mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-11-10 10:40:32 +01:00
v1.99.0.0
209
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
3183120cec |
Stop a main merge from counting as the PR's own change, so a retake no longer needs a second full review (GST-2229) (#4259)
The receipt carry and finish scoped-review packet counted context lines, hunk headers and the base's change toward the 200-line section cap (founderstar#802). gstack-review-plan measured the fix range as --range-base..HEAD, so files a main merge brought counted as the PR's fix (harness-evals#354). Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
1d91652764 |
Make the archive check refuse unknown PR states, cut-short issue rows and a missing title policy (GST-2241) (#4251)
* Make the archive check refuse unknown PR states, cut-short issue rows and a missing title policy (GST-2241) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Regenerate the doctor result-code table for the two new archive codes Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Document that the archive check refuses unknown PR states and needs the title policy on land Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
83bfdc5177 |
Refuse to archive a thread that holds an open PR, and close a landed PR's issue (GST-2188) (#4244)
* Test that a Captain cannot archive a thread still holding open work (GST-2188) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Refuse to archive a thread that holds an open PR and close a landed PR's issue (GST-2188) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Clear the archive check's handoff file on a failed read and say plainly that long PR lists cannot be checked Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#2 reader=testing Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#3 reader=state-machines Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Review-Finding: p1/red-team#3 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Refuse to archive on an issue list with no rows, and match tracker codes in any case when closing a landed PR's issues Review-Finding: p3/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Review-Finding: p3/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Say in the skills guide that a rotated thread is archived only once none of its PRs is open Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Shorten the runaway-stopper archive step so the skill fits its context budget after the rebase Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
f75ce6fdcc |
Stop the merge queue from landing a stacked PR's unreviewed parent commits (GST-2153) (#4229)
* Add failing tests: ready and land accept a stacked child's receipt reviewed against its open parent branch Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Refuse a receipt reviewed against another branch than the queue base at ready, land and train build (GST-2153) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Regenerate the doctor result anchors for the new receipt base mismatch code Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes Train build now has a test that refuses a receipt reviewed against a parent branch. Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=specialist-batched Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes Keep the base-contains-head diagnostic ahead of the receipt base check, normalize any remote's refs, and tell callers to merge the base in before the carry. Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#3 reader=outside-voice Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Say in the changelog entry that the base is merged into the child before the carry Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * List the receipt base mismatch refusal in the land refusal tables Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Leave the crew captain refusal table for a follow-up so this PR changes no agent instructions after review Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
89856f3b3a |
Make the behind= trailer and rebase rules agree across gstack docs (GST-2136) (#4224)
* Make the behind= trailer and rebase rules agree across gstack docs (GST-2136) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Keep the Capy skill inside its context budget after the behind= rewrite (GST-2136) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Skip the unset fix for a pin with a recorded reason, and add the changelog fragment (GST-2136) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
c25580eb52 |
Let the docs audit repair a badly shaped final line without using an attempt (#4205)
* Let the docs audit repair a badly shaped final line without using an attempt Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Keep the audit id and outcome out of docs audit format repairs A missing audit id or a missing or unknown status is now a content failure, a --repair-of that names a non-repairable output no longer uses up the audit's one repair, and the re-ask goes to a fresh agent with no tools instead of the writer child. Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#2 reader=testing Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Treat repeated identity keys and malformed outcome lists as failed docs audits A repeated audit_id or status key, and a files_updated or blockers list that is present but malformed, are now content failures, so a format repair can no longer erase a reported blocker or choose the outcome. A missing list stays repairable. Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
516435311d |
Refuse agent words on owner-only autoplan answers (#4201)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
a8e36b9815 |
Fewer false privacy holds when posting PRs and running pre-merge checks (GST-2047) (#4198)
* Stop flagging test run numbers in PR descriptions as phone numbers (GST-2047) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Let approval import record autoplan run ids that look like phone or card numbers (GST-2047) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Read versions beside a VERSION file or a semver as versions, not public IPs (GST-2047) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Say pre-merge checks in the changelog entry (GST-2047) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Keep the phone-number check on run-id fields that hold other text and on run id names (GST-2047) Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=security Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Exempt only 11 to 20 digit run numbers in a ship summary block from the phone-number check (GST-2047) Review-Finding: v1/adversarial-native#2 reader=adversarial-native Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
a229e25806 |
Let review exclusions handle big results PRs (GST-1967) (#4184)
* Let review exclusions handle big results PRs (GST-1967) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Keep the value rule in review-exclude so the pinned review-risk rules stay at their replayed bytes Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Reword the changelog entry so its credential sentence reads plainly Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
e077053c3c |
Let pull requests that only change human-facing docs skip the test suites (GST-1951) (#4178)
* Let pull requests that only change human-facing docs skip the test suites (GST-1951) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Quote the docs test list in the docs lane so shellcheck passes Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Keep the Windows smoke check green on docs-only pull requests and update the workflow contract tests Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Keep the merged test check when the base gained a reader of a changed doc, hold the land policy key until a release reads it, and register two more docs reader tests Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Check links in untracked docs and docs with quoted or spaced names, and report an undecodable anchor instead of crashing Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Point the flaky-exception anchor back at its section and test the link checker's exit codes Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
b6155921a5 |
Stop the pre-push check flagging real files whose names start with tmp or scratch (GST-1944) (#4177)
* Stop pregate flagging real files whose names start with tmp or scratch (GST-1944) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Make the stray-name test safe on case-insensitive disks and record the tmp-word tradeoff Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Describe the new scratch-name rule in the PREGATE_STRAYS troubleshooting entry Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
6417abf7a6 |
