docs: ship-policy fill-rule sentence says gstack's own train fills at 5 PRs

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
garrytanandcapy-ai[bot] committed 2026-10-31 19:15:42 +00:00
1 parent 45618dfaad
commit e7e1d6f05b
1 file changed
+2 -2
+2 -2
View File
@@ -568,8 +568,8 @@ forked (the chain's merge onto the pin's own prefix is the verdict), refuses
`QUEUE_TRAIN_CONFLICT` for a pin that does not merge, and otherwise prints
`MERGE_CHECK: T1..T<k> merge clean onto <base>@<sha>`, so a
`QUEUE_TRAIN_WAITING` result is also a clean dry-run merge of the pool (the
crew template's sibling trial merge, done by the tool). gstack's own block fills at 3 PRs or one hour (it was 5 PRs or
three hours until 2026-10-26, which left READY PRs waiting most of a day). The same pins on the same base return the live train
crew template's sibling trial merge, done by the tool). gstack's own block fills at 5 PRs or one hour (it was 5 PRs or
three hours until 2026-10-26, which left READY PRs waiting most of a day, then 3 PRs or one hour until 2026-10-31). The same pins on the same base return the live train
instead of a second one; `train build --train <nonce>` resumes a train from
its record. Refusals, all before any spend: `QUEUE_TRAIN_UNTRUSTED` (a fork
head), `QUEUE_TRAIN_MOVED` (a head moved from its pin),