CalvinBackup/awesome-chatgpt-prompts-prompts.chat
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/f/awesome-chatgpt-prompts.git synced 2026-02-12 15:52:47 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add prompt: Universal Job Fit Evaluation Prompt

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
thanos0000@gmail.com
2026-02-05 03:50:39 +00:00
parent e8b3a7af01
commit acb16051fa
2 changed files with 346 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

179
PROMPTS.md
View File

@@ -62149,3 +62149,182 @@ Contributed by [@mellowdrastic@gmail.com](https://github.com/mellowdrastic@gmail
</details>
<details>
<summary><strong>Universal Job Fit Evaluation Prompt</strong></summary>
## Universal Job Fit Evaluation Prompt
Contributed by [@thanos0000@gmail.com](https://github.com/thanos0000@gmail.com)
```md
<!-- Universal Job Fit Evaluation Prompt – Fully Generic & Shareable -->
<!-- Author: Scott M -->
<!-- Version: 1.3 -->
<!-- Last Modified: 2026-02-04 -->
## Goal
Help a candidate objectively evaluate how well a job posting matches their skills, experience, and portfolio, while producing actionable guidance for applications, portfolio alignment, and skill gap mitigation.
This prompt is designed to be:
- Profession-agnostic
- Shareable
- Resume- and portfolio-aware
- Explicit about assumptions and fallbacks
---
## Pre-Evaluation Checklist (User: please confirm these are provided before proceeding)
- [ ] Step 0: Candidate Priorities customized
- [ ] Step 1: Skills & Experience source (markdown link or pasted content)
- [ ] Step 1a: Key Skills Anchor List (optional but strongly recommended if focusing on specific areas)
- [ ] Step 2: Portfolio links/descriptions (optional but recommended)
- [ ] Job Posting: URL or full text inserted below
If any are missing, the evaluation may have reduced confidence.
---
## Step 0: Candidate Priorities (Evaluate With These in Mind)
<!-- These priorities should influence scoring, weighting, and commentary -->
<!-- ←←← CUSTOMIZE THIS SECTION →→→ -->
- Highest priority roles or domains:
- Location preference (remote / hybrid / city / region):
- Compensation expectations or constraints:
- Non-negotiables (e.g., on-call, travel, clearance, tech stack):
- Nice-to-haves:
---
## Step 1: Skills & Experience Source (Primary Reference)
### Preferred: Skills & Experience Markdown File
Provide access to a structured markdown file describing the candidate.
**Expected sections (recommended, not mandatory):**
- Core Skills (strongest, production-ready)
- Supporting / Secondary Skills
- Tools & Technologies
- Years of Experience / Seniority indicators
- Notable Projects or Achievements
- Certifications / Education (if relevant)
<!-- INSERT ONE OR MORE METHODS BELOW -->
<!-- Option A – Direct link(s) to a markdown file -->
<!-- Example: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/username/skills-summary/main/Skills_Experience.md -->
<!-- Option B – Paste the full markdown content directly here -->
<!-- ←←← PASTE SKILLS & EXPERIENCE MARKDOWN HERE →→→ -->
---
## Step 1a: Key Skills to Explicitly Evaluate (Anchor List)
<!-- Use this to force evaluation of specific skills, even if the resume is broad -->
<!-- Especially useful for career pivots or skill-building phases -->
<!-- Example:
- Python (data analysis, automation)
- Cloud security (AWS, IAM, threat modeling)
