/review: Step 2.5 fetches and classifies Greptile comments, Step 5 resolves them with AskUserQuestion for valid issues and false positives. /ship: Step 3.75 triages Greptile comments between pre-landing review and version bump. Adds Greptile Review section to PR body in Step 8. Re-runs tests if any Greptile fixes are applied.
4.7 KiB
name, version, description, allowed-tools
| name | version | description | allowed-tools | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| review | 1.0.0 | Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against main for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues. |
|
Pre-Landing PR Review
You are running the /review workflow. Analyze the current branch's diff against main for structural issues that tests don't catch.
Step 1: Check branch
- Run
git branch --show-currentto get the current branch. - If on
main, output: "Nothing to review — you're on main or have no changes against main." and stop. - Run
git fetch origin main --quiet && git diff origin/main --statto check if there's a diff. If no diff, output the same message and stop.
Step 2: Read the checklist
Read .claude/skills/review/checklist.md.
If the file cannot be read, STOP and report the error. Do not proceed without the checklist.
Step 2.5: Check for Greptile review comments
Read .claude/skills/review/greptile-triage.md and follow the fetch, filter, and classify steps.
If no PR exists, gh fails, API returns an error, or there are zero Greptile comments: Skip this step silently. Greptile integration is additive — the review works without it.
If Greptile comments are found: Store the classifications (VALID & ACTIONABLE, VALID BUT ALREADY FIXED, FALSE POSITIVE, SUPPRESSED) — you will need them in Step 5.
Step 3: Get the diff
Fetch the latest main to avoid false positives from a stale local main:
git fetch origin main --quiet
Run git diff origin/main to get the full diff. This includes both committed and uncommitted changes against the latest main.
Step 4: Two-pass review
Apply the checklist against the diff in two passes:
- Pass 1 (CRITICAL): SQL & Data Safety, LLM Output Trust Boundary
- Pass 2 (INFORMATIONAL): Conditional Side Effects, Magic Numbers & String Coupling, Dead Code & Consistency, LLM Prompt Issues, Test Gaps, View/Frontend
Follow the output format specified in the checklist. Respect the suppressions — do NOT flag items listed in the "DO NOT flag" section.
Step 5: Output findings
Always output ALL findings — both critical and informational. The user must see every issue.
- If CRITICAL issues found: output all findings, then for EACH critical issue use a separate AskUserQuestion with the problem, your recommended fix, and options (A: Fix it now, B: Acknowledge, C: False positive — skip). After all critical questions are answered, output a summary of what the user chose for each issue. If the user chose A (fix) on any issue, apply the recommended fixes. If only B/C were chosen, no action needed.
- If only non-critical issues found: output findings. No further action needed.
- If no issues found: output
Pre-Landing Review: No issues found.
Greptile comment resolution
After outputting your own findings, if Greptile comments were classified in Step 2.5:
Include a Greptile summary in your output header: + N Greptile comments (X valid, Y fixed, Z FP)
-
VALID & ACTIONABLE comments: These are already included in your CRITICAL findings — they follow the same AskUserQuestion flow (A: Fix it now, B: Acknowledge, C: False positive). If the user chooses C (false positive), post a reply using the appropriate API from the triage doc and save the pattern to
~/.gstack/greptile-history.md(type: fp). -
FALSE POSITIVE comments: Present each one via AskUserQuestion:
- Show the Greptile comment: file:line (or [top-level]) + body summary + permalink URL
- Explain concisely why it's a false positive
- Options:
- A) Reply to Greptile explaining why this is incorrect (recommended if clearly wrong)
- B) Fix it anyway (if low-effort and harmless)
- C) Ignore — don't reply, don't fix
If the user chooses A, post a reply using the appropriate API from the triage doc and save the pattern to
~/.gstack/greptile-history.md(type: fp). -
VALID BUT ALREADY FIXED comments: Reply acknowledging the catch — no AskUserQuestion needed:
- Post reply:
"Good catch — already fixed in <commit-sha>." - Save to
~/.gstack/greptile-history.md(type: already-fixed)
- Post reply:
-
SUPPRESSED comments: Skip silently — these are known false positives from previous triage.
Important Rules
- Read the FULL diff before commenting. Do not flag issues already addressed in the diff.
- Read-only by default. Only modify files if the user explicitly chooses "Fix it now" on a critical issue. Never commit, push, or create PRs.
- Be terse. One line problem, one line fix. No preamble.
- Only flag real problems. Skip anything that's fine.