mirror of
https://github.com/OWASP/www-project-ai-testing-guide.git
synced 2026-06-13 09:37:49 +02:00
103 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
103 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
|
|
# **4. Appendixes and References**
|
|
|
|
### **Introduction**
|
|
|
|
This chapter provides all supporting materials that complement the main body of the OWASP AI Testing Guide.
|
|
The appendixes offer structured frameworks, threat models, risk lifecycles, and domain-specific guidance that reinforce the methodology proposed in the guide.
|
|
|
|
These resources serve three primary goals:
|
|
|
|
1. **Deepen** the concepts presented earlier in the document.
|
|
2. **Operationalize** AI testing through models, mappings, and methodologies.
|
|
3. **Ground** the guide in recognized industry standards, security taxonomies, and academic literature.
|
|
|
|
The chapter concludes with a complete **References** section that documents all sources used throughout the guide.
|
|
|
|
### **4.1 Appendix A: Rationale for Using SAIF (Secure AI Framework)**
|
|
|
|
Appendix A introduces the rationale for adopting the **Secure AI Framework (SAIF)** as a foundational model for trustworthy AI development and testing.
|
|
|
|
SAIF provides:
|
|
|
|
* a holistic structure covering data, model, application, and infrastructure layers,
|
|
* a secure-by-design perspective tailored to AI systems,
|
|
* alignment with modern risk taxonomies and governance frameworks, and
|
|
* conceptual continuity with the appendixes on threats, risk, and architecture.
|
|
|
|
This appendix explains why AI requires a framework beyond traditional software testing paradigms.
|
|
|
|
### **4.2 Appendix B: Distributed, Immutable, Ephemeral (DIE) Threat Identification**
|
|
|
|
This appendix presents the **DIE model**—Distributed, Immutable, Ephemeral—as a lens for identifying threats in cloud-native and modern AI environments.
|
|
|
|
AI systems often include:
|
|
|
|
* distributed compute clusters,
|
|
* immutable artifacts (e.g., containers, model binaries),
|
|
* ephemeral jobs (e.g., training pipelines, microservices).
|
|
|
|
These characteristics create unique attack surfaces.
|
|
The DIE framework helps testers recognize threats such as: supply-chain injection, poisoned artifacts, workflow manipulation, and cloud environment exploitation.
|
|
|
|
### **4.3 Appendix C: Risk Lifecycle for Secure AI Systems**
|
|
|
|
Appendix C describes the **AI-specific risk lifecycle**, reflecting the dynamic and evolving nature of AI systems.
|
|
|
|
The lifecycle includes:
|
|
|
|
* identifying risks,
|
|
* assessing likelihood and impact,
|
|
* designing mitigation strategies,
|
|
* monitoring for drift or adversarial manipulation,
|
|
* reviewing residual risk and updating controls.
|
|
|
|
Special attention is given to phenomena unique to AI systems, such as data drift, model drift, and feedback-loop risks.
|
|
|
|
### **4.4 Appendix D: Threat Enumeration to AI Architecture Components**
|
|
|
|
This appendix provides a structured mapping of **threats across AI architectural components**, including:
|
|
|
|
* data layer,
|
|
* model layer,
|
|
* application/API layer,
|
|
* infrastructure and deployment environment.
|
|
|
|
For each component, the appendix details:
|
|
|
|
* key threat vectors,
|
|
* typical vulnerabilities,
|
|
* propagation effects across layers.
|
|
|
|
This enumeration forms the basis for the testing procedures defined earlier in the guide.
|
|
|
|
### **4.5 Appendix E: Mapping AI Threats Against AI System Vulnerabilities (CVEs & CWEs)**
|
|
|
|
Appendix E connects AI-specific threats to established vulnerability taxonomies such as:
|
|
|
|
* **CWE** (Common Weakness Enumeration),
|
|
* **CVE** (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures),
|
|
* relevant MITRE classifications.
|
|
|
|
This mapping demonstrates how threats like model extraction, prompt injection, and training data leakage relate to traditional software weakness classes.
|
|
The goal is to integrate AI-security testing with existing enterprise vulnerability management workflows.
|
|
|
|
### **4.6 Appendix F: Domain-Specific Testing**
|
|
|
|
This appendix outlines considerations for **testing AI systems in specific industry domains**, including:
|
|
|
|
* healthcare,
|
|
* finance,
|
|
* automotive and autonomous systems,
|
|
* critical infrastructure,
|
|
* defense and aerospace.
|
|
|
|
Each domain presents unique risks, regulatory frameworks, and operational constraints.
|
|
The appendix provides guidance on tailoring AI testing strategies to sector-specific requirements and workflows.
|
|
|
|
### **4.7 References**
|
|
|
|
The final section compiles all sources cited throughout this guide, including standards, academic research, industry papers, and open-source projects.
|
|
These references provide the foundational material supporting the frameworks, methodologies, and recommendations outlined in the OWASP AI Testing Guide.
|
|
|