Move the tools only Capy crews use into a crew/ folder (GST-1833) (#4145)
* Load the Capy crew skills only on Capy machines (GST-1833) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Add changelog entry for Capy-only crew skills (GST-1833) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Move the Capy-only crew tooling into crew/ and run its tests only when needed (GST-1833) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Test that the Capy launch file puts crew/bin on PATH Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Count any ~/.capy as a Capy machine, so a Mac running Capy keeps /captain Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Fix the tests and fixtures that broke when crew tooling moved into crew/ Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Plan every crew test when a pull request's merge-base can't be read Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Add a test that checks each crew-only module left the root tree for crew/ Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Run crew tests on pull requests that change bin/ commands or workflows they drive Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Keep running every crew test on every pull request; the skip comes in a later change Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Keep copied installs and older release bisects working after the crew/ move Setup now copies crew/lib into every host's runtime root beside bin and lib, so Windows installs (which copy instead of linking) can still start gstack-ship-receipt, gstack-pregate and the other commands that import it. The release bisect runs the train-gate script from wherever the checked-out commit has it, so a bisect over commits from before the move still gets a verdict. Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Say in the changelog that Windows installs keep working after the crew/ move Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Point the harness guide's merge-queue rows at crew/lib/ where those modules moved Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Point the plain-title test at the wave module's new home in crew/ (GST-1833) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
6042f6ad48 |
Give a clear error when Chromium's sandbox can't start, and make design-build preflight launch the browser (GST-1906) (#4162)
* Give a clear error when Chromium's sandbox can't start, and make design-build preflight launch the browser (GST-1906) On Linux hosts that deny unprivileged user namespaces (stock Ubuntu 23.10+ under AppArmor, non-root Docker), Chromium aborts with "No usable sandbox!". browse now fails with one error naming both fixes (allow user namespaces, or GSTACK_CHROMIUM_NO_SANDBOX=1 for trusted pages only) with Chromium's line below it, and never turns the sandbox off on its own. Docker's /.dockerenv now counts as a container, like CONTAINER. gstack-design-build preflight opens and closes one tab in the browser it found and stops with code=BROWSER_SANDBOX and the same error when that launch fails. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Reword the Chromium sandbox changelog entry (GST-1906) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
1bdb1644d8 |
Stop /ship stalling on branches that merged in thousands of data files (GST-1855) (#4149)
* Stop /ship stalling on branches that merged in thousands of data files (GST-1855) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Still spot scripts in data files when git grep is set to fixed strings Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Document that a review plan run by itself also stops at its time limit Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
914e7b6fb3 |
Write PR titles, commit messages and branch names in plain English (GST-1825) (#4146)
* Add a check that keeps tracker codes and internal jargon out of PR titles and branch names gstack-plain-title checks the readable front of a title, branch name, PR opening or changelog entry against the repository's .gstack/plain-titles.json; one trailing issue code stays allowed. A Plain title workflow runs it on every new pull request, and /ship's push refuses a never-pushed branch whose name fails it. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Move the PR body's machine-read lines into a closing Agent notes section The ship receipt, its runs block and the Plan line now live in one collapsed section at the end of the body, and every reader looks there first while still accepting the old receipt-at-top layout. gstack-post refuses to post a title the plain-title check refuses, and land uses the checked PR title as main's commit title. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Teach /ship to write plain titles, PR openings, commit messages and changelog entries The README now lists what gstack is for, so a PR opening can name the goal it serves. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Keep tests, size budgets and generated files in step with plain titles and Agent notes Copy lists that install result-code modules now include the plain-title codes, the ship goldens and size ledger are refreshed, the new workflow is classified, and the pinned prose tests read the new title and body layout. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Record the test-profile list change as non-behavioral for the shared test harness Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Keep text people add below the PR notes, and fix three smaller review findings The notes section now ends at its own closing tag, so a collapsible added after it survives the next post. The opening check splits the body the same way the notes reader does. Wave PR titles no longer name the area, which the plain-title check could refuse. The Capy line in the PR-body steps now puts Approvals in the notes. Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team Review-Finding: p1/red-team#3 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Mask credentials in refused-title lines and keep older PRs' plan lines readable A refused title's printed match is masked by the secret scanner first. The Plan line reader falls back to the whole body when the Agent notes section has none, so a body written before this change keeps its plan when its first receipt lands. The notes section also ends at its own closing tag when its opener is split or marked open, or when a collapsible inside it is left unclosed. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Print a fixed placeholder when a credential in a refused title cannot be masked Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Keep a plain-title policy edit from scheduling every paid eval Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Record the paid-eval list change as non-behavioral for the shared test harness Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Recheck the PR title on every edit so a base change cannot turn a refused title green Review-Finding: s11/targeted#1 reader=targeted Review-Finding: s11/adversarial-native#1 reader=adversarial-native Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
aa46032f2b |
Stop /ship from stalling when the docs checker misspells a field in its reply (GST-1843) (#4147)
* Stop /ship from stalling when the docs checker misspells a field in its reply (GST-1843) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Make the docs reply check refuse hidden extra fields and keep old audit ids out of the retry Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=security Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#2 reader=testing Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team Review-Finding: p1/red-team#3 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Let the docs eval fixture run the new reply check, and keep odd audit ids and keys from escaping it Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice Review-Finding: v1/adversarial-native#1 reader=adversarial-native Review-Finding: fc1/fix-check#1 reader=fix-check Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Add the changelog entry for the docs reply check Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * List every way a docs checker reply can be refused in the troubleshooting entry Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
7cb151bff7 |
Count an outside review as clean only when it ends with a VERDICT line (#4140)
* Add failing tests: outside reviews read clean only from a last-line verdict
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Count an outside review as clean only from its last VERDICT line
Every outside-review prompt now asks the reviewer to end with exactly
VERDICT: CLEAN or VERDICT: FINDINGS, and the parser reads a pass only from
that line. Prose no-findings sentences are no longer evidence for clean.
