Commit Graph
125 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 46d51496b4 Let an owner's ruling clear new blockers that an extra review round found, so /ship can finish (GST-2251) (#4260)
* Let an owner's ruling clear the new blockers a granted fix-check found (GST-2251)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Name every finding that still holds a fix-check open, with the full rule command (GST-2251)

Review-Finding: p1/adversarial-native#1 reader=adversarial-native
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Describe the wider FIX_CHECK_OPEN list in the release note (GST-2251)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Keep a skipped blocking finding open until the owner rules it, even beside a ruled CRITICAL (GST-2251)

A ruled open CRITICAL could clear a fix-check row while an unruled non-CRITICAL finding logged skipped with blocking:true stayed unruled. Rulings now clear a row only when one covers every unresolved or blocking finding, and FIX_CHECK_OPEN names the rest.

Review-Finding: captain-audit/Q1 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-10 01:43:01 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 00cb80cce8 Make the ship queue fetch the latest main before it checks a pull request (GST-2232) (#4256)
* Make ship-queue ready fetch the base before it checks the receipt (GST-2232)

ready read origin/<base> as the clone last fetched it, so a lane a few landings behind measured the PR from an older merge base and refused a good receipt with a false RECEIPT_INVALID field=review_exclude. ready now fetches the base first and refuses QUEUE_BASE_UNFETCHED when it cannot; the stamp path of land refuses the same way instead of ignoring a failed fetch.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Regenerate the doctor component list for the new queue refusal code (GST-2232)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Keep the new ready test off the Windows-safe set and say which land path uses the new refusal (GST-2232)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-10 01:03:46 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] dfdaea2efd Make ship-queue ready refuse when its READY note doesn't reach origin (GST-2242) (#4254)
* Make ship-queue ready refuse when its READY note doesn't reach origin (GST-2242)

ready exited 0 and printed "notes pushed" even when the READY note never reached origin, so land refused the pin with QUEUE_NOT_READY (#4245). The notes writer now reads origin's ref back after each push, and train ready refuses with QUEUE_READY_NOTE_UNPUSHED when origin still lacks the note after three tries.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Name the changelog fragment for the branch (GST-2242)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Regenerate the doctor component list for the new ready result code (GST-2242)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Say that ready's notes check covers train policies, and how to rerun it with its gate flags (GST-2242)

Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Skip the ready notes-push test on Windows, where the gh shim can't run (GST-2242)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-10 00:54:27 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 3183120cec Stop a main merge from counting as the PR's own change, so a retake no longer needs a second full review (GST-2229) (#4259)
The receipt carry and finish scoped-review packet counted context lines, hunk headers and the base's change toward the 200-line section cap (founderstar#802). gstack-review-plan measured the fix range as --range-base..HEAD, so files a main merge brought counted as the PR's fix (harness-evals#354).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-09 23:41:35 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] a5bcbc4f89 Stop the merge queue from calling a head green while a check on it failed (GST-2167) (#4235)
* Stop the merge queue from calling a head green while a check on it failed (GST-2167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Don't count a workflow run cancelled before any job as a failed check, and keep a jobless failure counted until its replacement starts (GST-2167)

A concurrency group cancels a pending run when a newer one at another SHA arrives, so the main backstop at 526f604f91 and 5fdfa14904 would have read red forever. A replacing run that is still queued with no jobs no longer hides the failure before it. Adds a test that an unreadable workflow-runs list is unknown.

Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Judge each check suite by its latest attempt that ran jobs, so a rerun clears a dropped matrix failure and an empty failed rerun stays red (GST-2167)

ciAtHead now reads check runs with the default filter and with filter=all. A suite the default list names is judged by that list alone; a suite only filter=all names is judged by its earlier attempts, and its workflow run counts as a failed check with no jobs when it failed and nothing in the suite already counts the failure.

Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: v1/adversarial-native#1 reader=adversarial-native
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Name the changelog fragment after the branch and split a run-on sentence in it (GST-2167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Describe how the merge queue now counts CI in the ship policy doc (GST-2167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-09 22:29:04 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] f75ce6fdcc Stop the merge queue from landing a stacked PR's unreviewed parent commits (GST-2153) (#4229)
* Add failing tests: ready and land accept a stacked child's receipt reviewed against its open parent branch

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Refuse a receipt reviewed against another branch than the queue base at ready, land and train build (GST-2153)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Regenerate the doctor result anchors for the new receipt base mismatch code

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Train build now has a test that refuses a receipt reviewed against a parent branch.

Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=specialist-batched
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Keep the base-contains-head diagnostic ahead of the receipt base check, normalize any remote's refs, and tell callers to merge the base in before the carry.

Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#3 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Say in the changelog entry that the base is merged into the child before the carry

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* List the receipt base mismatch refusal in the land refusal tables

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Leave the crew captain refusal table for a follow-up so this PR changes no agent instructions after review

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-09 18:34:34 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] d59a523670 Keep quoted file names with secrets in review (GST-1451) (#4203)
* Keep quoted file names with secrets in review (GST-1451)

The review collector now decodes git's C-quoted patch headers, so the secret-line keep rule reads the added lines of a file whose name holds a quote, backslash or control byte. reviewExclude also keeps a matched file the collector holds no lines for, as unread.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Type the expected kept reasons in the quoted-name test

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Skip the quoted-name tests on Windows, which cannot create those names

Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-09 11:35:56 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] a7968dc77d Keep deferred review findings on the PR instead of filing issues (#4208)
* Keep deferred review findings on the PR instead of filing issues

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Repin the ship review section after the deferred-findings lead edit

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Keep the deferred record's severity as the plain label

The reviewer's stated severity and Blocks text now sit in their own field, so a review-log row built from a deferred record keeps a severity the ledger can rank. The PR body renders the same line as before.

