Files
gstack/TODOS.md
T
Garry Tan 46b6ded584 fix: resolve merge conflicts with origin/main (v0.5.1 + v0.5.2)
Merge main's gstack-slug helper, review dashboard, screenshot visibility,
and design-consultation enhancements into the office-hours branch.

Conflicts resolved:
- CHANGELOG: keep both 0.6.0 (ours) and 0.5.1/0.5.2 (main) entries
- VERSION: keep 0.6.0 (ours)
- design-consultation: use gstack-slug + office-hours naming
- plan-eng-review: use gstack-slug
- office-hours: adopt gstack-slug for SLUG/BRANCH computation

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-17 09:20:38 -07:00

487 lines
17 KiB
Markdown

# TODOS
## Browse
### Bundle server.ts into compiled binary
**What:** Eliminate `resolveServerScript()` fallback chain entirely — bundle server.ts into the compiled browse binary.
**Why:** The current fallback chain (check adjacent to cli.ts, check global install) is fragile and caused bugs in v0.3.2. A single compiled binary is simpler and more reliable.
**Context:** Bun's `--compile` flag can bundle multiple entry points. The server is currently resolved at runtime via file path lookup. Bundling it removes the resolution step entirely.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P2
**Depends on:** None
### Sessions (isolated browser instances)
**What:** Isolated browser instances with separate cookies/storage/history, addressable by name.
**Why:** Enables parallel testing of different user roles, A/B test verification, and clean auth state management.
**Context:** Requires Playwright browser context isolation. Each session gets its own context with independent cookies/localStorage. Prerequisite for video recording (clean context lifecycle) and auth vault.
**Effort:** L
**Priority:** P3
### Video recording
**What:** Record browser interactions as video (start/stop controls).
**Why:** Video evidence in QA reports and PR bodies. Currently deferred because `recreateContext()` destroys page state.
**Context:** Needs sessions for clean context lifecycle. Playwright supports video recording per context. Also needs WebM → GIF conversion for PR embedding.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P3
**Depends on:** Sessions
### v20 encryption format support
**What:** AES-256-GCM support for future Chromium cookie DB versions (currently v10).
**Why:** Future Chromium versions may change encryption format. Proactive support prevents breakage.
**Effort:** S
**Priority:** P3
### State persistence
**What:** Save/load cookies + localStorage to JSON files for reproducible test sessions.
**Why:** Enables "resume where I left off" for QA sessions and repeatable auth states.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P3
**Depends on:** Sessions
### Auth vault
**What:** Encrypted credential storage, referenced by name. LLM never sees passwords.
**Why:** Security — currently auth credentials flow through the LLM context. Vault keeps secrets out of the AI's view.
**Effort:** L
**Priority:** P3
**Depends on:** Sessions, state persistence
### Iframe support
**What:** `frame <sel>` and `frame main` commands for cross-frame interaction.
**Why:** Many web apps use iframes (embeds, payment forms, ads). Currently invisible to browse.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P4
### Semantic locators
**What:** `find role/label/text/placeholder/testid` with attached actions.
**Why:** More resilient element selection than CSS selectors or ref numbers.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P4
### Device emulation presets
**What:** `set device "iPhone 16 Pro"` for mobile/tablet testing.
**Why:** Responsive layout testing without manual viewport resizing.
**Effort:** S
**Priority:** P4
### Network mocking/routing
**What:** Intercept, block, and mock network requests.
**Why:** Test error states, loading states, and offline behavior.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P4
### Download handling
**What:** Click-to-download with path control.
**Why:** Test file download flows end-to-end.
**Effort:** S
**Priority:** P4
### Content safety
**What:** `--max-output` truncation, `--allowed-domains` filtering.
**Why:** Prevent context window overflow and restrict navigation to safe domains.
**Effort:** S
**Priority:** P4
### Streaming (WebSocket live preview)
**What:** WebSocket-based live preview for pair browsing sessions.
**Why:** Enables real-time collaboration — human watches AI browse.
**Effort:** L
**Priority:** P4
### CDP mode
**What:** Connect to already-running Chrome/Electron apps via Chrome DevTools Protocol.
**Why:** Test production apps, Electron apps, and existing browser sessions without launching new instances.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P4
### Linux/Windows cookie decryption
**What:** GNOME Keyring / kwallet / DPAPI support for non-macOS cookie import.
**Why:** Cross-platform cookie import. Currently macOS-only (Keychain).
**Effort:** L
**Priority:** P4
## Ship
### Ship log — persistent record of /ship runs
**What:** Append structured JSON entry to `.gstack/ship-log.json` at end of every /ship run (version, date, branch, PR URL, review findings, Greptile stats, todos completed, test results).