Codex's structured review and /codex review run through codex exec, since
codex review --base takes no prompt and could never give the line.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Repin the outside reviewer briefs and fix the tests the verdict line broke (GST-1821)
The outside brief, both adversarial sections and the review-army prompt-file line now carry the last-line VERDICT request; their pins move under the preregistered no-loss replay GST-1821. Test fakes that wrote a clean reply now end it with VERDICT: CLEAN, the review carve marker follows the codex exec sentence, size pins drop where skills shrank, and the plan-review prompt-file line is shortened so /plan-eng-review stays at its pin.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Give the plan-review invocation test's fake reviewer the verdict line it now needs
CI's free-suite shard 5 failed at
|
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
f97c0dde02 |
Outside reviews that mention a problem no longer pass as clean (#4136)
* test(outside-review): failing-first cases for false-clean conclusions (GST-1808) and the preflight state-root leak (GST-1809) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test(outside-voice-preflight): spawn fixtures on an isolated state root (GST-1809) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test(outside-review): fixtures that read clean only through the lax scope and colon rules name the whole change (GST-1808) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(outside-review): read the no-findings conclusion as one closed sentence (GST-1808) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test(outside-review): failing-first: a whole-change scope may name the branch or its base (GST-1808 review p1) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(outside-review): a whole-change scope may name the branch or the base it is diffed against (GST-1808 review p1) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test(outside-review): failing-first: a base-name tail never accepts another origin ref (GST-1808 review p2) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(outside-review): the base tail names only main or master, with or without origin/ (GST-1808 review p2) Review-Finding: p2/red-team#1 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(changelog): scope the toward-clean claim to captured fixture replies (GST-1808 review v2) Review-Finding: v2/adversarial-native#3 reader=adversarial-native Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(changelog): name the fragment after the branch and end the colon sentence (GST-1808, /ship Step 13) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
1a29fbc344 |
fix(autoplan): bind rec_hash to its run and plan; keep legacy gates answerable (GST-1819) (#4137)
* fix(autoplan): bind rec_hash to its run and plan; keep legacy gates answerable (GST-1819) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(autoplan): legacy rec_hash is not run-bound; re-render pending pre-change gates (GST-1819) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
fb663a2bdd |
feat: the plan check works on public repos: a machine-local plan_record and a record-keyed Plan line (GST-1774) (#4133)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
e58be617f1 |
fix(outside-review): a check-results sign-off keeps the no-findings conclusion (#3469) (#4130)
* fix(outside-review): a check-results sign-off keeps the no-findings conclusion (#3469) A clean Codex review that ends with "Tests, lint, and build all pass." read VERDICT: unverified, so /ship and /review reported missing outside coverage. Closing check-results sentences are now skipped when the conclusion is read, fail-closed for code, failures, truncation and wrapped lines. (GST-1803) Co-authored-by: vilano93 <244097767+vilano93@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes A clause after the whole-change scope ("No issues in the diff, while the change disables auth.") no longer reads as a no-findings conclusion: the scope phrase ends at a clause break and while/whereas count as contrast words. Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes Any clause joined after the whole-change scope (a comma, dash, parenthesis, or and/so/since/while...) keeps the no-findings statement from concluding the review; a list of change kinds stays one scope. The scope test is linear again. Review-Finding: p2/fix-check/fix-check#1 reader=fix-check Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes A double-hyphen or figure dash, brackets, a spaced slash, plus and despite after the whole-change scope also start a clause the scope does not cover. Granted fix-check under review_loop_exception a-2726c5b57840. Review-Finding: fc2/fix-check#1 reader=fix-check Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(troubleshooting): name the scope-clause rules for the outside-review no-findings conclusion Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: vilano93 <244097767+vilano93@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
901f246d74 |
feat: crew PRs carry their brief's Plan line; ship-queue ready and land check it (GST-1751) (#4118)
* feat: crew PRs carry their brief's Plan line; ship-queue ready and land check it (GST-1751) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * feat: /ship finish and train ready/land check the Plan line (GST-1751) finish --plan resolves the brief's Plan line before stage 1; train ready, base-red ready, train land and stamp land read and write the READY note's plan record like direct ready and land. Review fixes: grant and exception rows never pass as plan approvals, render --plan stays short when redacted, no explicit changelog-only exemption, off mode still records a resolved line. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team Review-Finding: p1/red-team#3 reader=red-team Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing Review-Finding: bin/gstack-approvals:56:functional-contract reader=qa Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test: cover the plan check at ready, train ready, land-direct, finish and the policy key (GST-1751) Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#3 reader=testing Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: the Plan line stands for the gate's real state, and a broken store never throws (GST-1751) A row id from an autoplan run resolves to that run's newest gate revision; a run id needs the plan approval answered and no decision left unanswered. readStore skips malformed rows and unreadable files; with the key off the check never throws or prints. Train land rechecks the Plan line before its merge on every path. /ship's Step 19-C renders Approvals with --plan; DRIVER.md back under its size limit. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test: train land refuses a slot with no plan record under require (GST-1751) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes Step 8 plan discovery (lib/ship-audit.ts and the plan-completion sections) skips the Plan record line, so a later Plan: <path> binding is still found; render --plan refuses a line it cannot parse. The review skill's pins drop by 4 bytes. Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Review-Finding: scripts/resolvers/plan-gates.ts:206:functional-contract reader=qa Review-Finding: p1/red-team#3 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: changelog fragment passes the prose lint (GST-1751) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: captain.md describes the READY PLAN: line (GST-1751) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: plan discovery splits the Plan line on whitespace and skips record kinds in any case (GST-1751) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test: lower the gstack-review size pins after the Step 8 binding shrank 4 bytes (GST-1751) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
ef99eb5a55 |
feat: retire /investigate after a no-gain eval (GST-1717) (#4110)
* feat: retire /investigate after a no-gain eval (GST-1717)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(skill-start): core routing offer drops every non-core rule line (GST-1717)
The retired /investigate rule became 'Bugs/errors → fix them directly', which no
longer matches '→ invoke /', so proactive=core leaked it into the offered section.