Review-Finding: p1/adversarial-native#2 reader=adversarial-native
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Say deferred findings stay on the PR in the unattended docs

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-09 11:28:20 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 88c76ebefa Let a clean follow-up review count after an earlier one found a blocker (GST-1973) (#4188)
* Add failing tests for fix-check chains whose earlier links found issues (GST-1973)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Count fix-check chains whose earlier links found issues a later clean link read (GST-1973)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* List the new follow-up review test with the other release-script tests in the test-only ratchet (GST-1973)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Match finding paths written with a leading ./ and test the remaining refusal guards (GST-1973)

Review-Finding: p1b/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing
Review-Finding: p1b/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Name the changelog entry after the branch and say it in plain words (GST-1973)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Reword the changelog entry in plain words without tracker codes (GST-1973)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Refuse a follow-up review chain when no later clean review read an earlier finding's file (GST-1973)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Say in the changelog entry that a finding no later clean review read now refuses the chain (GST-1973)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-09 06:37:08 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 10fc9b1eab Let a repository name its own docs-only paths in its ship policy (GST-1974) (#4185)
* Add failing tests for repo-declared docs-only paths (GST-1974)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Let a repository name its own docs-only paths in its base ship policy (GST-1974)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Catch relative directory readers, missing docs tests and readers the base gained in the docs-only class

Review-Finding: review/specialist-batched#1 reader=security
Review-Finding: review/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: review/red-team#2 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: voices/adversarial-native#1 reader=adversarial-native
Review-Finding: voices/adversarial-native#3 reader=adversarial-native
Review-Finding: voices/adversarial-native#5 reader=adversarial-native
Review-Finding: voices/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: voices/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: voices/outside-voice#3 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: voices/outside-voice#4 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Say in the changelog that a missing docs test or a new base reader keeps the full checks

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Describe the new directory-reader forms, the missing docs test refusal and land's base-reader check

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-09 04:14:37 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] a229e25806 Let review exclusions handle big results PRs (GST-1967) (#4184)
* Let review exclusions handle big results PRs (GST-1967)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Keep the value rule in review-exclude so the pinned review-risk rules stay at their replayed bytes

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Reword the changelog entry so its credential sentence reads plainly

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-09 03:43:59 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] e077053c3c Let pull requests that only change human-facing docs skip the test suites (GST-1951) (#4178)
* Let pull requests that only change human-facing docs skip the test suites (GST-1951)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Quote the docs test list in the docs lane so shellcheck passes

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Keep the Windows smoke check green on docs-only pull requests and update the workflow contract tests

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Keep the merged test check when the base gained a reader of a changed doc, hold the land policy key until a release reads it, and register two more docs reader tests

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Check links in untracked docs and docs with quoted or spaced names, and report an undecodable anchor instead of crashing

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Point the flaky-exception anchor back at its section and test the link checker's exit codes

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-09 01:42:33 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 6417abf7a6 Move the tools only Capy crews use into a crew/ folder (GST-1833) (#4145)
* Load the Capy crew skills only on Capy machines (GST-1833)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Add changelog entry for Capy-only crew skills (GST-1833)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Move the Capy-only crew tooling into crew/ and run its tests only when needed (GST-1833)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Test that the Capy launch file puts crew/bin on PATH

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Count any ~/.capy as a Capy machine, so a Mac running Capy keeps /captain

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Fix the tests and fixtures that broke when crew tooling moved into crew/

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Plan every crew test when a pull request's merge-base can't be read

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Add a test that checks each crew-only module left the root tree for crew/

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Run crew tests on pull requests that change bin/ commands or workflows they drive

Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Keep running every crew test on every pull request; the skip comes in a later change

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Keep copied installs and older release bisects working after the crew/ move

Setup now copies crew/lib into every host's runtime root beside bin and lib, so Windows installs (which copy instead of linking) can still start gstack-ship-receipt, gstack-pregate and the other commands that import it. The release bisect runs the train-gate script from wherever the checked-out commit has it, so a bisect over commits from before the move still gets a verdict.

Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Say in the changelog that Windows installs keep working after the crew/ move

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Point the harness guide's merge-queue rows at crew/lib/ where those modules moved

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Point the plain-title test at the wave module's new home in crew/ (GST-1833)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-08 14:26:14 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] d479c5bf1e Require the Plain title check before merging, and keep long PR bodies readable (GST-1825) (#4152)
* Keep reading an older receipt at the top of a PR body, and leave quoted receipt examples in place

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Put a receipt posted on its own inside the PR body's Agent notes, so the new one is the one read

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Read the PR body from the event file so a very long body cannot break the title check

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Make the Plain title check required before gstack merges a PR

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Keep the PR's opening paragraph when a posted receipt moves into the Agent notes

Review-Finding: v1/adversarial-native#1 reader=adversarial-native
Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Say exactly when an older receipt at the top of a PR body is still read

The older receipt is read only while it still opens the body. A receipt quoted in the readable part is never read only when the body has an Agent notes section. The example policy now lists the Plain title check.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Add the changelog entry for the required Plain title check

