* feat: Completeness Principle — Boil the Lake (WIP, pre-merge) Add Completeness Principle to all skill preambles, dual-time estimates, compression table, anti-pattern gallery, Lake Score, and completeness gaps review category. VERSION/CHANGELOG will be rebased after merge. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: update stale version reference in TODOS.md (v0.5.3 → v0.6.1) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: update CHANGELOG date + README for v0.6.1 features - Add date to CHANGELOG 0.6.1 entry - Add Completeness Principle to README intro - Add SELECTIVE EXPANSION mode to CEO review section - Add test bootstrap mention to /ship section - Fix uninstall command missing design-consultation in project uninstall - Add "recommends shortcuts" and "no tests" to Without gstack list Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: split README into lean intro + docs/ directory (gh CLI pattern) README: 875 → 243 lines. Keeps intro, skill table, demo, install, and troubleshooting. All per-skill deep dives, Greptile integration guide, and contributor mode docs moved to docs/ directory. - docs/skills.md — full philosophy and examples for all 13 skills - docs/greptile.md — Greptile setup and triage workflow - docs/contributor-mode.md — how to enable and use contributor mode - README now links to docs/ via Documentation table - Updated skill table entries with latest features (fix-first, regression tests, test health, completeness gaps) - Updated demo transcript with AUTO-FIXED, coverage audit, regression test Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: remove "competitor" language, rewrite README in Garry's voice Replace "browses competitors" with "knows the landscape" / "what's out there" throughout all user-facing copy. Trim README from 243 to 167 lines — tighter, more opinionated, less listicle energy. Remove Completeness Principle from README top (it lives in CLAUDE.md and the skill preambles where Claude actually reads it). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: rewrite README in Garry's raw voice — AGI era, L8 factory, real stories The README now sounds like Garry, not a product page. Leads with the live experiment, the 16k LOC/day reality, the real-life coding stories (Austin, hospital bedside). Highlights the newest unlocks (design at the heart, /qa parallelism, smart review routing, test bootstrap). Closes with an open invitation — free MIT, fork it, let's all ride the wave together. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add Garry's bonafides to README intro — Palantir, Posterous, YC, 600k LOC Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add real /retro numbers — 140k lines, 362 commits across 3 projects Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add "in the last 60 days" timeframe to 600k LOC claim Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add GitHub contribution graphs — 2026 vs 2013 side by side Same person, different era. 2013: 772 contributions building Bookface. 2026: 1,237 contributions and accelerating. The difference is the tooling. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: clarify /retro stats are from last 7 days Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add designer/PM/eng manager roles to intro Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: remove Josh/L8 reference from README Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: move demo up, make it dramatically more impressive Show the actual architecture diagram, auto-fixed issues, 100% coverage, regression test generation. Punch line: "That is not a copilot. That is a team." Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: remove "My journey" section — intro already covers it Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: prefix all skill commands with You: in demo transcript Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: collapse You/Claude lines in demo — no gap between command and response Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: clarify plan mode flow in demo — approve, exit, Claude implements Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: move /ship to end of demo — review → QA → ship is the real flow Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add /plan-design-review to demo, tighten CEO response Shorter CEO reply, compressed eng diagram, added design audit with AI Slop score. Seven commands now: plan → eng → build → design → review → QA → ship. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: move design review before implementation — it's part of planning Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: reorder demo — design before eng, after CEO Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: remove URL from /plan-design-review in demo Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add [...] annotations showing what actually happens at each step Each step now shows what the agent does under the hood: 8 expansion proposals cherry-picked, 80-item design audit, ASCII diagrams for every flow, 2400 lines written in 8 minutes, real browser QA, bug found and fixed. Makes the demo feel real, not abstract. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: rename Contributor Mode to How to Contribute in docs table Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add Coinbase, Instacart, Rippling to YC bonafides Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add "one or two people in a garage" to founder story Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add skill table to top of skills.md with anchor links Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: consolidate — roll contributor-mode into CONTRIBUTING, greptile into skills - docs/contributor-mode.md → merged into CONTRIBUTING.md (session awareness section) - docs/greptile.md → merged into docs/skills.md (Greptile integration section) - Reordered docs table: Skills > Architecture > Browser > Contributing > Changelog Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
8.5 KiB
gstack development
Commands
bun install # install dependencies
bun test # run free tests (browse + snapshot + skill validation)
bun run test:evals # run paid evals: LLM judge + E2E (~$4/run)
bun run test:e2e # run E2E tests only (~$3.85/run)
bun run dev <cmd> # run CLI in dev mode, e.g. bun run dev goto https://example.com
bun run build # gen docs + compile binaries
bun run gen:skill-docs # regenerate SKILL.md files from templates
bun run skill:check # health dashboard for all skills
bun run dev:skill # watch mode: auto-regen + validate on change
bun run eval:list # list all eval runs from ~/.gstack-dev/evals/
bun run eval:compare # compare two eval runs (auto-picks most recent)
bun run eval:summary # aggregate stats across all eval runs
test:evals requires ANTHROPIC_API_KEY. E2E tests stream progress in real-time
(tool-by-tool via --output-format stream-json --verbose). Results are persisted
to ~/.gstack-dev/evals/ with auto-comparison against the previous run.