Match any '- … → ' rule line.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* revert(review): keep review/checklist.md at its no-loss-pinned bytes (GST-1717)
The pin names replay GSTA-224 H1; a reviewer checklist edit merges only after a
passing no-loss replay (crew rule 15). The /investigate flake line stays until a
replayed repin.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* test: repair free-suite fallout from retiring /investigate (GST-1717)
CI run 42340956269 at
|
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
3cf4bc9181 |
fix: test fixtures stop tripping /ship's fetch sweep (GST-1695) (#4105)
* test: leftover test fixtures must not quarantine a /ship review pass (GST-1695) Failing first: a marked fixture root and ship-bin's insteadOf-local clone are printed as ignored and never block the rerun, an unmarked network clone still does, and every test process keeps its temp paths under one marked root that is removed after a timeout. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: test fixtures live under a marked per-process root and the fetch sweep ignores them (GST-1695) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes The macOS named regressions re-host a captured 120-column Claude screen at the run's temp path; under the per-process marked root that path is 11 characters longer, so the permission row overran 120 columns, the PTY split '(shift+tab)' mid-word and the guard never granted (CI run 42326005642). The fake now word-wraps an overlong row at its last space, as Claude Code's renderer does. test-setup.ts, the changelog fragment and docs/review-policy.md now say a Bun.spawn child given no env keeps the original temp dir, and the policy names the exemptions a reader could forge. Review-Finding: test/plan-count-file-permission.test.ts:101:functional-contract reader=qa Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=security Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: shard sandboxes carry the fixture marker so a runner-provided TMPDIR stays as handed (GST-1695) The narrow screen (evals run 42333856900) went red on qa-bootstrap: the preload nested gst-XXXXXX under the paid shard's private TMPDIR, so the case's mkdtemp(os.tmpdir()) landed below the bootstrap retention scope's temporary dir and registerBootstrapRetention refused it. createShardSandbox now writes the marker into the shard state dir beside tmp/, and the preload keeps any TMPDIR under a marked directory. Harness pin recorded as non-behavioral. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
3742ee9527 |
feat: cut standalone /plan-eng-review; /autoplan keeps its eng phase (GST-1698) (#4108)
* feat: cut standalone /plan-eng-review; /autoplan keeps its eng phase (GST-1698) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test: lower shrunk SKILL.md size pins; keep the retired methodology's pins measured beside /autoplan Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: carry /autoplan's plan-eng-review.md into Kiro installs Kiro's per-skill loop copied only SKILL.md and sections, so ~/.kiro/skills/gstack-autoplan lacked the Phase 3 methodology file its SKILL.md reads. Generated sibling *.md files now travel with SKILL.md under the same ownership guards. Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: file /plan-eng-review retirement follow-ups; scope the changelog claim to ./setup Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: route architecture-review requests to /autoplan by its description (journey-plan-eng) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
ca367035c0 |
fix: the receipt and the review plan agree on stamp and docs carry for review_targeted (GST-1689) (#4099)
* fix: the receipt and the review plan agree on stamp and docs carry for review_targeted (GST-1689) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes A restamp after a base merge now carries the targeted record: the CHANGELOG is read against the read commit's merged with the base's, so a sibling release's section is not counted as the PR's docs change. Adds the stamps-only and base-merge restamp cases. Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
0c41ced4fd |
Capy session: defer the upgrade while a /ship or review run is open; upgrade-path fixes (GST-1677, GST-1658) (#4095)
* capy session: defer the upgrade while a /ship or review run is open; upgrade-path fixes (GST-1677, GST-1658) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes The pin override releases .setup-lock before an older gstack-upgrade on the local default branch runs, so that copy takes the lock itself instead of refusing against the session's own pid; the no-flock eval-lock test skips visibly instead of returning. Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: troubleshooting names an open /ship or review run as an UPGRADE_BUSY cause Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * changelog: note the older-gstack-upgrade lock release (GST-1658) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
a7585d0e74 |
setup: new installs default to stable; Capy threads run latest main daily (GST-1642) (#4091)
* setup: new installs default to the stable channel; Capy crews stay on main (GST-1642)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* capy: threads run gstack's latest main at least daily; review fixes (GST-1642, R75)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* test: raise the capy skill's eager context ceiling for the R75 stale-pin prose (GST-1642)
The R75 rules grew capy/skill/gstack/SKILL.md to 5491 tokens, past its 5315 ceiling; free-tests run 42251052228 failed test/context-budget-ratchet.test.ts. Per the ratchet protocol this records the capture's value (actual x 1.10 = 6041) for this skill only; every other ceiling is unchanged. Gate disposition left open for the owner.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: pre-landing review fixes
A review-voice --check no longer prints the run-the-fix-before-the-first-workflow stale note (its fix would move the lane's shared checkout); a refused fast-forward after the pin-override switch is now tested to restore the pin.
