Commit Graph
9 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 914e7b6fb3 Write PR titles, commit messages and branch names in plain English (GST-1825) (#4146)
* Add a check that keeps tracker codes and internal jargon out of PR titles and branch names

gstack-plain-title checks the readable front of a title, branch name, PR opening or changelog entry against the repository's .gstack/plain-titles.json; one trailing issue code stays allowed. A Plain title workflow runs it on every new pull request, and /ship's push refuses a never-pushed branch whose name fails it.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Move the PR body's machine-read lines into a closing Agent notes section

The ship receipt, its runs block and the Plan line now live in one collapsed section at the end of the body, and every reader looks there first while still accepting the old receipt-at-top layout. gstack-post refuses to post a title the plain-title check refuses, and land uses the checked PR title as main's commit title.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Teach /ship to write plain titles, PR openings, commit messages and changelog entries

The README now lists what gstack is for, so a PR opening can name the goal it serves.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Keep tests, size budgets and generated files in step with plain titles and Agent notes

Copy lists that install result-code modules now include the plain-title codes, the ship goldens and size ledger are refreshed, the new workflow is classified, and the pinned prose tests read the new title and body layout.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Record the test-profile list change as non-behavioral for the shared test harness

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Keep text people add below the PR notes, and fix three smaller review findings

The notes section now ends at its own closing tag, so a collapsible added after it survives the next post. The opening check splits the body the same way the notes reader does. Wave PR titles no longer name the area, which the plain-title check could refuse. The Capy line in the PR-body steps now puts Approvals in the notes.

Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#3 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Mask credentials in refused-title lines and keep older PRs' plan lines readable

A refused title's printed match is masked by the secret scanner first. The Plan line reader falls back to the whole body when the Agent notes section has none, so a body written before this change keeps its plan when its first receipt lands. The notes section also ends at its own closing tag when its opener is split or marked open, or when a collapsible inside it is left unclosed.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Print a fixed placeholder when a credential in a refused title cannot be masked

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Keep a plain-title policy edit from scheduling every paid eval

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Record the paid-eval list change as non-behavioral for the shared test harness

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Recheck the PR title on every edit so a base change cannot turn a refused title green

Review-Finding: s11/targeted#1 reader=targeted
Review-Finding: s11/adversarial-native#1 reader=adversarial-native
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-08 00:59:38 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 901f246d74 feat: crew PRs carry their brief's Plan line; ship-queue ready and land check it (GST-1751) (#4118)
* feat: crew PRs carry their brief's Plan line; ship-queue ready and land check it (GST-1751)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat: /ship finish and train ready/land check the Plan line (GST-1751)

finish --plan resolves the brief's Plan line before stage 1; train ready,
base-red ready, train land and stamp land read and write the READY note's
plan record like direct ready and land. Review fixes: grant and exception
rows never pass as plan approvals, render --plan stays short when redacted,
no explicit changelog-only exemption, off mode still records a resolved line.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#3 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing
Review-Finding: bin/gstack-approvals:56:functional-contract reader=qa
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: cover the plan check at ready, train ready, land-direct, finish and the policy key (GST-1751)

Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#3 reader=testing
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: the Plan line stands for the gate's real state, and a broken store never throws (GST-1751)

A row id from an autoplan run resolves to that run's newest gate revision; a
run id needs the plan approval answered and no decision left unanswered.
readStore skips malformed rows and unreadable files; with the key off the
check never throws or prints. Train land rechecks the Plan line before its
merge on every path. /ship's Step 19-C renders Approvals with --plan;
DRIVER.md back under its size limit.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: train land refuses a slot with no plan record under require (GST-1751)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Step 8 plan discovery (lib/ship-audit.ts and the plan-completion sections) skips the Plan record line, so a later Plan: <path> binding is still found; render --plan refuses a line it cannot parse. The review skill's pins drop by 4 bytes.

Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: scripts/resolvers/plan-gates.ts:206:functional-contract reader=qa
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#3 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: changelog fragment passes the prose lint (GST-1751)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: captain.md describes the READY PLAN: line (GST-1751)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: plan discovery splits the Plan line on whitespace and skips record kinds in any case (GST-1751)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: lower the gstack-review size pins after the Step 8 binding shrank 4 bytes (GST-1751)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-07 09:53:38 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 208d0c8fcc v1.94.27.0 feat(pregate): housekeeping guards before every push (GST-1138) (#3923)
* feat(pregate): pre-push housekeeping guards (--stage guards, push runs them, gstack's guard list) (GST-1138)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* changelog: no version string the secrets scan reads as an IP address

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-release): push guards certify only HEAD's tree and skip a missing base; classify pregate-guards.json; cover finish-record reuse

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-release): push guards skip only when origin has no base branch; a refused run or unreachable origin stops

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-release): skip push guards only when origin holds no other branch; HEAD must not move during the run; a dirty-tree stop names failing guards

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-03 16:45:58 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] a1da77e6d4 v1.94.20.0 test(review): one file per review and harness pin, so independent repins merge cleanly (GST-1084) (#3903)
* test(review): one file per review and harness pin, so independent repins merge cleanly (GST-1084)

The reviewer-brief pins move from the table in test/review-packets-removed.test.ts to
test/fixtures/review-pins/{files,replays,brief-bodies}/*.json, and the harness pins from
scripts/harness-version.json to scripts/harness-pins/<path>.json. Every entry is ported
unchanged. New tests prove a stale pin still fails and that two repins of different pins
merge cleanly with a real git merge-tree.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (GST-1084)

- unadmitted() and the specialist coverage use Object.hasOwn, so an inherited name such as toString is not an admitted replay
- MUST_PIN names every non-specialist reviewer source; deleting one of those pins now fails
- writeManifest writes the pins before the manifest head; pin parse errors name the file
- mergePinEdits removes its repository when setup throws, and the merge tests clean up every merge they made

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: name the changelog fragment for the branch (GST-1084)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: the harness guard pins one file per harness file (GST-1084)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-release): GST-1031 re-pin route reads per-file harness pins (GST-1084)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* changelog: GST-1031 route reads per-file harness pins

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(test-audit): harness guard pins 42 files

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(harness-version): a pin ahead of the manifest version counts as drift (GST-1084)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-03 15:04:56 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] a65404886b v1.93.38.0 fix(review): one record per native finding at its stated severity; blocker count keys on Blocks; fix-check is never a pass (GST-1031) (#3894)
* fix(review): one record per native finding at its stated severity; blocker count keys on Blocks; fix-check start; harness re-pin is metadata (GST-1031)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): summary candidates need a denied or fixed label; only a Blocks: field lowers the count (GST-1031 review pass 1)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): JSON findings state no Blocks field; the code-class FIXABLE check takes only a Blocks: field (GST-1031 review pass 2)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): a Blocks yes in any form vetoes unblocking; summary candidates need a closing noun and cover label lists (GST-1031 Step 11)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* revert(review): keep the pinned adversarial brief files at their no-loss bytes (GST-1031)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-03 02:56:02 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] b6cb70aea1 v1.91.355.0 ship: poll readers in-program, 32 KB returns, gated fix program, unattended push defers the guard offer, calls meter (GSTA-167 calls PR 1) (#3662)
* ship: poll readers in-program, never wait on wakes; 32 KB returns; gated fix program; unattended push defers the guard offer; calls meter (GSTA-167 calls PR 1)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (inventory lib/ship-release.ts as a GSTACK_SESSION_KIND reader)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(ship-budget): document calls and dotted --step notes

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ship: judge treats a missing severity as invalid; Capy passes rendered briefs via cat (replay C1-34 breaks)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: keep the Capy skill under its context budget after the main merge