Project structure
gstack/
├── browse/ # Headless browser CLI (Playwright)
│ ├── src/ # CLI + server + commands
│ │ ├── commands.ts # Command registry (single source of truth)
│ │ └── snapshot.ts # SNAPSHOT_FLAGS metadata array
│ ├── test/ # Integration tests + fixtures
│ └── dist/ # Compiled binary
├── scripts/ # Build + DX tooling
│ ├── gen-skill-docs.ts # Template → SKILL.md generator
│ ├── skill-check.ts # Health dashboard
│ └── dev-skill.ts # Watch mode
├── test/ # Skill validation + eval tests
│ ├── helpers/ # skill-parser.ts, session-runner.ts, llm-judge.ts, eval-store.ts
│ ├── fixtures/ # Ground truth JSON, planted-bug fixtures, eval baselines
│ ├── skill-validation.test.ts # Tier 1: static validation (free, <1s)
│ ├── gen-skill-docs.test.ts # Tier 1: generator quality (free, <1s)
│ ├── skill-llm-eval.test.ts # Tier 3: LLM-as-judge (~$0.15/run)
│ └── skill-e2e.test.ts # Tier 2: E2E via claude -p (~$3.85/run)
├── qa-only/ # /qa-only skill (report-only QA, no fixes)
├── plan-design-review/ # /plan-design-review skill (report-only design audit)
├── qa-design-review/ # /qa-design-review skill (design audit + fix loop)
├── ship/ # Ship workflow skill
├── review/ # PR review skill
├── plan-ceo-review/ # /plan-ceo-review skill
├── plan-eng-review/ # /plan-eng-review skill
├── retro/ # Retrospective skill
├── document-release/ # /document-release skill (post-ship doc updates)
├── setup # One-time setup: build binary + symlink skills
├── SKILL.md # Generated from SKILL.md.tmpl (don't edit directly)
├── SKILL.md.tmpl # Template: edit this, run gen:skill-docs
└── package.json # Build scripts for browse
SKILL.md workflow
SKILL.md files are generated from .tmpl templates. To update docs:
- Edit the
.tmplfile (e.g.SKILL.md.tmplorbrowse/SKILL.md.tmpl) - Run
bun run gen:skill-docs(orbun run buildwhich does it automatically) - Commit both the
.tmpland generated.mdfiles
To add a new browse command: add it to browse/src/commands.ts and rebuild.
To add a snapshot flag: add it to SNAPSHOT_FLAGS in browse/src/snapshot.ts and rebuild.
Writing SKILL templates
SKILL.md.tmpl files are prompt templates read by Claude, not bash scripts. Each bash code block runs in a separate shell — variables do not persist between blocks.
Rules:
- Use natural language for logic and state. Don't use shell variables to pass state between code blocks. Instead, tell Claude what to remember and reference it in prose (e.g., "the base branch detected in Step 0").
