Files
gstack/CLAUDE.md
T
Garry Tan 9d47619e4c feat: Completeness Principle — Boil the Lake (v0.6.1) (#140)
* feat: Completeness Principle — Boil the Lake (WIP, pre-merge)

Add Completeness Principle to all skill preambles, dual-time estimates,
compression table, anti-pattern gallery, Lake Score, and completeness
gaps review category. VERSION/CHANGELOG will be rebased after merge.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: update stale version reference in TODOS.md (v0.5.3 → v0.6.1)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: update CHANGELOG date + README for v0.6.1 features

- Add date to CHANGELOG 0.6.1 entry
- Add Completeness Principle to README intro
- Add SELECTIVE EXPANSION mode to CEO review section
- Add test bootstrap mention to /ship section
- Fix uninstall command missing design-consultation in project uninstall
- Add "recommends shortcuts" and "no tests" to Without gstack list

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: split README into lean intro + docs/ directory (gh CLI pattern)

README: 875 → 243 lines. Keeps intro, skill table, demo, install, and
troubleshooting. All per-skill deep dives, Greptile integration guide,
and contributor mode docs moved to docs/ directory.

- docs/skills.md — full philosophy and examples for all 13 skills
- docs/greptile.md — Greptile setup and triage workflow
- docs/contributor-mode.md — how to enable and use contributor mode
- README now links to docs/ via Documentation table
- Updated skill table entries with latest features (fix-first, regression
  tests, test health, completeness gaps)
- Updated demo transcript with AUTO-FIXED, coverage audit, regression test

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: remove "competitor" language, rewrite README in Garry's voice

Replace "browses competitors" with "knows the landscape" / "what's out
there" throughout all user-facing copy. Trim README from 243 to 167
lines — tighter, more opinionated, less listicle energy. Remove
Completeness Principle from README top (it lives in CLAUDE.md and the
skill preambles where Claude actually reads it).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: rewrite README in Garry's raw voice — AGI era, L8 factory, real stories

The README now sounds like Garry, not a product page. Leads with the
live experiment, the 16k LOC/day reality, the real-life coding stories
(Austin, hospital bedside). Highlights the newest unlocks (design at
the heart, /qa parallelism, smart review routing, test bootstrap).
Closes with an open invitation — free MIT, fork it, let's all ride
the wave together.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add Garry's bonafides to README intro — Palantir, Posterous, YC, 600k LOC

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add real /retro numbers — 140k lines, 362 commits across 3 projects

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add "in the last 60 days" timeframe to 600k LOC claim

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add GitHub contribution graphs — 2026 vs 2013 side by side

Same person, different era. 2013: 772 contributions building Bookface.
2026: 1,237 contributions and accelerating. The difference is the tooling.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: clarify /retro stats are from last 7 days

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add designer/PM/eng manager roles to intro

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: remove Josh/L8 reference from README

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: move demo up, make it dramatically more impressive

Show the actual architecture diagram, auto-fixed issues, 100% coverage,
regression test generation. Punch line: "That is not a copilot. That is
a team."

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: remove "My journey" section — intro already covers it

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: prefix all skill commands with You: in demo transcript

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: collapse You/Claude lines in demo — no gap between command and response

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: clarify plan mode flow in demo — approve, exit, Claude implements

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: move /ship to end of demo — review → QA → ship is the real flow

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add /plan-design-review to demo, tighten CEO response

Shorter CEO reply, compressed eng diagram, added design audit with
AI Slop score. Seven commands now: plan → eng → build → design →
review → QA → ship.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: move design review before implementation — it's part of planning

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: reorder demo — design before eng, after CEO

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: remove URL from /plan-design-review in demo

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add [...] annotations showing what actually happens at each step

Each step now shows what the agent does under the hood: 8 expansion
proposals cherry-picked, 80-item design audit, ASCII diagrams for
every flow, 2400 lines written in 8 minutes, real browser QA, bug
found and fixed. Makes the demo feel real, not abstract.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: rename Contributor Mode to How to Contribute in docs table

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add Coinbase, Instacart, Rippling to YC bonafides

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add "one or two people in a garage" to founder story

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add skill table to top of skills.md with anchor links

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: consolidate — roll contributor-mode into CONTRIBUTING, greptile into skills