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* docs: new installs follow stable in the recommended harness (GST-1642)
Step 14.5 documentation audit gst1642-docs-1.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* chore: regenerate bin/gstack-doctor-components.sh for PIN_UNREASONED (GST-1642)
bun run gen:skill-docs --host all adds the pin-unreasoned anchor row the new result code needs.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* capy skill: tighten step 2 to fit the 5315-token ceiling; restore the ceiling (reverts
|
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
a19130d66a |
ship-budget resume opens a new meter epoch for a successor thread (GST-1655) (#4088)
* ship-budget resume opens a new meter epoch for a successor thread's counter (GST-1655) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test: ship-budget successor cases exercise lib/ship-budget directly (test-of-test ratchet, GST-1655) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: refuse a successor epoch while a handoff child is open (pre-landing review) Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: successor refusal points at reconcile --return; a reconcile without it writes the child off (GST-1655 fix-check#1) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: refuse a successor epoch while a dispatch reservation still has readers on the previous counter (pre-landing review) Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: changelog fragment names the successor refusals (GST-1655) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
cb8f9eaeac |
release: daily stable check: important gated changes reach stable within a day, forced cut at 7 days (GST-1646, R74) (#4083)
* release: daily stable check cuts important gated changes after 24 h and forces a cut at 7 days (GST-1646, R74) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * release-cut: no release PR is NO_RELEASE_PR, a warning on a dry run, so the PR dry run against main stays green between cuts Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes release-cut --daily: a plan that clears the 24 h floor while the daily check cannot date stable is held as FLOOR_UNKNOWN, so a null decision never reaches a cut (red-team p1#1). Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: name the important: fragment field in changelog.d/README.md and CHANGELOG_FRAGMENT_INVALID Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
64862e4187 |
ship-policy: refuse a floor above stable; doctor floor row uses runningGstackVersion (GST-1637) (#4080)
* ship-policy: refuse a min_gstack_version floor above the newest stable release; doctor floor row compares runningGstackVersion and offers no no-op fast-forward (GST-1637) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test(policy-floor-stable): build the expected doctor row from the project path, not a forward-slash join (Windows) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test: keep fixtures off the live stable release (GSTACK_STABLE_REPO in test-setup); pregate-invalidation counts the policy-floor check Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes A vendored gstack copy (no .git of its own, inside a project) no longer resolves the newest stable release from the enclosing project's release tags: newestStableRelease and the doctor's _dc_newest_stable resolve only when the root is the top of its own git checkout, else the floor is not compared (STABLE_RELEASE_UNKNOWN) and the doctor keeps the real upgrade fix. Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes The newest stable release is the highest release tag at origin's stable commit (a tag a half-way cut left behind no longer counts), and locally the VERSION at the stable ref wins over local tags. The doctor skips the remote lookup where timeout is missing (stock macOS) instead of running it unbounded. Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: the newest stable release is the tag at origin's stable commit Review-Finding: p3/fix-check#2 reader=fix-check Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
10770954f0 |
ship-receipt write: every docs audit in one /ship run binds the reviewed digest (GST-1616) (#4071)
* fix(ship-receipt): write honors every docs audit in one /ship run (GST-1616) When Step 14.5 audits twice in one /ship run (an audit, then a base merge and restamp, then the re-audit), receipt write reset only the last audit's files, so a file the first audit edited and committed stayed in the review_exclude selection and write refused the reviewed digest (gbrain #8678). gstack-docs-candidate snapshot now takes --run (the invocation record), --pre on a post snapshot (records the files the audit edited, before and after) and --carry (the run's earlier post snapshot, refused from another run). Write resets every file the run's audits edited to its content before them when HEAD holds what the last of them left; a file no audit edited, an edit after an audit and a carried audit of another run still refuse. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test(docs-candidate): cover --run/--pre/--carry refusals and a three-audit chain (Step 7 coverage, GST-1616) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes Review-Finding: review-p1r/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing Review-Finding: review-p1r/red-team#1 reader=red-team Review-Finding: review-p1r/red-team#2 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(ship-receipt): a carried-audit retry never drops an integrity refusal (GST-1616) |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
1a06afdc19 |
ship finish: a Godot UID sidecar added after review binds with no reader; base-declared test_code (GST-1604) (#4063)
* ship finish: a Godot UID sidecar added after review binds with no reader; base-declared test_code globs (GST-1604) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * windows-curation: exclude test/ship-uid-sidecar.test.ts (bin shebang spawns fail on windows-latest, run 42205201312) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=security Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#2 reader=testing Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes (Step 11: unique UID proof, protected paths never declared test code) Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * ship sidecar: only another declaration of the UID refuses a sidecar, never a scene that references the script (GST-1604) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * changelog: cover the review fixes and the UID-holder narrowing (GST-1604) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: the UID sidecar proof counts only another declaration of the UID (GST-1604) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * ship pr-body: name the Godot UID sidecar line the receipt requires (GST-1604) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
f7015fa72c |
ship-receipt write: the targeted record survives a main merge (GST-1593) (#4058)
* ship-receipt write: the targeted record survives a main merge; classes since the read cover the PR's own change (GST-1593)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* docs: the targeted record's change since the read is the PR's own (GST-1593)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* ship-receipt depth: a branch edit to a path whose base did not move always voids the targeted record; isolate the GST-1593 tests' gate scan from the real home (GST-1593)
ownChangeSince compared the PR's per-path hunks with line numbers stripped even when main had not moved the
path's base content, so a branch commit after the targeted read that relocated the PR's money line to an
identical-context block read as unchanged and the record bound (red-team, /ship #4058 pass 1). Hunk
comparison now applies only when the base blob moved. The four direct targetedClassesSince calls in the
GST-1593 tests now run with the fixture's env, so gstack-gate-diff no longer writes under the real
~/.gstack (CI run 42179129702, free-suite (4): FREE_SUBSHARD_REJECTED real home changed).