- Technical writing for non-technical audiences
-->
<!-- ←←← INSERT KEY SKILLS / EXPERIENCE FOCUS AREAS HERE →→→ -->
---
## Step 2 (Optional but Recommended): Portfolio / Work Samples
<!-- Provide access the same way as skills: links or pasted descriptions -->
<!-- Examples:
- Portfolio site
- GitHub repos
- Case study PDFs
- Design files, demos, videos
-->
<!-- ←←← INSERT PORTFOLIO LINKS OR DESCRIPTIONS HERE →→→ -->
---
## Fallback Rule (Do Not Remove)
If any provided links are broken, empty, or inaccessible, display:
"⚠️ One or more reference files inaccessible – proceeding with conversation history, attached resumes, and any portfolio details already shared."
Then continue with available information. If critical sections are missing, note reduced confidence in the output.
---
## Task: Job Fit Evaluation
Analyze the provided job posting (URL or full text) against:
- Skills & Experience Markdown
- Key Skills Anchor List
- Portfolio (when applicable)
- Candidate Priorities
### Scoring Instructions
For each section, assign a percentage match calculated as:
- Approximate proportion of listed job requirements / duties / qualifications that are demonstrably met by the candidate’s provided skills, experience, portfolio, and anchor list (e.g., 4 out of 5 key duties align → ~80%).
- Use semantic alignment, not just keyword matching.
- Provide 2–3 concise sentences explaining key alignments and gaps.
Sections to score:
- Responsibilities / Key Duties
- Required Qualifications / Experience
- Preferred Qualifications (if listed)
- Skills / Technologies / Education / Certifications
**Default Weighting (unless overridden):**
- Responsibilities: 30%
- Required Qualifications: 30%
- Skills / Technologies: 25%
- Preferred Qualifications: 15%
Explain any adjustment to weighting if role seniority, domain, or candidate priorities warrant it (e.g., heavy emphasis on seniority might increase Required Qualifications weight).
---
## Output Requirements
Provide:
- Overall Fit Percentage (weighted average of section scores)
- Confidence Level: High / Medium / Low
(based on completeness of provided candidate info: High = full markdown + portfolio + priorities; Medium = partial; Low = minimal info)
- 2–4 tailored application recommendations
- Portfolio-Specific Guidance (when relevant): Tie each recommendation to a specific skill gap or requirement + a concrete portfolio action
Example: “This JD emphasizes X; your Project Y demonstrates this partially. Expand the case study to highlight Z to close the gap.”
---
## Additional Commentary
Call out any visible:
- Location constraints
- Salary range mismatches
- Remote/hybrid policies
- Clearance, travel, or on-call expectations
- Cultural or structural deal-breakers
---
## Final Summary Table (Use This Exact Format)
| Section | Match % | Key Alignments & Gaps | Confidence |
|--------------------------------|---------|----------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Responsibilities | XX% | | |
| Required Qualifications | XX% | | |
| Preferred Qualifications | XX% | | |
| Skills / Technologies / Edu | XX% | | |
| **Overall Fit** | **XX%** | | **High/Medium/Low** |
---
## Job Posting
<!-- INSERT JOB URL OR FULL JOB DESCRIPTION HERE -->
If the job URL is inaccessible, search LinkedIn, Indeed, Glassdoor, or the company’s career page for the current version of the role and note that you did so.
```
</details>