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-08 03:23:53 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 914e7b6fb3 Write PR titles, commit messages and branch names in plain English (GST-1825) (#4146)
* Add a check that keeps tracker codes and internal jargon out of PR titles and branch names

gstack-plain-title checks the readable front of a title, branch name, PR opening or changelog entry against the repository's .gstack/plain-titles.json; one trailing issue code stays allowed. A Plain title workflow runs it on every new pull request, and /ship's push refuses a never-pushed branch whose name fails it.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Move the PR body's machine-read lines into a closing Agent notes section

The ship receipt, its runs block and the Plan line now live in one collapsed section at the end of the body, and every reader looks there first while still accepting the old receipt-at-top layout. gstack-post refuses to post a title the plain-title check refuses, and land uses the checked PR title as main's commit title.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Teach /ship to write plain titles, PR openings, commit messages and changelog entries

The README now lists what gstack is for, so a PR opening can name the goal it serves.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Keep tests, size budgets and generated files in step with plain titles and Agent notes

Copy lists that install result-code modules now include the plain-title codes, the ship goldens and size ledger are refreshed, the new workflow is classified, and the pinned prose tests read the new title and body layout.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Record the test-profile list change as non-behavioral for the shared test harness

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Keep text people add below the PR notes, and fix three smaller review findings

The notes section now ends at its own closing tag, so a collapsible added after it survives the next post. The opening check splits the body the same way the notes reader does. Wave PR titles no longer name the area, which the plain-title check could refuse. The Capy line in the PR-body steps now puts Approvals in the notes.

Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#3 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Mask credentials in refused-title lines and keep older PRs' plan lines readable

A refused title's printed match is masked by the secret scanner first. The Plan line reader falls back to the whole body when the Agent notes section has none, so a body written before this change keeps its plan when its first receipt lands. The notes section also ends at its own closing tag when its opener is split or marked open, or when a collapsible inside it is left unclosed.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Print a fixed placeholder when a credential in a refused title cannot be masked

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Keep a plain-title policy edit from scheduling every paid eval

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Record the paid-eval list change as non-behavioral for the shared test harness

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Recheck the PR title on every edit so a base change cannot turn a refused title green

Review-Finding: s11/targeted#1 reader=targeted
Review-Finding: s11/adversarial-native#1 reader=adversarial-native
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-08 00:59:38 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] fb663a2bdd feat: the plan check works on public repos: a machine-local plan_record and a record-keyed Plan line (GST-1774) (#4133)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-07 18:02:40 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 901f246d74 feat: crew PRs carry their brief's Plan line; ship-queue ready and land check it (GST-1751) (#4118)
* feat: crew PRs carry their brief's Plan line; ship-queue ready and land check it (GST-1751)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat: /ship finish and train ready/land check the Plan line (GST-1751)

finish --plan resolves the brief's Plan line before stage 1; train ready,
base-red ready, train land and stamp land read and write the READY note's
plan record like direct ready and land. Review fixes: grant and exception
rows never pass as plan approvals, render --plan stays short when redacted,
no explicit changelog-only exemption, off mode still records a resolved line.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#3 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing
Review-Finding: bin/gstack-approvals:56:functional-contract reader=qa
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: cover the plan check at ready, train ready, land-direct, finish and the policy key (GST-1751)

Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#3 reader=testing
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: the Plan line stands for the gate's real state, and a broken store never throws (GST-1751)

A row id from an autoplan run resolves to that run's newest gate revision; a
run id needs the plan approval answered and no decision left unanswered.
readStore skips malformed rows and unreadable files; with the key off the
check never throws or prints. Train land rechecks the Plan line before its
merge on every path. /ship's Step 19-C renders Approvals with --plan;
DRIVER.md back under its size limit.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: train land refuses a slot with no plan record under require (GST-1751)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Step 8 plan discovery (lib/ship-audit.ts and the plan-completion sections) skips the Plan record line, so a later Plan: <path> binding is still found; render --plan refuses a line it cannot parse. The review skill's pins drop by 4 bytes.

Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: scripts/resolvers/plan-gates.ts:206:functional-contract reader=qa
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#3 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: changelog fragment passes the prose lint (GST-1751)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: captain.md describes the READY PLAN: line (GST-1751)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: plan discovery splits the Plan line on whitespace and skips record kinds in any case (GST-1751)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: lower the gstack-review size pins after the Step 8 binding shrank 4 bytes (GST-1751)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-07 09:53:38 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 5862765a20 feat(diff-scope): template UI in .ts/.js counts as frontend; receipt records the static design pass (GST-1718) (#4112)
* feat(diff-scope): template UI in .ts/.js counts as frontend; receipt records the static design pass (GST-1718)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: regenerate ship goldens for the static design-review line (GST-1718)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=specialist
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: count edits inside tagged templates and spaced template tags as frontend

Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: v1/adversarial-native#1 reader=adversarial-native
Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: one set comparison per template file instead of a grep per changed line

Review-Finding: p2/red-team#2 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): GST-1718 fragment covers edits inside tagged templates

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(ship-policy): design record wording matches the in-template rule

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-07 06:39:20 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] aaff4741b9 fix: gstack's GitHub waits poll REST at most once a minute and wait out rate limits (GST-1713) (#4109)
* fix: gstack's GitHub waits poll REST at most once a minute and wait out rate limits (GST-1713)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: register the gh-poll REST fixtures as free fixtures (GST-1713)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (GST-1713)

ci-gate --registration-wait re-polls while time is left in the window; a rate-limited gh pr merge fails at once under the land lock; a bot PR author reads without its [bot] suffix; ci-carry wait documents its one-poll overrun.

Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing
Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#2 reader=testing
Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#3 reader=testing
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: the GST-1713 changelog fragment names the gh pr merge exception

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-07 05:51:12 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] dd97420b53 fix: release stamps and a docs-audit edit after the last fix-check are no gate-class edit (GST-1702) (#4101)
* fix: release stamps and a docs-audit edit after the last fix-check are no gate-class edit (GST-1702)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

The GST-1702 carry no longer applies when the range after the fix-check holds an executable, symlink or gitlink file, or a commit whose message the gate scan tags as a CI skip marker (RH-14); both still stop. Two regression cases in test/review-plan-post-review-stamps.test.ts.

Review-Finding: s11/outside-voice#2.1 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: s11/outside-voice#2.2 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: ship-policy names the GST-1702 post-review carry; changelog fragment wording

Step 14.5 documentation audit fix (docs/ship-policy.md) and the prose-lint rewording of the changelog.d fragment.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: set the executable bit through the index so the GST-1702 executable-docs case holds on Windows

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-07 02:28:29 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] e325b6d160 fix: a granted fix-check after a fix-check plans in the loop (GST-1681) (#4096)
* fix: a granted fix-check after a fix-check plans in the loop (GST-1681)

In the loop, a new review_loop_grant naming the last fix-check's commit
(--range-base, the stop it answers) plans one more scoped fix-check, the
next link of the fix-check chain finish counts (GEVA-363, gstack-evals#254).

Replay: GST-1681 (repins lib/review-depth.ts)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

In the loop, a grant recorded before a later logged fix-check already bought a link of the fix-check chain, so gstack-review-plan refuses it (exit 3): a post-review link's grant names the commit its fix-check read, and a stale --range-base names an earlier link. A CLI regression covers both, and a grant recorded after the newest fix-check still plans.

Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-06 21:58:23 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 688e3ab9d1 fix: finish counts a post-review fix-check chain's first link; review-plan plans the next chained fix-check (GST-1676) (#4093)
* finish counts a post-review fix-check chain's first link; review-plan plans the next chained fix-check (GST-1676)

Replay: GST-1676 (repins lib/review-depth.ts)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-06 20:31:15 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] cb8f9eaeac release: daily stable check: important gated changes reach stable within a day, forced cut at 7 days (GST-1646, R74) (#4083)
* release: daily stable check cuts important gated changes after 24 h and forces a cut at 7 days (GST-1646, R74)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* release-cut: no release PR is NO_RELEASE_PR, a warning on a dry run, so the PR dry run against main stays green between cuts

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

release-cut --daily: a plan that clears the 24 h floor while the daily check cannot date stable is held as FLOOR_UNKNOWN, so a null decision never reaches a cut (red-team p1#1).

Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: name the important: fragment field in changelog.d/README.md and CHANGELOG_FRAGMENT_INVALID

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-06 17:16:24 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 64862e4187 ship-policy: refuse a floor above stable; doctor floor row uses runningGstackVersion (GST-1637) (#4080)
* ship-policy: refuse a min_gstack_version floor above the newest stable release; doctor floor row compares runningGstackVersion and offers no no-op fast-forward (GST-1637)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(policy-floor-stable): build the expected doctor row from the project path, not a forward-slash join (Windows)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: keep fixtures off the live stable release (GSTACK_STABLE_REPO in test-setup); pregate-invalidation counts the policy-floor check

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

A vendored gstack copy (no .git of its own, inside a project) no longer resolves the newest stable release from the enclosing project's release tags: newestStableRelease and the doctor's _dc_newest_stable resolve only when the root is the top of its own git checkout, else the floor is not compared (STABLE_RELEASE_UNKNOWN) and the doctor keeps the real upgrade fix.

Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

The newest stable release is the highest release tag at origin's stable commit (a tag a half-way cut left behind no longer counts), and locally the VERSION at the stable ref wins over local tags. The doctor skips the remote lookup where timeout is missing (stock macOS) instead of running it unbounded.

Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: the newest stable release is the tag at origin's stable commit

Review-Finding: p3/fix-check#2 reader=fix-check
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-06 17:13:48 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 603d6bb22a ship finish chains granted fix-check rows; a pregate rerun at the same tree keeps its clears (GST-1627) (#4077)
* ship finish chains granted fix-check rows; a pregate rerun at the same tree keeps its clears (GST-1627)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (one grant per fix-check link; same-tree clears keep only at the same head)

Review-Finding: s11/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: s11/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: s11/adversarial-native#2 reader=adversarial-native
Review-Finding: s11/adversarial-native#3 reader=adversarial-native
Review-Finding: s11/adversarial-native#6 reader=adversarial-native
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=security
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-06 15:37:33 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 10770954f0 ship-receipt write: every docs audit in one /ship run binds the reviewed digest (GST-1616) (#4071)
* fix(ship-receipt): write honors every docs audit in one /ship run (GST-1616)

When Step 14.5 audits twice in one /ship run (an audit, then a base merge and
restamp, then the re-audit), receipt write reset only the last audit's files,
so a file the first audit edited and committed stayed in the review_exclude
selection and write refused the reviewed digest (gbrain #8678).

