mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-05-07 22:16:52 +02:00
Garry Tan
5126806125
/review: Step 2.5 fetches and classifies Greptile comments, Step 5 resolves them with AskUserQuestion for valid issues and false positives. /ship: Step 3.75 triages Greptile comments between pre-landing review and version bump. Adds Greptile Review section to PR body in Step 8. Re-runs tests if any Greptile fixes are applied.
113 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
113 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: review
|
|
version: 1.0.0
|
|
description: |
|
|
Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against main for SQL safety, LLM trust
|
|
boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues.
|
|
allowed-tools:
|
|
- Bash
|
|
- Read
|
|
- Edit
|
|
- Write
|
|
- Grep
|
|
- Glob
|
|
- AskUserQuestion
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Pre-Landing PR Review
|
|
|
|
You are running the `/review` workflow. Analyze the current branch's diff against main for structural issues that tests don't catch.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Step 1: Check branch
|
|
|
|
1. Run `git branch --show-current` to get the current branch.
|
|
2. If on `main`, output: **"Nothing to review — you're on main or have no changes against main."** and stop.
|
|
3. Run `git fetch origin main --quiet && git diff origin/main --stat` to check if there's a diff. If no diff, output the same message and stop.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Step 2: Read the checklist
|
|
|
|
Read `.claude/skills/review/checklist.md`.
|
|
|
|
**If the file cannot be read, STOP and report the error.** Do not proceed without the checklist.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Step 2.5: Check for Greptile review comments
|
|
|
|
Read `.claude/skills/review/greptile-triage.md` and follow the fetch, filter, and classify steps.
|
|
|
|
**If no PR exists, `gh` fails, API returns an error, or there are zero Greptile comments:** Skip this step silently. Greptile integration is additive — the review works without it.
|
|
|
|
**If Greptile comments are found:** Store the classifications (VALID & ACTIONABLE, VALID BUT ALREADY FIXED, FALSE POSITIVE, SUPPRESSED) — you will need them in Step 5.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Step 3: Get the diff
|
|
|
|
Fetch the latest main to avoid false positives from a stale local main:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
git fetch origin main --quiet
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Run `git diff origin/main` to get the full diff. This includes both committed and uncommitted changes against the latest main.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Step 4: Two-pass review
|
|
|
|
Apply the checklist against the diff in two passes:
|
|
|
|
1. **Pass 1 (CRITICAL):** SQL & Data Safety, LLM Output Trust Boundary
|
|
2. **Pass 2 (INFORMATIONAL):** Conditional Side Effects, Magic Numbers & String Coupling, Dead Code & Consistency, LLM Prompt Issues, Test Gaps, View/Frontend
|
|
|
|
Follow the output format specified in the checklist. Respect the suppressions — do NOT flag items listed in the "DO NOT flag" section.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Step 5: Output findings
|
|
|
|
**Always output ALL findings** — both critical and informational. The user must see every issue.
|
|
|
|
- If CRITICAL issues found: output all findings, then for EACH critical issue use a separate AskUserQuestion with the problem, your recommended fix, and options (A: Fix it now, B: Acknowledge, C: False positive — skip).
|
|
After all critical questions are answered, output a summary of what the user chose for each issue. If the user chose A (fix) on any issue, apply the recommended fixes. If only B/C were chosen, no action needed.
|
|
- If only non-critical issues found: output findings. No further action needed.
|
|
- If no issues found: output `Pre-Landing Review: No issues found.`
|
|
|
|
### Greptile comment resolution
|
|
|
|
After outputting your own findings, if Greptile comments were classified in Step 2.5:
|
|
|
|
**Include a Greptile summary in your output header:** `+ N Greptile comments (X valid, Y fixed, Z FP)`
|
|
|
|
1. **VALID & ACTIONABLE comments:** These are already included in your CRITICAL findings — they follow the same AskUserQuestion flow (A: Fix it now, B: Acknowledge, C: False positive). If the user chooses C (false positive), post a reply using the appropriate API from the triage doc and save the pattern to `~/.gstack/greptile-history.md` (type: fp).
|
|
|
|
2. **FALSE POSITIVE comments:** Present each one via AskUserQuestion:
|
|
- Show the Greptile comment: file:line (or [top-level]) + body summary + permalink URL
|
|
- Explain concisely why it's a false positive
|
|
- Options:
|
|
- A) Reply to Greptile explaining why this is incorrect (recommended if clearly wrong)
|
|
- B) Fix it anyway (if low-effort and harmless)
|
|
- C) Ignore — don't reply, don't fix
|
|
|
|
If the user chooses A, post a reply using the appropriate API from the triage doc and save the pattern to `~/.gstack/greptile-history.md` (type: fp).
|
|
|
|
3. **VALID BUT ALREADY FIXED comments:** Reply acknowledging the catch — no AskUserQuestion needed:
|
|
- Post reply: `"Good catch — already fixed in <commit-sha>."`
|
|
- Save to `~/.gstack/greptile-history.md` (type: already-fixed)
|
|
|
|
4. **SUPPRESSED comments:** Skip silently — these are known false positives from previous triage.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Important Rules
|
|
|
|
- **Read the FULL diff before commenting.** Do not flag issues already addressed in the diff.
|
|
- **Read-only by default.** Only modify files if the user explicitly chooses "Fix it now" on a critical issue. Never commit, push, or create PRs.
|
|
- **Be terse.** One line problem, one line fix. No preamble.
|
|
- **Only flag real problems.** Skip anything that's fine.
|