- Don't hardcode branch names. Detect
main/master/etc dynamically viagh pr vieworgh repo view. Use{{BASE_BRANCH_DETECT}}for PR-targeting skills. Use "the base branch" in prose,<base>in code block placeholders. - Keep bash blocks self-contained. Each code block should work independently. If a block needs context from a previous step, restate it in the prose above.
- Express conditionals as English. Instead of nested
if/elif/elsein bash, write numbered decision steps: "1. If X, do Y. 2. Otherwise, do Z."
Browser interaction
When you need to interact with a browser (QA, dogfooding, cookie setup), use the
/browse skill or run the browse binary directly via $B <command>. NEVER use
mcp__claude-in-chrome__* tools — they are slow, unreliable, and not what this
project uses.
Vendored symlink awareness
When developing gstack, .claude/skills/gstack may be a symlink back to this
working directory (gitignored). This means skill changes are live immediately —
great for rapid iteration, risky during big refactors where half-written skills
could break other Claude Code sessions using gstack concurrently.
Check once per session: Run ls -la .claude/skills/gstack to see if it's a
symlink or a real copy. If it's a symlink to your working directory, be aware that:
- Template changes +
bun run gen:skill-docsimmediately affect all gstack invocations - Breaking changes to SKILL.md.tmpl files can break concurrent gstack sessions
- During large refactors, remove the symlink (
rm .claude/skills/gstack) so the global install at~/.claude/skills/gstack/is used instead
For plan reviews: When reviewing plans that modify skill templates or the gen-skill-docs pipeline, consider whether the changes should be tested in isolation before going live (especially if the user is actively using gstack in other windows).
CHANGELOG style
CHANGELOG.md is for users, not contributors. Write it like product release notes:
- Lead with what the user can now do that they couldn't before. Sell the feature.
- Use plain language, not implementation details. "You can now..." not "Refactored the..."
- Put contributor/internal changes in a separate "For contributors" section at the bottom.
- Every entry should make someone think "oh nice, I want to try that."
- No jargon: say "every question now tells you which project and branch you're in" not "AskUserQuestion format standardized across skill templates via preamble resolver."
AI effort compression
When estimating or discussing effort, always show both human-team and CC+gstack time:
| Task type | Human team | CC+gstack | Compression |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boilerplate / scaffolding | 2 days | 15 min | ~100x |
| Test writing | 1 day | 15 min | ~50x |
| Feature implementation | 1 week | 30 min | ~30x |
| Bug fix + regression test | 4 hours | 15 min | ~20x |
| Architecture / design | 2 days | 4 hours | ~5x |
| Research / exploration | 1 day | 3 hours | ~3x |
Completeness is cheap. Don't recommend shortcuts when the complete implementation is a "lake" (achievable) not an "ocean" (multi-quarter migration). See the Completeness Principle in the skill preamble for the full philosophy.
Local plans
Contributors can store long-range vision docs and design documents in ~/.gstack-dev/plans/.
These are local-only (not checked in). When reviewing TODOS.md, check plans/ for candidates
that may be ready to promote to TODOs or implement.
E2E eval failure blame protocol
When an E2E eval fails during /ship or any other workflow, never claim "not
related to our changes" without proving it. These systems have invisible couplings —
a preamble text change affects agent behavior, a new helper changes timing, a
regenerated SKILL.md shifts prompt context.
Required before attributing a failure to "pre-existing":
- Run the same eval on main (or base branch) and show it fails there too
- If it passes on main but fails on the branch — it IS your change. Trace the blame.
- If you can't run on main, say "unverified — may or may not be related" and flag it as a risk in the PR body
"Pre-existing" without receipts is a lazy claim. Prove it or don't say it.
Deploying to the active skill
The active skill lives at ~/.claude/skills/gstack/. After making changes:
- Push your branch
- Fetch and reset in the skill directory:
cd ~/.claude/skills/gstack && git fetch origin && git reset --hard origin/main - Rebuild:
cd ~/.claude/skills/gstack && bun run build
Or copy the binary directly: cp browse/dist/browse ~/.claude/skills/gstack/browse/dist/browse