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: pre-landing review fixes (GST-1593)
ownChangeSince: a path whose base content main also changed now moves unless replaying main's change onto
the read's content (git merge-file) gives HEAD's content exactly, so relocating the PR's money hunk to an
identical context after a main merge voids the targeted record; position-free hunk comparison is gone. The
built commit carries the branch's first-parent messages since the read, so a [skip ci] commit stays RH-14
gate class. Two red-first tests cover both.
Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: v1/adversarial-native#1 reader=adversarial-native
Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* ci: run the checks at the review-fix head (GST-1593)
The previous commit's message quoted a CI skip marker, so no workflow ran at
|
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
05114c8049 |
ship accept: a lanes-only head policy gates the final tree; owner-granted test-lane exception (GST-1595) (#4061)
* ship accept: a lanes-only head policy gates the final tree; name bun-hidden JUnit suites; owner-granted test-lane exception (GST-1595) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes Each excepted file is preflighted on its own and must run a counted test; the preflighted files count toward the lane's tests_ran; grants are kept per head and file set; lanesOnlyHeadPolicy compares .gstack/generated.json with the fork copy. Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#3 reader=outside-voice Review-Finding: v1/adversarial-native#2 reader=adversarial-native Review-Finding: v1/adversarial-native#4 reader=adversarial-native Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: lanesOnlyHeadPolicy compares generated.json with the base tip again A --policy-from head run loads the regen registry from the branch (lib/pregate/context.ts), so a branch whose .gstack/generated.json differs from main's tip keeps the base policy; comparing with the fork copy would gate under a stale registry. Review-Finding: p2/red-team#1 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: troubleshooting entries for the accept head policy and test-lane exceptions (GST-1595) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
4b1a115284 |
ship-receipt carry: changed and moved-context paths compose into one bounded re-check (GST-1561) (#4054)
* test: failing-first repro for the changed+context carry deadlock (GST-1561) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * ship-receipt carry: a changed path plus moved base context compose into one bounded re-check, and a base-side removed line joins the scoped review (GST-1561) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes baseEditOnly refuses a hunk whose range holds a line the base inserted without replacing any, so a merge that drops base code stays changed. Curates the new test out of the Windows scoped shard like ship-mechanical-retake. Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes baseEditOnly refuses any base hunk at the reviewed range that adds more lines than it removes, so a merge that drops a line the base added beside its own edit stays changed. Review-Finding: p2/red-team#1 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: ship-policy names the base-added-line case that stays a changed path (GST-1561) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
8d712d63dd |
ship finish: a declared mechanical version retake after a base merge binds without a new review (GST-1560) (#4053)
* test: failing-first founderstar#563 retake shape, refusals and planner agreement at the cap (GST-1560) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * feat(ship): finish routes a declared mechanical retake with no review; --post-review plans the inserted Step 9 (GST-1560) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(ship): mechanical_retake, ROUTE_MECHANICAL_REFUSED and the Step 16 planner line (GST-1560) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test: keep ship-mechanical-retake.test.ts off the Windows scoped lane (bin shebang spawns) (GST-1560) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes finish dropped a post-review path named like an Object.prototype key (constructor, toString, __proto__) from behavior through 'p in proven' on a plain object; proven is now a null-prototype map read with Object.hasOwn, with a regression test. Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: changelog fragment prose lint (GST-1560) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
c454496143 |
fix(review-exclude): files kept only for a secret line go to readers as excerpts (GST-1447) (#4044)
* fix(review-exclude): files kept only for a secret line go to pass readers as excerpts (GST-1447) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(review-exclude): keep the pinned depth rules untouched; the plan adds each dispatch's excerpt (GST-1447) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(review-exclude): split secret-excerpt sections only at real line starts (GST-1447) A CR, U+2028 or U+2029 followed by 'diff --git ' inside a changed line cut the file's section short, so the secret lines after it left the excerpt while the file stayed excluded from the reader's own diff. Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(review-exclude): scan secret-excerpt lines with their context and overlapping chunks (GST-1447) The scanner read changed lines alone, in chunks with no overlap, so a secret it detects only beside its label (an AWS secret key under an unchanged aws_secret_access_key line, or a label at the end of one 512 KiB chunk) left every excerpt. Scan every hunk line, repeat 1 KiB between chunks, and count findings on changed lines only. Review-Finding: p11/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(changelog): split the excerpt sentence (GST-1447) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
065afdfdcf |
fix(ubi-runner): an ambiguous create arms teardown only once this call's ssh key opens the VM (GST-1463) (#4046)
* fix(ubi-runner): an ambiguous create arms teardown only once this call's ssh key opens the VM (GST-1463) With an explicit -n name a second caller can take the name between the 404 name check and the create; if our create's 409 was lost (000), the by-name lookup adopted that caller's VM and teardown destroyed it. Teardown is now off from an ambiguous create answer on and armed only when this call's key opens the VM within UBI_SSH_WAIT; otherwise up keeps the record and bundle, exits UBI_CREATE_UNKNOWN and leaves the VM to its TTL, and run reports left=unknown. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: ubi-runner ssh proof offers only this call's key (IdentitiesOnly=yes) The ownership proof after an ambiguous create counted any ssh success, and ssh also offered agent and default ~/.ssh keys beside -i, so a holder VM that accepted one of them was armed and destroyed. Failing-first test: the fake agent holds the holder's key. Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=specialist-batched Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: ubi-runner ownership proof ignores ssh config identities (-F /dev/null) IdentitiesOnly=yes still offers IdentityFile and CertificateFile entries from ssh config, so the proof after an ambiguous create could pass on a holder VM that accepts a configured key. The unproven proof now runs with -F /dev/null; the normal path keeps the user's config. Failing-first: the fake ssh config holds the holder's key. Review-Finding: p2/red-team#1 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: ubicloud skill says to list before down after UBI_CREATE_UNKNOWN left=unknown can now mean another caller's VM; the runner prints list, not down, for that case. The changelog fragment notes that agent and config keys don't count for the proof. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
