Files
gstack/test/skill-e2e-plan-eng-multi-finding-batching.test.ts
T
garrytan 5269452983 test(eng-batching): grade the floor once the review report is complete
A completed GSTACK REVIEW REPORT ends the review, so the review-question
count is final there. Run 36606688266 wrote its report at 1,248 s and
closed the session at 1,318 s; the case now stops collection and applies
the unchanged floor at the report instead of waiting out the session.
No budget changes.
2026-09-29 19:15:06 +00:00

137 lines
6.3 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* /plan-eng-review multi-finding batching regression (periodic, paid, real-PTY).
*
* Catches the specific shape of the May 2026 transcript bug that the
* single-finding gate-tier floor test cannot detect: a model that fires
* one AskUserQuestion and then batches the remaining findings into a
* single "## Decisions to confirm" plan write + ExitPlanMode.
*
* Why a separate test from skill-e2e-plan-eng-finding-floor:
* - The gate-tier floor (runPlanSkillFloorCheck) exits on the first AUQ
* render and returns success. A model that fires once-then-batches
* would pass that test trivially.
* - This test uses runPlanSkillCounting at periodic tier (~25 min budget,
* N-AUQ tracking, ceiling-bounded retries) to actually count distinct
* review-phase AUQs and assert the model fires one per finding. Collection
* stops as soon as the floor is proven (~7 min observed).
*
* Why a separate test from skill-e2e-plan-eng-finding-count (the existing
* 5-finding count test):
* - The fixture here mirrors the D1-D4 transcript shape (4 findings) and
* the floor matches that exact threshold (3, the [N-1] tolerance band).
* This is the tightest regression test for the original bug class —
* not a band-around-N test, but a "did the agent batch?" test.
*
* Tier: periodic (~6 min expected; 25 min budget). Sequential by default.
*/
import { test } from 'bun:test';
import { describeE2ETier } from './helpers/e2e-gate';
import * as fs from 'node:fs';
import * as os from 'node:os';
import * as path from 'node:path';
import {
runPlanSkillCounting,
engStep0Boundary,
engSetupAUQ,
engFirstReviewAUQ,
hasCompletePlanReport,
} from './helpers/claude-pty-runner';
import { FORCING_BATCHING_ENG } from './fixtures/forcing-finding-seeds';
import { createEngBatchingIssueCounter } from './helpers/eng-seeded-coverage';
const describeE2E = describeE2ETier('periodic');
const N = 4;
const FLOOR = N - 1; // 3 — agent must fire at least one AUQ per non-batched finding
/** Plan-file target baked into the FORCING_BATCHING_ENG fixture prompt.
* Rewritten per-run to a mkdtemp path so concurrent runs (--retry,
* EVALS_JOBS>1, sibling worktrees) never share one /tmp artifact. */
const FIXTURE_PLAN_PATH = '/tmp/gstack-test-plan-eng-batching.md';
describeE2E('/plan-eng-review multi-finding batching regression (periodic)', () => {
test(
`4-finding plan emits >= ${FLOOR} review-phase AskUserQuestions (no batching)`,
async () => {
const startedAt = Date.now();
const tmpDir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'gstack-e2e-plan-eng-batching-'));
const planPath = path.join(tmpDir, 'gstack-test-plan-eng-batching.md');
const followUpPrompt = FORCING_BATCHING_ENG.replaceAll(FIXTURE_PLAN_PATH, planPath);
if (!followUpPrompt.includes(planPath)) {
throw new Error(
`fixture drift: FORCING_BATCHING_ENG no longer contains ${FIXTURE_PLAN_PATH} — update FIXTURE_PLAN_PATH`,
);
}
try {
const findings = createEngBatchingIssueCounter(() => {
try {
const stat = fs.lstatSync(planPath);
return stat.isFile() && !stat.isSymbolicLink() ? fs.readFileSync(planPath, 'utf8') : '';
} catch (error) {
if ((error as NodeJS.ErrnoException).code === 'ENOENT') return '';
throw error;
}
}, engSetupAUQ);
const obs = await runPlanSkillCounting({
skillName: 'plan-eng-review',
slashCommand: '/plan-eng-review',
followUpPrompt,
permissionPlanPath: planPath,
isLastStep0AUQ: engStep0Boundary,
isSetupAUQ: engSetupAUQ,
isFirstReviewAUQ: engFirstReviewAUQ,
isReviewAUQ: findings.isReviewAUQ,
// The only verdict is the floor. Once FLOOR distinct acknowledged
// review decisions exist, a batching regression can no longer occur
// in this attempt; stop instead of letting the review run to the
// ceiling (run 36385945043: floor at 6m41s, ceiling at 12m13s).
// A completed report ends the review, so the count is final there:
// grade it now rather than waiting out the session (run 36606688266
// wrote its report at 1,248 s and closed at 1,318 s).
isCollectionComplete: (_transcript, fingerprints) =>
fingerprints.filter(fp => !fp.preReview && !fp.administrative).length >= FLOOR ||
hasCompletePlanReport(planPath, startedAt, Date.now()),
reviewCountCeiling: N + 3, // hard cap above floor + tolerance
// Supplied prerequisites: routing setup and cross-project learnings are
// already declined, so the attempt starts at the review (setup answers
// were never counted; engSetupAUQ still vetoes any late setup question).
preconfiguredReviewActor: true,
timeoutMs: 1_500_000, // 25 min
env: { QUESTION_TUNING: 'false', EXPLAIN_LEVEL: 'default' },
});
if (!['plan_ready', 'completion_summary', 'collection_complete', 'ceiling_reached'].includes(obs.outcome)) {
throw new Error(
`multi-finding batching test FAILED: outcome=${obs.outcome}\n` +
`step0=${obs.step0Count} review=${obs.reviewCount} elapsed=${obs.elapsedMs}ms\n` +
`--- evidence (last 3KB) ---\n${obs.evidence}`,
);
}
if (obs.reviewCount < FLOOR) {
throw new Error(
`BATCHING REGRESSION: reviewCount=${obs.reviewCount} < FLOOR=${FLOOR}.\n` +
`Agent surfaced fewer review-phase AUQs than findings — this is the\n` +
`May 2026 transcript bug shape: model batched multiple findings into\n` +
`a single plan write + ExitPlanMode instead of asking one per finding.\n` +
`Review-phase fingerprints:\n` +
obs.fingerprints
.filter((f) => !f.preReview)
.map((f) => ` - "${f.promptSnippet.slice(0, 80)}"`)
.join('\n') +
`\n--- evidence (last 3KB) ---\n${obs.evidence}`,
);
}
} finally {
try {
fs.rmSync(tmpDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
} catch {
/* best-effort */
}
}
},
1_500_000 /* physical ceiling: the 25-min CI job + 1800s shard wall cap what can actually execute */,
);
});