fix(review-ledger): a lead's file:line has no runaway backtracking and may be a range; a mid-line Severity field must close its clause (GST-976 review)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
garrytanandcapy-ai[bot] committed 2026-11-02 12:51:23 +00:00
1 parent 25b45aaa3d
commit f3810d4705
2 files changed
+10 -6

No files matched your search

+4 -4
View File
@@ -69,17 +69,17 @@ export interface Stated { severity?: string; blocks?: string }
const STATED_SEVERITY = new RegExp(`(?<![A-Za-z0-9])Severity\\**\\s*:?\\s*\\**\\s*(${LABELS})(?![A-Za-z0-9])`, 'gi');
/**
* A finding's own `Severity` field: at the line's start (its colon optional there, "Severity Low"), or after a separator with its colon
* ("1. Drops rows (q.ts:7). Severity: Low", "(t.md:3) Severity: Low", "- Severity: P0"). With one present a severity word in the body never raises the label (GST-976); prose that mentions a
* severity ("pass 1 had Severity: Low", "filed at severity low") is not a field.
* ("1. Drops rows (q.ts:7). Severity: Low", "(t.md:3) Severity: Low", "- Severity: P0"), its label closing the clause. With one present a severity word in the body never raises the label (GST-976); prose that mentions a
* severity ("pass 1 had Severity: Low", "filed at severity low", "(Severity: Low in pass 1)") is not a field.
*/
const SEVERITY_FIELD = new RegExp(`(?:^(?:[-*+>]\\s+|\\d+[.)]\\s+)?\\**\\s*Severity\\**\\s*:?|(?:[.;,|()]\\s*|\\s[—–-]\\s*)\\**\\s*Severity\\**\\s*:)\\s*\\**\\s*(${LABELS})(?![A-Za-z0-9])`, 'gi');
const SEVERITY_FIELD = new RegExp(`(?:^(?:[-*+>]\\s+|\\d+[.)]\\s+)?\\**\\s*Severity\\**\\s*:?|(?:[.;,|()]\\s*|\\s[—–-]\\s*)\\**\\s*Severity\\**\\s*:)\\s*\\**\\s*(${LABELS})(?![A-Za-z0-9])(?=\\**\\s*(?:$|[.;,|()*—–]|-\\s|Blocks))`, 'gi');
/**
* A label leading its line past list, quote, heading, emphasis and emoji marks (one mark per step, so a long divider stays linear)
* and an optional file:line, closed by a mark or a separator, or by a space, comma or parenthesis after an all-caps word ("[P0] …",
* "1. **High**: …", "### CRITICAL: …", "1. api.ts:10 CRITICAL: …", "1. CRITICAL missing auth"): the reader's own label, which a
* Severity field never lowers. "P0 pilot …" is not one.
*/
const LEAD_LABEL = new RegExp(`^(?:[^\\p{L}\\p{N}\\s]\\s*|\\d+[.)]\\s*)*(?:[\\w./-]+:\\d+[^\\p{L}\\p{N}\\s]*\\s+(?:[^\\p{L}\\p{N}\\s]\\s*)*)?(${LABELS})(?=[*_\`\\])]|\\s*[:|—–]|\\s+-\\s|\\s*$|(?<=[A-Z]{3})[\\s,(.])`, 'u');
const LEAD_LABEL = new RegExp(`^(?:[^\\p{L}\\p{N}\\s]\\s*|\\d+[.)]\\s*)*(?:\\w[\\w./-]*:\\d+(?:[-–:,]\\s*\\d+)*[^\\p{L}\\p{N}\\s]*\\s+(?:[^\\p{L}\\p{N}\\s]\\s*)*)?(${LABELS})(?=[*_\`\\])]|\\s*[:|—–]|\\s+-\\s|\\s*$|(?<=[A-Z]{3})[\\s,(.])`, 'u');
const STATED_BLOCKS = /(?<![A-Za-z0-9])Blocks\**\s*:?\s*\**\s*(yes|no)(?![A-Za-z0-9])/gi;
function stated(raw: string): Stated | undefined {
if (raw.startsWith('{')) return undefined;
+6 -2
View File
@@ -685,12 +685,16 @@ describe('gstack-review-dispatch sent, collect, judge and verify: nothing change
// line's start; and a long run of marks before a label stays linear.
const p2: Array<[string, string]> = [['1. CRITICAL missing auth. Severity: Low', 'CRITICAL'], ['1. CRITICAL, missing auth on DELETE. Severity: Low', 'CRITICAL'],
['1. CRITICAL (api.ts:10) missing auth. Severity: Low', 'CRITICAL'], ['1. The P0 pilot table drops a row (t.md:3) Severity: Low', 'Low'],
['1. The P0 pilot table drops a row\nSeverity Low', 'Low'], ['1. The P0 pilot table drops a row\n**Severity** Low', 'Low']];
['1. The P0 pilot table drops a row\nSeverity Low', 'Low'], ['1. The P0 pilot table drops a row\n**Severity** Low', 'Low'],
['1. Bypass x.ts:3 is CRITICAL (Severity: Low in pass 1)', 'CRITICAL'], ['Still open: x.ts:3 is CRITICAL, Severity: Low in pass 1 understated it', 'CRITICAL'],
['1. lib/x.ts:42-58 CRITICAL: drops rows. Severity: Low', 'CRITICAL'], ['1. lib/x.ts:42:7 CRITICAL: drops rows. Severity: Low', 'CRITICAL'],
['1. (lib/x.ts:42, 50) CRITICAL: drops rows. Severity: Low', 'CRITICAL']];
for (const [output, label] of p2) expect([output, parseFindings('outside-voice', output).map(f => f.label)]).toEqual([output, [label]]);
const t0 = performance.now();
for (const run of ['='.repeat(60), '-'.repeat(60), '|' + '-'.repeat(60) + '|', '🔴'.repeat(60), '. '.repeat(60), '-.'.repeat(60), '`'.repeat(60)])
for (const tail of [' P0 pilot table', ' High-risk', ' CRITICAL findings follow', ' a.ts:3 P0 pilot']) parseFindings('outside-voice', run + tail + '. Severity: Low');
expect(performance.now() - t0).toBeLessThan(500);
parseFindings('outside-voice', '-'.repeat(16000) + ' P0 pilot table. Severity: Low');
expect(performance.now() - t0).toBeLessThan(1000);
});
// Value: protects=a non-review the same dispatch later answers with a review is voided (counted, VERIFY clean), and a failed outside