4c400661d9 |
fix(review-exclude): write, ready and carry bind a digest whose policy gives the PR's files the same selection (GST-1446) (#4041)
* fix(review-exclude): write, ready and carry bind a digest whose policy gives the PR's files the same selection (GST-1446) harness-evals #222's reviewers read 7cf39a7e1150, which excludes 1,260 of its files under #272's three globs. After #278 added six globs that match none of them, main's digest became dde43b124877 and gstack-ship-receipt write refused the reviewed digest: write compared digests only, and the shared carryExcludeBinds rule bound a moved digest only when both selections were empty. carryExcludeBinds now binds when the recorded selection and HEAD's give the PR's files the same list hash (applied patterns, excluded files, kept files with their reasons); the empty-selection rule is the case where both lists are empty. ready, train build, land and carry pick it up through the same predicate. Write gets only the reviewed digest, so it rebuilds the record from the review_exclude_paths the base held at each commit that changed the policy file, and binds when one of them with HEAD's list builds the digest (REVIEW_EXCLUDE_POLICY_MOVED:). A digest no such policy builds, an omitted --review-exclude, a selection that differs and an unreadable base policy still refuse; --docs-post keeps its path. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes reviewedRecord walks the policy file's full history, so a merge that restores an earlier policy no longer hides the reviewed one (GST-1446). Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
3374c5838d |
fix(ubi-runner): an API error is never read as success on the money path (GST-1441) (#4039)
* fix(ubi-runner): an API error is never read as success on the money path (GST-1441)
A refused create disarms teardown, a 5xx/unanswered create is looked up by
name, down counts a VM gone only on a readable list, pull fails on ssh
failure, gc reports failed destroys, an unanswerable run record refuses
instead of starting a second VM, and the API key leaves curl's argv.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: pre-landing review fixes
A 5xx or unanswered create no longer adopts a VM another caller already holds under that name: up refuses a name that already answers show before any create is sent, and adopts after an ambiguous create only when the name was free just before it. Regression test reproduces the adopt-then-destroy on
|
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
713c672d28 |
fix(review-exclude): fixed git calls for the name scan and binary read; dispatch names a plan timeout (GST-1442) (#4040)
* fix(review-exclude): one git grep per tree through a scratch index, batched blob reads; dispatch prints REVIEW_PLAN_STOPPED (GST-1442) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(review-dispatch): the plan limit lives beside the scan deadline it must stay a minute above (GST-1442) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes Batched blob prefixes are copied, so each 64 MB cat-file --batch buffer is released after its group instead of staying alive until every blob is read. Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(review-policy): a plan past the pass limit stops with REVIEW_PLAN_STOPPED (GST-1442) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
6278ee4fb7 |
fix(review-exclude): ready binds an older digest when no selection holds a PR file; name scan greps consumers only (GST-1434, GST-1435) (#4036)
* fix(review-exclude): ready binds an older digest when no selection holds a PR file; the name scan greps consumers only (GST-1434, GST-1435) GST-1434: gstack-ship-queue ready (and train build, land) refused any receipt whose recorded review_exclude digest differed from the base policy's, so a policy edit on main voided every receipted PR even when no PR file fell under a pattern (harness-evals #274, #276 after #278). excludeMismatch now uses carryExcludeBinds, the predicate carry uses since #4030: a digest change binds when neither the recorded selection nor HEAD's holds a file the PR changed; anything else still refuses. GST-1435: the named-by-code scan ran git grep over the whole tree, so on harness-evals #269 it searched 30 MB of receipts for 4,354 candidate paths, ran 278 s past its 120 s limit and kept every file. It now lists each tree, keeps the consumer files (code and tests outside the candidates) and greps only those through literal pathspecs in 24 KB chunks. A git failure or timeout still keeps every candidate. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes grepFixed keeps every candidate when a consumer's name does not survive UTF-8 decoding, since its literal pathspec would match nothing. Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Review-Finding: p1/adversarial-native#1 reader=adversarial-native Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: the queue's review_exclude check follows carry's rule (GST-1434) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
467be16ab2 |
fix(ship-receipt): a docs audit after the review no longer forces another review (GST-1429) (#4034)
* fix(ship-receipt): a docs audit after the review no longer voids the review_exclude binding (GST-1429) Step 14.5's docs audit runs after the review. When it edits, adds or removes a file under review_exclude_paths, HEAD's selection digest moves and receipt write refused the reviewed digest. write --docs-post <audit-id>-post.json now binds the reviewed digest when it is HEAD's selection with the files under a pattern that changed since the snapshot's HEAD reset to it, each named by the snapshot with the content HEAD holds and excluded or kept only because code names it, and every other file selected alike. Anything else still refuses. The ship driver's Step 19 write omitted --review-exclude, so gbrain #8627 wrote recorded=none; it now passes it, and the refusal says when the flag was left out. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test(review-exclude): keep the GST-1429 in-process receipt read off the real state root The #8627-shape test called receiptReviewAtHead in-process with the runner's GSTACK_STATE_ROOT, so its gate scan wrote gate-diff and slug-cache entries under the real ~/.gstack and CI rejected free-suite shard 9 (FREE_SUBSHARD_REJECTED, run 42017628509). It now points GSTACK_STATE_ROOT at the fixture like the docs-only gate-tagged test does. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes The docs-audit exception reset every changed file under review_exclude_paths to the post snapshot's HEAD, so a docs edit the review read while it was still uncommitted was reverted and write refused a normal /ship run. --docs-pre <Prepare snapshot> now narrows the reset to the files the audit changed, back to their Prepare content. Snapshot hashes of working-tree bytes also compare against HEAD's content as it checks out, so autocrlf or a clean filter no longer reads as an edit after the audit. Review-Finding: s11/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Review-Finding: s11/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * chore: changelog and TODOS gstack: ok 1.96.0.0 for=ship Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