gstack-docs-candidate snapshot now takes --run (the invocation record), --pre
on a post snapshot (records the files the audit edited, before and after) and
--carry (the run's earlier post snapshot, refused from another run). Write
resets every file the run's audits edited to its content before them when HEAD
holds what the last of them left; a file no audit edited, an edit after an
audit and a carried audit of another run still refuse.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(docs-candidate): cover --run/--pre/--carry refusals and a three-audit chain (Step 7 coverage, GST-1616)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Review-Finding: review-p1r/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing
Review-Finding: review-p1r/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: review-p1r/red-team#2 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-receipt): a carried-audit retry never drops an integrity refusal (GST-1616)

918ab93 retried writeExcludeBinds with shorter carried-audit lists on any
failure, so an unreviewed edit to a file a carried audit edited (one code
names, so the selection digest did not move) bound once that audit was
dropped (outside voice on #4071). Only the reconstruction digest mismatch
retries now; an edit after an audit, a file changed between audits and a
foreign HEAD end the check. The repro is a test that must refuse.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* review: record the outside-voice finding b9c5fa8 fixed (GST-1616)

Review-Finding: review-p2/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-06 15:04:30 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 1a06afdc19 ship finish: a Godot UID sidecar added after review binds with no reader; base-declared test_code (GST-1604) (#4063)
* ship finish: a Godot UID sidecar added after review binds with no reader; base-declared test_code globs (GST-1604)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* windows-curation: exclude test/ship-uid-sidecar.test.ts (bin shebang spawns fail on windows-latest, run 42205201312)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=security
Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#2 reader=testing
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (Step 11: unique UID proof, protected paths never declared test code)

Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ship sidecar: only another declaration of the UID refuses a sidecar, never a scene that references the script (GST-1604)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* changelog: cover the review fixes and the UID-holder narrowing (GST-1604)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: the UID sidecar proof counts only another declaration of the UID (GST-1604)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ship pr-body: name the Godot UID sidecar line the receipt requires (GST-1604)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-06 13:52:51 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 37f81cf19d ship accept: record-ci bound from base ci_record_timeout_s; say when the final pregate ran tests here (GST-1606) (#4065)
* test: failing-first accept record-ci timeout from base policy and no-carry pregate line (GST-1606)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(ship): accept bounds record-ci by base ci_record_timeout_s and says when the final pregate ran tests here (GST-1606)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: ci_record_timeout_s and accept-local-tests (GST-1606)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

The accept record-ci timeout test's run profile, tree.json os and workflow runner follow the host, so the accepted-carry case holds on macOS too (fromRunProfiles matches the profile os to the host; a runner for another OS is a platform lane).

Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-06 12:35:40 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 05114c8049 ship accept: a lanes-only head policy gates the final tree; owner-granted test-lane exception (GST-1595) (#4061)
* ship accept: a lanes-only head policy gates the final tree; name bun-hidden JUnit suites; owner-granted test-lane exception (GST-1595)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Each excepted file is preflighted on its own and must run a counted test; the preflighted files count toward the lane's tests_ran; grants are kept per head and file set; lanesOnlyHeadPolicy compares .gstack/generated.json with the fork copy.

Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#3 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: v1/adversarial-native#2 reader=adversarial-native
Review-Finding: v1/adversarial-native#4 reader=adversarial-native
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: lanesOnlyHeadPolicy compares generated.json with the base tip again

A --policy-from head run loads the regen registry from the branch (lib/pregate/context.ts), so a branch whose .gstack/generated.json differs from main's tip keeps the base policy; comparing with the fork copy would gate under a stale registry.

Review-Finding: p2/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: troubleshooting entries for the accept head policy and test-lane exceptions (GST-1595)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-06 10:16:00 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 4b1a115284 ship-receipt carry: changed and moved-context paths compose into one bounded re-check (GST-1561) (#4054)
* test: failing-first repro for the changed+context carry deadlock (GST-1561)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ship-receipt carry: a changed path plus moved base context compose into one bounded re-check, and a base-side removed line joins the scoped review (GST-1561)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

baseEditOnly refuses a hunk whose range holds a line the base inserted without replacing any, so a merge that drops base code stays changed. Curates the new test out of the Windows scoped shard like ship-mechanical-retake.

Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

baseEditOnly refuses any base hunk at the reviewed range that adds more lines than it removes, so a merge that drops a line the base added beside its own edit stays changed.

Review-Finding: p2/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: ship-policy names the base-added-line case that stays a changed path (GST-1561)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-06 07:02:54 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 12d18a2e10 paid screens: narrow screens derive setup instead of running the full gate (GST-1575) (#4056)
* paid screens: narrow screens derive setup; modules/loadouts.json derives through its reader (GST-1575)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* changelog: name the fragment after the branch (GST-1575)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* harness pins: test-pr-profile.ts change is non-behavioral (case selection only) (GST-1575)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* changelog: setup reaches its cases through touchfiles; loadouts-only edits wait for the train census (GST-1575)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-06 06:15:12 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 8d712d63dd ship finish: a declared mechanical version retake after a base merge binds without a new review (GST-1560) (#4053)
* test: failing-first founderstar#563 retake shape, refusals and planner agreement at the cap (GST-1560)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(ship): finish routes a declared mechanical retake with no review; --post-review plans the inserted Step 9 (GST-1560)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(ship): mechanical_retake, ROUTE_MECHANICAL_REFUSED and the Step 16 planner line (GST-1560)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: keep ship-mechanical-retake.test.ts off the Windows scoped lane (bin shebang spawns) (GST-1560)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

finish dropped a post-review path named like an Object.prototype key (constructor, toString, __proto__) from behavior through 'p in proven' on a plain object; proven is now a null-prototype map read with Object.hasOwn, with a regression test.

Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: changelog fragment prose lint (GST-1560)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-06 04:33:54 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] cf21a7fbef ship finish: an owner-ruled note closes its finding, and every ruling is listed (GST-1537) (#4050)
* ship finish: an owner-ruled note closes its finding, and every ruling is listed (GST-1537)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(windows): exclude ship-finish-ruled-notes from the Windows lanes like its ship-bin-fixture siblings (GST-1537)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ship: keep the pinned Step 9 brief unchanged; the PR body's Pre-Landing Review lists ruled notes (GST-1537)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=state-machines
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Review-Finding: p2/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: bind each ruled note to the stop head it was ruled at (GST-1537)

Review-Finding: p2/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: s11/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#2 reader=testing
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-06 02:08:16 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] a339b93597 fix(review-exclude): every reader path, standalone render included, reads the policy's selection and excerpts (GST-1476) (#4048)
* fix(review-exclude): standalone render reads the base policy's selection and excerpts (GST-1476)

The plan, buildManifest and gstack-review-dispatch render share lib/review-selection.ts, so a first render, a re-render after a failed dispatch and a late stage read the same diff.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: name the changelog fragment after the branch (GST-1476)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: read a reader's selection from the checkout root, not the caller's directory (GST-1476)

Review-Finding: p1v/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: name the checkout-root read in the changelog fragment (GST-1476)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 22:23:20 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] c454496143 fix(review-exclude): files kept only for a secret line go to readers as excerpts (GST-1447) (#4044)
* fix(review-exclude): files kept only for a secret line go to pass readers as excerpts (GST-1447)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review-exclude): keep the pinned depth rules untouched; the plan adds each dispatch's excerpt (GST-1447)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review-exclude): split secret-excerpt sections only at real line starts (GST-1447)

A CR, U+2028 or U+2029 followed by 'diff --git ' inside a changed line cut the
file's section short, so the secret lines after it left the excerpt while the
file stayed excluded from the reader's own diff.

Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review-exclude): scan secret-excerpt lines with their context and overlapping chunks (GST-1447)

The scanner read changed lines alone, in chunks with no overlap, so a secret it
detects only beside its label (an AWS secret key under an unchanged
aws_secret_access_key line, or a label at the end of one 512 KiB chunk) left
every excerpt. Scan every hunk line, repeat 1 KiB between chunks, and count
findings on changed lines only.

Review-Finding: p11/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): split the excerpt sentence (GST-1447)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 19:27:19 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 4c400661d9 fix(review-exclude): write, ready and carry bind a digest whose policy gives the PR's files the same selection (GST-1446) (#4041)
* fix(review-exclude): write, ready and carry bind a digest whose policy gives the PR's files the same selection (GST-1446)

harness-evals #222's reviewers read 7cf39a7e1150, which excludes 1,260 of its files under #272's
three globs. After #278 added six globs that match none of them, main's digest became
dde43b124877 and gstack-ship-receipt write refused the reviewed digest: write compared digests
only, and the shared carryExcludeBinds rule bound a moved digest only when both selections
were empty.

carryExcludeBinds now binds when the recorded selection and HEAD's give the PR's files the same
list hash (applied patterns, excluded files, kept files with their reasons); the empty-selection
rule is the case where both lists are empty. ready, train build, land and carry pick it up
through the same predicate. Write gets only the reviewed digest, so it rebuilds the record from
the review_exclude_paths the base held at each commit that changed the policy file, and binds
when one of them with HEAD's list builds the digest (REVIEW_EXCLUDE_POLICY_MOVED:). A digest no
such policy builds, an omitted --review-exclude, a selection that differs and an unreadable base
policy still refuse; --docs-post keeps its path.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

reviewedRecord walks the policy file's full history, so a merge that restores an earlier policy no longer hides the reviewed one (GST-1446).

Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 18:06:47 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 713c672d28 fix(review-exclude): fixed git calls for the name scan and binary read; dispatch names a plan timeout (GST-1442) (#4040)
* fix(review-exclude): one git grep per tree through a scratch index, batched blob reads; dispatch prints REVIEW_PLAN_STOPPED (GST-1442)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review-dispatch): the plan limit lives beside the scan deadline it must stay a minute above (GST-1442)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Batched blob prefixes are copied, so each 64 MB cat-file --batch buffer is released after its group instead of staying alive until every blob is read.

Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(review-policy): a plan past the pass limit stops with REVIEW_PLAN_STOPPED (GST-1442)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 17:40:15 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 6278ee4fb7 fix(review-exclude): ready binds an older digest when no selection holds a PR file; name scan greps consumers only (GST-1434, GST-1435) (#4036)
* fix(review-exclude): ready binds an older digest when no selection holds a PR file; the name scan greps consumers only (GST-1434, GST-1435)

GST-1434: gstack-ship-queue ready (and train build, land) refused any receipt whose
recorded review_exclude digest differed from the base policy's, so a policy edit on
main voided every receipted PR even when no PR file fell under a pattern
(harness-evals #274, #276 after #278). excludeMismatch now uses carryExcludeBinds,
the predicate carry uses since #4030: a digest change binds when neither the recorded
selection nor HEAD's holds a file the PR changed; anything else still refuses.