- docs/contributor-mode.md → merged into CONTRIBUTING.md (session awareness section)
- docs/greptile.md → merged into docs/skills.md (Greptile integration section)
- Reordered docs table: Skills > Architecture > Browser > Contributing > Changelog

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-17 16:34:08 -05:00

171 lines
8.5 KiB
Markdown

# gstack development
## Commands
```bash
bun install # install dependencies
bun test # run free tests (browse + snapshot + skill validation)
bun run test:evals # run paid evals: LLM judge + E2E (~$4/run)
bun run test:e2e # run E2E tests only (~$3.85/run)
bun run dev <cmd> # run CLI in dev mode, e.g. bun run dev goto https://example.com
bun run build # gen docs + compile binaries
bun run gen:skill-docs # regenerate SKILL.md files from templates
bun run skill:check # health dashboard for all skills
bun run dev:skill # watch mode: auto-regen + validate on change
bun run eval:list # list all eval runs from ~/.gstack-dev/evals/
bun run eval:compare # compare two eval runs (auto-picks most recent)
bun run eval:summary # aggregate stats across all eval runs
```
`test:evals` requires `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`. E2E tests stream progress in real-time
(tool-by-tool via `--output-format stream-json --verbose`). Results are persisted
to `~/.gstack-dev/evals/` with auto-comparison against the previous run.
## Project structure
```
gstack/
├── browse/ # Headless browser CLI (Playwright)
│ ├── src/ # CLI + server + commands
│ │ ├── commands.ts # Command registry (single source of truth)
│ │ └── snapshot.ts # SNAPSHOT_FLAGS metadata array
│ ├── test/ # Integration tests + fixtures
│ └── dist/ # Compiled binary
├── scripts/ # Build + DX tooling
│ ├── gen-skill-docs.ts # Template → SKILL.md generator
│ ├── skill-check.ts # Health dashboard
│ └── dev-skill.ts # Watch mode
├── test/ # Skill validation + eval tests
│ ├── helpers/ # skill-parser.ts, session-runner.ts, llm-judge.ts, eval-store.ts
│ ├── fixtures/ # Ground truth JSON, planted-bug fixtures, eval baselines
│ ├── skill-validation.test.ts # Tier 1: static validation (free, <1s)
│ ├── gen-skill-docs.test.ts # Tier 1: generator quality (free, <1s)
│ ├── skill-llm-eval.test.ts # Tier 3: LLM-as-judge (~$0.15/run)
│ └── skill-e2e.test.ts # Tier 2: E2E via claude -p (~$3.85/run)
├── qa-only/ # /qa-only skill (report-only QA, no fixes)
├── plan-design-review/ # /plan-design-review skill (report-only design audit)
├── qa-design-review/ # /qa-design-review skill (design audit + fix loop)
├── ship/ # Ship workflow skill
├── review/ # PR review skill
├── plan-ceo-review/ # /plan-ceo-review skill
├── plan-eng-review/ # /plan-eng-review skill
├── retro/ # Retrospective skill
├── document-release/ # /document-release skill (post-ship doc updates)
├── setup # One-time setup: build binary + symlink skills
├── SKILL.md # Generated from SKILL.md.tmpl (don't edit directly)
├── SKILL.md.tmpl # Template: edit this, run gen:skill-docs
└── package.json # Build scripts for browse
```
## SKILL.md workflow
SKILL.md files are **generated** from `.tmpl` templates. To update docs:
1. Edit the `.tmpl` file (e.g. `SKILL.md.tmpl` or `browse/SKILL.md.tmpl`)
2. Run `bun run gen:skill-docs` (or `bun run build` which does it automatically)
3. Commit both the `.tmpl` and generated `.md` files
To add a new browse command: add it to `browse/src/commands.ts` and rebuild.
To add a snapshot flag: add it to `SNAPSHOT_FLAGS` in `browse/src/snapshot.ts` and rebuild.
## Writing SKILL templates
SKILL.md.tmpl files are **prompt templates read by Claude**, not bash scripts.
Each bash code block runs in a separate shell — variables do not persist between blocks.
Rules:
- **Use natural language for logic and state.** Don't use shell variables to pass
state between code blocks. Instead, tell Claude what to remember and reference
it in prose (e.g., "the base branch detected in Step 0").
- **Don't hardcode branch names.** Detect `main`/`master`/etc dynamically via
`gh pr view` or `gh repo view`. Use `{{BASE_BRANCH_DETECT}}` for PR-targeting
skills. Use "the base branch" in prose, `<base>` in code block placeholders.
- **Keep bash blocks self-contained.** Each code block should work independently.
If a block needs context from a previous step, restate it in the prose above.