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-31 07:22:56 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] e744bfe994 v1.91.353.0 fix(ship): Step 12 keeps VERSION on --keep-current, adds bump never, and waits for the owner's answer before an unattended bump (GST-380) (#3666)
* test(ship): failing-first Step 12 keep-current refusal and unattended early bump write (GST-380)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): Step 12 keeps VERSION on --keep-current, adds bump never, and waits for the owner's answer before an unattended bump (GST-380)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: regenerate ship SKILL goldens (GST-380)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (answer gate covers ALREADY_BUMPED --version writes; typed session rows; never drift and --answer rejection cases)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (the answer gate names every flag that decides the write; Version Gate and validate understand bump never)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: under bump never a release PR that moves VERSION takes the Version Gate's ordinary rules

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): fragment for GST-380 Step 12 keep-current and bump never

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-31 06:07:36 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 8966f3620c v1.91.350.0 feat(review): GSTA-167 variant G reviewer stack: blocking floor in both voices, one batched specialist, data-file classifier (#3660)
* feat(review): variant G part 4: data files no code names are docs in classifyDiff, untested state-matrix cells map below the floor per cell (GSTA-167 PR-a)

Part 4a: lib/review-depth.ts owns DATA_PATH (JSON, JSONL, NDJSON, CSV, TSV, raster
images; YAML, TOML and SVG stay code) and applies the data rule only in classifyDiff,
to candidates lib/review-collect.ts finds no non-docs consumer for (git grep of
basenames at head, merge base and, live, the working tree; data-to-data chains four
deep; over 2,000 candidates keeps all code; a grep failure fails closed). classifyPath
and every path-only caller are unchanged; the receipt gate scan decides through
gateScanNeeded (path-only), so it cannot be skipped. gstack-ship-preflight computes
RUNTIME_LINES with classifyDiff over gstack-review-plan --json (now with consumed).

Part 4b: lib/review-scope.ts mapStateMatrixOutput maps an "untested cell" finding to
INFORMATIONAL when its cell has test null in the same output's matrix and it is the
only finding on that cell; gstack-state-matrix findings prints it for Step 9.2 before
the merge. state-machines.md is byte-identical; check still reads the raw output.

Reviewer-brief pins repinned under no-loss replay PR-a (Arm 4: plan identity at the 14
cohort heads; free exact re-score of saved C, D and A' findings).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(review): variant G parts 1 and 3: blocking floor in both prose voices, specialists at medium (GSTA-167)

Part 1: the native adversarial and outside-voice prompts end with the blocking
floor ("would fail a test, break production, or lose data or secrets") and ask
each finding for Severity and Blocks: yes|no. Additive rule: a finding is
CRITICAL when its label rule says so or it says Blocks: yes; Blocks: no never
lowers one (proseVoiceSeverity, BLOCKING_FLOOR in lib/review-scope.ts).
Part 3: ROLE_EFFORT puts specialists at medium; Red Team, native adversarial
and fix-check stay full; light's batched specialist (carries the Red Team
prompt) stays full; --no-tiers sends specialists to host.

Repinned reviewer briefs with no-loss replay G1 (live Arm G1, not yet run):
ship/sections/review-army.md, ship/sections/adversarial.md,
review/sections/adversarial.md, lib/review-depth.ts. Merge only on G1's pass.
Review-skill parity ratio 1.3136 -> 1.3180 and the gstack-review size pins
+537 for the approved +0.3k tokens per voice.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(review): variant G part 2: lean ensemble, one batched specialist at every depth (GSTA-167)

planReview dispatches one 'specialist batched' at standard and full depth (and
light, which adds the Red Team checklist): Testing and Security always on code
and gate class, plus State-machines, Data-migration, API-contract and Design
when scope asks; a forced checklist always joins. Maintainability, Performance
and Simplification are read only when forced (SKIP names them). LIGHT_FIXED is
[testing, security]; BATCH_SCOPED joins DEPTH_RULES so old receipts re-plan.
The Red Team rule and prompt are unchanged; it reads the batched reader's
merged findings. specialistsFor stays as the legacy selection the dispatch
compare script models.

