||
GSTACK_STATE_ROOT: fixture.stateRoot,
|
||||
GSTACK_QUESTION_LOG_NO_DERIVE: '1',
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -289,7 +296,7 @@ describeIfSelected('PlanTune cathedral E2E: annotation', ['plan-tune-annotation'
|
||||
};
|
||||
const res = spawnSync(hookPath, [], {
|
||||
env: {
|
||||
...process.env,
|
||||
...fixture.env,
|
||||
GSTACK_STATE_ROOT: fixture.stateRoot,
|
||||
GSTACK_QUESTION_LOG_NO_DERIVE: '1',
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -338,7 +345,7 @@ describeIfSelected('PlanTune cathedral E2E: codex import', ['plan-tune-codex-imp
|
||||
const bin = path.join(fixture.workDir, 'bin', 'gstack-codex-session-import');
|
||||
const res = spawnSync(bin, [sessionFile], {
|
||||
env: {
|
||||
...process.env,
|
||||
...fixture.env,
|
||||
GSTACK_STATE_ROOT: fixture.stateRoot,
|
||||
GSTACK_QUESTION_LOG_NO_DERIVE: '1',
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -392,7 +399,7 @@ describeIfSelected('PlanTune cathedral E2E: dream cycle', ['plan-tune-dream-cycl
|
||||
// 1. Apply the proposal via gstack-distill-apply.
|
||||
const applyBin = path.join(fixture.workDir, 'bin', 'gstack-distill-apply');
|
||||
const applyRes = spawnSync(applyBin, ['--proposal', '0'], {
|
||||
env: { ...process.env, GSTACK_STATE_ROOT: fixture.stateRoot },
|
||||
env: { ...fixture.env, GSTACK_STATE_ROOT: fixture.stateRoot },
|
||||
encoding: 'utf-8',
|
||||
cwd: fixture.workDir,
|
||||
timeout: 30_000,
|
||||
@@ -431,7 +438,7 @@ describeIfSelected('PlanTune cathedral E2E: dream cycle', ['plan-tune-dream-cycl
|
||||
};
|
||||
const hookRes = spawnSync(hookPath, [], {
|
||||
env: {
|
||||
...process.env,
|
||||
...fixture.env,
|
||||
GSTACK_STATE_ROOT: fixture.stateRoot,
|
||||
GSTACK_QUESTION_LOG_NO_DERIVE: '1',
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -223,9 +223,9 @@ describeE2E('/setup-gbrain Path 4 + Step 4.5 Yes → local PGLite for code', ()
|
||||
`Read the skill file at ${skillPath} and follow Path 4 (Remote MCP). ` +
|
||||
`Use this MCP URL: ${stubServer.url}. ` +
|
||||
`The bearer token is already in GBRAIN_MCP_TOKEN. ` +
|
||||
`At Step 4.5 (the new "Want symbol-aware code search?" question), PICK YES — set up local PGLite for code. ` +
|
||||
`At Step 4d (the "Want symbol-aware code search?" question), ask me with AskUserQuestion and wait for my answer. ` +
|
||||
`Then continue through Step 5a (MCP registration) → Step 10 (verdict). ` +
|
||||
`Do not skip Step 4.5; the test depends on the Yes path being taken.`,
|
||||
`I have not yet chosen whether to set up local PGLite; do not skip that decision.`,
|
||||
workingDirectory: sandboxHome,
|
||||
env: { GBRAIN_MCP_TOKEN: FIXTURE_TOKEN },
|
||||
maxTurns: 25,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user