- **Express conditionals as English.** Instead of nested `if/elif/else` in bash,
write numbered decision steps: "1. If X, do Y. 2. Otherwise, do Z."
## Browser interaction
When you need to interact with a browser (QA, dogfooding, cookie setup), use the
`/browse` skill or run the browse binary directly via `$B <command>`. NEVER use
`mcp__claude-in-chrome__*` tools — they are slow, unreliable, and not what this
project uses.
## Vendored symlink awareness
When developing gstack, `.claude/skills/gstack` may be a symlink back to this
working directory (gitignored). This means skill changes are **live immediately**
great for rapid iteration, risky during big refactors where half-written skills
could break other Claude Code sessions using gstack concurrently.
**Check once per session:** Run `ls -la .claude/skills/gstack` to see if it's a
symlink or a real copy. If it's a symlink to your working directory, be aware that:
- Template changes + `bun run gen:skill-docs` immediately affect all gstack invocations
- Breaking changes to SKILL.md.tmpl files can break concurrent gstack sessions
- During large refactors, remove the symlink (`rm .claude/skills/gstack`) so the
global install at `~/.claude/skills/gstack/` is used instead
**For plan reviews:** When reviewing plans that modify skill templates or the
gen-skill-docs pipeline, consider whether the changes should be tested in isolation
before going live (especially if the user is actively using gstack in other windows).
## CHANGELOG style
CHANGELOG.md is **for users**, not contributors. Write it like product release notes:
- Lead with what the user can now **do** that they couldn't before. Sell the feature.
- Use plain language, not implementation details. "You can now..." not "Refactored the..."
- Put contributor/internal changes in a separate "For contributors" section at the bottom.
- Every entry should make someone think "oh nice, I want to try that."
- No jargon: say "every question now tells you which project and branch you're in" not
"AskUserQuestion format standardized across skill templates via preamble resolver."
## AI effort compression
When estimating or discussing effort, always show both human-team and CC+gstack time:
| Task type | Human team | CC+gstack | Compression |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|-------------|
| Boilerplate / scaffolding | 2 days | 15 min | ~100x |
| Test writing | 1 day | 15 min | ~50x |
| Feature implementation | 1 week | 30 min | ~30x |
| Bug fix + regression test | 4 hours | 15 min | ~20x |
| Architecture / design | 2 days | 4 hours | ~5x |
| Research / exploration | 1 day | 3 hours | ~3x |
Completeness is cheap. Don't recommend shortcuts when the complete implementation
is a "lake" (achievable) not an "ocean" (multi-quarter migration). See the
Completeness Principle in the skill preamble for the full philosophy.
## Local plans
Contributors can store long-range vision docs and design documents in `~/.gstack-dev/plans/`.
These are local-only (not checked in). When reviewing TODOS.md, check `plans/` for candidates
that may be ready to promote to TODOs or implement.
## E2E eval failure blame protocol
When an E2E eval fails during `/ship` or any other workflow, **never claim "not
related to our changes" without proving it.** These systems have invisible couplings —
a preamble text change affects agent behavior, a new helper changes timing, a
regenerated SKILL.md shifts prompt context.
**Required before attributing a failure to "pre-existing":**
1. Run the same eval on main (or base branch) and show it fails there too
2. If it passes on main but fails on the branch — it IS your change. Trace the blame.
3. If you can't run on main, say "unverified — may or may not be related" and flag it
as a risk in the PR body
"Pre-existing" without receipts is a lazy claim. Prove it or don't say it.
## Deploying to the active skill
The active skill lives at `~/.claude/skills/gstack/`. After making changes:
1. Push your branch
2. Fetch and reset in the skill directory: `cd ~/.claude/skills/gstack && git fetch origin && git reset --hard origin/main`
3. Rebuild: `cd ~/.claude/skills/gstack && bun run build`
Or copy the binary directly: `cp browse/dist/browse ~/.claude/skills/gstack/browse/dist/browse`