**Why:** /retro has no structured data about shipping velocity. Ship log enables: PRs-per-week trending, review finding rates, Greptile signal over time, test suite growth.
**Context:** /retro already reads greptile-history.md — same pattern. Eval persistence (eval-store.ts) shows the JSON append pattern exists in the codebase. ~15 lines in ship template.
**Effort:** S
**Priority:** P2
**Depends on:** None
### Post-deploy verification (ship + browse)
**What:** After push, browse staging/preview URL, screenshot key pages, check console for JS errors, compare staging vs prod via snapshot diff. Include verification screenshots in PR body. STOP if critical errors found.
**Why:** Catch deployment-time regressions (JS errors, broken layouts) before merge.
**Context:** Requires S3 upload infrastructure for PR screenshots. Pairs with visual PR annotations.
**Effort:** L
**Priority:** P2
**Depends on:** /setup-gstack-upload, visual PR annotations
### Visual verification with screenshots in PR body
**What:** /ship Step 7.5: screenshot key pages after push, embed in PR body.
**Why:** Visual evidence in PRs. Reviewers see what changed without deploying locally.
**Context:** Part of Phase 3.6. Needs S3 upload for image hosting.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P2
**Depends on:** /setup-gstack-upload
## Review
### Inline PR annotations
**What:** /ship and /review post inline review comments at specific file:line locations using `gh api` to create pull request review comments.
**Why:** Line-level annotations are more actionable than top-level comments. The PR thread becomes a line-by-line conversation between Greptile, Claude, and human reviewers.
**Context:** GitHub supports inline review comments via `gh api repos/$REPO/pulls/$PR/reviews`. Pairs naturally with Phase 3.6 visual annotations.
**Effort:** S
**Priority:** P2
**Depends on:** None
### Greptile training feedback export
**What:** Aggregate greptile-history.md into machine-readable JSON summary of false positive patterns, exportable to the Greptile team for model improvement.
**Why:** Closes the feedback loop — Greptile can use FP data to stop making the same mistakes on your codebase.
**Context:** Was a P3 Future Idea. Upgraded to P2 now that greptile-history.md data infrastructure exists. The signal data is already being collected; this just makes it exportable. ~40 lines.
**Effort:** S
**Priority:** P2
**Depends on:** Enough FP data accumulated (10+ entries)
### Visual review with annotated screenshots
**What:** /review Step 4.5: browse PR's preview deploy, annotated screenshots of changed pages, compare against production, check responsive layouts, verify accessibility tree.
**Why:** Visual diff catches layout regressions that code review misses.
**Context:** Part of Phase 3.6. Needs S3 upload for image hosting.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P2
**Depends on:** /setup-gstack-upload
## QA
### QA trend tracking
**What:** Compare baseline.json over time, detect regressions across QA runs.
**Why:** Spot quality trends — is the app getting better or worse?
**Context:** QA already writes structured reports. This adds cross-run comparison.
**Effort:** S
**Priority:** P2
### CI/CD QA integration
**What:** `/qa` as GitHub Action step, fail PR if health score drops.
**Why:** Automated quality gate in CI. Catch regressions before merge.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P2
### Smart default QA tier
**What:** After a few runs, check index.md for user's usual tier pick, skip the AskUserQuestion.
**Why:** Reduces friction for repeat users.
**Effort:** S
**Priority:** P2
### Accessibility audit mode
**What:** `--a11y` flag for focused accessibility testing.
**Why:** Dedicated accessibility testing beyond the general QA checklist.
**Effort:** S
**Priority:** P3
## Retro
### Deployment health tracking (retro + browse)
**What:** Screenshot production state, check perf metrics (page load times), count console errors across key pages, track trends over retro window.