GST-1435: the named-by-code scan ran git grep over the whole tree, so on
harness-evals #269 it searched 30 MB of receipts for 4,354 candidate paths, ran
278 s past its 120 s limit and kept every file. It now lists each tree, keeps the
consumer files (code and tests outside the candidates) and greps only those through
literal pathspecs in 24 KB chunks. A git failure or timeout still keeps every
candidate.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

grepFixed keeps every candidate when a consumer's name does not survive UTF-8 decoding, since its literal pathspec would match nothing.

Review-Finding: p1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: p1/adversarial-native#1 reader=adversarial-native
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: the queue's review_exclude check follows carry's rule (GST-1434)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 15:38:48 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 467be16ab2 fix(ship-receipt): a docs audit after the review no longer forces another review (GST-1429) (#4034)
* fix(ship-receipt): a docs audit after the review no longer voids the review_exclude binding (GST-1429)

Step 14.5's docs audit runs after the review. When it edits, adds or removes a
file under review_exclude_paths, HEAD's selection digest moves and receipt
write refused the reviewed digest. write --docs-post <audit-id>-post.json now
binds the reviewed digest when it is HEAD's selection with the files under a
pattern that changed since the snapshot's HEAD reset to it, each named by the
snapshot with the content HEAD holds and excluded or kept only because code
names it, and every other file selected alike. Anything else still refuses.

The ship driver's Step 19 write omitted --review-exclude, so gbrain #8627
wrote recorded=none; it now passes it, and the refusal says when the flag was
left out.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(review-exclude): keep the GST-1429 in-process receipt read off the real state root

The #8627-shape test called receiptReviewAtHead in-process with the runner's
GSTACK_STATE_ROOT, so its gate scan wrote gate-diff and slug-cache entries
under the real ~/.gstack and CI rejected free-suite shard 9
(FREE_SUBSHARD_REJECTED, run 42017628509). It now points GSTACK_STATE_ROOT at
the fixture like the docs-only gate-tagged test does.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

The docs-audit exception reset every changed file under review_exclude_paths
to the post snapshot's HEAD, so a docs edit the review read while it was still
uncommitted was reverted and write refused a normal /ship run. --docs-pre
<Prepare snapshot> now narrows the reset to the files the audit changed, back
to their Prepare content. Snapshot hashes of working-tree bytes also compare
against HEAD's content as it checks out, so autocrlf or a clean filter no
longer reads as an edit after the audit.

Review-Finding: s11/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: s11/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: changelog and TODOS

gstack: ok 1.96.0.0 for=ship
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 12:25:45 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] b406820980 fix(land): merged_checks can't read land's environment through /proc (GST-1421) (#4032)
* fix(land): close land's /proc environment to merged_checks (GST-1421)

A merged check could read land's exec-time environment (GitHub token
included) through /proc/$PPID/environ or a /proc scan. On Linux land now
makes itself non-dumpable before the first check and refuses to run them
when it cannot. macOS (ps -E) is documented as still readable.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): GST-1421 fragment

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(land): kill what a merged check leaves running before land's git and gh calls (GST-1421)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): GST-1421 fragment names the stray kill

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 09:21:26 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] f37042c0d3 fix(tree-receipt): accept a release output release_tool regenerates (GST-1176) (#4033)
* fix(tree-receipt): accept a release output release_tool regenerates (GST-1176)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=testing
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: regenerate a release output the stamp adds

Review-Finding: p4/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: run the in-process stampMismatch check under the fixture's git config (Windows autocrlf)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 08:42:30 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 5297ddf42d fix(ship-receipt): carry survives a base policy change that selects no PR file (GST-1415) (#4030)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 08:33:21 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 6666b72967 feat(ship-policy): gstack adopts the release gate; a pre-adoption backstop freeze only warns (GST-1133) (#4031)
* feat(ship-policy): adopt the release gate; a backstop freeze only warns land once release_gate is set (GST-1133)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=state-machines
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2.1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: bisect follows the current policy cap and resumes when it is raised; docs say the cap prices trials at the reservation

Review-Finding: p2/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: p2/outside-voice#2 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): GST-1133 fragment covers release-cut and the bisect cap

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: land table and QUEUE_TRAIN_FROZEN note the release_gate stand-down (Step 14.5 audit g2a1)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 07:33:37 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 549b9a8660 fix(ship): finish takes a landed stack parent as the reviewed base, fail-closed (GST-1399) (#4021)
* fix(ship): finish takes a landed stack parent as the reviewed base, fail-closed on metadata and never bounded (GST-1399)

Ported from #4013 onto #4020's route: the stacked-parent path judges every
shipped path's metadata class against main, counts stamp_paths and
release_outputs only while stamp-only, and never feeds the bounded route.
The receipt carry's landed-parent search finds a squash main edited since.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): a loop exception starts at the landed parent; a conflicted base commit never holds a parent (GST-1399)

Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: v1/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): a metadata-only conflict still holds a landed parent; a post-merge loop head starts at its own fork (GST-1399)

heldBy counts a merge as conflicted only when a conflicted path is inside its pathspec, so a train's VERSION restamp
in the squash no longer hides the landed parent. The review-loop exception's atHead uses patchBase, so a fix-check head
after the child merged main starts at its own merge base, not at the parent.

