docs(review): one sentence after the floor in ship-policy; review-floor comment names only the reviewers that carry it

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

docs/ship-policy.md

@@ -986,8 +986,9 @@ construction:
    context; `outside`: anything else), a `kind`, `blocking` and a `scope`.
    `blocking` is a CRITICAL defect. CRITICAL is the blocking floor: a finding that
    would fail a test, break production, lose data or secrets, or open a security hole
-   (injection, auth bypass, secret exposure). Everything else is INFORMATIONAL. Everything else (an advisory, an informational
-   item, a test gap, a wording note) is below the floor. Pass 1 fixes findings in
+   (injection, auth bypass, secret exposure). Everything else is INFORMATIONAL.
+   An advisory, an informational item, a test gap or a wording note is below the
+   floor. Pass 1 fixes findings in
    the diff (`scope: fix`). A blocking finding in code the PR did not change is
    `scope: defer`: `gstack-review-scope defer` files it as a GitHub issue (reusing
    an open issue that carries the same `<!-- gstack-deferred-finding: <fingerprint> -->`

scripts/resolvers/review-floor.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /**
  * The blocking floor every gstack reviewer prompt carries (docs/review-policy.md#the-blocking-floor).
- * One sentence, so the core checklist, each specialist, the Red Team and the fix-check rate
- * severity the same way. test/review-severity-floor.test.ts keeps the markdown copies in step.
+ * One sentence, so the core checklist, each specialist and the fix-check rate severity the
+ * same way. test/review-severity-floor.test.ts keeps the markdown copies in step.
  */
 export const BLOCKING_FLOOR = 'CRITICAL is the blocking floor: a finding that would fail a test, break production, lose data or secrets, or open a security hole (injection, auth bypass, secret exposure). Everything else is INFORMATIONAL.';