Repinned reviewer briefs with no-loss replay L (live Arm L, scored L∘G1 vs G1;
not yet run): ship/sections/review-army.md, lib/review-depth.ts. Merge only on
L's pass.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(review): variant G on #3648's dispatch: Blocks: yes collects as CRITICAL, batched checklists by name (GSTA-167)

Integrates parts 1 and 2 with gstack-review-dispatch (#3648):
- lib/review-ledger.ts parseFindings: a prose voice's "Blocks: yes" makes its
  own line, or the finding on the line just before it, CRITICAL in
  merged.jsonl (normalizer v2, certified by round 5's G1), so judge refuses a
  lead that keeps it below the floor; with no finding before it the Blocks
  line is its own CRITICAL finding. "Blocks: no" never lowers a label.
- lib/review-brief.ts: the outside-voice brief no longer appends "Give each
  finding a severity"; the section's prompt now asks for Severity and Blocks,
  so the brief is the certified section prompt plus the branch diff.
- bin/gstack-review-dispatch render --checklists takes the plan's
  checklists= names (review/specialists/<name>.md) as well as paths and
  refuses an unknown one, since the batched reader is now every depth's
  specialist dispatch.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore(changelog): GSTA-167 variant G reviewer stack fragment

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): consumer scan survives grep.lineNumber/grep.column; collect reads separate-line Severity/Blocks

/ship pass 1 (PR #3660): the Red Team CRITICAL at lib/review-collect.ts:120 and the
informational findings in the same batch. proseVoiceSeverity had no caller and is
removed; the normalizer v2 table now runs through parseFindings, the path collect uses.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): collect keeps every prose blocker and one id per finding

/ship pass 2 (PR #3660): an unlabeled line carrying an inline Blocks: yes collects as
CRITICAL again; Severity/Blocks continuation needs a colon, stops at a list item, heading,
bold paragraph opener or a repeated field, and never swallows a top-level bullet or its
section label; the native voice's FIXABLE collects as CRITICAL under its role with or
without a dispatch name; the consumer scan adds --no-color.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): a later finding's fields never land on the one before it; explicit Severity wins its line

/ship pass 2 Red Team (PR #3660): prose after a finding's Severity/Blocks field, a
post-blank paragraph or a line in an indented block starts the next finding, and a
line's explicit Severity: label decides it over other label words on the line.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): FIXABLE outranks a Severity label on its line; a blocker keeps its own id and subject

/ship fix-check (PR #3660): labels are named before the strongest is taken, so a one-line
native FIXABLE ... Severity: Medium collects as CRITICAL; a later finding starts at a
file:line after the open finding's fields, field bullets stay on their finding, a field
line may omit the colon, and continuation prose never replaces a list item's subject.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): GSTA-167 fragment adds round 6 and the collect and consumer-scan fixes

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-31 05:06:03 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 21277291c8 v1.91.345.0 feat(ship): compact driver plus preflight/release bins over the restored reviewers (GSTA-167) (#3648)
* feat(ship): GSTA-167 turn levers on the restored reviewers: ship preflight/release bins, own-jam meter, dispatch-pair metering, ship/DRIVER.md

Ports the non-reviewer parts of #3633 (gsta-167-pr34) and #3637 (gsta-167-pr5 @2914400)
onto main ae3d58c (v1.91.331.0). Reviewer briefs, checklists, the fix-check prompt and
the depth rules are byte-identical to main and now pinned in
test/review-packets-removed.test.ts.