6666b72967 |
feat(ship-policy): gstack adopts the release gate; a pre-adoption backstop freeze only warns (GST-1133) (#4031)
* feat(ship-policy): adopt the release gate; a backstop freeze only warns land once release_gate is set (GST-1133) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=state-machines Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2.1 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: bisect follows the current policy cap and resumes when it is raised; docs say the cap prices trials at the reservation Review-Finding: p2/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Review-Finding: p2/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(changelog): GST-1133 fragment covers release-cut and the bisect cap Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: land table and QUEUE_TRAIN_FROZEN note the release_gate stand-down (Step 14.5 audit g2a1) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
e4f2930812 |
fix(ship): a required edit after review takes one scoped reader, not another review round (GST-1276, GST-1311) (#4020)
* feat(ship): bounded post-review edits take one scoped reader, not a third review round (GST-1276, GST-1311) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(ship): a scoped-review STOP takes one reader, not a fix-check round (GST-1276) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test: bound the diff-scope spawn and record the ship size ledger (GST-1276) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test: repin lib/review-depth.ts on the GST-1276 no-loss replay Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=specialist-batched Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#2 reader=specialist-batched Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#3 reader=specialist-batched Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team Review-Finding: p1/red-team#3 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: a blank line or a template literal no longer hides a changed expected value (review fix-check) Review-Finding: p2/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(ship): a bounded lanes edit changes only dependencies; any other pregate key stops (GST-1276) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * ship: take the receipt-write targeted rebind out of GST-1276 (follow-up); document the lanes key check Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: list always-run.json as a gate path and finish's bounded=N stop Step 14.5 audit da1-gst1276 corrections. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: keep review-policy.md at its reviewed bytes main's finish reads docs/review-policy.md as agent prose (behavior); the gate-path list omission of .gstack/always-run.json is recorded as doc debt in the PR body. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
a4d058b078 |
feat(review): enforce the reader fetch rule with a per-stage sweep (GST-1322 B) (#4011)
* feat(review): enforce the reader fetch rule with a per-stage sweep (GST-1322 B) Split of #4008 onto current main: the squashed product diff at cf34a43. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes (GST-1322 B, ship-c-p1) A start sweep that hit its bounds is a partial note, never a violation (sweepResult). The sweep tests remove their fixture repos. A stage's rerun dispatches no reader while a path its first attempt found still exists (FETCH_RERUN_BLOCKED, the Captain's ruling C on #4011). Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=state-machines Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: sweep strips remote userinfo; a spent or blocked rerun stops every later stage (GST-1322 B, grant a-7b63e4cad37c) outside-voice#1: remote URLs are recorded and printed without user:token@. outside-voice#2: resuming after FETCH_RERUN_SPENT stops before any later stage and returns no reader output; while a kept path blocks one stage's rerun, no stage's start (Step 11's voices included) dispatches a reader. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: sweep reads remotes through git config and redacts fail-closed (GST-1322 B, GSTA-297) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=security Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: quarantine every collection of a dispatch; classify remotes on the raw value (GST-1322 B, GSTA-297) Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
3b66745ce5 |
fix: queued PRs keep their ship receipts when main starts excluding paths they never touched (GST-1408) (#4018)
* fix(ship-queue): a receipt with no review_exclude digest binds when the PR touches no new pattern (GST-1408) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test(review-exclude): type the touched-file cases for the test typecheck ratchet Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(changelog): name the GST-1408 fragment by branch slug Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(troubleshooting): the queue accepts a recorded=none receipt when no pattern matches (GST-1408) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
ef6425036e |
fix(outside-review): a ## Recommendation heading counts as the completion marker (#4000)
* fix(outside-review): a ## Recommendation heading counts as the completion marker (#3980) A completed Codex review whose model wrote its recommendation as a Markdown heading with the prose underneath was classified unavailable/missing_markers, because only an inline "Recommendation: <action> because <reason>" line passed. The fence-blanked views now fold the heading and its next prose line into the inline marker. Empty sections, no because-rationale, list or quote lines under the heading, and fenced examples still report missing. Co-authored-by: nfitzsimmons <2198211+nfitzsimmons@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(outside-review): keep labels and verdicts under the heading visible to the severity parsers Review p1 (specialist + adversarial) found that folding the heading into the fence-blanked views moved a P1:, Critical: or Verdict: line under the heading off line start, so a blocking review read clean. The folded view now feeds only the completion check and the no-findings conclusion. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(outside-review): fold only a heading line that carries a because-clause Pass 2's fix-check found that a structured reply ending '## Recommendation' over 'No issues found.' read clean at base and unverified after the fold. A line with no because can never meet the completion marker, so it is left as prose. Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(changelog): fragment for the Recommendation heading fix Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(troubleshooting): missing-markers entry names the Recommendation heading form Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: nfitzsimmons <2198211+nfitzsimmons@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
ec1f2aa6a4 |
fix(redact): a short sha is not a phone number or a bc1 wallet; plan-reality receipt and pregate fixture flakes (#3998)
* fix(redact): a short sha is not a phone number or a bc1 wallet; plan-reality receipt and pregate fixture flakes (GSTA-279) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: the review_loop_grant sha exemption and the fixture origin's maintenance setting (GSTA-279) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(changelog): name the fragment for the branch and narrow its claim to the review_loop_grant position (GSTA-279) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |