* feat: Completeness Principle — Boil the Lake (WIP, pre-merge) Add Completeness Principle to all skill preambles, dual-time estimates, compression table, anti-pattern gallery, Lake Score, and completeness gaps review category. VERSION/CHANGELOG will be rebased after merge. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: update stale version reference in TODOS.md (v0.5.3 → v0.6.1) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: update CHANGELOG date + README for v0.6.1 features - Add date to CHANGELOG 0.6.1 entry - Add Completeness Principle to README intro - Add SELECTIVE EXPANSION mode to CEO review section - Add test bootstrap mention to /ship section - Fix uninstall command missing design-consultation in project uninstall - Add "recommends shortcuts" and "no tests" to Without gstack list Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: split README into lean intro + docs/ directory (gh CLI pattern) README: 875 → 243 lines. Keeps intro, skill table, demo, install, and troubleshooting. All per-skill deep dives, Greptile integration guide, and contributor mode docs moved to docs/ directory. - docs/skills.md — full philosophy and examples for all 13 skills - docs/greptile.md — Greptile setup and triage workflow - docs/contributor-mode.md — how to enable and use contributor mode - README now links to docs/ via Documentation table - Updated skill table entries with latest features (fix-first, regression tests, test health, completeness gaps) - Updated demo transcript with AUTO-FIXED, coverage audit, regression test Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: remove "competitor" language, rewrite README in Garry's voice Replace "browses competitors" with "knows the landscape" / "what's out there" throughout all user-facing copy. Trim README from 243 to 167 lines — tighter, more opinionated, less listicle energy. Remove Completeness Principle from README top (it lives in CLAUDE.md and the skill preambles where Claude actually reads it). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: rewrite README in Garry's raw voice — AGI era, L8 factory, real stories The README now sounds like Garry, not a product page. Leads with the live experiment, the 16k LOC/day reality, the real-life coding stories (Austin, hospital bedside). Highlights the newest unlocks (design at the heart, /qa parallelism, smart review routing, test bootstrap). Closes with an open invitation — free MIT, fork it, let's all ride the wave together. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add Garry's bonafides to README intro — Palantir, Posterous, YC, 600k LOC Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add real /retro numbers — 140k lines, 362 commits across 3 projects Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add "in the last 60 days" timeframe to 600k LOC claim Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add GitHub contribution graphs — 2026 vs 2013 side by side Same person, different era. 2013: 772 contributions building Bookface. 2026: 1,237 contributions and accelerating. The difference is the tooling. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: clarify /retro stats are from last 7 days Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add designer/PM/eng manager roles to intro Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: remove Josh/L8 reference from README Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: move demo up, make it dramatically more impressive Show the actual architecture diagram, auto-fixed issues, 100% coverage, regression test generation. Punch line: "That is not a copilot. That is a team." Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: remove "My journey" section — intro already covers it Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: prefix all skill commands with You: in demo transcript Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: collapse You/Claude lines in demo — no gap between command and response Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: clarify plan mode flow in demo — approve, exit, Claude implements Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: move /ship to end of demo — review → QA → ship is the real flow Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add /plan-design-review to demo, tighten CEO response Shorter CEO reply, compressed eng diagram, added design audit with AI Slop score. Seven commands now: plan → eng → build → design → review → QA → ship. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: move design review before implementation — it's part of planning Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: reorder demo — design before eng, after CEO Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: remove URL from /plan-design-review in demo Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add [...] annotations showing what actually happens at each step Each step now shows what the agent does under the hood: 8 expansion proposals cherry-picked, 80-item design audit, ASCII diagrams for every flow, 2400 lines written in 8 minutes, real browser QA, bug found and fixed. Makes the demo feel real, not abstract. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: rename Contributor Mode to How to Contribute in docs table Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add Coinbase, Instacart, Rippling to YC bonafides Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add "one or two people in a garage" to founder story Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add skill table to top of skills.md with anchor links Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: consolidate — roll contributor-mode into CONTRIBUTING, greptile into skills - docs/contributor-mode.md → merged into CONTRIBUTING.md (session awareness section) - docs/greptile.md → merged into docs/skills.md (Greptile integration section) - Reordered docs table: Skills > Architecture > Browser > Contributing > Changelog Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
13 KiB
Contributing to gstack
Thanks for wanting to make gstack better. Whether you're fixing a typo in a skill prompt or building an entirely new workflow, this guide will get you up and running fast.
Quick start
gstack skills are Markdown files that Claude Code discovers from a skills/ directory. Normally they live at ~/.claude/skills/gstack/ (your global install). But when you're developing gstack itself, you want Claude Code to use the skills in your working tree — so edits take effect instantly without copying or deploying anything.
That's what dev mode does. It symlinks your repo into the local .claude/skills/ directory so Claude Code reads skills straight from your checkout.
git clone <repo> && cd gstack
bun install # install dependencies
bin/dev-setup # activate dev mode
Now edit any SKILL.md, invoke it in Claude Code (e.g. /review), and see your changes live. When you're done developing:
bin/dev-teardown # deactivate — back to your global install
Contributor mode
Contributor mode turns gstack into a self-improving tool. Enable it and Claude Code
will periodically reflect on its gstack experience — rating it 0-10 at the end of
each major workflow step. When something isn't a 10, it thinks about why and files
a report to ~/.gstack/contributor-logs/ with what happened, repro steps, and what
would make it better.
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set gstack_contributor true
The logs are for you. When something bugs you enough to fix, the report is already written. Fork gstack, symlink your fork into the project where you hit the issue, fix it, and open a PR.
The contributor workflow
- Use gstack normally — contributor mode reflects and logs issues automatically
- Check your logs:
ls ~/.gstack/contributor-logs/ - Fork and clone gstack (if you haven't already)
- Symlink your fork into the project where you hit the bug:
# In your core project (the one where gstack annoyed you) ln -sfn /path/to/your/gstack-fork .claude/skills/gstack cd .claude/skills/gstack && bun install && bun run build - Fix the issue — your changes are live immediately in this project
- Test by actually using gstack — do the thing that annoyed you, verify it's fixed
- Open a PR from your fork
This is the best way to contribute: fix gstack while doing your real work, in the project where you actually felt the pain.
Session awareness
When you have 3+ gstack sessions open simultaneously, every question tells you which project, which branch, and what's happening. No more staring at a question thinking "wait, which window is this?" The format is consistent across all 13 skills.
Working on gstack inside the gstack repo
When you're editing gstack skills and want to test them by actually using gstack
in the same repo, bin/dev-setup wires this up. It creates .claude/skills/
symlinks (gitignored) pointing back to your working tree, so Claude Code uses
your local edits instead of the global install.
gstack/ <- your working tree
├── .claude/skills/ <- created by dev-setup (gitignored)
│ ├── gstack -> ../../ <- symlink back to repo root
│ ├── review -> gstack/review
│ ├── ship -> gstack/ship
│ └── ... <- one symlink per skill
├── review/
│ └── SKILL.md <- edit this, test with /review
├── ship/
│ └── SKILL.md
├── browse/
│ ├── src/ <- TypeScript source
│ └── dist/ <- compiled binary (gitignored)
└── ...
Day-to-day workflow
# 1. Enter dev mode
bin/dev-setup
# 2. Edit a skill
vim review/SKILL.md
# 3. Test it in Claude Code — changes are live
# > /review
# 4. Editing browse source? Rebuild the binary
bun run build
# 5. Done for the day? Tear down
bin/dev-teardown
Testing & evals
Setup
# 1. Copy .env.example and add your API key
cp .env.example .env
# Edit .env → set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-...
# 2. Install deps (if you haven't already)
bun install
Bun auto-loads .env — no extra config. Conductor workspaces inherit .env from the main worktree automatically (see "Conductor workspaces" below).
Test tiers
| Tier | Command | Cost | What it tests |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 — Static | bun test |
Free | Command validation, snapshot flags, SKILL.md correctness, TODOS-format.md refs, observability unit tests |
| 2 — E2E | bun run test:e2e |
~$3.85 | Full skill execution via claude -p subprocess |
| 3 — LLM eval | bun run test:evals |
~$0.15 standalone | LLM-as-judge scoring of generated SKILL.md docs |
| 2+3 | bun run test:evals |
~$4 combined | E2E + LLM-as-judge (runs both) |
bun test # Tier 1 only (runs on every commit, <5s)
bun run test:e2e # Tier 2: E2E only (needs EVALS=1, can't run inside Claude Code)
bun run test:evals # Tier 2 + 3 combined (~$4/run)
Tier 1: Static validation (free)
Runs automatically with bun test. No API keys needed.
- Skill parser tests (
test/skill-parser.test.ts) — Extracts every$Bcommand from SKILL.md bash code blocks and validates against the command registry inbrowse/src/commands.ts. Catches typos, removed commands, and invalid snapshot flags. - Skill validation tests (
test/skill-validation.test.ts) — Validates that SKILL.md files reference only real commands and flags, and that command descriptions meet quality thresholds. - Generator tests (
test/gen-skill-docs.test.ts) — Tests the template system: verifies placeholders resolve correctly, output includes value hints for flags (e.g.-d <N>not just-d), enriched descriptions for key commands (e.g.islists valid states,presslists key examples).
Tier 2: E2E via claude -p (~$3.85/run)
Spawns claude -p as a subprocess with --output-format stream-json --verbose, streams NDJSON for real-time progress, and scans for browse errors. This is the closest thing to "does this skill actually work end-to-end?"
# Must run from a plain terminal — can't nest inside Claude Code or Conductor
EVALS=1 bun test test/skill-e2e.test.ts
- Gated by
EVALS=1env var (prevents accidental expensive runs) - Auto-skips if running inside Claude Code (
claude -pcan't nest) - API connectivity pre-check — fails fast on ConnectionRefused before burning budget
- Real-time progress to stderr:
[Ns] turn T tool #C: Name(...) - Saves full NDJSON transcripts and failure JSON for debugging
- Tests live in
test/skill-e2e.test.ts, runner logic intest/helpers/session-runner.ts
E2E observability
When E2E tests run, they produce machine-readable artifacts in ~/.gstack-dev/:
| Artifact | Path | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Heartbeat | e2e-live.json |
Current test status (updated per tool call) |
| Partial results | evals/_partial-e2e.json |
Completed tests (survives kills) |
| Progress log | e2e-runs/{runId}/progress.log |
Append-only text log |
| NDJSON transcripts | e2e-runs/{runId}/{test}.ndjson |
Raw claude -p output per test |
| Failure JSON | e2e-runs/{runId}/{test}-failure.json |
Diagnostic data on failure |
Live dashboard: Run bun run eval:watch in a second terminal to see a live dashboard showing completed tests, the currently running test, and cost. Use --tail to also show the last 10 lines of progress.log.
Eval history tools:
bun run eval:list # list all eval runs (turns, duration, cost per run)
bun run eval:compare # compare two runs — shows per-test deltas + Takeaway commentary
bun run eval:summary # aggregate stats + per-test efficiency averages across runs
Eval comparison commentary: eval:compare generates natural-language Takeaway sections interpreting what changed between runs — flagging regressions, noting improvements, calling out efficiency gains (fewer turns, faster, cheaper), and producing an overall summary. This is driven by generateCommentary() in eval-store.ts.
Artifacts are never cleaned up — they accumulate in ~/.gstack-dev/ for post-mortem debugging and trend analysis.
Tier 3: LLM-as-judge (~$0.15/run)
Uses Claude Sonnet to score generated SKILL.md docs on three dimensions:
- Clarity — Can an AI agent understand the instructions without ambiguity?
- Completeness — Are all commands, flags, and usage patterns documented?
- Actionability — Can the agent execute tasks using only the information in the doc?
Each dimension is scored 1-5. Threshold: every dimension must score ≥ 4. There's also a regression test that compares generated docs against the hand-maintained baseline from origin/main — generated must score equal or higher.
# Needs ANTHROPIC_API_KEY in .env — included in bun run test:evals
- Uses
claude-sonnet-4-6for scoring stability - Tests live in
test/skill-llm-eval.test.ts - Calls the Anthropic API directly (not
claude -p), so it works from anywhere including inside Claude Code
CI
A GitHub Action (.github/workflows/skill-docs.yml) runs bun run gen:skill-docs --dry-run on every push and PR. If the generated SKILL.md files differ from what's committed, CI fails. This catches stale docs before they merge.
Tests run against the browse binary directly — they don't require dev mode.
Editing SKILL.md files
SKILL.md files are generated from .tmpl templates. Don't edit the .md directly — your changes will be overwritten on the next build.
# 1. Edit the template
vim SKILL.md.tmpl # or browse/SKILL.md.tmpl
# 2. Regenerate
bun run gen:skill-docs
# 3. Check health
bun run skill:check
# Or use watch mode — auto-regenerates on save
bun run dev:skill
For template authoring best practices (natural language over bash-isms, dynamic branch detection, {{BASE_BRANCH_DETECT}} usage), see CLAUDE.md's "Writing SKILL templates" section.
To add a browse command, add it to browse/src/commands.ts. To add a snapshot flag, add it to SNAPSHOT_FLAGS in browse/src/snapshot.ts. Then rebuild.
Conductor workspaces
If you're using Conductor to run multiple Claude Code sessions in parallel, conductor.json wires up workspace lifecycle automatically:
| Hook | Script | What it does |
|---|---|---|
setup |
bin/dev-setup |
Copies .env from main worktree, installs deps, symlinks skills |
archive |
bin/dev-teardown |
Removes skill symlinks, cleans up .claude/ directory |
When Conductor creates a new workspace, bin/dev-setup runs automatically. It detects the main worktree (via git worktree list), copies your .env so API keys carry over, and sets up dev mode — no manual steps needed.
First-time setup: Put your ANTHROPIC_API_KEY in .env in the main repo (see .env.example). Every Conductor workspace inherits it automatically.
Things to know
- SKILL.md files are generated. Edit the
.tmpltemplate, not the.md. Runbun run gen:skill-docsto regenerate. - TODOS.md is the unified backlog. Organized by skill/component with P0-P4 priorities.
/shipauto-detects completed items. All planning/review/retro skills read it for context. - Browse source changes need a rebuild. If you touch
browse/src/*.ts, runbun run build. - Dev mode shadows your global install. Project-local skills take priority over
~/.claude/skills/gstack.bin/dev-teardownrestores the global one. - Conductor workspaces are independent. Each workspace is its own git worktree.
bin/dev-setupruns automatically viaconductor.json. .envpropagates across worktrees. Set it once in the main repo, all Conductor workspaces get it..claude/skills/is gitignored. The symlinks never get committed.
Testing your changes in a real project
This is the recommended way to develop gstack. Symlink your gstack checkout into the project where you actually use it, so your changes are live while you do real work:
# In your core project
ln -sfn /path/to/your/gstack-checkout .claude/skills/gstack
cd .claude/skills/gstack && bun install && bun run build
Now every gstack skill invocation in this project uses your working tree. Edit a
template, run bun run gen:skill-docs, and the next /review or /qa call picks
it up immediately.
To go back to the stable global install, just remove the symlink:
rm .claude/skills/gstack
Claude Code falls back to ~/.claude/skills/gstack/ automatically.
Alternative: point your global install at a branch
If you don't want per-project symlinks, you can switch the global install:
cd ~/.claude/skills/gstack
git fetch origin
git checkout origin/<branch>
bun install && bun run build
This affects all projects. To revert: git checkout main && git pull && bun run build.
Shipping your changes
When you're happy with your skill edits:
/ship
This runs tests, reviews the diff, triages Greptile comments (with 2-tier escalation), manages TODOS.md, bumps the version, and opens a PR. See ship/SKILL.md for the full workflow.