Files
gstack/test/skill-e2e-plan-design-finding-count.test.ts
T
Garry TanandClaude Fable 5 ae5ffefb9a fix(test): unique tmp dirs for plan artifacts + audited live-repo cwd sites
Six paid PTY tests wrote their expected plan artifact to a FIXED shared
/tmp path ('/tmp/gstack-test-plan-<mode>.md') and rmSync'd it in
finally — under --retry 1, EVALS_JOBS>1, or two concurrent worktrees, a
sibling's cleanup deletes this run's artifact and the D19 'agent did
not produce expected plan file' assertion fires spuriously. Each test
now mkdtemps its own dir, interpolates the unique path into the agent
prompt (fixture-sourced prompts get a replaceAll + drift guard that
throws if the fixture's literal ever moves), and cleans up its own dir.

The 18 cwd:-into-the-live-repo sites were audited: all deliberate
(skill registry + hermetic pre-trusted dir, in-repo gen renders, git
history reads, slug resolution) — each now carries a
'// LIVE-REPO CWD: <reason>' comment so the next audit can tell
deliberate from accidental.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 04:59:48 +00:00

138 lines
5.2 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* /plan-design-review per-finding AskUserQuestion count (periodic, paid, real-PTY).
*
* Same shape as skill-e2e-plan-ceo-finding-count: drives /plan-design-review
* against a 5-finding seeded plan and asserts review-phase AUQ count ∈ [N-1, N+2].
* Plus D19: review report at bottom of produced plan file.
*
* Tier: periodic (~25 min, ~$5/run). Sequential by default per plan §D15.
*/
import { test } from 'bun:test';
import { describeE2ETier } from './helpers/e2e-gate';
import * as fs from 'node:fs';
import * as os from 'node:os';
import * as path from 'node:path';
import {
runPlanSkillCounting,
designStep0Boundary,
assertReviewReportAtBottom,
} from './helpers/claude-pty-runner';
const describeE2E = describeE2ETier('periodic');
const N = 5;
const FLOOR = N - 1;
const CEILING = N + 2;
const planDesign5Findings = (planPath: string) => [
`Please review this plan thoroughly. As you go, write your plan-mode plan to ${planPath} (use Edit/Write to that exact path).`,
'',
'# Plan: Settings Page UI redesign',
'',
'## Visual Hierarchy',
'The "Save" button is rendered with the same size, weight, and color as',
'three other buttons in the page header (Reset, Cancel, Export). Nothing',
'tells the user which is the primary action.',
'',
'## Spacing',
'Between sections we have 24px in some places, 32px in others, and 16px',
'in a third — no consistent vertical rhythm.',
'',
'## Color',
'The error message uses red text on a light pink background. Contrast',
'ratio is approximately 3:1 (below WCAG AA).',
'',
'## Typography',
'We use 14px, 16px, and 18px font sizes across the form labels. Two',
'sizes would suffice and create stronger hierarchy.',
'',
'## Motion',
'The "Save" action takes 2-5 seconds with no loading indicator. Users',
'see a frozen page; we should add a spinner or skeleton state.',
].join('\n');
describeE2E('/plan-design-review per-finding AskUserQuestion count (periodic)', () => {
test(
`5-finding plan emits ${FLOOR}-${CEILING} review-phase AskUserQuestions`,
async () => {
// Per-run artifact dir: a hardcoded shared /tmp path collides under
// --retry, EVALS_JOBS>1, or concurrent worktrees (a sibling's finally-
// rmSync deletes this run's artifact → spurious D19 failure).
const tmpDir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'gstack-e2e-plan-design-'));
const planPath = path.join(tmpDir, 'gstack-test-plan-design.md');
try {
const obs = await runPlanSkillCounting({
skillName: 'plan-design-review',
slashCommand: '/plan-design-review',
followUpPrompt: planDesign5Findings(planPath),
isLastStep0AUQ: designStep0Boundary,
reviewCountCeiling: CEILING + 1,
// LIVE-REPO CWD: PTY session needs the repo cwd — gstack skill
// registry + hermetic pre-trusted dir (hermetic-env trustedDirs).
cwd: process.cwd(),
timeoutMs: 1_500_000,
env: { QUESTION_TUNING: 'false', EXPLAIN_LEVEL: 'default' },
});
if (!['plan_ready', 'completion_summary', 'ceiling_reached'].includes(obs.outcome)) {
throw new Error(
`plan-design-review finding-count FAILED: outcome=${obs.outcome}\n` +
`step0=${obs.step0Count} review=${obs.reviewCount} elapsed=${obs.elapsedMs}ms\n` +
`fingerprints (last 8):\n` +
obs.fingerprints
.slice(-8)
.map(
(f, i) =>
` ${i}. preReview=${f.preReview} sig=${f.signature.slice(0, 12)} prompt="${f.promptSnippet.slice(0, 60)}"`,
)
.join('\n') +
`\n--- evidence (last 3KB) ---\n${obs.evidence}`,
);
}
if (obs.reviewCount < FLOOR) {
throw new Error(
`BAND FAIL (below floor): reviewCount=${obs.reviewCount} < FLOOR=${FLOOR}.\n` +
`Likely batching regression. Review-phase fingerprints:\n` +
obs.fingerprints
.filter((f) => !f.preReview)
.map((f) => ` - "${f.promptSnippet.slice(0, 80)}"`)
.join('\n'),
);
}
if (obs.reviewCount > CEILING) {
throw new Error(
`BAND FAIL (above ceiling): reviewCount=${obs.reviewCount} > CEILING=${CEILING}.`,
);
}
if (!fs.existsSync(planPath)) {
throw new Error(
`D19 FAIL: agent did not produce expected plan file at ${planPath}. ` +
`outcome=${obs.outcome} review=${obs.reviewCount}`,
);
}
const planContent = fs.readFileSync(planPath, 'utf-8');
const verdict = assertReviewReportAtBottom(planContent);
if (!verdict.ok) {
throw new Error(
`D19 FAIL: plan file at ${planPath} ${verdict.reason}\n` +
(verdict.trailingHeadings
? `Trailing headings: ${verdict.trailingHeadings.join(' | ')}\n`
: '') +
`--- plan content (last 1KB) ---\n${planContent.slice(-1024)}`,
);
}
} finally {
try {
fs.rmSync(tmpDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
} catch {
/* best-effort */
}
}
},
1_700_000,
);
});