docs: record external AI-detector models as out of scope

Generic HuggingFace AI-vs-real classifiers are per-generator, degrade
off-distribution, are untested on the metadata-stripped surfaces we
care about (gpt-image, Gemini Nano Banana), and our own SDXL pass would
likely defeat them as it does SynthID. Detection stays local +
signal-based. Decision 2026-05-24.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

CLAUDE.md

@@ -38,4 +38,5 @@ You are a **principal Python engineer** maintaining a CLI tool and library for r
 - `ultralytics` monkey-patches `PIL.Image.open` and tries to autoload `pi_heif`. When `pi_heif` is missing, opening files raises `ModuleNotFoundError`, not `UnidentifiedImageError`. Code that opens user-supplied or unknown-format files should `except Exception`, not just `OSError`/`UnidentifiedImageError`.
 - Metadata detection for AVIF/HEIF/JPEG-XL relies on a binary scan for `C2PA_UUID` + `IPTC_AI_MARKERS`. C2PA removal in those containers is implemented via `noai/isobmff.py` (top-level ``uuid`` / ``jumb`` box stripper, no re-encoding). EXIF/XMP boxes inside those containers are not yet scrubbed.
 - **SynthID detection is metadata-only.** There is no reliable *local* detector of the SynthID *pixel* watermark — Google's decoder is proprietary, no public spec or API (only a waitlisted portal). We detect SynthID by its C2PA companion (`synthid_source` / `SYNTHID_C2PA_ISSUERS`), which is reliable while the manifest is intact but says nothing once C2PA is stripped. **Surface-dependent blind spot (verified 2026-05-24):** the same Google model emits different metadata per surface -- the Gemini *app* wraps outputs in Google C2PA, but the *API/playground* (AI Studio, Nano Banana / gemini-2.5-flash-image) emits the SynthID *pixel* watermark (confirmed via the Gemini-app oracle) + the visible sparkle but **no C2PA/IPTC at all**, so `synthid_source` returns None despite SynthID being present. Only the pixel oracle or the visible-sparkle detector catches those. (Meta AI is another surface mismatch: it writes the IPTC `digitalSourceType=trainedAlgorithmicMedia` marker, not C2PA and not SynthID.) Google→SynthID is long-standing; OpenAI→SynthID is confirmed by OpenAI's Help Center (ChatGPT/Codex/API "include both C2PA metadata and SynthID watermarks", updated 2026-05-21) but time-gated (pre-rollout OpenAI images carry C2PA without SynthID), so the OpenAI verdict is hedged "likely". Oracles: Gemini app "Verify with SynthID" (Google), openai.com/verify (OpenAI). The spectral phase-coherence approach from `github.com/aloshdenny/reverse-SynthID` was evaluated (May 2026) and **does not work for real-content detection**: on its own shipped codebook + validation set, watermarked and cleaned images were indistinguishable (conf within noise, cleaned often higher); it only fires on pure-black 1024x1024 reference images at exact resolution (the controlled case it was calibrated on). The README's "90% / conf=0.91" reproduces only in that lab condition. Do not build a production detector on it; if revisited, it is experimental/diagnostic only and needs a per-resolution, per-model reference corpus. A from-scratch gpt-image pilot (2026-05-24) confirmed this independently: 5 independent solid-black gpt-image outputs share a near-identical fixed signature (pairwise residual correlation **0.92**, avg-template retains 97% energy), so the watermark/carrier IS strongly present and consistent on flat content — but the carrier frequencies extracted from it do NOT discriminate real content (carrier-to-random ratio: cleaned 1.86 > watermarked 1.53; a non-gpt-image image scored highest at 3.67). The signature drowns in content texture. Net: a perfectly consistent solid-color signature still yields no real-content pixel detector with magnitude/carrier methods.
+- **External AI-vs-real classifier models are out of scope (decided 2026-05-24).** Generic HuggingFace detectors (`Organika/sdxl-detector` Swin Transformer, `umm-maybe/AI-image-detector`, and fine-tunes) exist and report ~0.98 on their *own* SDXL-vs-real validation sets, but they are per-generator and the model cards themselves note degraded accuracy off-distribution; they are untested on gpt-image / Gemini Nano Banana (the metadata-stripped surfaces we care about), and our own light SDXL pass would likely defeat them the same way it defeats SynthID. Detection here stays local + signal-based (metadata + visible sparkle); do not add a bundled classifier dependency.
 - **SynthID v2 vs default pipeline:** the SDXL-based default profile (since May 2026) defeats SynthID v2. **Verified end-to-end (May 2026):** local SDXL run on a Gemini 3 Pro output, checked via the Gemini app's "Verify with SynthID" feature, returned "no SynthID watermark detected". Also confirmed against **OpenAI's** SynthID (2026-05-23): a fresh ChatGPT/gpt-image output read "SynthID detected" on openai.com/verify before the local SDXL run and "SynthID not detected" after (corpus regression chain: pos `4ef377bd` -> cleaned `47188e88`). The same configuration is used in raiw-app production (`fal-ai/fast-sdxl` at native ~1024 px, strength 0.05, steps 50). SD-1.5 dreamshaper at 768 px was previously the default and does NOT defeat v2 — verified empirically against the same feature (strength 0.04, 0.10, and elastic warp α∈{5,8} all flagged positive). That SD-1.5 path was removed; only `default` (SDXL) and `ctrlregen` profiles remain.