167
prompts.csv
View File

@@ -47953,3 +47953,170 @@ Abandoned Wife,"{
},
""artistic_intent"": ""Capture the silent narrative of a private moment after a significant encounter. The focus is on the emotional landscape: a blend of vulnerability, fleeting beauty, quiet strength, and the profound self-awareness that follows intimacy. It's a portrait of an inner turning point.""
}",FALSE,STRUCTURED,mellowdrastic@gmail.com
Universal Job Fit Evaluation Prompt,"<!-- Universal Job Fit Evaluation Prompt – Fully Generic & Shareable -->
<!-- Author: Scott M -->
<!-- Version: 1.3 -->
<!-- Last Modified: 2026-02-04 -->
## Goal
Help a candidate objectively evaluate how well a job posting matches their skills, experience, and portfolio, while producing actionable guidance for applications, portfolio alignment, and skill gap mitigation.
This prompt is designed to be:
- Profession-agnostic
- Shareable
- Resume- and portfolio-aware
- Explicit about assumptions and fallbacks
---
## Pre-Evaluation Checklist (User: please confirm these are provided before proceeding)
- [ ] Step 0: Candidate Priorities customized
- [ ] Step 1: Skills & Experience source (markdown link or pasted content)
- [ ] Step 1a: Key Skills Anchor List (optional but strongly recommended if focusing on specific areas)
- [ ] Step 2: Portfolio links/descriptions (optional but recommended)
- [ ] Job Posting: URL or full text inserted below
If any are missing, the evaluation may have reduced confidence.
---
## Step 0: Candidate Priorities (Evaluate With These in Mind)
<!-- These priorities should influence scoring, weighting, and commentary -->
<!-- ←←← CUSTOMIZE THIS SECTION →→→ -->
- Highest priority roles or domains:
- Location preference (remote / hybrid / city / region):
- Compensation expectations or constraints:
- Non-negotiables (e.g., on-call, travel, clearance, tech stack):
- Nice-to-haves:
---
## Step 1: Skills & Experience Source (Primary Reference)
### Preferred: Skills & Experience Markdown File
Provide access to a structured markdown file describing the candidate.
**Expected sections (recommended, not mandatory):**
- Core Skills (strongest, production-ready)
- Supporting / Secondary Skills
- Tools & Technologies
- Years of Experience / Seniority indicators
- Notable Projects or Achievements
- Certifications / Education (if relevant)
<!-- INSERT ONE OR MORE METHODS BELOW -->
<!-- Option A – Direct link(s) to a markdown file -->
<!-- Example: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/username/skills-summary/main/Skills_Experience.md -->
<!-- Option B – Paste the full markdown content directly here -->
<!-- ←←← PASTE SKILLS & EXPERIENCE MARKDOWN HERE →→→ -->
---
## Step 1a: Key Skills to Explicitly Evaluate (Anchor List)
<!-- Use this to force evaluation of specific skills, even if the resume is broad -->
<!-- Especially useful for career pivots or skill-building phases -->
<!-- Example:
- Python (data analysis, automation)
- Cloud security (AWS, IAM, threat modeling)
- Technical writing for non-technical audiences
-->
<!-- ←←← INSERT KEY SKILLS / EXPERIENCE FOCUS AREAS HERE →→→ -->
---
## Step 2 (Optional but Recommended): Portfolio / Work Samples
<!-- Provide access the same way as skills: links or pasted descriptions -->
<!-- Examples:
- Portfolio site
- GitHub repos
- Case study PDFs
- Design files, demos, videos
-->
<!-- ←←← INSERT PORTFOLIO LINKS OR DESCRIPTIONS HERE →→→ -->
---
## Fallback Rule (Do Not Remove)
If any provided links are broken, empty, or inaccessible, display:
""⚠️ One or more reference files inaccessible – proceeding with conversation history, attached resumes, and any portfolio details already shared.""
Then continue with available information. If critical sections are missing, note reduced confidence in the output.
---
## Task: Job Fit Evaluation
Analyze the provided job posting (URL or full text) against:
- Skills & Experience Markdown
- Key Skills Anchor List
- Portfolio (when applicable)
- Candidate Priorities
### Scoring Instructions
For each section, assign a percentage match calculated as:
- Approximate proportion of listed job requirements / duties / qualifications that are demonstrably met by the candidate’s provided skills, experience, portfolio, and anchor list (e.g., 4 out of 5 key duties align → ~80%).
- Use semantic alignment, not just keyword matching.
- Provide 2–3 concise sentences explaining key alignments and gaps.
Sections to score:
- Responsibilities / Key Duties
- Required Qualifications / Experience
- Preferred Qualifications (if listed)
- Skills / Technologies / Education / Certifications
**Default Weighting (unless overridden):**
- Responsibilities: 30%
- Required Qualifications: 30%
- Skills / Technologies: 25%
- Preferred Qualifications: 15%
Explain any adjustment to weighting if role seniority, domain, or candidate priorities warrant it (e.g., heavy emphasis on seniority might increase Required Qualifications weight).
---
## Output Requirements
Provide:
- Overall Fit Percentage (weighted average of section scores)
- Confidence Level: High / Medium / Low
(based on completeness of provided candidate info: High = full markdown + portfolio + priorities; Medium = partial; Low = minimal info)
- 2–4 tailored application recommendations
- Portfolio-Specific Guidance (when relevant): Tie each recommendation to a specific skill gap or requirement + a concrete portfolio action
Example: “This JD emphasizes X; your Project Y demonstrates this partially. Expand the case study to highlight Z to close the gap.”
---
## Additional Commentary
Call out any visible:
- Location constraints
- Salary range mismatches
- Remote/hybrid policies
- Clearance, travel, or on-call expectations
- Cultural or structural deal-breakers
---
## Final Summary Table (Use This Exact Format)
| Section | Match % | Key Alignments & Gaps | Confidence |
|--------------------------------|---------|----------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Responsibilities | XX% | | |
| Required Qualifications | XX% | | |
| Preferred Qualifications | XX% | | |
| Skills / Technologies / Edu | XX% | | |
| **Overall Fit** | **XX%** | | **High/Medium/Low** |
---
## Job Posting
<!-- INSERT JOB URL OR FULL JOB DESCRIPTION HERE -->
If the job URL is inaccessible, search LinkedIn, Indeed, Glassdoor, or the company’s career page for the current version of the role and note that you did so.
",FALSE,TEXT,thanos0000@gmail.com
Can't render this file because it is too large.