**Why:** Retro should include production health alongside code metrics.
**Context:** Requires browse integration. Screenshots + metrics fed into retro output.
**Effort:** L
**Priority:** P3
**Depends on:** Browse sessions
## Infrastructure
### /setup-gstack-upload skill (S3 bucket)
**What:** Configure S3 bucket for image hosting. One-time setup for visual PR annotations.
**Why:** Prerequisite for visual PR annotations in /ship and /review.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P2
### gstack-upload helper
**What:** `browse/bin/gstack-upload` — upload file to S3, return public URL.
**Why:** Shared utility for all skills that need to embed images in PRs.
**Effort:** S
**Priority:** P2
**Depends on:** /setup-gstack-upload
### WebM to GIF conversion
**What:** ffmpeg-based WebM → GIF conversion for video evidence in PRs.
**Why:** GitHub PR bodies render GIFs but not WebM. Needed for video recording evidence.
**Effort:** S
**Priority:** P3
**Depends on:** Video recording
### Deploy-verify skill
**What:** Lightweight post-deploy smoke test: hit key URLs, verify 200s, screenshot critical pages, console error check, compare against baseline snapshots. Pass/fail with evidence.
**Why:** Fast post-deploy confidence check, separate from full QA.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P2
### GitHub Actions eval upload
**What:** Run eval suite in CI, upload result JSON as artifact, post summary comment on PR.
**Why:** CI integration catches quality regressions before merge and provides persistent eval records per PR.
**Context:** Requires `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` in CI secrets. Cost is ~$4/run. Eval persistence system (v0.3.6) writes JSON to `~/.gstack-dev/evals/` — CI would upload as GitHub Actions artifacts and use `eval:compare` to post delta comment.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P2
**Depends on:** Eval persistence (shipped in v0.3.6)
### E2E model pinning
**What:** Pin E2E tests to claude-sonnet-4-6 for cost efficiency, add retry:2 for flaky LLM responses.
**Why:** Reduce E2E test cost and flakiness.
**Effort:** XS
**Priority:** P2
### Eval web dashboard
**What:** `bun run eval:dashboard` serves local HTML with charts: cost trending, detection rate, pass/fail history.
**Why:** Visual charts better for spotting trends than CLI tools.
**Context:** Reads `~/.gstack-dev/evals/*.json`. ~200 lines HTML + chart.js via Bun HTTP server.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P3
**Depends on:** Eval persistence (shipped in v0.3.6)
### CI/CD QA quality gate
**What:** Run `/qa` as a GitHub Action step, fail PR if health score drops below threshold.
**Why:** Automated quality gate catches regressions before merge. Currently QA is manual — CI integration makes it part of the standard workflow.
**Context:** Requires headless browse binary available in CI. The `/qa` skill already produces `baseline.json` with health scores — CI step would compare against the main branch baseline and fail if score drops. Would need `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` in CI secrets since `/qa` uses Claude.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P2
**Depends on:** None
### CDP-based DOM mutation detection for ref staleness
**What:** Use Chrome DevTools Protocol `DOM.documentUpdated` / MutationObserver events to proactively invalidate stale refs when the DOM changes, without requiring an explicit `snapshot` call.
**Why:** Current ref staleness detection (async count() check) only catches stale refs at action time. CDP mutation detection would proactively warn when refs become stale, preventing the 5-second timeout entirely for SPA re-renders.
**Context:** Parts 1+2 of ref staleness fix (RefEntry metadata + eager validation via count()) are shipped. This is Part 3 — the most ambitious piece. Requires CDP session alongside Playwright, MutationObserver bridge, and careful performance tuning to avoid overhead on every DOM change.
**Effort:** L
**Priority:** P3
**Depends on:** Ref staleness Parts 1+2 (shipped)
## Office Hours / Design
### Design docs → Supabase team store sync
**What:** Add design docs (`*-design-*.md`) to the Supabase sync pipeline alongside test plans, retro snapshots, and QA reports.
**Why:** Cross-team design discovery at scale. Local `~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/` keyword-grep discovery works for same-machine users now, but Supabase sync makes it work across the whole team. Duplicate ideas surface, everyone sees what's been explored.
**Context:** /office-hours writes design docs to `~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/`. The team store already syncs test plans, retro snapshots, QA reports. Design docs follow the same pattern — just add a sync adapter.
**Effort:** S
**Priority:** P2
**Depends on:** `garrytan/team-supabase-store` branch landing on main
## Design Review
### /plan-design-review + /qa-design-review + /design-consultation — SHIPPED
Shipped as v0.5.0 on main. Includes `/plan-design-review` (report-only design audit), `/qa-design-review` (audit + fix loop), and `/design-consultation` (interactive DESIGN.md creation). `{{DESIGN_METHODOLOGY}}` resolver provides shared 80-item design audit checklist.
## Document-Release
### Auto-invoke /document-release from /ship
**What:** Add Step 8.5 to /ship that reads document-release/SKILL.md and executes the doc update workflow after creating the PR.
**Why:** Zero-friction doc updates — user runs /ship and docs are automatically current. No extra command to remember.
**Context:** /ship currently ends at Step 8 (PR URL output). Step 8.5 would continue into the document-release workflow. Same pattern as /ship calling /review's checklist in Step 3.5.
**Effort:** S
**Priority:** P1
**Depends on:** /document-release shipped
### `{{DOC_VOICE}}` shared resolver
**What:** Create a placeholder resolver in gen-skill-docs.ts encoding the gstack voice guide (friendly, user-forward, lead with benefits). Inject into /ship Step 5, /document-release Step 5, and reference from CLAUDE.md.
**Why:** DRY — voice rules currently live inline in 3 places (CLAUDE.md CHANGELOG style section, /ship Step 5, /document-release Step 5). When the voice evolves, all three drift.
**Context:** Same pattern as `{{QA_METHODOLOGY}}` — shared block injected into multiple templates to prevent drift. ~20 lines in gen-skill-docs.ts.
**Effort:** S
**Priority:** P2
**Depends on:** None
## Ship Confidence Dashboard
### Smart review relevance detection
**What:** Auto-detect which of the 4 reviews are relevant based on branch changes (skip Design Review if no CSS/view changes, skip Code Review if plan-only).
**Why:** Currently dashboard always shows 4 rows. On docs-only changes, "Design Review: NOT YET RUN" is noise.
**Context:** /plan-design-review and /qa already do file-type detection in diff-aware mode. Could reuse that heuristic. Would require a `gstack-diff-scope` helper or enriching `gstack-slug` to also output change categories.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P3
**Depends on:** Ship Confidence Dashboard (shipped)
### /merge skill — review-gated PR merge
**What:** Create a `/merge` skill that merges an approved PR, but first checks the Review Readiness Dashboard and runs `/review` (Fix-First) if code review hasn't been done. Separates "ship" (create PR) from "merge" (land it).
**Why:** Currently `/review` runs inside `/ship` Step 3.5 but isn't tracked as a gate. A `/merge` skill ensures code review always happens before landing, and enables workflows where someone else reviews the PR first.
**Context:** `/ship` creates the PR. `/merge` would: check dashboard → run `/review` if needed → `gh pr merge`. This is where code review tracking belongs — at merge time, not at plan time.
**Effort:** M
**Priority:** P2
**Depends on:** Ship Confidence Dashboard (shipped)
## Completed
### Phase 1: Foundations (v0.2.0)
- Rename to gstack
- Restructure to monorepo layout
- Setup script for skill symlinks
- Snapshot command with ref-based element selection
- Snapshot tests
**Completed:** v0.2.0
### Phase 2: Enhanced Browser (v0.2.0)
- Annotated screenshots, snapshot diffing, dialog handling, file upload
- Cursor-interactive elements, element state checks
- CircularBuffer, async buffer flush, health check
- Playwright error wrapping, useragent fix
- 148 integration tests
**Completed:** v0.2.0
### Phase 3: QA Testing Agent (v0.3.0)
- /qa SKILL.md with 6-phase workflow, 3 modes (full/quick/regression)
- Issue taxonomy, severity classification, exploration checklist
- Report template, health score rubric, framework detection
- wait/console/cookie-import commands, find-browse binary
**Completed:** v0.3.0
### Phase 3.5: Browser Cookie Import (v0.3.x)
- cookie-import-browser command (Chromium cookie DB decryption)
- Cookie picker web UI, /setup-browser-cookies skill
- 18 unit tests, browser registry (Comet, Chrome, Arc, Brave, Edge)
**Completed:** v0.3.1
### E2E test cost tracking
- Track cumulative API spend, warn if over threshold
**Completed:** v0.3.6
### Auto-upgrade mode + smart update check
- Config CLI (`bin/gstack-config`), auto-upgrade via `~/.gstack/config.yaml`, 12h cache TTL, exponential snooze backoff (24h→48h→1wk), "never ask again" option, vendored copy sync on upgrade
**Completed:** v0.3.8