Files
gstack/test/skill-e2e-plan-design-plan-mode.test.ts
T
Garry Tan 30fe6bb11c v1.26.2.0 fix: plan-eng-review STOP gates always fire AskUserQuestion + report-at-bottom contract enforcement (#1313)
* fix(plan-eng-review): tighten STOP gates with anti-rationalization clause

Five sites in SKILL.md.tmpl uplift to the office-hours b512be71 pattern:
the four review-section gates (Architecture, Code Quality, Test, Performance)
plus the Step 0 complexity-check trigger. Adds tool_use reminder ("call the
tool directly"), names blocked next steps explicitly, anti-rationalization
clause naming the precise failure mode (loading the schema via ToolSearch
and writing the recommendation as chat prose).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(test/helpers): initialPlanContent + wrote_findings_before_asking + shared report-at-bottom assertion

Three additions to claude-pty-runner.ts:

1. runPlanSkillObservation gains initialPlanContent?: string. Pre-pumps a
   user message containing the seeded plan before invoking the skill, with
   a 3s gap so the message renders before the slash command. claude has no
   --plan-file flag (verified via claude --help), so message-pump is the
   route. Lets STOP-gate regression tests force complexity findings.

2. ClassifyResult gains wrote_findings_before_asking with companion
   strictPlanWrites?: boolean opt on classifyVisible. Fires when a Write/
   Edit to .claude/plans/* precedes any AskUserQuestion render in the
   session window. Default off — preserves zero-findings → write plan →
   plan_ready as legitimate for unseeded smokes. Six new unit tests cover
   before/after-AUQ ordering, permission-dialog edge case, strict-off path.

3. assertReportAtBottomIfPlanWritten(obs) shared helper. Wraps the existing
   assertReviewReportAtBottom(content) and gates on obs.planFile (artifact
   existing), so the assertion fires under both 'asked' and 'plan_ready'
   when a plan was actually written.

Also: runPlanSkillObservation now captures obs.planFile on every classifier
outcome, not just 'plan_ready'. Catches the case where the skill wrote a
plan partway through then paused on a question.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: wire assertReportAtBottomIfPlanWritten into 4 plan-mode E2E tests + add seeded-plan STOP-gate case

Every test case in skill-e2e-plan-{eng,ceo,design,devex}-plan-mode.test.ts
that produces a plan file now asserts ## GSTACK REVIEW REPORT is the last
## section. The {{PLAN_FILE_REVIEW_REPORT}} resolver mandated this contract;
nothing tested it until now.

Plan-eng additionally gains a third test case: STOP gate fires when seeded
plan forces Step 0 findings. Combines the new initialPlanContent runner
option with --disallowedTools AskUserQuestion to force the Conductor
MCP-variant path through mcp__*__AskUserQuestion. Asserts outcome NOT in
{wrote_findings_before_asking, auto_decided, silent_write, exited, timeout}
and that plan_ready outcomes carry a ## Decisions section.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(touchfiles): delete duplicate plan-design-review-plan-mode keys

Verified duplicates in test/helpers/touchfiles.ts:
- E2E_TOUCHFILES had plan-design-review-plan-mode at line 94 (full deps)
  AND line 243 (smaller deps); JS object literals: later wins.
- E2E_TIERS had it at line 399 ('gate') AND line 524 ('periodic'); same
  later-wins rule.

Effective tier was 'periodic', not 'gate'. Three of four plan-mode siblings
ran on every PR; design ran weekly only.

Delete the line-243 and line-524 duplicates. Keep line 94 (full deps) and
line 399 ('gate'). Also extend the four plan-mode-test entries to include
scripts/resolvers/review.ts so changes to {{PLAN_FILE_REVIEW_REPORT}}
trigger all four siblings in bun run eval:select.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump version and changelog (v1.26.2.0)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: tighten CHANGELOG voice for v1.26.2.0

Move contributor-flavored bullet (runPlanSkillObservation seeding) into
For contributors. Drop branch-internal narrative (Codex review pass,
plan iteration tracking) per CHANGELOG-for-users style.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-03 20:26:59 -07:00

78 lines
3.2 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* plan-design-review plan-mode smoke (gate, paid, real-PTY).
*
* See test/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-plan-mode.test.ts for the shared assertion
* contract. Exercises the same contract against /plan-design-review.
*
* Note: on no-UI-scope branches plan-design-review legitimately short-
* circuits to plan_ready without firing AskUserQuestion. Both 'asked' and
* 'plan_ready' are valid pass outcomes.
*/
import { describe, test, expect } from 'bun:test';
import {
runPlanSkillObservation,
assertReportAtBottomIfPlanWritten,
} from './helpers/claude-pty-runner';
const shouldRun = !!process.env.EVALS && process.env.EVALS_TIER === 'gate';
const describeE2E = shouldRun ? describe : describe.skip;
describeE2E('plan-design-review plan-mode smoke (gate)', () => {
test('reaches a terminal outcome (asked or plan_ready) without silent writes', async () => {
const obs = await runPlanSkillObservation({
skillName: 'plan-design-review',
inPlanMode: true,
timeoutMs: 300_000,
});
if (obs.outcome === 'silent_write' || obs.outcome === 'exited' || obs.outcome === 'timeout') {
throw new Error(
`plan-design-review plan-mode smoke FAILED: outcome=${obs.outcome}\n` +
`summary: ${obs.summary}\n` +
`elapsed: ${obs.elapsedMs}ms\n` +
`--- evidence (last 2KB visible) ---\n${obs.evidence}`,
);
}
expect(['asked', 'plan_ready']).toContain(obs.outcome);
assertReportAtBottomIfPlanWritten(obs);
}, 360_000);
// v1.21+ regression: see skill-e2e-plan-ceo-plan-mode.test.ts for the
// contract. plan-design-review legitimately short-circuits on no-UI-scope
// branches, so this case keeps the same ['asked', 'plan_ready'] envelope
// as the baseline. The discriminating regression signals are
// 'auto_decided' (AUTO_DECIDE preamble fired upstream) or any failure
// outcome — both mean the user never saw a question they should have.
test('does not silently auto-decide when --disallowedTools AskUserQuestion is set', async () => {
const obs = await runPlanSkillObservation({
skillName: 'plan-design-review',
inPlanMode: true,
extraArgs: ['--disallowedTools', 'AskUserQuestion'],
timeoutMs: 300_000,
});
if (
obs.outcome === 'auto_decided' ||
obs.outcome === 'silent_write' ||
obs.outcome === 'exited' ||
obs.outcome === 'timeout'
) {
throw new Error(
`plan-design-review AskUserQuestion-blocked regression: outcome=${obs.outcome}\n` +
`summary: ${obs.summary}\n` +
`elapsed: ${obs.elapsedMs}ms\n` +
`--- evidence (last 2KB visible) ---\n${obs.evidence}`,
);
}
// plan-design-review legitimately short-circuits to plan_ready on no-UI
// branches. Allow plan_ready WITHOUT a decisions section ONLY if the
// plan file genuinely has no UI scope (we don't have a deterministic way
// to check this from the test, so this skill keeps the looser envelope).
// Other plan-mode skills require the decisions section under
// --disallowedTools; design is the special case.
expect(['asked', 'plan_ready']).toContain(obs.outcome);
assertReportAtBottomIfPlanWritten(obs);
}, 360_000);
});