Left out: gstack-review-packet and its libs, parallel/batched fanout, --like, collect,
the audit prompt split, the docs-audit packet, review-army/adversarial/outside-voice
edits, the gate-scan summary-only block and the review-depth scope-error change.
Packet-bytes reader pricing is dropped from gstack-ship-budget; handoff READ ranges
send each section whole; the driver runs the audit, review, adversarial and
documentation sections as written.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(context-budget): raise the capy/skill/gstack eager ceiling to its captured value after the main merge (own-jam meter, driver and reviewer-batch prose, GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(ship-driver): name ship/DRIVER.md.tmpl so the pregate maps the template to its test lane (GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-driver): keep the skill generator off lib/ship-budget so a minimal setup checkout still renders (GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(windows): keep test/ship-release.test.ts off the Windows subset; it launches the shebang bin and sh stubs directly (GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(ship): variant E orchestration: one program per review pass and Step 14.5 audit, the review child starts at Step 9, a metered dispatch:docs role, and the driver's record headings (GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(ship): variant G orchestration: one call per driver phase (9 for a clean pass, at most 12), gstack-ship-preflight --audit for single reads and deterministic audits, an observe-mode ledger with note and credits, 240 s wait pings, and small-model audit readers (GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-budget): a Capy handoff child needs no jam id: verify-handoff with no reading makes it parent-metered (METER: parent), it never delegates on an unknown charge, and reconcile charges the parent's counter delta (GSTA-167 replay 7e)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): a poll settles a reader only at done, failed or a final summary, never a fresh idle; return settles the child's open step reservation (GSTA-167 replay 7e)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-budget): return releases an open step reservation under the estimate meter instead of booking its projection; measured meters still settle it (GSTA-167 replay 7e)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): a clean fix-check after below-floor fixes is done; Step 11 and fix-check below-floor findings are notes at pass 1

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(ship): verbatim reviewer briefs and loss-free collection (gstack-review-dispatch render/sent/collect/judge/verify)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

- verify requires each output's brief rendered and sent verbatim, reruns judge
  against the recorded judged.jsonl hash, and flags outputs collected after judge
- judge drops self-folds, fold cycles and chains
- prose findings parse a leading label or a label heading, not any severity word
- releasePaths: manifests count as release metadata only for version-only edits,
  lockfiles never; TODOS.md stays out of lane-evidence exemptions
- push stops when the sealed-output guard did not run
- ship-audit reads the test tree once instead of one git grep per file
- drop the uncalled --delegate measured mode; doc/help step-number fixes

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (pass 2)

- collect keeps a finding wherever its label stands (headings, table rows,
  mid-line, Informational and upper-case labels); only top-level list items
  inherit a label heading, and any heading or bold-only line ends it
- judge treats a merged file missing any collected id as a drop; verify flags
  merged_ids_missing and a sent reader never collected (NOT_COLLECTED)
- finish computes release paths after --build, so a build that rewrites
  package.json is a build-input change

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review-dispatch): verify per render, voided superseded mismatches

- verify treats each render as one dispatch of its reader, so a two-pass
  ledger compares pass-1 sends with pass-1 briefs (later renders print as
  <reader>@2); outputs bind to the latest send of their own render
- a mismatched send re-sent byte-exact before anything was collected is void
  and counted (voided=N on the verdict line); one that produced an output
  stays MISMATCH
- an indented bold sub-line no longer ends a label section (fix-check)
- docs: a failed reader is collected from its failure text

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review-dispatch): only the newest render of a path checks its file; absolute ledger paths

- a later render into the same briefs directory overwrites the earlier brief by
  design, so verify checks a brief file only for the newest render of that path
- collect and judge record absolute output, merged and judged paths, so verify
  reads them from any directory
- docs: a failed reader's failure text is parsed like any output

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: changelog and TODOS

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-release): the changelog_fragments fragment is release metadata

Fix-check 4 (CRITICAL) after the main merge: releasePaths omitted
<changelog_fragments.dir>/<branch-slug>.md, so finish stopped on the
fragment Step 13 writes under gstack's policy, or routed it to re-review.
version now names the fragment in its Step 13 NEXT line instead of
[Unreleased], DRIVER.md Step 13 writes and lints where NEXT says, and the
preflight POLICY line says Steps 12-16.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: changelog and TODOS

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-31 01:09:31 +00:00