Review-Finding: p2/specialist-batched#1 reader=specialist-batched
Review-Finding: p2/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(ship): stacked-parent loop-exception matrix over merge order, parent state and fix-check head (GST-1399)

28 cells: the child merged main before the parent landed, after, or never; the parent landed by squash, by squash
with a later main edit of its lines, with a release fold, or not at all; the fix-check head is before any merge, the
merge, or after it. Every cell runs the postinstall and stamp_paths probes (parent changes main never took, edited
after the fix-check) and a control run (the child's own file and a main-only file edited after the fix-check).

Red at 3f4c47c (4): merged before or after the landing × parent edited × fix-check head merge or post; the
exception accepts package.json and src/policy.ts. The other 24 cells pass.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): a loop exception's fix-check paths are the head's own patch from both forks; heldBy reads merge-tree with -z (GST-1399)

The "touched at the fix-check head" set is the intersection of the head's patch from its merge base and from the
landed parent, so neither a parent change main never took nor a main-only file counts as reviewed, whatever order
the child merged main in. heldBy reads conflicted names NUL-separated, so a C-quoted name still counts as a conflict.
The stacked-parent matrix (28 cells) is green.

Review-Finding: fc1/fix-check#1 reader=fix-check
Review-Finding: fc1/fix-check#3 reader=fix-check
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 06:30:15 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 44f4875c9d chore(ship-policy): gstack runs land.merged_checks on stale-base lands (GST-1332) (#4029)
* chore(ship-policy): gstack runs land.merged_checks on stale-base lands (GST-1332)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(ship-policy): gstack's land.merged_checks names only test files that exist (GST-1332)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-policy): land.merged_checks run tests through the strict runner and catch untracked generated files (GST-1332)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 06:06:09 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] e4f2930812 fix(ship): a required edit after review takes one scoped reader, not another review round (GST-1276, GST-1311) (#4020)
* feat(ship): bounded post-review edits take one scoped reader, not a third review round (GST-1276, GST-1311)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(ship): a scoped-review STOP takes one reader, not a fix-check round (GST-1276)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: bound the diff-scope spawn and record the ship size ledger (GST-1276)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: repin lib/review-depth.ts on the GST-1276 no-loss replay

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=specialist-batched
Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#2 reader=specialist-batched
Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#3 reader=specialist-batched
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#3 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: a blank line or a template literal no longer hides a changed expected value (review fix-check)

Review-Finding: p2/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): a bounded lanes edit changes only dependencies; any other pregate key stops (GST-1276)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ship: take the receipt-write targeted rebind out of GST-1276 (follow-up); document the lanes key check

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: list always-run.json as a gate path and finish's bounded=N stop

Step 14.5 audit da1-gst1276 corrections.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: keep review-policy.md at its reviewed bytes

main's finish reads docs/review-policy.md as agent prose (behavior); the gate-path list omission of .gstack/always-run.json is recorded as doc debt in the PR body.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 04:16:06 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 3b66745ce5 fix: queued PRs keep their ship receipts when main starts excluding paths they never touched (GST-1408) (#4018)
* fix(ship-queue): a receipt with no review_exclude digest binds when the PR touches no new pattern (GST-1408)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(review-exclude): type the touched-file cases for the test typecheck ratchet

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): name the GST-1408 fragment by branch slug

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(troubleshooting): the queue accepts a recorded=none receipt when no pattern matches (GST-1408)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 04:10:02 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 6bdafb2cf5 fix(ship): carry NEXT names the push and CI wait; docs give the real diff-plus-blocking cap (GST-1346 follow-up) (#4006)
* docs: diff-plus-blocking stops at the third fix cycle; carry order matches ship Step 1 (Step 14.5)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): carry NEXT names the push and CI wait; docs give the real diff-plus-blocking cap (GST-1346 follow-up)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): carry route says push before the dry-run and that CI_CARRY: none is not a stop

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 01:00:05 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 87d7f0f54e fix(ship-receipt): record the installed gstack VERSION, not the newest policy-key version (GST-1366) (#4002)
* fix(ship-receipt): record the installed gstack VERSION, not the newest policy-key version (GST-1366)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): fragment for GST-1366 receipt gstack_version

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 00:19:30 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 2bf6bd7942 feat(review): fetch rule in every reader brief, base-read readers policy (GST-1322 A) (#4007)
* feat(review): a fetch rule in every reader brief and a base-read readers policy (GST-1322 PR A)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(review-fetch): type the empty policy fixture for the test typecheck ratchet

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(review-fetch): register the #362 fixture as a free fixture

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

Head forbid_paths are ignored (base only), directory-form forbid_paths cover files under them in the scanner and the keep filter, an explicit --base that resolves nowhere refuses, and audit-fetch gains a CLI test.

Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#1 reader=security
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#2 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/red-team#3 reader=red-team
Review-Finding: p1/specialist-batched#2 reader=testing
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

forbid_paths also excludes <pattern>/** so git's diff exclusion covers nested files the way forbiddenPath does; the readersAt refusal no longer names a network command.

Review-Finding: p2/red-team#1 reader=red-team
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

forbiddenPath matches a pattern against the path and its parent directories only, the set forbidSpecs makes git exclude; the probe of a made-up child also forbade siblings (lib/x forbade lib/).

Review-Finding: p2/outside-voice#1 reader=outside-voice
Review-Finding: p2/adversarial-native#1 reader=adversarial-native
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): name the PR A fragment for its branch; forbid_paths and the note come from the base

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: fix the readers and review-scope anchors; key versions live in lib/ship-policy-keys.ts (Step 14.5 audit)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-04 23:46:23 +00:00